The Deep State: a Conspiracy, Not a Theory

George Bush, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller etc called it the New World Order. Edward Snowden has used the term generally to refer to the influence of civil servants over elected officials: “the deep state is not just the intelligence agencies, it is really a way of referring to the career bureaucracy of government. These are officials who sit in powerful positions, who don’t leave when presidents do, who watch presidents come and go … they influence policy, they influence presidents.”

Senator Rand Paul said “Absolutely there is a deep state because the deep state is that the intelligence communities do not have oversight.” He continued, “There is no “SKEPTIC” [emphasis in original] among the four Republican and four Democratic Senators “who are supposedly” providing oversight, so that the intelligence communities, “with their enormous power … have become a deep state.” On December 4, 2018, Paul, in commenting on the CIA Director briefing only those eight Senators rather than the entire Senate, added “The deep state wants to keep everyone in the dark. This is just ridiculous!” On December 10, 2018, he said “The very definition of a ‘deep state’ is when the very people, congressional leaders – people who are elected by the people – are not allowed to hear the intelligence.”

Here is U.S. President John F. Kennedy in his massive speech on this subject.  He speaks bluntly.  If you have not heard this recently, don’t miss it.  JFK was the last true Democrat as far as I know.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AufFEWqrfIU

The late Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, a mentor to President Bill Clinton, was close to the core of the Deep State for years, and, while he disagreed with the secrecy, he admitted to agreeing with most of its aims. He was even allowed to examine their records for a period of time.

And then, spilling the proverbial beans, Quigley put some of his explosive findings in his massive 1966 book Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time. (Free pdf at link below.)

Quigley offered extremely important insight into the agenda, especially the monetary machinations, of the real Deep State.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” he explained on page 324.

“This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”

“The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.”

Indeed, just as Quigley explained, the world now exists under what could fairly be described as a neofeudalist-type system. And international entities such as the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Bank play key roles in it all.

Amazon review: Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley is the ultimate insider admission of a secret global elite that has impacted nearly every modern historical event. Learn how the Anglo-American banking elite were able to secretly establish and maintain their global power, a detailed world history beginning with the industrial revolution and imperialism through two world wars, a global depression and the rise of communism. Tragedy & Hope is the definitive work on the world’s power structure and an essential source material for understanding the history, goals and actions of the New World Order.

Here is it for FREE in pdf: https://archive.org/details/TragedyAndHope_201709/page/n1


Quotes by Edward Snowden and Rand Paul are from Wikipedia.

Hat tip and thanks to the New American.  https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/27869-deep-state-follow-the-rothschild-soros-and-rockefeller-money

Review of Quigley’s book is quoted from Amazon’s review of the book.  No author was given.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Yes, Your Ideology Sucks

Leading for Liberty

If one’s ideology requires that they coerce and plunder others to get what they want, to do their ‘good’, that ideology is evil regardless its label. If one will not allow me to coerce them towards my ends, and plunder their property for my gain, then why should they be able to do the same to me (which their ideology–socialism, communism, fascism, statism, corporatism, cronyism, crony capitalism, etc.) demands? They shouldn’t. To believe one can plunder and coerce others but others cannot do the same to them, is irrational, hypocritical, arrogant, and when put into institutional practice in governance, pure evil.”

DM Chaney “Thoughts on Liberty”  © 2019

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We are all mongrels. Race is a political fiction.

Race is a political fiction.  I encourage you and your family and friends to read the book titled “DNA” : “Who we are and how we got here.” By Dr. David Reich.  His genomics laboratory and his associates leading other genomics labs examined ancient DNA samples going back tens of thousands of years past to hundreds of thousands of years past and they are able to discern the many migrations of early humanoids and the many instances of interbreeding that have occurred.  The hard science of whole genome analysis on samples of ancient DNA refutes the mental construct of “race.”  There is no such thing as a pure race, or even majority pure race.  That includes groups lost on remote islands for all of known history and pockets of isolated humans anywhere.

Today, a “race” can be distinguished by its common DNA mutations and sequences.  But, go back a few tens of generations and that is no longer possible.  Migrations and interbreeding were occurring for hundreds of thousands of years.  We are all mongrels now.

The geographic location today of a group, society or civilization does not correlate well with its ancient DNA ancestry.  The diversity among of those many ancient, migrating and interbreeding groups was farther apart genetically than, for example today, a northern European and a Japanese and there were many more of these very diverse groups back then.  Migrations went from west to east and back again and north to south and back again.

You may recall that my business was scientific instruments including those used in the human genome projects.  I have visited some of these laboratories and scientists whose work is reported in the very readable book by David Reich mentioned above.

Contrary to the convenient mental construct which we all learned in school, which held sway in science since Charles Darwin, there is no one common tree trunk from which we all branch.  That construct has been proven wrong.  But that does not imply that Genesis is wrong.

Race, racism, etc is a tool for identity politics to divide and conquer.  We are all mixed-breeds, mongrels.

P.S. “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” ~ Max Planck (Nobel Prizewinner for Physics and the originator of quantum theory): from Max Planck, Scientific Autobiography.

Dr. Reich’s video lecture here is excellent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHdCuhYRHqo    

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/mar/29/who-we-are-how-got-here-david-reich-ancient-dna-review

https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Truth and border consequences

In 1993, U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) visited the US-Mexican border with U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno. This is what she had to say:

“When you come to these two borders, you have to remember a [few] things: In Mexico, there is no welfare, there is no AFDC, there is no SSI, there is no Medicaid, there is no Social Security, there is no Medicare, and there is a 50 cents an hour minimum wage. … The day when America could be the welfare system for Mexico is gone. We simply can’t afford it… It’s a competition for space. Whether the space is a job, the space is a home, a place in a classroom.”

..As quoted on NumbersUSA.com

#WhiteHouse #RealDonaldTrump

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“We warn the west…”

“We warn the West from what we fled from in the Middle East, but the West doesn’t want to listen. This is your next generation:” ~ Imam Mohamad Tawhidi (@Imamofpeace) May 3, 2019 https://t.co/3zeU2PFSfa
 
On April 22, 2019, the Muslim American Society Islamic Center in Philadelphia (MAS Philly) uploaded a video of an “Ummah Day” celebration to its Facebook page in which young children wearing Palestinian scarves sang: “Glorious steeds call us and lead us [to] the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The blood of martyrs protects us… Take us, oh ships… until we reach our shores and crush the treacherous ones… Flow, oh rivers of martyrs!” A young girl read a poem praising martyrs who sacrificed their lives for Palestine, and she asked: “Will [Jerusalem] be a hotbed for cowards?” Another young girl read: “We will defend [Palestine] with our bodies… We will chop off their heads, and we will liberate the sorrowful and exalted Al-Aqsa Mosque… We will subject them to eternal torture.” MAS Philly belongs to the Muslim American Society (MAS), which has 42 chapters in the United States and one in the United Kingdom. MAS’ website says that its mission is to “move people to strive for God-consciousness, liberty and justice, and to convey Islam with utmost clarity,” and that its vision is “a virtuous and just American society.”
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Illegal is illegal

Since it is illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, it is not logical that non-citizens would be able to indirectly influence or skew votes in Congress or in the Electoral College vote for President.

An illegal alien or a legal resident who is following the process and waiting in line to become a U.S. citizen is removed from the process if they register to vote.

“Since enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, federal law has prohibited noncitizens from voting in federal elections, punishing them by fines, imprisonment, inadmissibility and deportation.”

What part of illegal do you not understand?

The U.S. is a republic, which means like ancient Athens, Greece, the rule of law is the controlling factor, not the rule of mercurial and popularist opinions of people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_foreigners_to_vote_in_the_United_States?fbclid=IwAR2nsrTHfuTtpULBI6dxKJzGX65TlkRa1u_JWAnMMYnnUZYYihteUu2HmMk

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CO2 logic

Since the increasing trend in total atmospheric CO2 concentration does not reveal a measurable anomaly, deviation or increase associated with the contribution of CO2 by humans from burning fossil fuels, then it is not logical to expect that human-produced CO2 will result in a measurable change in temperature nor a change in sea level, nor glaciers, nor in myriad other natural events. All of these measurements of other natural events are confounded by numerous additional simultaneous biases which are absent from the simple measurement of trend in total atmospheric CO2 concentration versus time.

CO2 Chart by Dr Roy Spencer

CO2 chart by Dr. Roy Spencer

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Apportionment and The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution: Re-blog

Apportionment and The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution
 
Political representation in the United States is based upon creating constituencies in proportion to geographical areas. The US House of Representatives, for example, delimits seats proportionally between states. The states, in turn, create districts in which House members run.
 
The decennial US Census has been used since 1790 as the basis for the United States representational form of government. As a result of growing population, the number of House members eventually quadrupled in size. In 1911, the number of Representatives was therefore fixed at 435.
 
In principle, districts are reapportioned every ten years after the decennial US Census. The number of districts apportioned to each state is defined by Congress, in accordance with Title 2 of US Code. (In practice, the two major political parties vie for control of reapportionment in order to maximize their respective constituency bases). During the 1960s, the Supreme Court ruled in a series of cases that congressional and state legislative districts must consist of relatively equal populations. Specifically, the Court’s decision in Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) mandated that states apportion congressional district boundaries based strictly according to population.
 
Malapportionment can occur in the states as a result of failures to reapportion after significant population shifts within established districts. The resulting effect is that in a given House district, a House member can end up representing a much larger number of voters as compared with another district. The result is that citizens in the larger district have less direct access to, and influence upon, their elected Representative – thus diluting the principle of “one man, one vote”, which has been upheld by the US Supreme Court.1
Reapportionment based on non-citizens
 
As the number of US House seats is fixed at 435, reapportionment means that if a given state gains a House district, another state must lose one. If (illegal alien non-citizens are counted in the decennial Census upon which districts are apportioned, then states with larger illegal alien populations are likely to end up with more districts and therefore more representation in the House. This effectively dilutes the votes of citizens in states having relatively low populations of illegal aliens.
 
Similarly, congressional districts in those states with proportionately higher numbers of illegal aliens end up representing a large illegal alien, non-citizen, non-enfranchised population.
 
Illegal immigration has the same effect on presidential elections because the Electoral College is based on the size of congressional delegations. Indeed, the presence of all foreign-born persons in 2000 (naturalized citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens) redistributed 16 seats, up from 12 seats in 1990.5
 
For example, in Southern California, several districts contain less than half of the eligible voters found in districts in other states.2 Indeed, 43 percent of the population in California’s 31st district is made up of non-citizens, while in the 34th district, 38 percent are non-citizens. In Florida’s 21st district, 28 percent of the population is non-citizen, and in New York’s 12th district the number is 23 percent.5 The presence of illegal aliens in other states caused Indiana, Michigan, and Mississippi to each lose one seat in the House in 2000, while Montana failed to gain a seat it otherwise would have. In addition, the presence of all non-citizens in the Census redistributed a total of nine seats.5
Apportionment Solutions
 
Reapportionment weighted by the presence of illegal alien noncitizens is notably unfair to American citizens (both natural-born and naturalized), and clearly violates the principle of “one man, one vote”.
 
The most obvious solution to this inequity is to stop counting noncitizens for purposes of apportionment. Article 1 Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution mandates that a census be conducted every 10 years expressly for the purpose of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives. Yet the Constitution does not specify the method of apportionment, or the composition of the population to be apportioned. Since the original 1790 apportionment, several different methods have been used, with the method of Equal Proportions being used since 1940.
 
Precedent is established in that Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution and the 14th Amendment both explicitly exclude non-taxed Indians from apportionment. In addition, the 14th Amendment, Section 2 acknowledges that some may be denied the right to vote. 2
 
Although the Supreme Court has to-date favored counting both citizens and noncitizens in reapportionment cases, this interpretation of the Constitution appears to clearly go against the Founders’ intent. It should not require a Constitutional amendment to count only citizens for apportionment purposes, but in light of special interest groups pushing for open borders, perhaps an Amendment ultimately will be necessary.
 
“If, as I suggest, one person one vote protects a right uniquely held by citizens, it would be a dilution of that right to allow noncitizens to share therein.”
 
Kozinski’s opinion reinforces the concept that illegal aliens should not be count for apportionment purposes.
 
Given the number and power of special interest groups pressing for open borders, any attempt to change apportionment methodology would meet substantial resistance in Congress. Furthermore, the most serious obstacle to counting only citizens for apportionment purposes would remain: the inability to differentiate between citizens and noncitizens during the Census-taking process.
Ultimate Solution
 
The ultimate solution would be to enforce existing immigration laws both along the US perimeter and within in the interior, thus preventing additional illegal aliens from entering the US, while encouraging those already living here to return home to reunite with their families.
References
 
1. Reapportionment, and United States Census, 2000 (Wikipedia)
 
2. James Gimpel and John Edwards , Immigration Dilutes the Voting Rights of Citizens- Gimpel, The Social Contract (Winter 2005)
 
3. Charles Wood, Losing Control of America’s Future — Census, Birthright Citizenship & Illegal Aliens, The Social Contract (Spring 2005) [This article is adapted from a larger paper, “Losing Control of America’s Future – the Census, Birthright Citizenship, & Illegal Aliens”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (Spring, 1999)]
 
4. Charles Wood, Losing Control of the Nation’s Future — Part One — The Census and Illegal Aliens, The Social Contract (Winter 2005) [This article is adapted from a larger paper, “Losing Control of America’s Future – the Census, Birthright Citizenship, & Illegal Aliens”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (Spring, 1999)]
 
5. Dudley L. Poston, Jr., Steven A. Camarota, and Amanda K. Baumle, Remaking the Political Landscape – The Impact of Illegal and Legal Immigration on Congressional Apportionment (Center for Immigration Studies, October 2003)
 
6. Dudley L. Poston, Jr., Steven A. Camarota, Leon F. Bouvier, Godfrey Jin-Kai Li, and Hong Dan, Remaking the Political Landscape – How Immigration Redistributes Seats in the House (Center for Immigration Studies, October 1998)
 
7. Mark Krikorian, Dudley L. Poston, Jr., Steven Camarota, Noah M. J. Pickus, Remaking The Political Landscape: The Impact of Illegal and Legal Immigration on Congressional Apportionment, Panel Discussion Transcript, Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. (Center for Immigration Studies, October 23, 2003)
 
8. Steven A. Camarota, The Impact of Non-Citizens on Congressional Apportionment, Testimony prepared for the House Subcommittee on Federalism and the Census (Center for Immigration Studies, December 6, 2005)
 
9. Leon F. Bouvier, The Impact of Immigration on Congressional Representation (Center for Immigration Studies, July, 1988)
 
10. Steven A. Camarota Rotten Boroughs – Immigration’s Effect on the Redistribution of House Seats (Center for Immigration Studies, Fall, 1998)
 
11. Dudley. L. Poston, “The U.S. Census and Congressional apportionment”, Jr. (Society, 34, March-April 1997, pp.36-44)
 
12. Dudley L. Poston, Jr., Leon F. Bouvier, and Hong Dan, “The Impacts of apportionment Method and Legal and Illegal Immigration on Congressional apportionment in the Year 2000”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Demographic Association, Orlando, Florida (September 25-27, 1997)
 
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bearing False Witness

How the Anti-Defamation League in Boston, MA conspired to have a critic investigated for a fake hate crime…Jussied.

Source: Bearing False Witness

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Newspeak of Climate Socialists

This pure propaganda from the British Foreign Office could be Newspeak in George Orwell’s dystopian book Nineteen Eighty-four (1984). Newspeak is the language of Oceania, a fictional totalitarian state ruled by the Party INGSOC, who created the language to meet the ideological requirements of English Socialism: “The most terrifying thing is the projection of just how much worse this will get if we don’t reduce emissions rapidly” 📷 Envoy Nick Bridge discusses the effects of climate change. Short video at this link. Soon to be a drone outside your window or speaking to you from your TV screen. Any objection will lead to your imprisonment.

https://twitter.com/foreignoffice/status/1145613101246701568

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment