Thomas Sowell on Intellectuals and Society. Sowell is a reformed Marxist. Antifa today is named after the 1930’s organization Antifa, which is a Marxist-Leninist communist organization intent on chaos and destruction. They want anarchy and destruction of government so that a communist revolution can be enabled, which is exactly how the revolutions were done in Russia and China…by young, well-educated Marxists, supported by the artists and intellectuals. Most of these Antifa people today are young, college educated, privileged people who have been sold Marxist ideology in schools. For example the two young ivy league lawyers in New York City pictured here who we were just arrested after firebombing a NYPD car.
How do I know this? I sometimes lurk on Facebook, Twitter, etc especially in violent times like today or the Ferguson riots last year. They get sloppy in these times and send messages to people like Linda Sarsour, Michael Moore, Jane Fonda etc with photos and messages.
At the link https://youtu.be/JyufeHJlodE or above is a video interview with Professor Sowell wherein he explains how and why this works for Obama and intellectuals.
“The SCOTUS has lost its way. We need to fix that.
First, no legitimate self-government in a truly free society can, by definition, tell any business or individual that they are not essential. In a truly free society all are equal*, making this proclamation by the State null and void on its face. That we would accept ANY intrusion in our self-determination of this nature, therefore, is a tacit acceptance of our slavery.
Second, with this in mind, if churches are not essential, government itself is definitely not essential and needs to be thrown off.
After all, what’s more essential than retaining faith, hope, long-suffering, patience, kindness, meekness, and peace in time of crisis?
What’s more essential than unconditional love for all when we are all hurting?
What’s more essential than faith and healing when there are many who are sick or have died?
If church and the worship of God, each in their own way, is not essential, in a nation founded on the principles of unalienable rights granted by the — Creator — then, nothing, absolutely nothing, is essential.
A society that allows the State to tell it that its faith is not essential, is a society that has already self-enslaved.
Carry on, serfs. Throw of the chains of our slavery. Carry on.”
— DM Chaney “Thoughts on Liberty”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Declaration of Independence, Preamble.
This is an important short read. Scientists in India published a report described below, then it was retracted. But about a month later Luc Montagnier (the renowned French virologist and Nobel prize winner in medicine and physiology, the co-discoverer of HIV) reported in a French television interview that corona virus C-19 has been intentionally manipulated by insertion of HIV sequence in specific regions of the corona virus which enhance its infectiousness in humans, a gain of function (GOF) not found in bats. Dr. Montagnier specifically mentions the Indian study. We still do not know if those GOF sequence segments were inserted in U.S. or in Chinese laboratories.
We do not yet know if the Chinese released the virus intentionally, but we do know that the Chinese covered up the release, and that it was not a bat from the nearby food market (which is their cover story), and we know that China allowed Wuhan people to travel internationally but not in China following release of the virus. We do not yet know the specifics of the involvement by the U.S. people with the Chinese lab, but we know that the original project came from a U.S. lab and was transferred illegally to China after the project had been shut down due to danger following a contamination or leak at the U.S. top-level containment laboratory of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
The following is a translation from the German. The German language original is at the link below.
Study: Wuhan coronavirus contains unique components of the HIV virus By Andreas Lilge2.
February 2020 Updated: February 12, 2020 9:23
A group of biologists from the University of New Delhi have found elements of the HIV virus at crucial points in the new coronavirus. These spots are important for the virus to be infected. The gene sequences of the novel corona virus are being investigated at many institutes worldwide. A group of biologists at the University of New Delhi pointed out unique components of the new virus in their study published on bioRxiv. These components, which the researchers call “inserts”, were previously only known from the HIV virus. After its publication, the study is still pending a peer review. The researchers are members of the Kusuma School of biological sciences, Indian institute of technology (New Delhi-110016) and Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi (New Delhi-110019) India. The researchers were provided with several samples of Chinese coronavirus genes as the basis for their work. These were obtained from humans and bats. For comparison, they also used the extensive databases that are available worldwide for other types of corona virus. For their study, they used methods for gene sequence analysis and 3D modeling of viruses. The novel virus contains unique gene sequences The most important result of the study is the finding that at sites of the virus that are responsible for docking and penetrating into a host cell, sequences have been found that are previously only known in this form in the HIV virus; more specifically, the HIV mutations that are common in Asia and Africa. These sequences could not be found in the samples obtained from bats.
The scientists pointed out that although the HIV sequences were only “fragments” of the original sequences, their special arrangement would work together. This would give the virus its ability to be highly contagious and to use different cells as hosts. The novel corona virus is the most similar to the SARS virus, but has some differences. The question of whether there is a mutation or manipulation remains open The research team is not explicitly concerned with the question of how this variant of the coronavirus originated. They point out that the exchange of genetic material among unrelated virus strains is possible, but is not the norm. In particular, the very special variety that this virus represents seems very unlikely to them, according to previous experience. They also have no series of coronavirus mutations that would point in this direction. The clarification of how this virus originated is put in the room as an urgent question to be answered.”
In another paper (link below), less technically worded:
Summary / Abstract Masks
and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.
Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.
The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.
“If C19 was biowarfare, and some experts believe it was, reaction to it defines the future terror and State elite-controlled battlefield options. If the reaction to 0.26 percent death rate was and is as we’ve seen it, what control is achievable with 3.0 percent death rate? State process, reaction, practices, and citizen reaction, fear, and actions, define and set the bar. Given C19, therefore, count on X20, or Y21, or Z22, with a much higher death rate. If you know the elite, their end game, and their willingness to use democide and genocide to move the masses to fear and to willing serfdom, then you see this as almost certain. Funding both sides of and setting the stages for WWI and WWII come to mind, not to mention all wars since. The only way to stop them is to cut off the head of the snake — a direct and all out assault on the global elite cabal — 600 plus of the world’s wealthiest and oldest money elite and their key operatives and operations. Or, if there is a better, but at least as effective, strategy, by all means, go. If this isn’t done, however, expect X00. Evil is not hard to predict once you’ve seen it in action for 100 plus years. We have that information. We know what they have done and will do. We know who they are. Yes, they control hundreds of trillions in assets, and all that implies. Yet, we control the best military in the world and hearts of good and right. Sometimes the obvious is the best strategy, head-to-head, you or us. Insane? How many more hundreds of millions of human beings, innocent men, women, children, fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, uncles, and aunts need to be slaughtered by evil before we confront the insanity? This is the question of humanity and its freedom, or slavery. Carry on, serfs.” — DM Chaney “Thoughts on Liberty”
Hillary and Obama sent a U.S. Ambassador and many other Americans into Libya on a ‘do or die’ mission to recover surface-to-air-missiles (SAMS). Hillary and Obama had sponsored those missiles, other arms, funding and training of non-American groups to overthrow middle eastern governments, including but not only Syria. Some of those missiles had already shot down U.S. military aircraft and U.S. military recovered the identity and source of those missiles. One of those SAMS could bring down a commercial airplane. Just prior to the 2016 election, during the presidential “debate” season, news was about to come out that a SAM missile supplied by Obama and Hillary’s operation had downed a U.S. helicopter. Benghazi was another Obama ‘Fast and Furious’ tragedy. Obama and Hillary could not send U.S. aircraft to Benghazi to rescue Ambassador Stephens and the others there because they knew in advance that there were thousands of SAMS on the loose in the hands of terrorists which could easily shoot down those rescue planes. The Ambassador and the other heroes who went to Benghazi knew this going in. The cover story (the Muhammad video) and the video were invented and made before the heroes went in on their ‘do or die’ mission. As far as we know, those SAMS are still missing.
“The essential formula is that taxpayers can be scared into funding new programs.” Does that concept seem familiar?
THE UNITED NATIONS: AN UNCONSTRAINED BUREAUCRACY by JAMAL MUNSHI
ABSTRACT: The United Nations is financed mostly by taxpayers from a few donor countries but the large and growing bureaucracy is too far removed from those taxpayers to be directly accountable to them. It is run by unelected, unaccountable, undisciplined, and incompetent bureaucrats. The organization’s size, budget, and scope are unconstrained. The budget funding process provides perverse incentives for these bureaucrats to increase the size and scope of their organization simply by creating multitudes of agencies and programs, and by inventing problems and environmental crises set on a global scale.1
The United Nations Agenda 21 Agreement was signed by President George H.W. Bush who also signed the predecessor agreement in Rio. If you were to ask at random the question, “Have you heard of Agenda 21?” the answer would be an over-whelming “No,” although it is being implemented in every local community.
Agenda 21 is a 40 chapter document listing goals to be achieved globally. It is the global plan to change the way we “live, eat, learn and communicate” because we must “save the earth.”
“Its regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation – even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system,” according to Berit Kjos, author of Brave New Schools.
What you should know is that UN Agenda 21 has already been adopted in the U.S. and most of the countries of the world. This UN non-binding agreement was done without ratification by the U.S. Senate. It is already being implemented in the U.S. at the federal, state, county and community levels. You can read about all about it on the UN website. But, to understand it, you need a translator who understands UN-speak or an excellent ability to read between the lines and connect the dots.
Communities, fisheries, industries, resources, governance, police, environment, money, population control, property control, a tax on all financial transactions to permanently funds the UN (or its successor), and global taxation and regulation of carbon dioxide (i.e. your breath and energy), all planned at the global level – that’s Agenda 21. Its claimed basis is communitarianism. Most Americans have heard of “sustainable development” – that’s UN-speak for compliance with Agenda 21. Turn on all of your defenses.
In a nutshell, Agenda 21 calls for governments to take control of all land use and offshore resources and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private citizens or property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and environment and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.
U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more, a redistribution of wealth. Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world. Only then, they say, will there be social justice which is a cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan.
Agenda 21 dovetails with the UN Law of the Sea Treaty. Imagine the cost to every small fishing boat which is required to take an official government minder aboard every morning they go out to sea, who verifies the weight, size species of each catch. Meanwhile, a multimillion dollar NOAA research ship speeds by staffed by PhD’s and their computers attempting to sample and count fish on the fishing banks, but they can’t find the fish which the local fishermen are bringing in by millions of pounds. The PhD’s report from their computer model that the fishing banks are being depleted without asking the fishermen or looking at the catch reports of the government-required minders. Then NOAA issues limitations on the number of each type fish that may be caught by each fisherman. The result is small family businesses which have continued for generations as well as a town’s fishing industry are no longer economically sustainable and shut down. Instead giant fleets of giant factory ships extract all the fish and have a treaty and pay fees to the global government. This is already happening and has been happening for years.
Study Agenda 21 carefully. It is a plan to strip you of sovereignty, liberty and wealth…unless you happen to be one of the protected global elites. The sole piece of legislation authored by Senator Barack Obama supported the UN’s program, the lofty sounding Millennium Program, to transfer wealth to third world countries.