THE LINK BELOW IS TO A VIDEO PRESENTATION BY AN ARTICULATE BRITISH CITIZEN BLASTING PM DAVID CAMERON FOR HIS FOOLISH VIEW & ENABLING OF MUSLIMS / ISLAM ENTRY AND EXPANSION IN ENGLAND. IT IS ABSOLUTELY THE BEST STATEMENT SEEN TO DATE ABOUT THE DANGER OF “CULTURAL ENRICHMENT” by MUSLIM IMPORTATION. 6 minutes.
https://player.vimeo.com/video/167607521?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0
Dr. Os Guinness’ great lecture : “A Free People’s Suicide: Sustainable Freedom and the American Future”
Islamist thinkers have long known that demographics favor their cause … right now. They have been planning the Mahdi and managing savagery for a long time.
Unfortunately, we have a leader who is their suckling, despite the sage advice of Thomas Jefferson, the smartest man in the room.
If allowed, they will kill the American dream of an egalitarian society, all the while persuading that you are free. That’s Agenda 2030. But, we don’t need the international intrigue overseas and we don’t need it on our doorstep.
Keep on with your political correctness and racism agenda and you will need a wall around your home and armed security, and you will be living in a rigid caste system. We are almost there now.
You must write your representatives until they stop and reverse this immigration invasion, before a President proclaims martial law, as did the abolitionists, and hands over authority, your sovereignty and your property to the international unelected oligarchy. That is their game.
Racism is a manipulative tool for rigid, class-based society.
Popular-ism is not a good characteristic for a public servant. Good principles and the motivation to stick to them are mission critical. Otherwise, there is no means for citizens to evaluate the candidates. Moral scruples are required in candidates.
Is the candidate moral or not? That should be an easy question for even thoughtless citizens to answer. But it is not. They can no longer tell right from wrong. Unfortunately, popular-ism elects candidates in thoughtless societies brainwashed by political correctness and the racist/class-based European agenda, regardless your position in the spectrum. It’s not something they’re entitled to, and they don’t get it. Someone with a firecracker can start a riot among them.
Do you get it? That is what racism is. The walls they are building are class rankings in their society apex-ed by royalty. The walls are rungs in the elitist ladder that they control.
But in fact there are no rungs in a ladder which only exists in your mind. You don’t have to accept their authority in a free country.
There is only one race. The differences in our genes are due to adaptation to different climate and social conditions occurring over millions of years. That is all that racism is.
Nature built the diversity in the one human race. The rest is all in your mind.
In America, Democrats enslave people to government and debt by welfare programs. Liberal progressives build walls between races. It’s a political strategy. Then they bring in low wage illegal workers and call that humanitarian. It’s a means to an end for Democrats.
Martin Luther King, as a Christian, called on his fellow Christian Americans to deliver on the values expressed in their Constitution. The American people did deliver by striking down all forms of segregation. The black man was now equal before the law…thanks in the large part to Republicans.
But that did not fit the so-called progressive model of socialist utopia, especially the Obama model. They intentionally re-opened a healing sore of racism to build a constituency among blacks and so-called progressives, and then proceeded to enslave blacks to great society welfare. American liberals see blacks, not as King’s free men before the law, but as a victim group, dependent on welfare hand-outs from the state. Aid to Families with Dependent Children, housing grants, Medicare, Women, Infants, and Children benefits, food stamps and more to prevent them from leaving the government plantation. Liberal progressives had always wanted a centralized welfare state with which to build their utopian socialist future, to justify their tax-and-spend policies. Of course, this implied that the black man was not the equal of whites in the market place. The black man needed help; he needed the support of the white progressive intelligentsia. This, of course, was pure patronizing; liberal condescension on a national scale.
But welfarism has not brought economic equality to American blacks. It has created ghettoes of dependency and levels of urban crime and family breakdown (particularly fatherless families) unseen before the advent of the welfare state.
As the black academic Thomas Sowell has pointed out, before the welfare state, unemployment rates among blacks were lower than among whites. Today, blacks have more than twice the unemployment rate of whites. Also, the incidence of fatherless families in the black community rocketed from the moment the state (the taxpayer) took over the financial responsibility for children.
The welfare state, according to Sowell, pays people to fail. In education, welfare money goes to schools with low scores, thereby creating an in-built incentive to fail. This, Sowell says, has had a devastating effect on the black community. Welfarism has institutionalised a poverty trap for blacks and entrenched them in their ghettos.
Martin Luther King wanted to liberate black people from legal disabilities. He wanted African Americans to take responsibility for self-improvement and to stand as equals in the market place.
Many have succeeded. But for many more, perhaps the majority, white liberal welfare condescension has created ghettos on a scale unknown before the Second World War. In cities such as Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, Oakland and Philadelphia, and more, the level of black crime is a matter of major national debate.
The bankruptcy of liberal welfarism has been exposed.
————————————————————————–
The post is not original. I borrowed heavily from and I embellished the following reference:
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4104/martin_luther_king_did_not_argue_for_welfare_dependency
If they knew what was ahead in global climate they would not share it with us, certainly not flying around to continuous international climate conferences, because all who knew would already be multi-billionaires in just a few minutes work in futures, options and hedge fund markets. Instead the carbon credit market is collapsing worldwide.
They don’t know. They don’t know what they don’t know.
Normal climate change looks like this. But what happens next is not yet settled science, despite what politicians and bureaucrats tell you.
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.