This is NOT science. This is marketing.
This is an important read.
This is NOT science. This is marketing.
This is an important read.
18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government.
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
by Baruch Pletner,PhD,MBA February 28, 2019
Today, like in 1776, it takes courage to stand up to power. There are possible and even likely adverse consequences, but let’s not kid ourselves: being banned from Twitter or even fired from a job is not the same as being shot by redcoats. Those Americans that chose to overthrow their obnoxious British rulers by risking their very lives have made it easy for us. All we need to do to get rid of our no less odious elites is simply tell them to their faces that they have no clothes. Stay away from them, shun them and their stupid “activities”, refuse to acknowledge their obvious lies about sex, and unborn babies, and the climate, and Islam, and immigration, and so much more. Whatever they want you to do, whatever they want you to say, wherever they want you to be, JUST SAY NO.
The Hi-Tech Traditionalist – Baruch Pletner is an entrepreneur, a scientist, an inventor, and a private pilot. He is passionate about education, the outdoors, and the war on globalism. Baruch holds a PhD degree from the Technion in Haifa, Israel and an MBA from Northeastern University in Boston.
This is the last paragraph of an article by Dr. Pletner in Tsarism
French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin announces that he will propose at an upcoming meeting of the Council of Ministers the dissolution of 2 Islamic NGOs: the CCIF (French Collective Against Islamophobia) and humanitarian association Baraka City as “enemies of the French Republic.”
“It is clear how political Islam, allied with radical Islam, leads to terrorism. Political Islam must be fought with the same force as terrorism.”
This is equivalent to the US Secretary of Homeland Security announcing the dissolution of CAIR and Islamic Relief USA.
Post by Leslie Shaw, President at FIRM in Paris Area, France.
Social media is a distraction from life. It is addictive. But, you will recover.
Like all other addictions, recognition that you have a problem is the first requirement before healing can begin.
Dr. Michael Yeadon comments on the possible requirement for SARS CoV-2 vaccination and possible coercion to vaccinate.
Dr Yeadon is a co-founder of Ziarco and CEO. He is an Allergy & Respiratory therapeutic area expert, developed out of deep knowledge of biology & therapeutics, and is an innovative drug discoverer with over 25 years of experience in drug discovery and development. Dr Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and since 2011 has consulted to more than 20 biotechnology companies. Prior to consulting as an independent, he was Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of the A&R Research Unit of Pfizer. At Pfizer, Dr Yeadon was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008. Under his leadership the unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive external collaborations and was involved in product and device licensing.
Prior to Pfizer, Dr Yeadon worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers. He attended the University of Surrey in Guildford, U.K, where he received his PhD (under Professor Ian Kitchen), with thesis work in the respiratory field, and a BSc, First Class, with Joint Honours, in Biochemistry and Toxicology.
|By Charles Lipson Real Clear Politics October 15, 2020 |
Charles Lipson is the Peter B. Ritzma Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Chicago, where he founded the Program on International Politics, Economics, and Security.
Email Link https://conta.cc/3dw8VET
Following up on my previous posts, regarding PCR tests and vaccines for SARS CoV-2 (Covid-19), the cart is still in front of the horse. Read the CDC document linked below and see for yourself. Here are a few quotes excerpted from that CDC document dated July, 2020. I provided the bolding for emphasis:
From the official CDC Covid-19 method document for the PCR Covid-19 test, with revisions (full citation and link below.)
“Results are for the identification of 2019-nCoV RNA. The 2019-nCoV RNA is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities. Negative results do not preclude 2019-nCoV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.”
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Bud’s comments: The PCR test has multiple probes designed insilico (i.e. in a computer) from the GenBank sequence database based on the N gene, not from isolated and validated sequence of SARS CoV-2. The N gene sequence codes for the glycoprotein coating that encapsulates and protects the RNA in the virus from nucleases in the body which would break apart the RNA sequence of the virus.
The human immune system does not work by recognition of RNA, DNA or protein sequence. Both T-cells and antibodies function by a 3D pattern recognition of the conformation (or epitope) of the glyco- (i.e. sugar) groups on the surface of the protein. These sugar groups are post translational modifications to the protein, that is, the sugar groups are added after the protein has been created from amino acids specified in the template of sequence of nucleotides. Small changes in the RNA and DNA sequence code (as small as a single nucleotide, a SNP) can move a methyl group (-CH3) from one position on the protein to another position on the protein and result in major changes in the 3D surface of the glyco- groups attached to the protein and in the 3D structure of the protein itself. A small change in RNA sequence or sequence homology can change the ability of a test or the immune system to recognize a virus. Or, that change may be and likely is a post translational change due to an entirely different, untested protein molecule, e.g. a chaperone, with entirely different sequence not found in the PCR test. Changes in 3D conformation of the protein can make major changes in the binding function of the S spike protein, or the conformaton of the glycoprotein coating, or other functions of the protein which in turn can result in major changes in infectivity of the virus. The changes can also prevent or change recognition of the virus by natural or synthetic antibodies, T-cells and pcr tests.
For example, in this informative recent paper: “An increasing body of evidence suggests that the tight binding of the S protein to ACE2 is the reason for the high person-to-person transmission rates and severity associated with this disease11,12,45. This is most evident when comparing the SARS 2002–2004 pandemic with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with 8,098 cases versus over 16 million cases (26th July 2020) respectively. Our analysis demonstrated that the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S proteins have substantial differences in their ACE2 binding motifs (50% identity), which results in an increased number of contacts between the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and ACE2. This correlates with the observed 10- to 20-fold higher affinity of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein for ACE2, compared to SARS-CoV S protein11.” “…the high level of TMPRSS2 similarity between species does not appear to affect viral entry, but instead it is the species-specific differences in the structure of ACE2 that affects SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infectivity.” Brooke GN, Prischi F. Structural and functional modelling of SARS-CoV-2 entry in animal models. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15917. Published 2020 Sep 28. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72528-z. : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522990/
Recall that the experiments that were underway at the top security U.S. labs, but ruled too dangerous, and were then transferred along with funding to the lab in Wuhan, China were “gain of function” experiments. The function of infectivity is changed by changing the 3D conformation of proteins. A synthetic sequence created from a computer model could create a protein vaccine for which some people have no immune defense, essentially a poison.
It bothers me that the world is running millions of PCR tests and antibody tests which have not been validated against the RNA from isolated and filtered SARS CoV-2 virus. At least, I have not been able to find publication of this information. The CDC document is very concerning. And now, without validation against isolated, filtered virus using either standard Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates (methods which have been used to validate cause for every other pandemic including SARS CoV-1 from the 2002-2004 pandemic), vaccines are being created based on synthetic sequence designed to cause invivo human cells in the living, healthy patient to produce one or more proteins from the S-spike protein on the virus, but neither this sequence nor the protein it produces has been validated against the sequence of the S-spike protein on isolated SARS CoV2. Billions of dollars are being spent on tests and vaccines which have not been validated against actual SARS CoV-2. Does it bother you?
You may recall that I have not had TV, newspapers, magazines, etc for more that 10 years.
But I watched pieces of the Senate confirmation hearings online.
This jumped out at me: https://video.parler.com/vZ/oY/vZoYSjebu9a3.mp4
I hope you are able to view this very short video.