“In 1940, Fabian socialist H. G. Wells wrote his own The New World Order, popularizing the phrase. The book advocated unification of the nations of the world to end war and bring global peace. Since the late eighteenth century, when the Illuminati first called for the New World Order, many globalists have openly advocated its creation, including President Woodrow Wilson, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, President George H. W. Bush, British prime minister Tony Blair, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, banker David Rockefeller, and Vice President Joe Biden. “The world’s elite deal in only one commodity—power,” Marrs wrote in The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America. “They seek to gain and maintain the controlling power that comes from great wealth, usually gained through the monopoly of ownership over basic resources. Politics and social issues matter little to the globalist ruling elite, who move smoothly between corporate business and government service… It is this unswerving attention to commerce and banking that lies behind nearly all modern events. It is the basis for a ‘New World Order’ mentioned by both Hitler and former President George H. W. Bush.” Over the last century, the elite have engaged in a massive, covert campaign to prepare humanity for the New World Order.”
Paul McGuire (Trumpocalypse: The End-Times President, a Battle Against the Globalist Elite, and the Countdown to Armageddon)
9/11 was how the war started, and 9/11 was how Joe Biden surrendered. Our most dangerous enemy is no longer abroad – he’s in the White House.
Joe Biden pulled out of Afghanistan because he wanted to say he ended the war before the 20 year anniversary of 9/11… …and America paid dearly.
We turned over security of the country to the Taliban terrorists – because Joe Biden couldn’t be bothered with managing an orderly withdrawal that protected the tens of thousands of Afghan citizens from the brutalities of the terrorists.We abandoned 100 billion dollar air bases, and 100 million dollars of state of the art military equipment which the Taliban is busily selling to terrorists and America’s enemies all over the world.
We left humiliated before friend and foe alike. Former British prime minister Tony Blair, a staunch American ally described Biden’s strategy as “imbecilic.”
But Joe Biden could care less. No heads rolling, no apologies – Biden is so contemptuous of the American people and the soldiers and in country allies who sacrificed for us that he called this horrifying betrayal and defeat a “success.” The deepest fires in hell are reserved for scum like Joe Biden and the advisers and military brass who enabled him.
September 11th is a day of grief and reflection and resolve.
On this day, 21 years ago, men and women as young as 5 decided they would go to war and serve their country.
20 years later, Joe Biden spat in their faces and on their graves.
He will go down as the worst, most criminal and evil president in the history of our nation. By declaring war on half our citizenry, and leading a party determined to demonize and crush its political opposition, he has brought our nation to the brink of disaster.
Now more than ever those of us who love this country need to come together and forge a resistance to its enemies within. and forge a resistance to its enemies within. Sincerely, David Horowitz https://www.horowitzfreedomcenter.org/
So the question of the century is, how could building 7 have experienced freefall acceleration without using controlled demolition? How did eight floors of this modern, well-constructed building quickly vanish into thin air?
by Rick Hayes (bio below)
September 11, 2022
In yesterday’s article, we spoke about the existence of nano-thermite in the 9/11 dust. There are many unanswered questions regarding the events on that beautiful September day with its clear blue sky 21 years ago at the World Trade Center.
Questions regarding the fact that the fires below the rubble at ground zero burned for so long that a November 19, 2001 piece by the New York Times stated that some firefighting experts called the fire the “longest commercial building fire in United States history.” How firemen and first responders gave testimony that they witnessed rivers of molten steel, “like lava,” flowing down the channels under the debris pile at ground zero even though the government says such molten steel did not exist. Or the fact that the Pentagon has never produced a video or a single photo of the plane that crashed into it.
No steel-framed building on planet earth has ever had a total collapse before or since 9/11
But of these unexplained anomalies, the one event that stands out the most that the government has refused to explain is the perfectly symmetric collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
World Trade Center Building 7 was a modern 47-story high-rise steel-framed building, taller than any building in 33 states.
It had 40 thousand tons of structural steel, 24 steel beam core columns, and 57 perimeter columns and met all of the building codes when constructed in the mid-1980s.
Building 7 was not soaked by jet fuel and didn’t have its fireproofing insulation blown off since it was not hit by a plane. Yet, it was the third steel-framed building in world history to experience a total collapse due to office fires. The first and second time such a total collapse was known to have occurred with steel-framed buildings was on the same day WTC buildings one and two collapsed. No steel-framed building on planet earth has ever had a total collapse before or since 9/11.
Building 7’s freefall acceleration is the critical question that needs to be answered. To understand freefall acceleration, consider dropping a brick from a height of 100 feet toward the pavement below. As long as the brick has an unimpeded, straight-down descent to the ground, the speed at which it lands would be freefall acceleration. Meaning nothing got in the way of the brick to slow it down as it fell all 100 feet and hit the ground.
If the brick hits an object after falling the first 75 feet, then that brick fell at freefall acceleration for the first 75 feet before it met resistance and slowed down.
Building 7 fell at freefall acceleration for nearly 105 feet or approximately eight floors
It took a quick 6.5 seconds for all 47 floors of building 7 to plummet into a neat pile. Using video footage and physics software David Chandler, M.S., who holds a B.S. in Physics and an M.S. in mathematics, proved to NIST (The National Institute of Standards and Technology) that building 7 fell at freefall acceleration for nearly 105 feet or approximately eight floors.
“What we are seeing is a building coming straight down through itself with zero resistance.” Said Chandler adding, “Buildings don’t have zero resistance.” Chandler also stated that floors have to be instantly removed for a building to fall at freefall speed. And the only way to remove floors and obtain zero resistance is by controlled demolition.
Even though the U.S. government’s position changed to agree with Chandler that there was freefall acceleration in building 7, the government still contends that no controlled demolition was used.
According to NIST, simple office fires caused one column (column 79) on the 12th floor to fail, which caused the entire building to fall for 105 feet at freefall acceleration symmetrically.
Roland Angle, P.E. civil and structural engineer, said, “NIST is telling us that the building below it (building 7) ceased to exist for the first few seconds of the collapse of the building.” Angle added that things in physics don’t cease to exist.
Steel structural high-rise buildings “simply do not collapse due to fire”
Since the conclusion made by NIST did not make scientific sense, many scientists wanted to examine the input data that NIST used to explain building 7’s freefall collapse. However, Catherine Fletcher of NIST denied the Freedom of Information Act request for the collapse calculations used by NIST. She stated that releasing such information might “Jeopardize public safety.”
“Impossible,” Kamal Obeid C.E., S.E, stated regarding NIST’s explanation for the collapse of WTC building 7. A civil and structural engineer with over 30 years of practicing engineering, Obeid said that the one-column theory offered by NIST, whereby the collapse of column 79 on the 12th floor caused the entire building to fall symmetrically, is “embarrassing.” “This is the crime of the century,” the veteran engineer said, urging other structural engineers to look at the evidence. According to Obeid, the collapse of building 7 was “a classic case of controlled demolition.”
Scott Grainger, a fire protection engineer with over 40 years of experience and licensed in 13 states, said that steel structural high-rise buildings “simply do not collapse due to fire.” He added that other steel buildings have had much worse fires burning for much longer times and yet did not collapse. According to Grainger, the fires in building 7 were scattered, and many earlier fires were already out. Yet, with the building having asymmetrical damage, it collapsed uniformly and symmetrically. “That just does not make any sense.”
So the question of the century is, how could building 7 have experienced freefall acceleration without using controlled demolition? How did eight floors of this modern, well-constructed building quickly vanish into thin air?
Rick Hayes lives in the epicenter of liberal land where reality and truth will never encounter a welcome mat.
An award-winning writer and photographer, with over twenty years of professional experience in both fields, Hayes started his journalism adventure after a successful, eye-opening career as a Banker in Wall Street. Although he spent his early work life surrounded by custom made shirts, expensive ties and the shiniest of shoes, Hayes was an accomplished singer, cutting a few records with a local band and appearing on one of the first cable shows.
Working for a weekly New York paper, in one of the most politically corrupt areas in the State, he began investing his time trying to understand the nature of corruption.
Highlights from the paper linked below for your attention:
“Despite its importance, the characterisation of uncertainty on estimates of the global total FFCO2 [fossil fuel CO2] emission made from the CDIAC database is still cumbersome. The lack of independent measurements at the spatial and temporal scales of interest complicates the characterisation. The mix of dependent and independent data used in the CDIAC calculations further complicates the determination.”
Bud: Ten years after the data in this report (link below), the increase in CO2 from 2019 to 2020 was measured to be only 2.58 ppm due to all CO2 sources and sinks, natural and human, i.e. only 0.6% increase in net global CO2 concentration. (NOAA-Scripps Mauna Loa) Obviously, CO2 from fossil fuels is less than 2.58 ppm and 0.6%. But, the uncertainty in the CO2 emissions from fossil fuels is 11% to 25%! (Table 1 of 2 below) And the uncertainty of data from several large fossil fuel producers (table 2 of 2 below) is 9.4% to 20.2%. Yet, these uncertain numbers are used by CDIAC, Friedlingstein et al, UN IPCC, EPA, etc., to argue that CO2 due to emissions from fossil fuels is driving dangerous CO2 growth and requires global crisis remediation expenditure estimated by McKinsey & Co. at $9 Trillion per year.
The uncertainty in the estimatesof the claimed largest component of CO2 emission growth is more than 10 times larger than the measured annual increase in CO2 concentration. Attributing the increase to fossil fuels is not supported by the data.
“However, the end members of this range are not calculated on the same basis and each case measures different aspects of the FFCO2 data cube (Fig. 1). For example, the 1-D case assesses uncertainty primarily from a fuel-based methodology perspective (Table 1) [ABOVE] . As the contribution of different fuels to total fuel consumption changes annually, so does the annual global uncertainty change (Fig. 3). The 2-D case assesses uncertainty primarily from a national data quality perspective (Table 2). As the contribution from different countries changes annually, so does the annual global uncertainty change. Global uncertainty has been increasing recently (Fig. 4) because more emissions are coming from countries with less certain data collection and management practices (Fig. 5). The 3-D case assesses uncertainty primarily from a data revision perspective (Fig. 7). As data are revised, missing data are reported and methodology refined, global uncertainty for a given emission year settles to typically less than 2% growth after initial data publication.”
“This manuscript takes three different but complimentary assessments of the uncertainty in CDIAC estimates of FFCO2 emissions. None of these assessments give a systematic appraisal of the full uncertainty, but collectively they provide useful insights. Greatly simplifying the assessments contained herein and trying to address the community’s need for a single, global FFCO2 uncertainty value, 8.4% (2 σ) is offered as a reasonable combination of the data in Figs. 3, 4 and 7. Given the current data, this greatly simplified uncertainty value is dynamic and may change in the future as the global mix of fuels being consumed changes and as the distribution of those fuels to different countries changes. The lack of independent measurements may also hide systematic errors not incorporated into the three uncertainty cases analysed. If this uncertainty analysis did not capture all relevant terms, the uncertainty may actually be larger than that reported here.”
“Our results highlight, for the first time, distinct patterns of population- and subpopulation-level vulnerability for a wide variety of bird species found dead at renewable energy facilities. Of the 23 priority bird species killed at renewable facilities, 11 (48%) were either highly or moderately vulnerable, experiencing a greater than or equal to 20% decline in the population growth rates with the addition of up to either 1000 or 5000 fatalities, respectively.” …
“Despite being the focus of massive conservation efforts [74–76], bird populations across North America have declined by nearly 3 billion individuals in less than 50 years , and similar bird declines are occurring across the world (e.g. ). Although we focused on direct mortality, renewable energy also may cause indirect and sub-lethal effects, for example, through displacement of birds and disruption of habitat. Furthermore, wind and solar are part of a suite of anthropogenic stressors that are relevant to avian populations. For example, climate change, habitat loss and degradation, pesticides, killing by domestic cats, and collision with transmission lines, vehicles and buildings [25,78–81] all can directly or indirectly affect bird populations.” …
“Critically, not only local but also non-local, and often very distant, subpopulations often were vulnerable to additional fatalities at California renewable energy facilities.”
Former Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore Says Climate Change Based on False Narratives
Prominent scientist backs up claim that there is ‘no climate emergency’ By Lee Yun-Jeong
Patrick Moore, one of the founders of Greenpeace said in an email obtained by The Epoch Times that his reasons for leaving Greenpeace were very clear:
“Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realized there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.
Moore left Greenpeace in 1986, 15 years after he co-founded the organization.
“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instill fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”
He said they mainly operate behind closed doors with other political operatives at the U.N., World Economic Forum, and so on, all of which are primarily political in nature.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization,” he said. “It is a political organization composed of the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program.
“The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative.
Their campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, plastic, etc., are misguided and designed to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy. They are now a negative influence on the future of both the environment and human civilization.”
“Today the left has adopted many policies that would be very destructive to civilization as they are not technically achievable. Only look at the looming energy crisis in Europe and the UK, which Putin is taking advantage of. But it is of their own making in refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” Moore wrote.
The Left ‘Hijacked’ Greenpeace
He said “green” for the environment and “peace” for the people were the organization’s founding principles, but peace was largely forgotten, and green had become the sole agenda.
“Many [so-called] ‘environmental’ leaders were now saying that ‘humans are the enemies of the Earth, the enemies of Nature.’ I could not accept that humans are the only evil species. This is too much like ‘original sin,’ that humans are born with evil, but all the other species are good, even cockroaches, mosquitos, and diseases,” Moore argued.
He said the new dominant philosophy is that the world would be better if fewer people existed.
“But the people who said this were not volunteering to be the first to go away. They behave as if they are superior to others. This kind of ‘pride’ and ‘conceit’ is the worst of the Cardinal Sins,” Moore said. Environmental Activist
As a prominent scholar, ecologist, and long-time leader in the international environmental field, Patrick Moore is widely regarded as one of the world’s most qualified experts on the environment. He is also a founder of Greenpeace, the world’s largest environmental activist organization.
Moore received his Ph.D. in Ecology from the University of British Columbia in 1974 and an Honorary Doctorate of Science from North Carolina State University in 2005.
He co-founded Greenpeace in 1971 and served as president of Greenpeace Canada for nine years. From 1979 to 1986, Moore served as the Director of Greenpeace International, a driving force shaping the group’s policies and directions. During his 15-year tenure, Greenpeace became the world’s largest environmental activist organization.
In 1991, Moore founded Greenspirit, a consultancy focusing on environmental policies, energy, climate change, biodiversity, genetically modified food, forests, fisheries, food, and resources.
Between 2006 and 2012, Moore served as co-chairman of the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition, a U.S.-based environmental advocacy group.
In 2014, he was appointed Chairman of Ecology, Energy, and Prosperity of Frontier Centre for Public Policy, a non-partisan Canadian public policy think tank.
In 2019 and 2020, Moore served as the Chair of CO2 Coalition, a U.S.-based nonprofit environmental advocacy group dedicated to disputing false claims on CO2 as relates to climate change.
False Narrative on Chlorine
“At the time I decided to leave Greenpeace, I was one of 6 Directors of Greenpeace International. I was the only one with formal science education, BSc Honors in Science and Forestry, and Ph.D. in Ecology. My fellow directors decided that Greenpeace should begin a campaign to ‘Ban Chlorine Worldwide.’”
Moore said it is true that elemental chlorine gas is highly toxic and was used as a weapon in World War I. However, chlorine is one of the 94 [naturally-ocurring] elements on the Periodic Table and has many roles in biology and human health. For example, table salt (NaCl or Sodium Chloride) is an essential nutrient for all animals and many plants. It is impossible to “ban” NaCl.
He pointed out that adding chlorine to drinking water, swimming pools, and spas was one of the most significant advances in public health history in preventing the spread of water-borne communicable diseases such as cholera. And about 85 percent of pharmaceutical drugs are made with chlorine-related chemistry, and about 25 percent of all our medicines contain chlorine. All halogens, including chlorine, bromine, and iodine, are powerful antibiotics; without them, medicine would not be the same.
“Greenpeace named chlorine ‘The Devil’s Element’ and calls PVC, polyvinyl chloride, or simply vinyl, ‘the Poison Plastic.’ All of this is fake [and] to scare the public. In addition, this misguided policy reinforces the attitude that humans are not a worthy species and that the world would be better off without them. I could not convince my fellow Greenpeace directors to abandon this misguided policy. This was the turning point for me,” Moore said.
False Narrative on Polar Bears
When asked how Greenpeace utilizes its massive donations, Moore said it was used to pay for “a very large staff” (likely over 2,000), extensive advertisements, and fundraising programs. And virtually all of the organization’s ads for fundraising are based on false narratives, which he had thoroughly disproven in his books, one example being the polar bears.
“The International Treaty on Polar Bears, signed by all polar countries in 1973, to ban unrestricted hunting of polar bears, is never mentioned in the media, Greenpeace, or politicians who say the polar bear is going extinct due to melting ice in the Arctic. In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said.
“But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years.”
Moore said that he does not pretend to know everything and predict the future with confidence like many in the “climate emergency” business claim they can do. The Goal of the ‘Environmental Apocalypse’ Theory
“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said.
“The Aztecs threw virgins into volcanos, and the Europeans and Americans burned women as witches for 200 years claiming this would ‘save the world’ from evil people. This has been [referred to as] ‘herd mentality,’ ‘groupthink,’ and ‘cult behavior.’ Humans are social animals with a hierarchy, and it is easiest to gain a high position by using fear and control.”
Moore said the environmental apocalypse theory is mostly about “political power and control,” adding that he is dedicated to showing people that the situation is not as negative as they are told.
“Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?”
“People are naturally afraid of the future because it is unknown and full of risks and difficult decisions. I believe there is also an element of ‘self-loathing’ in this apocalypse movement.”
Moore said the young generation today are taught that humans are not worthy and are destroying the earth. This indoctrination has made them feel guilty and ashamed of themselves, which is the wrong way to go about life.
The Demonization of Carbon Dioxide
“Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today, and the sea level was 1–2 meters higher than today,” Moore said.
“Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.”
Moore clarified that the “minority opinion” is not about the history of the Earth’s temperature, but it is the relationship between the temperature and CO2 that is at the center of the dispute.
“In this regard, I agree that many believe CO2 is the main cause of warming. CO2 is invisible, so no one can actually see what it is doing. And this ‘majority’ are mainly scientists paid by politicians and bureaucrats, media making headlines, or activists making money. [The rest are] the public who believe this story even though they can’t actually see what CO2 is doing,” Moore said.
Moore provided a graph of temperature continuously measured over 350 years (from 1659 to 2009) in central England. “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t,” he explained.
1659–2009 Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Central England
Moore described the demonization of CO2 as “completely ridiculous.” He added that CO2 is the basis of all life on Earth and its concentration in the atmosphere today, even with the increase, is lower than it has been for a large majority of life’s existence.
Rising CO2 Correlates With Increased Plantation: Study
A study in 2013 found that increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have helped boost green foliage across the world’s arid regions over the past 30 years.
The Australian government agency CSIRO conducted the research in collaboration with Australian National University (ANU). The data was based on satellite observations from the year 1982 to 2010 across parts of the arid areas in Australia, North America, the Middle East, and Africa.
It found an 11 percent increase in foliage cover in the studied area due to what’s called “CO2 fertilization.”
The study said a fertilization effect occurs when elevated CO2 levels enable a leaf during photosynthesis—the process by which green plants convert sunlight into sugar—to extract more carbon from the air or lose less water to the air or both.
“If elevated CO2 causes the water use of individual leaves to drop, plants in arid environments will respond by increasing their total numbers of leaves. These changes in leaf cover can be detected by satellite, particularly in deserts and savannas where the cover is less complete than in wet locations,” according to Randall Donohue, the CSIRO research scientist.
Breaking the Global Warming Narrative
“Climate alarmists prefer to discuss climate knowledge only since 1850. The time before this they referred to as the pre-industrial age. This ‘pre-industrial age’ was more than 3 billion years when life was on the Earth. Many climate changes [occurred during that period], including Ice Ages, Hothouse Ages, major extinctions due to asteroid impacts, and other unknown causes,” Moore said.
“Today, the Earth is in the Pleistocene Ice Age, which began 2.6 million years ago. … So, the most recent major glaciation, which peaked 20,000 years ago, was not the end of the Ice Age. We are still in the Pleistocene Ice Age no matter how the climate alarmists wish to deny this.”
He said the great irony of the present panic about the climate is that the Earth is colder today than it was for 250 million years before the Pleistocene Ice Age set in. And CO2 is lower now than in more than 95 percent of Earth’s history.
“But you would never know this if you listen to all the people who benefit from the lie that the Earth will soon be too hot for life and that CO2 will become higher than in Earth’s history,” Moore said. ‘More CO2 Is Beneficial to the Environment and Humans’
According to Moore, nearly all commercial greenhouse farmers worldwide buy CO2 to inject into their greenhouses to realize up to 60 percent higher crop yields.
“I was impressed when flying over South Korea [and seeing] how many greenhouses there are in the valleys. Like British Columbia, Korea has a lot of mountains and not so much flat fertile farmland.
“I am sure the greenhouse farmers are putting more CO2 in their greenhouses, up to double and triple what it is in the atmosphere today. This is because nearly all plants growing outside in the natural atmosphere are starved for CO2, and it is what limits them from growing faster,” Moore added.
“Please refer to the chapter titled ‘Climate of Fear and Guilt’ in my book, [Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom], if you wish to gain a full understanding of these facts,” he said.
Moore said that most environmental activists, politicians, and so-called experts know that we cannot stop increasing the use of fossil fuels or reducing CO2 emissions within their proposed schedule.
“In 2015, while attending the COP (Conference of the Parties) in Paris, I offered a public bet for $100,000 in a broadcast media release which went out on more than 200 media feeds, that by 2025 global CO2 emissions would be higher than in 2015. I did not receive one taker, not even from the ‘greens,’” Moore said.
“I know that more CO2 is entirely beneficial to both the environment and human civilization. I am proud to be a director of the CO2 Coalition.”
The Irony of ‘Carbon Neutrality’
Moore said “carbon neutrality” is a political term, not a scientific one.
“It is simply wrong to call CO2 ‘carbon.’ Carbon is an element that is what diamonds, graphite, and carbon black (soot) are composed of. [And] CO2 is a molecule that contains carbon and oxygen and is an invisible gas that is the primary food for all life. [Likewise], it is incorrect to refer to NaCl (table salt) as ‘chlorine,’ even though NaCl contains chlorine,” Moore said.
“He said when elements (atoms) combine with each other to form compounds (molecules), they always have very different properties than the elements they are made from.
“‘Net-Zero’ is also a political term made-up by activists who are not scientists. For example, the top leaders of this crusade are people like Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Greta Thunberg, none of whom are scientists.”
According to Moore, Russia, China, and India are 40 percent of the human population, and they do not agree with this anti-fossil fuel agenda.
“If we add Brazil, Indonesia, and most African countries, it is a majority of the population who are not climate fanatics,” Moore added.
“Another great irony is that many countries with the coldest climates, such as Canada, Sweden, Germany, and the UK, are the most concerned about warming. For example, the average annual temperature in Canada is -5.35 degrees Celsius.”
Moore also said that fumes from engines are not CO2; they are other substances, as CO2 is invisible and odorless. Dust is also not CO2; it is soot and can be controlled with present technology. And coal plants built today are much cleaner than ones built 20 years ago.
‘Wind and Solar Power Are Parasites on the Economy’
“Solar and wind power are both very expensive and very unreliable. It is almost like a mental illness that so many people have been brainwashed to think entire countries can be supported with these technologies,” Moore said.
“I believe wind and solar energy are parasites on the larger economy. In other words, they make the country poorer than if other more reliable and less costly technologies were used.”
Moore said that wind and solar providers rely heavily on government subsidies, tax write-offs, and mandates, where citizens are forced to buy wind and solar power even if it is more expensive, on the pretext that it is “environmentally friendly.”
“Millions of people pay more for wind and solar energy while a few people make millions of dollars, marks, pounds, etc. It is a bit like a Ponzi scheme in the stock markets,” Moore added.
“They require vast areas of land, are not available most of the time, and require reliable energy such as nuclear, hydroelectric, [coal, and natural] gas to be available when wind and solar are unavailable.”
According to Moore, the construction of wind and solar farms uses vast amounts of fossil fuels for mining, transportation, and construction. And in many locations, they don’t produce nearly enough energy in their lifetimes as is required to build and maintain them.
“Why not use reliable energy [such as nuclear, hydroelectricity, natural gas, etc.] as the primary source?” Moore questioned, adding if that were the case, “then wind and solar would be unnecessary.”
‘Plastic Is Not a Toxic Substance’
“Plastic is not a toxic substance. That is why we package and wrap our food in it, to prevent it from becoming contaminated. Plastic does not magically become toxic when it enters the ocean,” Moore said.
“Of course, they say on one hand that plastic will never break down, and then, on the other hand, they say it will quickly decay into “microplastics,” which, of course, are conveniently invisible so no one can observe or verify this for themselves. How clever!”
According to Moore, our digestive system can tell the difference between “food” and plastic or tiny particles of sand. Our body does not ingest sand into our bloodstream, no matter how microscopic the sand is.
He said plastic floating in the ocean is like a tiny floating reef, the same as driftwood. It provides a surface for marine species to lay their eggs on, attach themselves to, and eat things that are attached to it.
“Pollution is usually toxic or causes harm to life. Plastic is simply ‘litter’ beside the road. It is not hurting anything. One exception is discarded fishing nets, not because they are plastic but because they are shaped to catch fish. The environmental community should work with the fishing industry to stop throwing damaged nets in the sea and bring them back to the dock, where they can be recycled, used in a waste-to-energy plant, or discarded safely,” Moore added.
This interview is a compilation of an email exchange between Moore and South Korean Professor Seok-soon Park, professor of environmental engineering at Ehwa Womans University in Seoul, South Korea, from November–December 2021. It was provided to The Epoch Times by Park with the permission of Moore on July 7, 2022.
Both he and Moore are among the 1,100 scientists and professionals that signed the World Climate Declaration (WCD) stating that there’s no climate emergency.
Professor Seok-soon Park was the first Korean to receive master’s and doctorate degrees in environmental science from Rutgers University in the United States.
He returned to South Korea in 1988 to work at the Korea Science Foundation.
He served as the head of the National Institute of Environmental Sciences, the president of the Korea Society for Environmental Education, the presidential science and technology advisor, and the presidential green growth committee.
He has published more than 20 books and contributed 150 papers to domestic and foreign journals and 180 environmental columns to Korean newspapers and specialized journals.
Park has refused to participate in environmental movements that exaggerate the risks of global warming and oppose development unconditionally.
He founded the Korea Free Environment Federation, which aims to protect environmental rights, reveal the truth about climate change, and help advance the country’s economy.
Dear Gov. Newsome and all virtue signaling EV tyrants…
Excerpt from abstract:
“Future scenarios of the Spanish electricity grid confirm that a massive introduction of renewable energies would lead to a 19.26% and 27.41% decrease of CO2-eq emissions in 2030 and 2050, respectively. Nevertheless, current and future energy scenario predictions show that electric vehicles will produce an increase in fine particulate matter formation (26%), human carcinogenic (20%) and non-carcinogenic toxicity (61%), terrestrial ecotoxicity (31%), freshwater ecotoxicity (39%), and marine ecotoxicity (41%) relative to petrol vehicles. Transfer of environmental burdens from the use phase to the raw materials extraction and manufacturing phases entails a delocalisation of the impacts, which constitutes a new challenge at environmental, social, and legal levels. This study is the first comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of passenger vehicles in Spain from a cradle-to-grave perspective, considering different impact categories and time scopes.”
Bud’s comment: The only thing harmful thing about water vapor and CO2 (the major greenhouse gases) is the people promoting the global warming /climate change fraud.
Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional, electric and hybrid passenger vehicles in Spain
“Those who know me are aware that I don’t believe anything until I run the numbers myself. I kept hearing that President Trump’s tax plan rewarded the rich and punished the middle class and the poor … turns out that’s a Democrat lie. Here’s the truth.” – Willis Eschenbach @WEschenbach. He publishes the blog What’s Up With That. https://wattsupwiththat.com/
Pierre Poilievre, MP, Conservative candidate for Prime Minister of Canada announced, “I will ban all my ministers from any involvement in the World Economic Forum (WEF)” should he become Prime Minister of Canada.
Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper of the Conservative Party has endorsed Pierre Poilievre. Mr. Poilievre served as Minister of State for Democratic Reform and Minister of Employment and Social Development under Harper.
HELLO to America’s GOP, floundering without a platform, Pierre Poilievre has a good idea!