“The FBI alone altered history in the 2020 election” ~ Tony Bobulinski, Hunter Biden’s business partner.

1 minute 42 second video

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Iranian girls remove their hijabs in defiance of mullahs

“In an unprecedented & dangerous act of solidarity, some school girls in #Iran have removed their hijabs & denounced the Islamic regime. Protests are in their third week now following the death of a young woman over an alleged hijab violation.” ~ Andy Ngo

Short video:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1. A doctor’s experience

By Aseem Malhotra. Excerpt from Journal of Insulin Resistance. (Link to full pdf of this peer reviewed paper is down below.)

“Another, and more useful, source of information (because of

the level of detail for each report made available to the public)

is the United States (US) Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting

System (VAERS). As with the UK’s system, the level of

reports – including serious ones – associated with COVID-19

vaccines is completely unprecedented. For example, over

24,000 deaths have now been recorded in VAERS as of 02

March 2022; 29% of these occurred within 48h of injection, and

half within two weeks. The average reporting rate prior to

2020 was less than 300 deaths per annum. One explanation

often given for this is that the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out is

unprecedented in scope; however, this is not valid, since

(for the last decade at any rate) the United States has

administered 150 million – 200 million vaccinations annually.

Another criticism of VAERS is that ‘anyone can make an

entry’, yet, in fact, an analysis of a sample of 250 early deaths

suggested that the vast majority are hospital or physician entries,36

and knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal

law punishable by fine and imprisonment.”

“It has been estimated that serious adverse effects that are

officially reported are actually a gross underestimate, and this

should be borne in mind when the above comments in

relation to VAERS reports are considered. For example, a

paper by David Kessler (a former FDA Commissioner) cites

data suggesting that as few as 1% of serious adverse events

are reported to the FDA.38″

“Similarly in relation to the Yellow Card scheme in the

United Kingdom, it has been estimated that only 10%

of serious adverse effects are reported.”39 40

….

“It is instructive to note that according to ambulance service

data, in 2021 (the year of the vaccine roll-out), there were

approximately an extra 20,000 (~20%  increase) out-of-hospital

cardiac arrest calls compared to 2019, and approximately

14,000 more than in 2020. Data obtained under Freedom of

Information laws from one of the largest ambulance trusts in

England suggest that there was no increase from November

2020 to March 2021, and thereafter the rise has been seen

disproportionately in the young.”41

“This is a huge signal that surely needs investigating with some urgency.”42

“Similarly, a recent paper in Nature revealed a 25%  increase in

both acute coronary syndrome and cardiac arrest calls in the

16- to 39-year-old age groups significantly associated with

administration with the first and second doses of the mRNA

vaccines but no association with COVID-19 infection.43

The authors state that:

“{T]he findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced

undetected severe cardiovascular side effects and underscore the

already established causal relationship between vaccines and

myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in

young individuals. (p. 1)”

“The disturbing findings in this paper have resulted in calls

for a retraction. In the past, scientists with a different view of

how data should be analysed would have published a paper

with differing assumptions and interpretation for discussion.

Now they try to censor.”

What could be the mechanism of harm?

“For ‘conventional vaccines’, an inert part of the bacteria or

virus is used to ‘educate’ the immune system. The immune

stimulus is limited, localised and short-lived. For the COVID-19

vaccines, spike protein has been shown to be produced

continuously (and in unpredictable amounts) for at

least four months after vaccination44  and is distributed throughout the

body after intramuscular injection.45”

“For the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

vaccines, the spike protein was chosen, possibly because it enables cell

entry. However, this protein is not inert, but rather it is the

source of much of the pathology associated with severe

COVID-19, including endothelial damage,46  clotting

abnormalities 47  and lung damage. It is instructive to note that

prior to roll-out of the mRNA products, the WHO endorsed a

priority list of potential serious adverse events of special

interest that may occur as a direct result of COVID-19 vaccines.

The list was based upon the specific vaccine platform, adverse

events associated with prior vaccines in general, theoretical

associations based upon animal models and COVID-19-

specific immunopathogenesis 40  (see Figure 2).”

Is the vaccine doing more harm than good?

“The most objective determinant of whether the benefits of the

vaccines outweigh the harms is by analysing its effects on

‘all-cause mortality’. This gets round the thorny issue as to

what should be classified as a COVID-19 death, and also

takes full account of any negative effects of the vaccine. It

would be surprising – to say the least – if during an apparently

deadly pandemic, an effective vaccine could not clearly and

unequivocally be shown to reduce all-cause mortality.

Pfizer’s pivotal mRNA trial in adults did not show any

statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality, and

in absolute terms there were actually slightly more deaths in

the treatment arm versus in the placebo.”

“Work by Fenton et al. showed an unusual spike in mortality

in each age group of the unvaccinated population, which

coincides with the vaccine roll-out for each age group.48

The rapid shrinking in the size of this population means a

small-time lag could theoretically produce this effect

artifactually. Alternative explanations must include

the (more likely) possibility that a rise in mortality after

vaccination was misattributed to the unvaccinated

population: in other words, those counted as ‘unvaccinated

deaths’ would in fact be those who had died within 14 days

of being vaccinated (a freedom of information [FOI] request

has now confirmed that authorities in Sweden were indeed

categorising deaths within 14 days of dosing as unvaccinated,

creating a misleading picture of efficacy vs death).”

“One has to raise the possibility that the excess cardiac

arrests and continuing pressures on hospitals in 2021/2022

from non-COVID-19 admissions may all be signalling a

non-COVID-19 health crisis exacerbated by interventions,

which would of course also include lockdowns and/or

vaccines.”

“Given these observations, and reappraisal of the randomised

controlled trial data of mRNA products, it seems difficult to

argue that the vaccine roll-out has been net beneficial in all age

groups. While a case can be made that the vaccines may have

saved some lives in the elderly or otherwise vulnerable groups,

that case seems tenuous at best in other sections of the

population, and when the possible short-, medium- and

unknown longer-term harms are considered (especially for

multiple injections, robust safety data for which simply does not

exist), the roll-out into the entire population seems, at best, a

reckless gamble. It’s important to acknowledge that the risks of

adverse events from the vaccine remain constant, whereas the

benefits reduce over time, as new variants are (1)

less virulent and (2) not targeted by an outdated product. Having appraised

the data, it remains a real possibility that my father’s sudden

cardiac death was related to the vaccine. A pause and reappraisal

of vaccination Policies for  COVID-19 is long overdue.”

A 4 minute video by the M.D./researcher

https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/224

<object class="wp-block-file__embed" data="https://budbromley.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/review-study-on-effects-of-jabs.pdf&quot; type="application/pdf" style="width:100%;height:600px" aria-label="<strong>review-study-on-effects-of-jabsreview-study-on-effects-of-jabsDownload

#Covid #SARS #CovidResponse #Covid19 #SARSCOVID-19 #mRNA #mRNAVaccines #jab #misinformation #pandemic #healthcare #mandates #governmentpolicy

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich 43 second video: What they want

The famous international trial lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich and his large worldwide network of lawyers have all the evidence that the pandemic is a crime against humanity. Several law suits have been won already and they are preparing major class action lawsuits against the WHO and governments. Reiner Fuellmich says a second Neurenberg may be needed.

Dr Reiner Fuellmich speaks on what the Elites end game will be.

Here is 5 minutes more Dr. Fuellmich speaking from Nuremburg. Click on his name below.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is lies on top of lies.

If your kids’ school teaches it, find another school system or home school, then work to remove the principal and school board.

Here are two short videos that go through some history and problems with CRT and The 1619 Project.

https://www.prageru.com/video/whats-wrong-with-the-1619-project

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The new Italian P.M. She gets it. Lei lo ottiene. Lei capisce molto.

Hooray for Italy! God willing, the EU will listen to her.

Or, is she a put up candidate like so many others?

This is only my first time to see her.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A wake up call for the “woke” alarmed by the fake climate crisis

The increase in Mauna Loa-measured global CO2 concentration over the last 50 years (1970 – 2020) has been about 89 ppm. The 50 year cumulative increase due to all CO2 sources and sinks, natural and human, is on average less than 0.0089% of the atmosphere. You and a few billion other humans exhale breath that is about 4% CO2. Where does it go?

Bert Bolin, PhD, Swedish meteorologist and the first chairman of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC), from 1988 to 1997, stated in Bolin & Eriksson, 1959: “First we see that if the partial pressure of CO2 varies and the hydrogen ion concentration [i.e.. pH] were kept constant, the relative changes would be the same in the sea as in the atmosphere. As the total amount of CO2 in the sea is about 50 times that in the air, practically all excess CO2 delivered to the atmosphere would be taken up by the sea when equilibrium has been established.” 

The hydrogen ion concentration they refer to is pH, which is highly buffered in both directions by the mineral ions and molecular ions dissolved in ocean surface, including dissolved CO2, but they minimize buffering in ocean by assuming disproportionate importance to the vertical ocean water column, and vertical migration times and circulation within that vertical column.  There are multiple large errors in Bolin & Eriksson, 1959, and some but not all assumptions they followed from Callendar, Seuss and Revelle, but the above paragraph they got mostly right, except the hypothesis is impossible since relative change in CO2 in the sea temporarily changes local pH in sea surface. For example, on page 131 the authors conclude by assumption with little if any evidence: “It is obvious that an addition of CO2 to the atmosphere will only slightly change the CO2 content of the sea but appreciably effect the CO2 of the atmosphere.” That is a huge and incorrect assumption in defiance of Henry’s Law, Fick’s Law and Graham’s Law, but it remains in the orthodoxy of climate alarmists and their models. For that assumption, people of Earth are paying billions of dollars per year growing to $9 trillion per year, if you believe McKinsey & Co., Foreign Policy Magazine, the UN, the Great Resetters, etc., not to mention other unnecessary sacrifices.

If you are interested in how we got ourselves into this fake global warming /climate change crisis, then you may find Bolin & Eriksson, 1959 to be interesting history. In a previous post, I pointed out the great error wherein they ignored the chemical enhancement in the huge surface area of the ocean.

Bolin, B., & Eriksson, E. (1959). Changes in the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere and sea due to fossil fuel combustion. In The Atmosphere and the Sea in Motion (pp. 130–141). Woods Hole, MA, USA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. (pdf linked here)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reblog: Parental Authority Is the Basis of Civilization

BY DENNIS PRAGER 12:19 AM ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 on PJMedia.com

Excellent truth. Archiving this since it will probably be cancelled. No one should be surprised if armed FBI, DOJ and other alphabet agencies pound his door and arrest him.

Read it here: https://pjmedia.com/culture/dennis-prager/2022/09/27/parental-authority-is-the-basis-of-civilization-n1632452

As most Americans now realize, America is experiencing a societal breakdown. This should be obvious to anyone, even those facilitating this breakdown as they openly acknowledge they seek to break down American society.

This is a society that teaches its youngest citizens a suicidal lie: that America was founded in 1619, that it was built on slavery and that even today it is systemically racist. At the same time, it does not teach the fundamental moral fact that every culture practiced slavery — Arab, Muslim, African, Asian, Native American — and usually more viciously (e.g., Arab slave masters routinely castrated black slaves so that they could not reproduce) than in America.

This is a society that robs its youngest of sexual innocence. Teachers — nearly all of them women, the sex that society has always regarded as the natural guardians of sexual innocence — now routinely sexualize young people with discussions of sexual behavior and by having drag queens perform for them.
This is a society that has taken as a given that there are more than two sexes; that has Jewish and Christian clergy sign emails with “preferred pronouns”; that will praise the Disney Corporation for dropping all references to “boys and girls” from its theme park announcements.

This is a society in which refusing to say that men give birth can lead to social banning and the loss of one’s job and income.

This is a society that encourages violent crime. It elects prosecutors who allow violent criminals to avoid having to pay bail. Its elites advocate defunding police. It keeps raising the dollar amount of stolen goods that constitutes a felony. In short, America is now a society in which the dominant message to would-be criminals is that crime pays.

This is a society in which fewer and fewer young people are marrying, fewer are having children, and more and are having children without being married, usually without a father in the life of the child.

This all began with the demise of moral authority — and moral, social and intellectual chaos is the inevitable result.

Prior to the 1960s, America had moral authority — God, country, parents, the Bible, teachers, police, and clergy.

Not one of them is a normative authority today.

Starting in the 1960s, each one was overthrown. The ’60s motto “Never trust anyone over 30” perfectly embodied this — given that every one of these was older than 30. Soon, teachers were called by their first names and frequently talked back to, even cursed; on college campuses, “America” was often spelled “Amerika,” and the flag is now declared a symbol of white supremacy; police were referred to as “pigs”; clergy were rendered irrelevant; the American motto, “In God we trust,” was ignored or mocked; and the Bible went from the dominant book in American life to the trash heap of history.

Most important, parental authority rapidly declined.

Moral stability — in other words, civilization — is dependent on parental authority. Once that breaks down, all the others mentioned here also break down.
If you look at the two tablets of the Ten Commandments, you will notice that each tablet has five commandments. The first five are laws between man and God, while the second five commandments govern behavior toward fellow human beings (do not murder, steal, etc.). The first four “rest” on the Fifth; and the second four “rest” on the Tenth.

Taking the second tablet first, the four commandments that precede the Tenth depend on obedience to the Tenth Commandment. When people murder, commit adultery, steal or offer false testimony, it is almost always because they “covet” what their neighbor has — his property, his animals, his spouse.
Likewise, the first four commandments regarding God as the One Moral Authority rest on people obeying the Fifth Commandment: “Honor your father and mother.”

Parental moral authority is the vehicle to divine moral authority. That is why the Fifth Commandment, to honor one’s parents, is the only human-to-human commandment on the first tablet. It is also the only one of the Ten Commandments that promises a reward — “that your days on the land will be lengthened” and “so that it goes well with you.” You will have a long-lived civilization and things will go well with you when parents have moral authority.

Beginning in the ’60s, parents stopped telling their children what to do and instead began asking them to do things. Parents became much more interested in being loved by their children than in being honored by their children. Children stopped fearing parents, and parents began fearing their children. Parents became much more interested in their children’s feelings than in their behavior.

Today, elementary schools and high schools work to diminish all parental authority. The most obvious example is hiding from parents that their 10-year-old says he or she is not their biological sex. And should a parent tell his or her 10-year-old, “This is not so, you were born a boy and you are a boy” or “You were born a girl and you are a girl,” those parents run the risk of having the child taken away from them, not to mention severe condemnation from doctors, psychotherapists and social workers.

One result of the breakdown of parental authority is that we probably have more child-parent alienation than at any time in American history. There are millions of parents whose adult child will not talk to them — many of them because of the way the parent voted (if the parent voted for former President Donald Trump, not if the parent voted for Hillary Clinton or President Joe Biden).

The bottom line is this: when parents don’t rule the home, chaos will rule society. And chaos always breeds tyranny. So, the choice is stark — either we have strong parents, or we will have a strong state.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

That would be the road to hell

Very short video.  U.S. Rep. @RashidaTlaib challenges bank CEOs to agree to stop funding fossil fuels. She is rejected by every single one.  Jamie Dimon’s comment is perfect: “That would be the road to Hell for America.”

Don’t miss it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Putting the false UN IPCC 13C/12C isotope argument to bed forever

Roy Spencer, PhD. (attached pdf.) and Murry Salby, PhD. (video link and text excerpt below), Tom Segalstad, PhD., (excerpts and links below and paper attached as pdf) and Edwin X Berry, PhD., (excerpt and link below and pdf attached) and Werner Stumm, PhD., have explained the problems with IPCC claimed carbon isotope “proof.”  Key excerpts and links to these works are presented here.  Brief bios of these scientists are below.

At this link is an excellent video lecture by Professor Murry Salby, PhD. The problem with the isotope “proof” is explained beginning at the 25-minute mark. https://youtu.be/b1cGqL9y548 

The following is quoted from Professor Salby’s 2012 book, “The upward trend of CO2 is commonly ascribed to emission by human activities. Support for this interpretation comes from isotopes of carbon. Carbon 13, like carbon 12, is stable. It represents about 1% of the isotopic composition of CO2. However, its concentration varies between reservoirs of carbon. Vegetation and ancestral carbon, fossil fuel, are slightly leaner in 13C than is the atmosphere.” (6)

(6) Reflecting increased efficiency of photosynthesis with the lighter form of carbon.

“Proxy evidence of δ13C is more variable than that of rCO2 [atmospheric mixing ratio of CO2]. It also has little overlap with the more recent instrumental record (crosses). Nevertheless, reconstructed δ13C decreased over the last two centuries, mirroring the contemporaneous increase of rCO2.”

“The decrease of δ13C, together with the increase of rCO2, reflects the addition of CO2 that is 13C lean. This feature is consistent with the combustion of fossil fuel, as well as biomass destruction.  It is equally consistent, however, with the decomposition of organic matter derived from vegetation. Thus, associating the decrease of δ13C to the combustion of fossil fuel requires the exclusion of other sources that are 13C lean. In particular, it relies on CO2 emission from the ocean, which overshadows other sources of CO2 (Sec. 17.3), having the same isotopic composition as the atmosphere (which would then be left unchanged). Only then can the decrease of δ13C be isolated to continental sources, which are weaker and, in particular, to the combustion of fossil fuel, which is an order of magnitude weaker. Yet, the isotopic composition of marine organic matter is influenced by a variety of biological and environmental factors (Francois et al., 1993; Goericke et al., 1994). Through those factors, δ13C in the upper ocean varies significantly. Along with transport from the deep ocean, which is likewise uncertain, they leave the magnitude and composition of ocean emission poorly understood (Sec. 1.6.2).” ~ Salby, Murry. Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate, page 24. 2012. Cambridge University Press.  https://climatecite.com/physics-of-the-atmosphere-and-climate-pt-1/

Tom V. Segalstad, PhD. explains: “Carbon Isotopes and Mass Balance Calculations Stable 13C/12C isotope ratios, expressed as delta 13C vs. PDB [Pee Dee Belemnite], provide the only way to determine unequivocally the fraction of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere. The natural atmospheric CO2 reservoir has delta 13C ~= -7‰ when in isotopic equilibrium with marine HCO3- (aq) and CaCO3 (s). CO2gas from burning of fossil-fuel and biogenic materials has delta 13C ~= -26‰ (Ohmoto and Rye, 1979; Deines,1980).”

“IPCC identifies 280 ppmv (ppm by volume) as the preindustrial CO2 value, but that may be arbitrarily influenced by the selection of low-value CO2 data from ice cores (where measured values up to 7,400 ppmv were omitted), as well as from them is matching of contemporary measurements with different ages (Jaworowski et al., 1992a; 1992b). IPCC claims the rise in CO2 to 353 ppmv in 1990, and 379 ppmv in 2005, is due only to anthropogenic CO2 (IPCC, 1990; 2007).”

“The delta 13C value reported for atmospheric CO2 was-7.489‰ in December 1978, decreasing 10 years later to -7.807‰ in December 1988 (Keeling et al., 1989). If the resultant decrease were solely the product of mixing natural CO2 with CO2 produced from the burning of fossil fuels or plants (~79% / ~21% CO2mix; lifetime 50–200 years; IPCC, 1990), the current atmospheric CO2 delta 13C value should be -11, much lower than reported (Segalstad, 1992; 2008).”

“The December 1988 atmospheric CO2 composition has been computed for its 748 Gt C (Gt =1015 g) total mass and delta 13C value of   -7.807‰ for three components: (1) natural fraction remaining from the preindustrial atmosphere, (2) cumulative fraction remaining from all annual fossil-fuel CO2 emissions, and (3) carbon isotope mass-balanced natural fraction. The masses of component (1) and (2) were computed for different atmospheric lifetimes of CO2 (Segalstad,1992).” 

“The result fits a lifetime of about five years, in agreement with 14C studies (see Sundquist, 1985;Segalstad, 1998; 2009; for further references). The mass of all past fossil-fuel and biogenic emissions remaining in the current atmosphere was -30 Gt C or less; i.e. a maximum of around 4% of the total, corresponding to an atmospheric concentration of approximately 14 ppmv. The implication of the five-year lifetime is that approximately 135 Gt C (18%) of the atmospheric CO2 is dynamically exchanged each year (Segalstad, 1992; 1996; 1998; 2008).” 

“The above calculations also demonstrate that over this 10-year period (1978–1988), at least 96% of the atmospheric CO2 is attributed to non-fossil-fuel sources, and this percentage has not likely varied much in the years since. Hence, it is clear marine degassing and juvenile degassing from sources such as volcanoes must be much more important for the atmospheric CO2 budget than the burning of fossil-fuels and biogenic materials. IPCC has failed to recognize this conclusion.” ~ Segalstad, Tom V., (17) (PDF) Some thoughts on ocean chemistry (Chapter 6.3.1.2). Available from this link: [accessed Sep 23 2022]. 

A longer refutation of the IPCC’s isotope “proof” by Tom V. Segalstad is attached as pdf, which includes an extensive list of references.  Conclusion: “The atmospheric CO2 level is ultimately determined by geologic processes. The carbon on the Earth’s surface has come from CO2 degassing of the Earth’s interior, which has released about half of its estimated CO2 contents throughout Earth’s history during the 4,500 million years up to now (Holland, 1984). Important geologic processes are volcanism and erosion, releasing carbon from the lithosphere and the Earth’s interior to the atmosphere – ocean – biosphere system. These processes are counteracted by sedimentation of carbonate and organic carbon in the hydrosphere (mainly the ocean). The balance between these two main processes determines the CO2 level in the atmosphere (e.g., Kramer, 1965; McDuff & Morel, 1980; Walker & Drever, 1988; Holmén, 1992). “Thus, while seawater alkalinity is directly controlled by the formation of calcium carbonate as its major sedimentary sink, it is also controlled indirectly by carbonate metamorphism which buffers the CO2 content of the atmosphere” (McDuff 18 & Morel, 1980).” ~ Segalstad, Tom V., Carbon cycle modelling and the residence time of natural and anthropogenic atmospheric CO2: on the construction of the “Greenhouse Effect Global Warming” dogma. Pdf attached.

“Partitioning of CO2 between atmosphere and hydrosphere is governed by Henry’s Law,
implying that 50-60 times more CO2 is dissolved in the oceans than in the atmosphere. Due to the retrograde solubility of CO2 in water, less CO2 will be dissolved in water at higher temperatures.” Segalstad, Tom V., 33rd International Geological Congress (Session TC), Oslo, Norway 6 – 14 August 2008.

A detailed discussion of the chemistry is presented in Aquatic chemistry : chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters, chapter 4.9 Carbon Isotopes and Isotope Fractionation, by Stumm, Werner. Publication date 1996.   https://archive.org/details/aquaticchemistry0000stum/page/194/mode/2up   pages 195-205.

Enrichment of the heavier, stable isotope 13CO2 is naturally occurring in the ocean.   The lighter isotope 12CO2 is preferentially vaporized out of the ocean surface into air.  “The distribution factor has been experimentally determined (Deuger & Degens, 1967).”  Enrichment of the heavier isotope 13CO2 in the ocean surface is “9.2% at 0 degrees C and 6.8% at 30 degrees C.  This fractionation occurs predominantly in the hydration stage and not during the passage of the atmospheric carbon dioxide through the air-water interface; that is, the reaction

 13CO2(g) + 12CO2(aq) <-> 12CO2(g) + 13CO2(aq)

has an equilibrium constant of K = alpha = 1.0.”  (Stumm, W. 1996. page 200)

Dr. Stumm’s book provides a specific reference on this topic:  Sarmiento, J. L. (1993) Ocean Carbon Cycle: Most of the Carbon Released from Fossil Fuels Will End Up in the Oceans Where a Complex Cycle of Circulation and Other Processes Control Its Fate. Chem. Eng. News 72, No. 22 (May 31), 30-43.

Edwin X. Berry, PhD., summarizes problems with the IPCC model from a slightly different perspective in the abstract of his paper, which includes extensive references.  (Link below and attached as pdf): “The Physics Model has only one hypothesis, that outflow is proportional to level. The Physics Model exactly replicates the 14C data from 1970 to 2014 with only two physical parameters: balance level and e-time. The 14C data trace how CO2 flows out of the atmosphere. The Physics Model shows the 14 CO2 e-time is a constant 16.5 years. Other data show e-time for 12CO2 is about 4 to 5 years. IPCC claims human CO2 reduces ocean buffer capacity. But that would increase e-time. The constant e-time proves IPCC’s claim is false. IPCC argues that the human-caused reduction of 14C and 13C in the atmosphere prove human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2. However, numbers show these isotope data support the Physics Model and reject the IPCC model. The Physics Model shows how inflows of human and natural CO2 into the atmosphere set balance levels proportional to their inflows. Each balance level remains constant if its inflow remains constant. Continued constant CO2 emissions do not add more CO2 to the atmosphere. No CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere. Present human CO2 inflow produces a balance level of about 18 ppm. Present natural CO2 inflow produces a balance level of about 392 ppm. Human CO2 is insignificant to the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere. Increased natural CO2 inflow has increased the level of CO2 in the atmosphere.” ~ Edwin X. Berry, Human CO2 Emissions Have Little Effect on Atmospheric CO2, International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences. Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2019 , pp. 13-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaos.20190301.13.

 https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=298&doi=10.11648/j.ijaos.20190301.13

————–

Bios

  • Edwin Berry, PhD. is CEO of Climate Physics, LLC, in Bigfork, Montana. He received his BS in Engineering from Caltech, his MA in Physics from Dartmouth, and his PhD in Physics from the University of Nevada.  At Dartmouth, Berry studied probability and Markov chains and philosophy of science under John Kemeny, a student of Albert Einstein. At Nevada, Berry studied physics under Friedwart Winterberg, Heisenberg’s best student, and William T. Scott.  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-0866
  • Murry Lewis Salby, PhD., deceased 2022, received his doctorate in environmental dynamics in 1978 at the Georgia Institute of Technology.  He was an American atmospheric scientist who focused on upper atmospheric wave propagation. He wrote two textbooks, Fundamentals of Atmospheric Physics (1996), and Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate (2012).
  • Tom V. Segalstad, PH.D. is associate professor of resource and environmental geology at the University of Oslo and head of the university’s Geological Museum. Dr. Segalstad has conducted research, publishing, and teaching in geochemistry, mineralogy, petrology, volcanology, structural geology.
  • Roy W. Spencer, PhD. received his Ph.D. in meteorology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1982.  He is principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and is known for his satellite-based temperature monitoring work, for which he was awarded the American Meteorological Society’s Special Award.
  • Werner Stumm was a Swiss chemist. After earning his doctorate in inorganic chemistry at the University of Zürich in 1952 he moved to the U.S. where he was active as a professor at Harvard University until 1969. From 1970 until 1992 he was head of the Swiss Federal Water Resources Centre EAWAG.  Werner Stumm was an active researcher in several aspects of geochemistry. During the early part of his career, he was influenced by the ideas of Lars Gunnar Sillén and Robert Garrels regarding aqueous chemical equilibria. He developed models where the ideas by Sillén regarding equilibria were combined with improved descriptions of kinetically controlled reactions (i.e., slow reactions that do not reach equilibrium, e.g., weathering).  Stumm is well known for writing the influential book Aquatic chemistry, together with James J. Morgan, and several other books on the interplay between mineral surfaces and water.

#ClimateChange #IPCC #GlobalWarming #ClimateCrisis #Sustainability #NetZero #EPA #EndangermentFinding #CO2 #ClimatePolicy #EnergyPolicy #FossilFuel #Henry’sLaw

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments