“DEAD MEN DON’T NEED IMPEACHMENT. Swamp in Panic: Trump In Danger.”

Longish but the best report I have seen on the coup against Trump and America. Includes revelations and what to expect next.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A very important short video

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Radiative emissions from greenhouse gases delay cooling, do not produce warming

More than 10 years ago, Dr. Roy Spencer explained (1) in detail with examples why the climate models are wrong.  All models were overstating climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases.  The models were all (at the time) too sensitive to radiative forcing because they had misunderstood feedback processes, that is, feedback is an effect of radiative forcing, not a cause.  His blockbuster revelation was that ALL feedback from radiative emissions from greenhouse gases is negative.

This note confirms Dr. Spencer’s conclusion at the molecular level.  In the troposphere, the layer of air closest to earth’s surface, a greenhouse gas molecule, for example CO2, re-emits the long wave infrared radiation (LWIR) it absorbed from earth’s surface on average in about 300 picometers (0.00000001181102 of an inch) when it collides with another air molecule.  But, when that emitted radiation is absorbed by another greenhouse gas molecule or earth’s surface, the radiation intensity is reduced by at least 50%, and so on for all subsequent absorption-collision-emission events.

In other words, radiative emission of LWIR from greenhouse gases is negative feedback, a cooling process not a warming process, resulting from the forcing of LWIR emissions up-dwelling from earth’s surface.

Long wave infrared radiation emitted and up-dwelling from the earth is broad spectrum IR radiation and varying in intensity, radiating from a bulk source on the surface which is usually continuing to radiate over some extended time interval.

In contrast, absorption of LWIR by a greenhouse gas molecule occurs at a specific intensity (watts per square meter) and at discrete, characteristic wavelengths of the greenhouse gas molecule.  Relative to the tiny gas molecule, the earth’s surface is a large plane which is probably still emitting, especially during the day, when no more radiation can be absorbed by saturated greenhouse gas molecules.  The bulk surface area of the earth emits a broad spectrum of LWIR wavelengths at varying intensities, but in contrast the greenhouse gas molecule can only absorb LWIR at discrete wavelengths and intensity.   The radiative emissions (forcing) from the earth’s surface and the molecular absorber are very mismatched.  LWIR radiation flux density from earth’s surface is astronomically large compared to the possible LWIR absorption by a gas molecule at any distance above the surface; the steradian geometry of LWIR from the surface is negligible.

Subsequent to the absorption event by the greenhouse gas molecule, the greenhouse gas molecule probably collides with a nitrogen or oxygen gas molecule, which usually causes the greenhouse gas molecule to emit its LWIR and relax to its ground state.  Essentially a point source of light emits radiation at one or more discrete, characteristic wavelengths in a discrete intensity (or quanta) as an instantaneous pulse into 3D space.  The intensity of that radiative emission is spread across 3D space.  The intensity of the LWIR upon incidence on the next molecules or surfaces will be reduced by the inverse square law (the inverse of the square of the distance between the radiating greenhouse gas molecule and each of the receiving molecules or surfaces.)  The radiation received at the next molecule or surface could be absorbed, reflected, scattered or transmitted transparently, but in all cases, the intensity of the LWIR radiation is reduced according to the inverse square law.

After a single radiative absorption event, the radiation from a molecule of greenhouse gas is emitted in a distribution spread across 3D space as determined by steradian geometry.  Multiple other greenhouse gas molecules at different distances could absorb some of that radiation, or the earth’s surface could absorb some of that radiation, or the liquid and aerosol water in clouds could absorb some of that radiation, and some radiation could be transmitted to outer space.  Every subsequent absorption event in the cascading series of absorption-emission-absorption events following the initial pulse of radiative emission from earth’s surface receives much less intense radiation than the absorption event that preceded it, never more intense radiation.  This means that all feedback from radiative emission from greenhouse gases are negative (cooling) events, in agreement with Dr. Roy Spencer (1).  Energy is being distributed in progressively lower amounts.  There is no warming after the initial LWIR from the surface.  Increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases (dominantly water vapor and clouds and minimally CO2) delays the rate of cooling by 3D steradian distribution of the LRIR radiation.

When the emitting greenhouse gas is very close to earth’s surface at least 50% of its emission is radiated away from the surface at varying steradian angles, and about 50% is radiated toward the surface at varying steradian angles.  Radiative emission intensity from water vapor and clouds will always be significantly less than the radiation absorbed by the water vapor and clouds from the earth’s surface.  Down-dwelling LWIR cannot warm the surface.

In addition, the wavelength of the radiation absorbed by the greenhouse gas is lengthened by the steradian angle of incidence of that radiation at earth’s surface.  The intensity of the down-dwelling radiative emission at its point of incidence the surface is reduced by more than 50% and its wavelength is lengthened in every case except where the point of incidence is 90 degrees perpendicular beneath the radiating molecule.  At all other steradian angles, the LWIR wavelength is lengthened.  The LWIR spectrum is between about 7.5 microns and 14 microns.  Above 14 microns is the microwave spectrum.  At wide steradian angles of incidence on the surface, the LWIR radiation that was originally emitted from the greenhouse gas molecule is lengthened into the microwave spectrum where different physical phenomena occur, which will not be discussed here.  But, the long wave IR from the original radiative emission from earth’s surface has been cooled to microwave wavelength by the radiative emission from the greenhouse gas molecule.  Thus, the wavelength lengthening process from the radiative emission by a greenhouse gas is also reducing the energy feedback, i.e. negative feedback to the initial forcing caused by the LWIR radiative emission from earth’s surface.

Radiative re-emission or feedback from a cloud or greenhouse gas can never warm the surface or the object or the molecule that was the source of that radiation, consistent with the laws of thermodynamics.  The source will always be at a much higher intensity than the feedback re-emitted radiation.  As the re-radiating molecule moves farther from the source of the LWIR, the 3D steradian angle increases, which further reduces the intensity.  Feedback from greenhouse gases such as CO2, methane, clouds and water vapor results in a time delay in cooling and reduction in intensity of the long wave IR radiative emissions.

In the case of one greenhouse gas molecule absorbing radiation from another greenhouse gas molecule, for example, a water vapor molecule absorbing radiative emission from a CO2 molecule, the water vapor molecule absorbs (if those energy bands are not already occupied) a specific intensity of radiation at CO2’s characteristic wavelengths which overlap with water vapor.  Subsequently, If that water vapor molecule then re-emits that radiation, the intensity of that re-emitted radiation is distributed into 3D steradian space.  That is, the intensity of the radiation received from the water vapor molecule by the next molecule is much less (following the inverse square law) than the energy that was initially absorbed by the water vapor molecule.  The energy does not disappear, but it is broadly distributed in 3D space and time delayed.

Potential energy in a greenhouse molecule is the relative motions of one atom and its electrons relative to another atom and its electrons within a single molecule.  The potential energy in one greenhouse gas molecule can be translated to potential energy in another greenhouse gas molecule by a collision under specific collision dynamics and geometry conditions.  The gas molecules must have identical vibration modes where one molecule is at ground state and the other molecule is at its elevated vibration state.  Also, the potential energy in one elevated greenhouse gas molecule can be translated to kinetic energy in another greenhouse gas molecule in specific collision dynamics and geometries.  These are relatively rare collisions compared to a greenhouse gas molecule colliding with molecules of non-greenhouse gases N2, O2 and Ar which make up about 98% of air molecules.  In the troposphere, neither IR radiation nor the potential energy associated with the elevated potential energy resulting from absorption of IR  be absorbed by or translated to a gas molecule which does not have a dipole moment, for example, oxygen, nitrogen or argon.)  LWIR radiative emissions from greenhouse gases cannot warm the non-greenhouse gases that comprise 98% of the molecules in the air.  Nor can LWIR radiation from any source warm the 99% empty space that surrounds gas molecules in air.

Ignoring other important effects and considering only radiative feedback effects, if the water vapor and clouds are low altitude where air pressure is higher, then water vapor and clouds will have a relatively higher insulating effect (i.e. more delay in cooling) as compared to higher altitude water vapor and clouds, where air pressure is less, intermolecular distances are greater, collisions are less frequent and reduction in intensity due to distance is larger.

In all cases of radiative emission and absorption by greenhouse gases, the intensity of the radiation  absorbed at one greenhouse gas molecule is substantially less than the intensity of the radiation that was absorbed by the prior greenhouse gas molecule which emitted that radiation, and the radiation becomes progressively less intense at each subsequent absorption event.  For example, radiation absorbed at 1 picowatt per square meter at one greenhouse gas molecule is absorbed by the next greenhouse gas molecule at a small fraction of 1 picowatt per square meter.

In Summary, greenhouse gases are distributing energy rather than trapping energy.  Radiative emissions from greenhouse gas molecules are spread over 3D space and spread over time.  LWIR radiation from earth’s surface is delayed on its path back into outer space.  This is delayed cooling, not warming, like wearing a stocking cap on a cold day.

Climate models yield incorrect answers in part because they assume a priori that feedback from greenhouse gases causes warming.  Thus the models always overstate sensitivity to radiative emissions, CO2 concentration, water vapor, clouds and methane concentration.  Climate modelers built greenhouse gas warming into their models.  Michael Mann, Benjamin Santer and other scientists admitted in their 19 June 2017 paper in Nature Geoscience, “In the early twenty-first century, satellite-derived tropospheric warming trends were generally smaller than trends estimated from a large multi-model ensemble,” reads the first line of the abstract. “Over most of the early twenty-first century, however, model tropospheric warming is substantially larger than observed,” they added.  In other words, the warming observed in real world temperature trends was “substantially” less than predicted by their climate models. (2)

Absorption and emission events in gases are not by and of themselves thermal events or heat.  Neither the increase in energy due to absorption nor the decrease in energy due to radiation have changed the ability of the molecule to do work.  Unless some other condition occurs, usually a collision, the greenhouse gas molecule is in thermodynamic equilibrium and in a natural, reversible state.  Radiative absorption and emission in gases are changes in the motions of atoms and electrons/bonds within a single molecule.  These are changes in potential energy, not kinetic energy.  Thermal energy or heat is molecular motion, that is, directional motion of the entire molecule, or kinetic energy.  Thermal energy is the molecule either moving at a velocity through space or the entire molecule vibrating or moving in contact with other molecules in a liquid or solid matrix.  The radiative energy absorbed by greenhouse gas molecules causes already ongoing (i.e. ground state) vibrations of atoms and bond/electrons within the gas molecule to be increased by a discrete amount.  The stretching and or bending oscillations/vibrations become higher frequency and farther; the outer electron shell expands.  After a collision, or a change in condition such as the temperature or altitude, the gas molecule will emit that radiation at almost the same wavelengths and intensity in which it was absorbed, except the emission is into 3D steradian space but it was received in a discrete pencil-like or tube-like beam.  Under certain conditions, for example very high pressure, there can be an extremely small amount of radiation emitted as scatter.  It is not the gas molecules that are vibrating in space but it is the atoms and bonds/electrons inside the molecule which are vibrating.  After the gas molecule emits its discrete quanta of radiation, it relaxes to its ground state vibrations, which are determined by temperature and pressure of the surrounding air.

Absorption and emission events are not in and of themselves thermal or heating events. The gas molecules do not change kinetic direction velocity as a result of absorption or emission.  Collisions change kinetic energy which in turn usually causes emission of the energy held in the elevated state of internal vibration.  The tropopause is the boundary between the troposphere and stratosphere. In the upper atmosphere above the tropopause, molecules are much farther apart, air is less dense, air pressure is lower, and CO2 spontaneously emits LWIR because its elevated energy state is out of thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding near vacuum.  There is little water vapor and clouds in the stratosphere and in the other atmospheric layers above the tropopause which could block the LWIR emissions from CO2 into space.  More than 50% of that radiative emission from CO2 will go into outer space.  Again, radiative emission from CO2 is a cooling effect; the temporary absorption of LWIR by CO2 gas molecules is a delay in cooling.

Sunlight and infrared radiation are not heat in and of themselves.  We perceive heat when the sunlight or infrared light cause the molecules in our skin to vibrate, which our nerves sense and our then brains perceive as heat.  Or, the sunlight or collisions of moving molecules striking a thermometer cause the molecules in the thermometer to vibrate and expand, which we read on the thermometer as higher temperature.


Reference (1): Satellite and Climate Model Evidence Against Substantial Manmade Climate Change, by Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D. December 27, 2008 (last modified December 29, 2008)


Reference (2): Causes of differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates.  Nature Geoscience.  19 June 2017.  Benjamin D. Santer, John C. Fyfe, Giuliana Pallotta, Gregory M.Flato, Gerald A. Meehl, Matthew H. England, Ed Hawkins, Michael E. Mann, Jerey F. Painter, Céline Bonfils, Ivana Cvijanovic, Carl Mears, Frank J. Wentz, Stephen Po-Chedley, Qiang Fu and Cheng-Zhi Zou. NATURE GEOSCIENCE| VOL 10 | JULY 2017. P.478


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Climate alarm conditioning

People have been conditioned to be hyper concerned by the way the data are presented.

Here is global temperature data from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in degrees F.  Nothing to worry about.

But the following graph is an example of how the data are usually presented.

Why So Many Global Temperature Records? (link to this graph on NASA GISS site)

Red represents the same data in both of the above graphic formats. But the second graph causes concern, and the first creates no concern.

The following graph is also from NASA GISS, published in a paper by the (at that time) NASA Director James Hansen.

As you can see, the long term trend in global temperatures is declining. In the Holocene, which is our present era, global temperature have been relatively flat at about 14 degrees C (~57 degrees F).

As shown in the graph below, temperatures have been relatively flat but declining slightly following the rapid warming after the Little Ice Age.

The differences in how the data are displayed and the time period can change the conclusions people takeaway from the presentation.

There is no reason to be concerned about the very slow warming we are having. Cold is far more dangerous to life and more difficult for adaptation.

Humans and human-produced CO2 from fossil fuels play no significant or even measureable role in either global warming or global cooling.

“Global climate alarmism has been costly to society, and it has the potential to be vastly more costly. It has also been damaging to science, as scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions. How can one escape from the Iron Triangle when it produces flawed science that is immensely influential and is forcing catastrophic public policy?…”

“There are past examples. In the U.S. in the early 20th century, the eugenics movement had coopted the science of human genetics and was driving a political agenda. The movement achieved the Immigration Restriction Act of 1923, as well as forced sterilization laws in several states. The movement became discredited by Nazi atrocities, but the American consequences survived well into the 1960s. Global Warming has become a religion. A surprisingly large number of people seem to have concluded that all that gives meaning to their lives is the belief that they are saving the planet by paying attention to their carbon footprint.”

“…This is not to diminish the importance of the efforts of some scientists to point out the internal inconsistencies. However, this is a polarized world where people are permitted to believe whatever they wish to believe. The mechanisms whereby such belief structures are altered are not well understood, but the evidence from previous cases offers hope that such peculiar belief structures do collapse.”

Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D., professor of atmospheric sciences, emeritus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://www.jpands.org/vol18no3/lindzen.pdf


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Where are the surface to air missiles from Libya?

I am posting this here because friends and not-so friends are telling me in private that the fact checkers, New York Times etc say it is unverified that an estimated 20,000 surface to air missiles were in Libya and that was a reason for the Ambassador Stevens and other Americans to be in Benghazi.

Let me help them out. Maybe they will stop accusing me of posting myths and fake news, but I doubt it.

U.S. Army General Carter Ham, commander of Africom, who led Operation Odyssey Dawn, the initial United States role in the 2011 military intervention in Libya, answering questions in the U.S. Senate Arms Services Committee, April 7, 2011: “Senator, to the second part of your question first, I’m very concerned about the proliferation of weapons, notably shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles which we assess there were perhaps as many as 20,000 in Libya as the operation began. Many of those we know are now not accounted for, and that’s going to be a concern for some period of time.


“In an interview with ABC News last month [August 2012], Glen Doherty, a 42-year-old former Navy SEAL who worked as a contractor with the State Department, [and died in Benghazi] said he personally went into the field to track down so-called MANPADS, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, and destroy them. After the fall of dictator Moammar Gadhafi, the State Department launched a mission to round up thousands of MANPADS that may have been looted from military installations across the country. U.S. officials previously told ABC News they were concerned the MANPADS could fall into the hands of terrorists, creating a threat to commercial airliners.”


“Though Libya had an estimated 20,000 man-portable surface-to-air missiles before the popular uprising began in February, Assistant Secretary of State Andrew Shapiro told ABC News today [Sept 27 2011] the government does not have a clear picture of how many missiles they’re trying to track down.” …“The missiles, four to six-feet long and Russian-made, can weigh just 55 pounds with launcher. They lock on to the heat generated by the engines of aircraft, can be fired from a vehicle or from a combatant’s shoulder, and are accurate and deadly at a range of more than two miles.”


US covered up fatal MANPAD missile downing of US military Chinook helicopter.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dare to call it what it was: Treason

U.S. Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi, Libya to secretly retrieve US-made Stinger Missiles that the State Department had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya without Congressional oversight or permission and also to retrieve an estimated 20,000 Russian-made surface to air missiles. The location of most of these missiles is still unknown after the U.S. and NATO regime-changed Libya resulting in the death of Libya’s leader.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and private arms dealer Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our U.S. military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile. The helicopter didn’t explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA.

Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. The U.S. presidential elections for November 2012 were coming up fast. Debates were already underway. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the “Stand Down” Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy!

It was the State Dep, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would NOT approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”

Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!

THIS is what the investigation is all about, one reason Hillary had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and the reason Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the ‘attack was the result of the YouTube video’, even though everyone knew it was not.

Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.

“Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone KNEW Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.

“So we had a traitor as POTUS.  He was not only corrupt, but compromised as well and a Secretary of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles; that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Department’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.


“Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi. More than half of US citizens DO NOT Know.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

I suppose the Dem koolaid puts them and RINOs to sleep

I suppose the Dem koolaid puts them and RINOs to sleep.

July 2018 on Anderson Cooper’s CNN show in the middle of the Mueller investigation of President Trump, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said: “One point I’d like to make, Anderson, that I don’t think has come up very much before — and I’m alluding now to [President Donald Trump’s] criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn’t do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling,” Clapper said Thursday on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360.”

Clapper added that “if it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today — notably, special counsel Mueller’s investigation.”
“President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place. I think that’s an important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.”

Of course Clapper believed that Mueller’s investigation would result in Trump’s impeachment, and then Obama would get the credit for that, and if Trump were not impeached, then Obama would be blamed instead of Clapper, Brennan and the U.S. intel deep state.

So it is ok with Dems and RINOs that Pres Obama ordered the US intel apparatus to investigate candidate Trump, and the Mueller investigation spent millions of taxpayer dollars assisted by the intel community including access to illegal spying on the Trump campaign … And they found nothing…zero. But somehow in Dem and Rino koolaid soaked-minds it is a problem for Trump to ask Ukraine’s President to investigate Biden and his son for a $1 billion extortion crime Biden already admitted, bragged about, captured on video and Ukraine’s President, and Ukraine’s former President and Ukraine’s former chief investigator have said on the record that the investigation was already underway in 2016 and was shut down by Biden’s threat.

And, by the way, Nancy Pelosi’s son works for a Ukraine gas company, John Kerry ‘s son was employed by a Ukraine company, Romney son worked with a Ukraine company in addition to Joe Biden ‘s son.

And then there is Secretary of State Clinton and Obama, and her assistants and CIA instigating and funding (with up to $5 billion in US taxpayer/State Department money) a regime change revolution in Ukraine, the so-call Maidan revolution.   Ukraine gave more to the Clinton Foundation than any other country.  https://www.theguardian.com/film/video/2015/jan/13/maidan-documentary-ukraine-2014-revolution-video

In addition, a group of Dem U.S. Senators wrote the President of Ukraine insisting with strong implied quid pro quo that Ukraine assist the Mueller investigation against Trump.

Here is that letter from the U.S. Senate website, which, by the way, Snopes claims is false.


And we know that Mueller found nothing after spending millions of dollars, hundreds of testimonies under oath and access to illegally acquired covert information on Trump and his campaign workers.  But in the corrupted minds of Pelosi and these corrupt Senators, and koolaid soaked media and Dem voters, President Trump is impeachable for phoning the President of Ukraine (with three actual live witnesses, not an unidentified Adam Schiff-co-conspiring undercover CIA hearsay “whistleblower”) to ask Ukraine’s President for assistance investigating Biden & son, and Trump released the entire unredacted transcript of the call.  Transcript

Ukraine’s President said Trump did not pressure him and the investigation was underway in 2016 but Biden demanded it be shut down.  Viktor Shokin, Ukraine’s chief prosecutor told Washington Post on the record, “I will answer that the activities of Burisma, the involvement of his son, Hunter Biden, and the (prosecutor general’s office) investigators on his tail, are the only, I emphasize, the only motives for organizing my resignation.”

Swamps are well known for stinking. Washington DC certainly stinks. It is necrotic and should be cut out.  But, how to do this surgery if half the country is drinking the koolaid? The worst part is the GOP are letting this happen and the media is complicit in pushing the false Dem impeachment narrative.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What say you?

A real question. Do Dems and their media not see how hypocritical and corrupt they appear to the public due to the following contradictory situation? Or, do they not care? Or, will they do and say absolutely anything to destroy the American republic, the Constitution, and national and individual sovereignty?
Prior to the 2016 election, the Obama adminstration including the White House, DOJ, the FBI, the DNI, the NSA, the CIA with assistance of the Democrat National Committee illegally spied on, surveilled, wire-tapped and investigated candidate Donald Trump. There is no longer any reasonable doubt that many crimes occurred, some carrying the death penalty.
In contrast, President Donald Trump in a fully documented, triple witnessed, and fully disclosed phone call simply requested the head of state of Ukraine to provide assistance to Trump’s lawyer and to the U.S. Secretary of State in investigating corruption and extorton involving over $1 billion U.S. government loan guarantees used as extortion leverage by former VP Joe Biden in Ukraine in 2016, while Joe Biden was still U.S. VP. The previous Ukraine President, the current Ukraine President and the former Ukraine chief prosecutor have already testified under oath or on the record that in 2016 they were in fact already investigating Joe Biden, Biden’s son and the company employing Biden’s son (for over $50,000 per month in a business where Biden’s son had no experience) but stopped the investigation due to U.S. Vice President Biden’s demand. Biden’s illegal extortive demand was immediately fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor or lose $1 billion in loan guarantees from the U.S. government. Biden in his own televised words proffered that Ukraine could call then President Obama if they did not believe his demands to immediately fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor. That was in 2016 and Ukraine’s fired chief prosecutor, the current Ukraine President and the previous Ukraine President say that in 2016 the chief prosecutor was investigating the employer of Biden’s son and Biden’s son, but stopped due to then Vice President Biden’s demand. In view of these facts and evidence, Democrats say they want to impeach President Trump.
These are both serious crimes committed by Democrats. In addition to the above crimes, Democrats are committing obstruction of justice and interference in the current U.S. election process for 2020, in addition to an ongoing treasonous coup to remove a duly elected U.S. President via an unconstitutional impeachment hoax. This needs to go to trial in the U.S. Senate, overseen by the Supreme Court.
Do Dems and their media cronies not see how hypocritical and corrupt they appear to the general public? Or, do they not care? Or, will they do and say absolutely anything to destroy the American republic, the Constitution, and national and individual sovereignty?
What say you?
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Central bankers announce their climate extortion plan

“While officially announced on September 22nd [2019] at the opening of the UN Climate Summit in NY, a Central Banker’s Climate Compact was unveiled under the leadership of Bank of England Governor Mark Carney that had already been in the works for over 18 months representing over 130 of the world’s largest and corrupt banks calling for a radical decarbonisation of the world economy by 2/3 according to commitments laid out in the 2015 Paris Climate accord.”

“Bank of England head and Chair of the Bank of International Settlement’s Financial Stability Board (2011-2018) Mark Carney announced at this venue that “climate disclosures must become comprehensive, climate risk management must be transformed and sustainable investing must go mainstream”. Carney then took on a more threatening tone by saying “the firms that anticipate these developments will be rewarded handsomely. Those that don’t will cease to exist”.”


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global Man-made CO2 emissions 1965 – 2018: BP data

via Global Man-made CO2 emissions 1965 – 2018: BP data

Quote | Posted on by | Leave a comment