Don’t follow the EU into oblivion.

“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” ~ Voltaire, French philosopher, Enlightenment writer, historian

French President Macron tightens state control of news media. German Chancellor Merkel calls for countries to hand over sovereignty to the increasingly powerful, anti-democratic EU Superstate. Merkel and her baby bear Macron want the EU to have an a military to defend against Russia, China and America.  Europe gets scarier by the day. Why do U.S. Democrats and RINOs want to follow this insanity of global elites into oblivion?

Power and money.  Social status and class, based on fealty and homage to unelected feudal lords.  That is how most of the world operates, except the United States.  And the elites and powerful in the U.S. today are pushing mightily with big bucks and media power for America to follow the EU.

And lastly, they have no ideas of their own.  They are stuck on Karl Marx and his college thesis from the mid-1800s, ignoring the one hundred million dead as a result of that disfunctional thesis.

There is never an explanation why America would want to follow these EU fools into their abyss. But there are good and valid reasons Americans left European feudalism and class-based societies.  These reasons are adequately expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, which, thank God, are still law in America.

Frau Merkel told the event, titled ‘Parliamentarianism Between Globalisation and National Sovereignty’: “In this day nation states must today – should today, I say – be ready to give up sovereignty.  But of course in an orderly procedure.” (Could she be more teutonic?)  Ma’am, at what point in your orderly procedure will private property be taken from EU subjects?

To hell with all that, Frau Merkel, give me liberty or give me death.

Frau Merkel2

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Identity Politics & The Marxist Lie of White Privilege | Dr. Jordan B. Peterson |

Excellent video interview with Dr. Jordan Peterson

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Marxism? Progressive? Social justice?

Got a teacher, student, lecturer, friend, family member who still praises Marxism in any of its deadly forms?

Send them Jordan Peterson’s preface to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago:

Why is it still acceptable to regard the Marxist doctrine as essentially accurate in its diagnosis of the ­hypothetical evils of the free-­market, democratic West; to still consider that doctrine “progressive” and fit for the compassionate and proper thinking person? Twenty-five million dead through internal repression in the Soviet Union (according to The Black Book of Communism). Sixty million dead in Mao’s China (and an all-too-likely return to autocratic oppression in that country in the near future). The horrors of Cambodia’s killing fields, with their two million corpses. The barely animate body politic of Cuba, where people struggle even now to feed themselves. Venezuela, where it has now been made illegal to attribute a child’s death in hospital to starvation. No political ­experi­ment has ever been tried so widely, with so many disparate people, in so many different countries (with such different histories) and failed so absolutely and so catastrophically.

Read it all.

And then read Solzhenitsyn’s absolutely brilliant book, which explains exactly why Marxism fails and exactly how the horror of the Soviet Union unfolded. All told by someone who saw it up close – and paid a terrible price.

Herald Sun of Australia


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Earth’s atmosphere is cooling

Earth’s upper atmosphere cooling off dramatically and cosmic rays continue to increase as deep solar minimum approaches.
Article by Paul Dorian, Perspecta, Inc, Nov 5, 2018 [H/t GWPF]
Thermosphere Climate Index
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US Fourth National [Climate] Assessment

Here is another critique of the US Fourth National [Climate] Assessment. This critique is by (Science and Environmental Policy Project), a non-profit started by S. Fred Singer, one of the founders of the U.S. satellite networks. This critique is written by SEPP’s president Ken Haapala. Ken lays on a lot of well-deserved sarcasm.


The US Fourth National Assessment: [link below] During the US government transition to the Trump administration the U.S. Global Change Research Program (US GCRP) released a report Called the Climate Science Special Report. Formed in 1989, according to its web site the USGCRP is mandated by Congress in the Global Change Research Act (GCRA) of 1990 to “assist the Nation and the world to understand, assess, predict, and respond to human – induced and natural processes of global change.”

At the time the Climate Science Special Report was released, there was no head of the Office of Science and Technology Policy or scientific advisor to President Trump, and
his nomination of meteorologist Kelvin Droegemeier to the post has yet to be confirmed. Thus, the report was signed off by a bureaucratic scientist, without any accountability.
The report claims to be “an authoritative assessment of the science of climate change, with a focus on the United States.” For some reason the authors of the report do not realize that in reporting “to understand, assess, predict, and respond to human-induced and natural processes of global change” natural climate change exists. Maybe they do not realize that natural variation such as ice ages may be a part of global change.

USGCRP Prophecies: On November 23, the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) released the second volume of its two part series on human caused global warming. The first volume. The “Climate Science Special Report (CSSR)” supposedly discussed the physical science but was largely confined to projections from poorly tested global climate models and physical events unrelated to increasing carbon dioxide. The current release came in time for the upcoming 24th Conference of Parties (COP-24) of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Katowice Poland. ( Announcement of the UN climate conference)

According to official announcements, this conference will additionally include “the 14th session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP) and the third part of the first session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA1-3)” – international bureaucratic science at its best. Unlike the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which supposedly provides scientific guidance on human caused variations to climate, the USGCRP is obligated to provide scientific guidance on both human – caused and natural climate change. The USGCRP has conveniently forgotten the part concerning natural climate change. In the current report, the USGCRP avoids discussing nature and the need to substantiate its claims with physical evidence by stating: “However, the assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”

Overview Chapter 1 p.1.

History is to be forgotten. In short, physical evidence cannot contradict USGCRP projections / predictions. The USGCRP created an illusory climate using complex climate models without a physical basis. As such, the entire 1100 – page report can be viewed as an assembly of prophecies that may or may not occur in the next 25 to 100 years – no contradictory evidence needed. Only the evidence presented in the USGCRP report is valid. This attitude reflects the status of science in the parts of the 13 federal government agencies that participated in the report: Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Health & Human Services, Interior, State, Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Aeronautics & Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Smithsonian Institution and U.S. Agency for International Development. Hopefully, the entire agencies will not base policies on long-term prophecies from poorly tested models. For example, the Department of Defense needs to defend the country against real threats, not imaginary ones. According to the report, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), part of the Department of Commerce, is responsible for the organization and administration of the report. Perhaps the claims without hard evidence to support them should not be a surprise. For some years, NOAA has been prophesizing sea level rise far beyond anything that can be concluded from actual measurements, to include that sea levels will rise exponentially (ever more rapidly). Who said bureaucrats don’t have imagination?

Ironically, immediately prior to the new release, the Northeast US experienced, perhaps, the coldest Thanksgiving in 100 years.

[Bud edited out several paragraphs for brevity. Let me know if you want the entire article.) Continuing with Haapala critique…]

Humanity evolved in the tropics about 200,000 years ago during periods of extreme climate change. The current warm period, the Holocene Epoch, started about 11,700 years ago.

According to the International Commission on Stratigraphy, the earth has experienced three periods of climate change since emerging from the depths of the last Ice Age into the Holocene Epoch.

Agriculture began during the Greenlanddian Age, the warmest time of the Holocene Epoch. Civilization began during Northgrippian Age, warmer than today, about 8200 to 4200 years ago.

During the subsequent cooling about 4200 years ago, humanity suffered and cultures disappeared. These changes appear to be unrelated to carbon dioxide (CO2). Yet the USGCRP declares that climate has been stable for 12,000 years and humanity is threatened by global warming from CO2?

The Fourth National Climate Assessment offers no hard evidence, just vague assertions and claims that past climate change is no evidence about future climate change. It earns the distinction that it does not meet the standards of the Information Quality Act, and each page should be stamped: “Based on speculation, not hard evidence.”

Fourth National Climate Assessment: Volume II: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States
The National Climate Assessment (NCA) assesses the science of climate change and variability and its impacts across the United States, now and throughout this century.
By Multiple Writers, U.S. Global Change Research Program, 2018


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Islam is not a religion of peace

“Shariah is the crucial fault line of Islam’s internecine struggle. On one side of the divide are Muslim reformers and authentic moderates – figures like Abdurrahman Wahid, the late president of Indonesia and leader of the world’s largest libertarian Muslim organization, Nahdlatul Ulama – whose members espouse the Enlightenment’s embrace of reason and, in particular, its separation of the spiritual and secular realms. On this side of the divide, shariah is a reference point for a Muslim’s personal conduct, not a corpus to be imposed on the life of a pluralistic society.”

“By contrast, the other side of the divide is dominated by Muslim supremacists, often called Islamists. Like erstwhile proponents of Communism and Nazism, these supremacists – some terrorists, others employing stealthier means – seek to impose a totalitarian regime: a global totalitarian system cloaked as an Islamic State and called a caliphate. On that side of the divide, which is the focus of the present study, shariah is an immutable, compulsory system that Muslims are obliged to install and the world required to adopt, the failure to do so being deemed a damnable offence against Allah. For these ideologues, shariah is not a private matter. Adherents see the West as an obstacle to be overcome, not a culture and civilization to be embraced, or at least tolerated. It is impossible, they maintain, for alternative legal systems and forms of governments peacefully to coexist with the end-state they seek.”

“Shariah is Anti-constitutional”

“If we are to face down shariah, we must understand what we are up against, not simply hope that dialogue and “engagement” will make the challenge go away. Those who today support shariah and the establishment of a global Islamic state (caliphate) are perforce supporting objectives that are incompatible with the U.S. Constitution, the civil rights the Constitution guarantees and the representative, accountable government it authorizes. In fact, shariah’s pursuit in the United States is tantamount to sedition.”

“Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as “dawa” (the “call to Islam”), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:

  1. the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;
  2. the republican democracy governed by the Constitution;
  3. freedom of conscience; individual liberty (including in matters of personal privacy and sexual preference);
  4. freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);
  5. economic liberty (including private property);
  6. equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);
  7. freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate “resistance”); and
  8. an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of federalism and democracy, not wanton violence.”

“The subversion campaign known as Civilization Jihad must not be confused with, or tolerated as a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework. In fact, we get this concept of “civilization jihad” from, among other sources, a document that was entered into evidence in the 2008 United States v Holy Land Foundation terrorist finance trial titled the An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group (3)”

 ~ from the Introduction by Andrew C. McCarthy, Harry E. Soyster and R. James Woolsey to “Shariah -The Threat to America Team B Report.”
Full report available here: 
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


I tracked terror events claimed by muslims in the months following 9/11/2001. I built a spreadsheet to hold the details.

I can sort the details.

Muslims were killing eight of their brothers and sisters for each infidel they killed.

Another year or two and I will not able to speak or write this truth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Islam is not love

Peace is waged by making love. Love is hardly mentioned in any translation of Islam’s holy books.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sharia via UN

“This UN Migration Compact is an attempt to make hijra (Islamic migration) a human right, while at the same time undermining a nation’s sovereignty.
All Western nations should withdraw unless their goal is to establish Sharia.
If not resisted by legal means, it is the way to gradually annihilate the non-Islamic host culture and replace it with an Islamic civilisation.
The seeds of this UN Compact were planted back in the 70’s when the Economic European Community (which later became the European Union) and the Arab League established their vision for “Eurabia”.
Please read this short one-page explanation of the United Nations Human Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) Compact for Migration, written by my research team, CSPI International.””
Countries refusing to sign the UN Global Migration Compact, so far: United States, Poland, Israel, Estonia, Czech Republic, Austria, Hungary, Croatia, Bulgaria. Italy is likely to join this group.
The “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” is set to be formally adopted at the UN Conference in Morocco on 10-11 December 2018. The Marrakech declaration, as its called, would block any criticism of mass migration, ban political parties opposing it and make migration a human right so no country could ever oppose it.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Political Power is its Own Reason for Being

via Political Power is its Own Reason for Being

Quote | Posted on by | Leave a comment