Cell-based assay, 2005: “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.”

“Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.”

“Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.”

Martin J Vincent 1 , Eric Bergeron, Suzanne Benjannet, Bobbie R Erickson, Pierre E Rollin, Thomas G Ksiazek, Nabil G Seidah, Stuart T Nichol

  1. Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. mvincent@cdc.gov

• PMID: 16115318

• PMCID: PMC1232869

• DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69




Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Debunking the COVID-19 narrative

Prof. Dr Dolores Cahill is a world-wide renowned expert in high-throughput proteomics technology development and automation, high content protein arrays and their biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery and diagnostics.
Prof. Cahill pioneered this research area at the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany, and holds several international patents in this field with research, biomedicine and diagnostic applications.
o Over 20 years expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, automation, proteomics technology development & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalised medicine.
o Since 2005 to present, Full Professor of Translational Science, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Academic, Researcher, Lecturer, Module Coordinator in Pathology Teaching, School of Medicine & Conway Institute
o 15 years as Irish, EU & international expert & advisor including Seconded National Expert to European Commission
o Company Co-founder & Shareholder (1997-2019) of Protagen AG in Germany (https://protagen.com/). Protagen Protein Services (2012-2019) contract services to healthcare sector & pharmaceutical industry (https://protagenproteinservices.com/).
o Since 2016, co-founding shareholder and Advisory Board member of Prof. Stephen Pennington’s UCD School of Medicine/Conway Institute spin-out company, Atturos Ltd. working to improve Prostate Cancer diagnosis (http://atturos.com/ and http://atturos.com/company/advisors/).
o Prof. Cahill has a total of over 5940 Citations, H (Hirsh)-index of 35, i10-index of 48.
o Project management: Has successfully obtained and project managed as Principal Investigator eight EU Programme funding grants from FP4, FP5, FP6, FP7 and Horizon 2020, Science Foundation Ireland, Enterprise Ireland, Health Research Board funding in companies and universities. Her full scientific bio and publications are here: https://people.ucd.ie/dolores.cahill

Dolores has been a member of the Advisory Science Council to the Irish government and a member of the International Science Advisory Board. Dolores is passionate about national sovereignty and Ireland maintaining a credible position of neutrality. In her first ever election contest in the European Elections last year, Dolores finished as the best performing Independent in the Ireland South constituency.



Hat tip to Philip Mulholland.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law


  • Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

    The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.


Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Open Memorandun To: Barack Hussein Obama From: Sidney Powell


To: Barack Hussein Obama
From: Sidney Powell

Date: May 13, 2020

Re: Your Failure to Find Precedent for Flynn Dismissal

Regarding the decision of the Department of Justice to dismiss charges against General Flynn, in your recent call with your alumni, you expressed great concern: “there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk.”

Here is some help—if truth and precedent represent your true concern. Your statement is entirely false. However, it does explain the damage to the Rule of Law throughout your administration.

First, General Flynn was not charged with perjury—which requires a material false statement made under oath with intent to deceive. 1 A perjury prosecution would have been appropriate and the Rule of Law applied if the Justice Department prosecuted your former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for his multiple lies under oath in an investigation of a leak only he knew he caused.

McCabe lied under oath in fully recorded and transcribed interviews with the Inspector General for the DOJ. He was informed of the purpose of the interview, and he had had the benefit of counsel. He knew he was the leaker. McCabe even lied about lying. He lied to his own agents—which sent them on a “wild-goose-chase”—thereby making his lies “material” and an obstruction of justice. Yet, remarkably, Attorney General Barr declined to prosecute McCabe for these offenses.

Applying the Rule of Law, after declining McCabe’s perjury prosecution, required the Justice Department to dismiss the prosecution of General Flynn who was not warned, not under oath, had no counsel, and whose statements were not only not recorded, but were created as false by FBI agents who falsified the 302.

Second, it would seem your “wingman” Eric Holder is missing a step these days at Covington & Burling LLP. Indelibly marked in his memory (and one might think, yours) should be his Motion to Dismiss the multi-count jury verdict of guilty and the entire case against former United States Senator Ted Stevens. Within weeks of Mr. Holder becoming Attorney General, he moved to dismiss the Stevens prosecution in the interest of justice for the same reasons the Justice Department did against General Flynn—egregious misconduct by prosecutors who hid exculpatory evidence and concocted purported crimes.

As horrifying as the facts of the Stevens case were, they pale in comparison to the targeted setup, framing, and prosecution of a newly elected President’s National Security Advisor and the shocking facts that surround it. This case was an assault on the heart of liberty— our cherished system of self-government, the right of citizens to choose their President, and the hallowed peaceful transition of power.

Third, the inability of anyone in your alumni association to find “anybody who has been charged [with anything] just getting off scot-free” would be laughable were it not so pathetic.

Many of your alum are featured prominently in the non-fiction legal thriller published in 2014: Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. A national best- seller, it focusses on the egregious prosecutorial misconduct of your longest serving White House Counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler; your counter-terrorism advisor Lisa Monaco; Loretta Lynch’s DAG for the Criminal Division Leslie Caldwell; and Mueller protégé Andrew Weissmann. While they worked as federal prosecutors on the Enron Task Force—under the purported supervision of Christopher Wray—they destroyed Arthur Andersen LLP and its 85,000 jobs; sent four Merrill Lynch executives to prison on an indictment that criminalized an innocent business transaction while they hid the evidence that showed those defendants were innocent for six years. Both cases were reversed on appeal for their over-criminalization and misconduct. Indeed, Andersen was reversed by a unanimous Supreme Court.

Fourth, even if your many alumni don’t remember multiple cases that had to be reversed or dismissed for their own misconduct, Judge Emmet Sullivan should remember dismissing the corrupted case against Ted Stevens. Judge Sullivan is the judicial hero of Licensed to Lie. It is that case that caused Judge Sullivan to enter the strong Brady order the Mueller and D.C. career prosecutors violated repeatedly in the Flynn prosecution.

Fifth, there is precedent for guilty pleas being vacated. Your alumni Weissmann and Ruemmler are no strangers to such reversals. At least two guilty pleas they coerced by threats against defendants in Houston had to be thrown out—again for reasons like those here. The defendants “got off scot-free” because—like General Flynn—your alumni had concocted the charges and terrorized the defendants into pleading guilty to “offenses” that were not crimes. Andersen partner David Duncan even testified for the government against Andersen in its trial, but his plea had to be vacated. Enron Broadband defendant Christopher Calger had his plea vacated. There are many others across the country.

Sixth, should further edification be necessary, see Why Innocent People Plead Guilty, written in 2014 by federal Judge Jed Rakoff (a Clinton appointee). Abusive prosecutors force innocent people to plead guilty with painful frequency. The Mueller special counsel operation led by Andrew Weissmann and Weissmann “wannabes” specializes in prosecutorial terrorist tactics repulsive to everything “justice” is supposed to mean. These tactics are designed to intimidate their targets into pleading guilty—while punishing them and their families with the process itself and financial ruin.

Most important, General Flynn was honest with the FBI agents. They knew he was—and briefed that to McCabe and others three different times. At McCabe’s directions, Agent Strzok and McCabe’s “Special Counsel” Lisa Page, altered the 302 to create statements Weissmann, Mueller, Van Grack, and Zainab Ahmad could assert were false. Only the FBI agents lied—and falsified documents. The crimes are theirs alone.

Seventh, the D.C. circuit in which you reside vacated a Section 1001 case for a legal failure much less egregious than those in General Flynn’s case. United States v. Safavian, 528 F.3d 957 (D.C. Cir. 2008). Safavian sought advice from his agency’s ethics board and did not give them all the relevant info. The jury convicted him on the theory it was a 1001 violation to conceal the information from the government ethics board. The court disagreed: “As Safavian argues and as the government agrees, there must be a legal duty to disclose in order for there to be a concealment offense in violation of § 1001(a)(1), yet the government failed to identify a legal disclosure duty except by reference to vague standards of conduct for government employees.” General Flynn did not even know he was the subject of an investigation—and in truth, he was not. The only crimes here were by your alumni in the FBI, White House, intelligence community, and Justice Department.

These are just a few obvious and well-known examples to those paying any attention to criminal justice issues.

Finally, the “leaked” comments from your alumni call further evinces your obsession with destroying a distinguished veteran of the United States Army who has defended the Constitution and this country “from all enemies, foreign and domestic,” with the highest honor for thirty-three years. He and many others will continue to do so.


1 As a “constitutional lawyer,” surely you recall that perjury (or false statements) also requires intent to deceive. In Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973), the Supreme Court reversed a conviction of perjury. In Bronston, the defendant’s answer was a truthful statement, but not directly responsive to the question and ultimately misled federal authorities. The Court determined: “A jury should not be permitted to engage in conjecture whether an unresponsive answer, true and complete on its face, was intended to mislead or divert the examiner; the state of mind of the witness is relevant only to the extent that it bears on whether “he does not believe [his answer] to be true.” To hold otherwise would be to inject a new and confusing element into the adversary testimonial system we know.” Id. at 359. The FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn specifically noted that his answers were true or he believed his answers to be true—completely defeating criminal intent. Furthermore, General Flynn knew and remarked they had transcripts of his conversations.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The architecture of oppression

#Obamagate is all high crimes and no misdemeanors., by Sabastian Gorka.


Maxine Waters on Obama’s database.  A data gathering infrastructure created for future use so powerful and all encompassing that it will ensnare “every individual.”

Here’s aunt Maxine from 2013… https://youtu.be/1vbTugrr2Ag

“What is being built is the architecture of oppression…” ~ Edward Snowden.  April, 2020.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Citizen, step into this cattle car, we will take you to a safer place.


“Collectivists will burn down the house, your house, destroy the economy, your job or business, under any pretext that works, to then offer you a homeless shelter built and run by cronies getting paid by your tax dollars. They will then tell you how you can live, with whom you can live, what you can eat, how you eat it, what you can say, and so forth, paid for by your tax dollars. Then, if you push back against their self-defined ‘greater good’, they vilify you as a hater, a racist, or any kind of label of the moment that sticks. You are a hater! How could you be so selfish? While you are destroyed and lie dying in the ditch, they celebrate their goodness and virtue. This, is evil collectivism that will easily load anyone who doesn’t see their goodness and superiority and go along with their insane evil onto cattle cars of genocide and democide. Carry on, serfs. What will you let them burn down and destroy next?” — DM Chaney “Thoughts on Liberty

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The 4th Amendment? Will Trump bring it back?

Sometimes information is revealed which the government and globalist oligarchy want to keep out of the press. This is one of those things. Read the short local news article at this link first. Then read the rest of this post.


When you connect a cell phone to a phone service provider, by law, the provider must have in person identification of the owner of that phone and linked that to the unique MAC address for that piece of hardware. This is done so they can track the phone, which usually means track the user since most people carry their phones with them. This is one reason it is so easy to transfer your phone number from one cell phone to another; the phone provider does not have to re-identify you in person. (Isn’t is amazing how the technocracy works so efficiently when they want it to?)

However, if you recall when you first got that cell phone number, they took your photo. Disclosure of this system is the reason Edward Snowden and his wife were exiled in Russia. Since Trump and his team are a victim of abuse of this system, will he act to fix it?  Will the Supreme Court find some balls, do its duty?

Today, the government is tracking compliance with its Covid-19 lockdown by requiring cell phone companies to report cell phone locations and movements during the lockdown. But as the coup against Trump and America unwinds, we see how the government uses its massive intel operation to control people, not only Americans but worldwide.  Germany’s Chancellor Merkel was also a victim.

They don’t just know your cell phone number and its location and have your photo, in fact they are storing every electronic communication you make with anyone or anything, forever.  All of your financial records, communications with your lawyers, with your family tax records, emails, social media, everything.  The coup against Trump and General Flynn reveal how they use this massive intel system against people, even when the person has done nothing wrong and has nothing to hide.  In combination with the use of force under color of authority, this is truly how governments (not only the U.S. government) maintain control.

ALL of the information about your life is connected together in a giant database run by the NSA and stored permanently, searchable, and hackable. Theoretically it is “masked” and you cannot be identified without a court order, or so they want you to believe. But, everyone should have learned already – during this coup against candidate and President Trump and members of his campaign and transition team- that unmasking can be done by anyone – for example Susan Rice – who has the right security clearance.  They can unmask anyone and any record from anyone you have contacted…and use that information to destroy you, to destroy political proponents, to coerce you to act against your own interest, as they have tried to do with President Trump, General Flynn, and several others in the Trump campaign and administration. Trump, Flynn, Stone, etc are the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Entrapment and framing are the game of governments worldwide.

Here is Edward Snowden’s first video with Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, whistleblowing on the abuse of this system.  12 minutes.  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance

Your innocence is irrelevant.  If they will go after a POTUS and his intended National Security Advisor with no legal predicate, no crime, imagine what they can do to anyone standing in their way.  Most people do not have the huge amount of money necessary to defend themselves from their government.

The government has been trampling and destroying 4th amendment rights since shortly after 9-11-2001.  Congress has re-authorized the Patriot Act and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and other nefarious laws from one year and administration to the next.  Government does not want public attention on this direct infringement of the Bill of Rights.  We have warrantless wiretapping, bulk surveillance on everyone all of the time, on everyone worldwide. This began under President George W Bush shortly after 9-11-2001 and accelerated under President Obama.  It is unknown if President Trump will do anything to stop it, even though he was a victim of it and could again be victimized by it after he leaves office.  Of course governments have excuses about why this is necessary, you know the old story of drug cartels, money laundering, terrorism, racism, etc.

And governments have given telecom and internet companies legal immunity to enable them to share your information with the government.  And in return governments share your information with them “masked” and theoretically only meta-information, which is the timeline of your life.  Citizens have no recourse, no redress, no remedy.

When governments want to do something that is clearly illegal, they merely contract with a prime contractor who contracts with a subcontractor.  In fact, that is how this nefarious spy system was built.

All of the information about Hillary and Bill and their corrupt foundation, and Adam Schiff, Biden, Soros, Pelosi , Weinstein, Epstein, drug dealers, pedophiles, bankers, inside traders, Hollywood deviants etc all of their information is already in the NSA database. Pay attention to who is NOT unmasked, and ask why not? This system is the leverage used to force compliance with the globalist agenda. This is Big Brother.

Maxine Waters probably made deep state intel squirm in this short video: https://youtu.be/KGgZ5M6KMt8

And now there is an entire generation addicted since before they could read to nearly constant communication with Big Brother and they have no expectation of privacy or what that should mean to them.

Big Brother has us.  Can we break free?

The jury is still out.


U.S. Intelligence State Unmasked  https://aim4truth.org/2017/05/27/the-u-s-surveillance-state-unmasked/comment-page-3/

Permanent Record, by Edward Snowden.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“It was all lies, literally all of it.”

Unfortunately for citizens, it is not a crime for Congress persons, politicians or mainstream media to lie to the public. They can get on their soapbox in the public media square and say or write anything except liable and slander, and even liable and slander are legally accepted between and about politicians. Politicians in Congress legalized their lying. In their hoax, it is not perjury (a lie) unless they are under oath.

On the other hand, it is a crime in most cases for citizens to lie to the government. It is not Tucker lying in this article. He is reporting that the government was lying to the people in the fake impeachment, the fake Mueller investigation, the fake Russia investigation, the fake Flynn investigation, the fake Stone investigation, and so on, and mainstream media was lying to support the government’s spin and agenda.

Hat tip to Harris Hall and David Chaney.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

To wear a mask or not?

WHO: No evidence wearing a mask can protect healthy people from coronavirus

The World Health Organization (WHO) said masks should only be worn by health care workers and those who are infected.


Joseph Guzman
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why lockdown is worse than COVID-19

World-renowned epidemiologist Dr. Knut Wittkowski and urgent-care physician Dr. Daniel Erickson discuss the science behind pandemics, why the lockdown is worse than the COVID-19 virus, and why it’s time to reopen America.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment