Are the climate data manipulated?

Günter Ederer / 18.11.2015 / 16:45 /

Professor Friedrich Karl Ewert advised in 36 countries on the construction of 83 dams. The geologist specializes in investigating the permeability of rocks and the methods of sealing them. Accurate measurements, precise statistical surveys were needed to rule out later shortcomings or even a disaster.

With this methodical thoroughness, he began to question climate change after retirement. He began to evaluate the temperature measurements of the usual warm and cold phases, as he had learned during his studies. Since 1880 there was already a worldwide network. The data thus obtained are managed by the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) of a department of NASA and offered on the Internet. Of the meanwhile 7365 stations, there are evaluable data series of 1153 stations for the period from 1881 onwards. These figures are also the basis by which NASA supplies the IPCC, the so-called IPCC. And from these publicly available data, Ewert has made a rather incredible discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012, the temperatures measured since 1881 were massively changed in hindsight,

It reads like a conspiracy theory, which Ewert writes in the summary of his years of Sisyphus work: Comparing the data from 2010 with those of 2012 shows, the NASA GISS has changed their own records so that we have a clear, especially since the beginning of the post-war period Global warming that does not exist.

Ewert had noticed in a report that the temperature data from Reykjavik and Godthab Nuur had been changed retrospectively. For the data from 2012, this resulted in a higher temperature rise in these Arctic stations than in the numbers before 2010. An analysis was possible because the data offered by NASA-GISS were archived before 2010 and could therefore be compared with those of after 2012 ,

Ewert randomly selected another 120 stations around the world and set to work to compare data from the years before 2010 and after 2012. And he always came to the same conclusion: The temperatures delivered from 2012 showed a higher warming, as the published until 2010. In order to be able to discover these, say, falsifications not so easy, ten different methods were used, which open only to those who has both groups of data and is not afraid to compare them before the mammoth task. One of the foundations of this work are those published by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) are the published seven warming and cooling epochs, which begin in 1881 and which are based on 1097 measurement stations.

Thus, in 1881, we had a mean global temperature of 13.8 degrees Celsius, which dropped to 12.9 degrees by 1895, then increased to 14.3 degrees by 1905, dropped below 12.9 degrees in 1920, to 13.9 in 1930 Increased to 13 degrees in 1975, increased to 14 degrees by the year 2000, and since then has cooled to 13.2 degrees by 2010. The hitherto warm year 2015 has no decisive importance on the long-term trend. It only shows that it is 1 degree warmer in 2015 than 1880, which means no turnaround for a year yet.

During this period, the CO2 concentration has increased from 3 parts in 10 000 parts of air to 4 parts without affecting the cycles of increase or decrease in temperature. As I said: These are all data of the IPCC.

Changing the data of individual years in the heating or cooling zones results in completely different climate scenarios. Ewert has collected tens of thousands of individual data for each of the 120 randomly selected stations that were reported by NASA before and after 2010 for each year. Thus, the changes in the seven climatic phases became clear. The manipulations are visible in the diagrams. Printing out his data would result in a 6 meter long list.

It turns out that ten different methods have been used to produce global warming. They are all documented in the study with examples.

6 of the 10 examples were used most frequently.

• A reduction of the annual mean values ​​in the initial phase. 
• A reduction of single higher values ​​in the first heat phase. 
• An increase in individual values ​​in the second heat phase. 
• A suppression of the second cooling phase beginning around 1995. 
• A reduction of the data series around the earlier decades. 
• For long-term series, the data series were even shortened to the early centuries.

For the shortening of the data series by deleting the data from earlier decades, the example Darwin (Australia).

The data from the first chart with the NASA-GISS measurements from 1882 to March 2010 indicate a cooling of – 0.0068 degrees Celsius per year. In March 2012, the NASA-GISS only the temperatures from 1964 available, resulting in a warming of + 0.0038 degrees per year.

In December 2012, NASA-GISS will once again offer a new data series. It began again in 1897. But miraculously, much colder temperatures were reported for the years 1897 to 1964 than before 2010. Thus, the annual temperature rise increased again to + 0.0104 Celsius.

In another example, the measuring station of Palma de Mallorca, it becomes clear how warming arose from a slowdown in Palma de Mallorca from 1881 to 1895 and then further minor adjustments.

If the data released by NASA-GISS from 1880 to March 2010 show an annual cooling of 0.0076 degrees Celsius, then the numbers from the same source result in a warming of + 0.0074 degrees per year in March 2012 , It is noticeable that some years are missing.

And as if that was not enough, the numbers change again in August and December 2012. Now it has become even warmer because of the new number sets. Now it shows an annual warming of + 0.01202 degrees per year.

Anyone who takes the trouble and deals with the endless lists of Ewert finds so colorfully highlighted when and how the previously measured data after decades of today’s doctrine are adapted by man made temperature increase, so that global warming becomes plausible. When comparisons are made that it has become much warmer today compared to the years since industrialization, as repeatedly reported, these are reports based on the ever-changing temperatures of earlier decades

The thesis of man made climate change gets a completely new meaning: Yes, it is always made by humans, if the data of the theory are adapted. The diligence work of Prof. Ewert has forerunners, fits into a series of scandals and contradictions, which are ignored by the political supporters of man-made climate change.

After the manipulations of the Climat research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, the other climate data source of the IPCC had come out and their boss Phil Jones had to resign, also the two American renowned meteorologists Joseph D’Alemo and Anthony Watts examined the data of 6,000 measuring stations NASA. On January 26, 2010, they released a 110-page study under the heading. “Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception? – Temperature measurements on the surface – politically driven deception?

They describe hundreds of irregularities, such as relocations of measuring stations in inner cities, selection of stations that are sometimes taken into account and sometimes not taken into account, cyclic changes in the multi-decade changes of cooling and heat phases. In summary, they conclude that NOA and NASA, together with CRU, are the driving force behind the systematic cheering of global warming in the 20th century and that there is an urgent need to have the terrestrial temperature data investigated by independent climate scientists who are not themselves Have interest in the result of the evaluations.

It was the contradictions of the daily reports in the German press about the impending heat collapse of the earth and the reports of snow in Jerusalem, bitter winters on the east coast of the USA, unknown cold spells in Argentina etc., the Prof. Friedrich Karl Ewert, Rainer Link and Prof. Hans-Joachim Lüdecke decided to evaluate the available temperature data of NASA in an elaborate work at about the same time. It was released in 2011 in Singapore and came to the same results as the Americans. “An analysis of 2246 surface temperature data” was the description of their study.

The facts have neither been disproved nor taken into account by the climate warming scientists. Hardly a politician and journalist took the trouble to look at the extensive figures. The manslaughter arguments that 98 percent of all scientists in the world agree and that 18,000 of the best scientists in the world have worked this out, dominate public perception and national and international politics. The extensive research carried out by Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise proves by name that more than 5,000 of the IPCC climate scientists listed in the “IPCC Review Bible” have not even completed their studies. 

It must be emphasized once again: All the data Ewert uses in his new study, are freely accessible, if you know what and where to look for and it is all the data that NASA itself has published, so no “concoctions” of ” climate deniers “.

According to NASA data from 2010, the surface temperature worldwide from 1940 to today has decreased by -1,110 degrees and since 2000 by -0,4223. The changes that result from “heat islands” are taken into account. Thus, the effects are described when measuring stations are relocated to the cities or framed their location of settlements. The slowdown applies to all continents except Australia, which has warmed 0.6339 degrees in the last cycle since 2000 (phase seven).The figures for Europe: Between 1940 and 2010, the data for 2010 showed a reduction of – 0.5465 and – since 2000 – – 0.3739.

After the scandal surrounding the manipulated data of the University of East Anglia’s CRU and now due to NASA’s changes in temperature readings, these serious events should be scrutinized by independent scientists and either refuted or lead to political consequences.

It would be inconceivable if all the CO2 laws, the interventions in the market to save the world, the German energy laws for climate protection and so on would be based on manipulated temperature data. An entire industry of climate rescuers and the resulting trillions of dollars invested or deindustrialized with them are at stake. In any case, those who have hitherto been involved in global warming, such as the Federal Ministry for the Environment, the Federal Environment Agency or even the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, are not suitable as appraisers. You would have to question yourself. 

You can query this axis contribution with diagrams from the author. E-Mail:

All datasets are always available to the public. The studies of Prof. Ewert will be sent by e-mail upon request. (


The above is translated by Google Chrome from the original German language version which is found here.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Honor is not what it’s been cracked up to be for the last several millennia.  Honor is a tool, if not THE tool of feudalism.

Honor is a manipulation of the natural, genetically inbred loyalty to family.

Honor is a tool of servatude, a tool of slavery.

For example, what would the world be like today with the blessing of the millions of souls from both sides who died “for King and country” in World War I?

Pray tell.




Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment



Breathe deep.  They almost had us.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nice try

You almost had us.  But you had to be in control.  We figured it out.  You might be in control from time to time.  But no one’s in control all the the time.  Technique will not let you go until you serve it.

That’s how you design any religion.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How to progress

Humanity will regress until reform-minded muslims shut down their imams and their violent, domineering brothers and sisters. No one can do it for them. They, not the rest of us, must hunt down and eliminate ISIS, taliban, al qaida, muslim brothers, hamas, hezbollah, quds, etc. We cannot do it for them. Jihadis have been indoctrinated since birth, there’s little hope to convert them. But, it’s worth a try in safe circumstances. Keep in mind that they will readily kill you, or their mother, or sister, or brother or their child if these relatives were to convert. Apostasy is a death sentence according to their indoctrination. And 400 years ago that was true in some other belief systems. Technology/technocracy is not progress. Progress is moving from an eye for an eye … to love.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Your government working against you

This well documented article is re-posted here as a prime example of your government working against citizens.

Former FBI Director, now special prosecutor Robert Mueller, worked with Lois Lerner of the IRS to target Tea Party members and conservatives prior to the 2012 presidential elections.  This article explains that.

I am guessing that President Trump is giving Mueller enough rope to hang himself in front of Congress and the American people.

Just when you thought the Deep State swamp couldn’t get any murkier and the stench any more repugnant, we are reminded by Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton in a Feb. 13 tweet of how Robert Mueller’s FBI worked with Lois Lerner’s IRS to target Tea Party and other groups in the run-up to the Obama re-election campaign:

@JudicialWatch lawsuit uncovered how Mueller’s FBI worked with Lois Lerner’s IRS to try to prosecute the very groups Obama IRS was suppressing. Another reason I don’t trust Mr. Mueller – or the FBI!

The treasure trove of documents detailing the weaponizing of powerful government agencies, including Mueller’s FBI, by the Obama administration to target the Tea Party was obtained by Judicial Watch as a result of court orders stemming from Freedom of Information Act lawsuits after the political targeting of the Tea Party:

Judicial Watch today released new Department of Justice (DOJ) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) documents that include an official “DOJ Recap” report detailing an October 2010 meeting between Lois Lerner, DOJ officials and the FBI to plan for the possible criminal prosecution of targeted nonprofit organizations for alleged illegal political activity.

The newly obtained records also reveal that the Obama DOJ wanted IRS employees who were going to testify to Congress to turn over documents to the DOJ before giving them to Congress. Records also detail how the Obama IRS gave the FBI 21 computer disks, containing 1.25 million pages of confidential IRS returns from 113,000 nonprofit social 501(c)(4) welfare groups – or nearly every 501(c)(4) in the United States – as part of its prosecution effort. According to a letter from then-House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, “This revelation likely means that the IRS – including possibly Lois Lerner – violated federal tax law by transmitting this information to the Justice Department.”

The documents were produced subsequent to court orders in two Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits: Judicial Watch v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:14-cv-01956) and Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:14-cv-01239).

The new IRS documents include a October 11, 2010 “DOJ Recap” memo sent by IRS Exempt Organizations Tax Law Specialist Siri Buller to Lerner and other top IRS officials explaining an October 8 meeting with representatives from the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section and “one representative from the FBI” to discuss the possible criminal prosecution of nonprofit organizations for alleged political activity:

On October 8, 2010, Lois Lerner, Joe Urban [IRS Technical Advisor, TEGE], Judy Kindell [top aide to Lerner], Justin Lowe [Technical Advisor to the Commissioner of Tax-Exempt and Government Entities], and Siri Buller met with the section chief and other attorneys from the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section, and one representative from the FBI, to discuss recent attention to the political activity of exempt organizations.

That attention involved harassment and intimidation of conservative groups opposed to Obamacare in particular and big government in general.  The irony is that the same Robert Mueller now investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election cooperated with Lois Lerner and the IRS to intervene on President Obama’s behalf in the lead-up to the 2012 presidential election.  As Investor’s Business Daily editorialized, Tea Party activist Catherine Engelbrecht was a prime target of this effort at political suppression:

Shortly after Engelbrecht founded True the Vote, which trains election volunteers to help root out voter fraud, and King Street Patriots, a group with ideals similar to the Tea Party, and sought tax-exempt status from the IRS in July 2010 for both groups, she was hit by an onslaught of federal harassment.

After seeing nary a government official in two decades of operation, Engelbrecht and her equipment manufacturing company suddenly had the pleasure of six FBI domestic terrorism inquiries, an IRS visit, two IRS business audits, two IRS personal audits and inspections by both the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Engelbrecht’s persecution by the IRS and FBI was also detailed by

Engelbrecht’s troubling saga was originally reported by Breitbart News’ Brandon Darby.

Engelbrecht’s application with the IRS for non-profit status allegedly triggered aggressive audits of one of her family’s personal businesses as well.  The FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) began a series of inquiries about her and her group; the BATF (Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms) began demanding to see her family’s firearms in surprise audits of her and her husband’s small gun dealership – which had done less than $200 in sales; OSHA (Occupational Safety Hazards Administration) began a surprise audit of their small family manufacturing business; and the EPA-affiliated TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environment Quality) did a surprise visit and audit due to “a complaint being called in.”

The Democratic Party of Texas filed a lawsuit against her, as did an ACORN affiliated group.  Both the FBI and the BATF continued to poke around her life, the lives of people in her Tea Party group, and her businesses.

This latest reminder or Mueller’s long history of supporting or protecting Democrats and their agenda comes just as it is revealed that another member of the Democratic elite was recently added to his star chamber staff of Democratic donors and Hillary sycophants:

An attorney on special counsel Robert Mueller’s team was a writer for HuffPost, The Daily Caller News Foundation has found.

Aaron Zelinsky, a self-described Democrat, wrote nearly 50 articles as a contributor for the liberal news outlet from 2009 to 2014.

“I’m a Democrat,” he wrote in November 2012.

A review of his articles shows that he supported President Barack Obama’s efforts to close Guantanamo Bay, opposed President George W. Bush’s policy on torture [sic], wrote in defense of gun control and argued for government-imposed limits on how much corporate executives can earn.

“Now is the time to begin enacting a progressive political agenda through the ballot box,” he wrote in a 2009 article on gay marriage [sic].

Zelinsky, who joined the Russia probe in June 2017, is not among the nine attorneys to have made federal donations.  But state records reveal a $100 donation he made to a Democratic committee in his home state of Connecticut in 2014, a couple months before he joined the Justice Department as a prosecutor.

Maybe Mueller can explain his efforts to interfere in the 2012 presidential election in cooperation with Lois Lerner and the IRS.  Or maybe he agrees with former IRS chief John Koskinen, who once famously said he and the IRS obeyed the law whenever they could. Maybe that should include Mueller and his FBI.  Maybe we need a special counsel to investigate the special counsel.

Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Good Book

There is a physical world (Caesar’s) and a spiritual world (God’s) and so far human science does not understand how they interact. We know they interact in many pervasive, millennium-spanning ways across humanity. For example, most humans experience love, insatiable curiosity about God and life, conscience, etc. (Yes, there are exceptions.) If the universe were randomly assembled, as some agnostics and atheists imagine, then how is it that most humans across eons of time, distance and language share these and other common, non-physical experiences? Clearly, something non-random is acting on us.

In the physical world, our knowledge is very, very limited. For example, in NASA’s words, “Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter – adds up to less than 5% of the universe.” We cannot see or measure the dark energy and dark matter that together make up about 70% of the universe. Dark matter and dark energy are catchall concepts for what we don’t know and don’t understand.

The Hubble Space Telescope observes the universe is expanding and accelerating. However, according to all science known to man, gravity should be slowing the expansion of the universe. But it is not. No human knows how to explain this physical reality. But something is still causing it, something is causing the accelerating expansion of the universe.

In summary then, so far humans cannot explain pervasive and commonly experienced non-physical realities, nor can humans explain about 70% of physical reality. But, we do have a guide book we can study which is given to us from the spiritual world and passed down through the ages.  In the most agnostic, skeptical case, if the book is not derived from the spirit world, at least we know that people pass down knowledge that they have found to work.

Therefore, since we know we are lost, since we know we are idiots unable to connect the dots of our reality, and since at least we have reason and logic commonly shared among many (but not all) humans, then our only rational alternative is to follow the guide book. Not following the book would be irrational and random. Since what we observe is not random, then we would be stupid to act randomly, like wandering around in the dark looking for something unknown, rather than standing under the light of the streetlamp and studying that which we do have and using it as a guide.  We once were lost, but now we are found.  We need to understand the Good Book.  What are you waiting for?

July 27, 2018

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stand and deliver

The business of government is to make government larger and more involved in your life. Your obligation, whether you accept it or not, is to control it. Refusal to accept your obligation is agreement to be enslaved.

Your government’s response to you should be identical to that of this boxer’s. Otherwise, your hand and the rest of you is dogfood.

If you give the puppy the run of the house, then it will relieve itself everywhere except possibly where it sleeps.  Unfortunately, years ago we did exactly that and now it believes it can relieve itself on us and everything around us and it bites the hand that feeds it.

Do we put it to sleep?  Or, do we try to retrain it?

Evilo Larue Bromley Doster

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The most unpopular bill in Washington, D.C.

Let’s have a federal commission on making the government smaller and less expensive…with a deadline…and guarantee that government will be reduced in size, cost and impact. That bill would get exactly how many votes in Congress? (We already know President Trump would go for it.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The trans agenda

Jennifer Bilek provides us with a brave and mindful article in the Federalist at the link below and copied below.  Well worth the read.

In reference to her topic, I would like to fund the prognosis study that models with full statistical power the future of individuals, institutions and humanity, pros and cons, with recommendations replete with statistical probabilities and uncertainties for each decision, from the social and geopolitical level down to the level of molecular biology and of course psychology. The participating scientists should prepare peer reviewed science using the technological sophistication equal to but better logically than the other similar manipulation of society by rich men, i.e. the billions of taxpayer dollars spent on global warming/climate change studies and ultimately funding their crony enterprises.

There is a valid analogy between the global warming agenda and the trans agenda.

The article and the comments fail to recognize or point out that repetitious behavior patterns produce real biological changes, both physical and mental. In their cause, with a few exceedingly rare exceptions like chromosome abnormalities, surgery is only for the impatient and mentally lazy. Should taxpayers fund them?  Science has barely scratched the surface of epigenetics and epigenomics. Humanity is not ready ethically, morally or logically to deal with these issues. If you can find studies of such issues, please post them.

Where are the philosophical and sociological studies on mutation?

Transgenderism Is Just Big Business Dressed Up In Pretend Civil Rights Clothes

The media keeps presenting us on the one hand with a trans civil rights movement for the oppressed and, on the other, with a cutting-edge (pun intended) lifestyle.
Jennifer Bilek


It’s hard to imagine a civil rights movement so indelibly tied to the capitalist marketplace that it could be used to sell fashion, makeup, hormones, surgery, cosmetology services, movies, TV series, mental health treatment, and women’s underwear, while concurrently being invested in by billionaire philanthropists, the technology and pharmaceutical industries, major corporations, and banks.

Imagine marketing a suffragette diet of fasting, or makeup so perfect it could cover a welt from police brutality? Imagine Google and Wells Fargo investing millions of dollars to eliminate the prison industrial complex?

Transgenderism, a purported civil rights movement, now intersects at every juncture of the global marketplace. It is hard to remember it came out of the medical industrial complex as a term for the most intense body dysphoria. Children are being prescribed puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, sterilized, and groomed into lifelong medical patients and consumers in more than 50 U.S. gender clinics that weren’t here ten years ago. It’s all because of transgenderism and that people fighting to live free of discrimination are hailed as heroes and celebrities for feeling alienated from their own biology.

What are we to make of this cultural storm that has transgenderism positioned as a social justice movement, a medical condition with ties to Hollywood as strong as those to the medical industrial complex, and to our political structure driving its ideology through all our institutions? The media keeps presenting us on the one hand with a trans civil rights movement for the oppressed and, on the other, with a cutting-edge (pun intended) lifestyle.

Transgender Celebrity, Fashion, and Markets

Transgenderism is looking more and more like Transgenderism™, when we look at the markets opening and its insidious presence in Hollywood. Whoopi Goldberg has started her own trans modeling company on Oprah’s Oxygen network, with trans models reported as the future of modeling. Supernatural Extraterrestrial and Co, a high-fashion clothing line, promotes their willingness to embrace a future of male pregnancy. A look at their new clothing line for 2019 has men strutting fashion runways in pregnancy prosthesis.

Trans celebrities are on constant display in the media, being celebrated as if having body dysphoria were a badge of honor. Cosmopolitan magazine offered a breast-binding guide for young women in 2016. Cosmetology consultant services are a growing business offering help to “trans women.” Crayola has created a new gender-fluid make-up, and Jecca has started a line just for “transgender” people.

Artists are photographing young “trans” children, and almost every new TV series has at least a nod to transgenderism. Jazz Jennings, a male teen who recently had his penis surgically removed, identifies as a transgender woman and has been on many major talk-shows since his family decided he was transgender at the age of four.

Jennings has his own reality TV series, chronicling his transition and how it is affecting him and his family. He also has his own trans foundation and has received many awards and accolades. A children’s storybook about his life, which normalizes for young school children the idea that they can become the opposite sex, has been adopted as part of some school curriculums.

TomBoyX is a woman’s undergarment company. It uses the term “tomboy” in its company name to denote a girl who enjoys so-called stereotypical boy activities like running and climbing trees to sell boxer shorts and comfortable underwear to women. Their message is of empowerment, not being hemmed in by feminine attire, but able to run and feel free “like a boy,” by donning clothes like his, but made for a woman’s body. In a recent ad they chose an attractive young woman with double mastectomy scars donning their boxers under a caption that reads: “This canvas was given to you but you made it your own. You crafted your own story. Share it with the world. #moretome.”

This message is a clear glorification of chosen body disfigurement posing as self-actualization and liberation, sickness as wellness, self-hatred made into empowerment, and cutting and maiming female flesh for public consumption via uber-marketing. George Orwell must be turning over in his grave with the language of doublespeak as prime-time advertisement.

A Civil Rights Movement or an Ad Campaign?

It is not just the pharmaceutical giants, the IT industry, fashion houses, Hollywood, and artists melding themselves to everything trans. Banks and investment houses are sending millions of dollars to transgender organizations all over the globe.

Men at the highest echelons of society—such as billionaire philanthropist Jennifer Pritzker and the creator of SiriusXM Satellite Radio, Martine Rothblatt—are claiming not just a transgender identity, but for Rothblatt, that of a transhumanist as well. Rothblatt believes “transgenderism is the onramp to transhumanism,” the precursor to superhumans.

If you look at the way transgenderism presents in the marketplace, it seems very much like an ad campaign for changing human biology toward making better, “liberated,” “self-generated” individuals, while being tied to the medical industrial complex. Rothblatt’s book, “From Transgender to Transhumanism,” reads like a blueprint for the modern-day trans project to infiltrate every sector of our societies. If that sounds preposterous, scientists are already looking at changing our biology as a way to deal with climate change.

This is happening at a time in our history when the escalation of robots and artificial intelligence are also surging in the marketplace with female-simulated robot sex dolls that are frighteningly close in texture and appearance to real humans acting as stand-in prostitutes in brothels, and for some men, stand-in women in relationships. Robot nannies that supposedly offer guidance and friendship for children while their parents are away, are being marketed by Mattel and other corporations as “the future of raising children.”

At Goldsmiths University in the United Kingdom, an annual conference, Love and Sex with Robots, holds sessions on humanoid robots and robot emotions and personalities, in a range of approaches from the psychological to the sociological and the philosophical. Robot experts project we will be marrying robots by 2050. A quick perusal of YouTube under “robots and humans” will yield in the neighborhood of five million videos.

So while transgenderism removes us from our very biology, we spend more and more time online and engaged in technology than with most of the people we know. For many, sexuality is becoming more and more unmoored from actual intimacy through hook-up culture, porn, and now the advent of robotic sex dolls. We are also being groomed for greater relationships to robots, surveillance, and artificial intelligence.

Rothblatt joined Whoopi on “The View” in 2016 to discuss transhumanism and exhibit a robot made in the likeness of his wife, Bina. Bina, he insists, will live indefinitely when he figures out how to download her personality into cyberspace.

Although transgenderism is positioned under the LGB civil rights banner, it appears to have a much closer relationship to commerce and global powerbrokers who have a penchant for technological megalomania. There is plenty of money flowing to transgender organizations, but even more going to normalizing transgender ideology in the culture, in language, through media, marketing, and commerce, and by billionaires’ philanthropic funding of nonprofits and other institutions.

One has to wonder if the LGB civil rights banner has not just been strategic positioning for transgenderism to claim civil rights, currying popular sympathies already well cultivated for the LGB community, as a pretext to insert itself into the global marketplace, our schools, universities, courts, and medical establishments for more nefarious purposes.

Is Anyone Clear About the Trans Lobby’s Goals?

Whether transgenderism is presented as intense body dysphoria, sexual-fetishization, social contagion, a civil rights movement, or cultural gender-bending that speaks the language of the progressive left while actually cementing gender stereotyping, being hyper-capitalistic and censorious, as a project it seems poised to normalize human biology-shifting through chemicals and surgery.

Far from a grassroots movement born from oppression, it is generated by the highest echelons of society and attempts to linguistically obfuscate its aim of creating an abstraction out of biological reality. Transgenderism seeks to dissociate people from their very bodies, and frames it as self-actualization. The trans lobby is fighting hard to change sex on birth certificates. Only a few states don’t allow people to change their sex on their birth certificates.

We need to look at what transgenderism does, how it functions, and how it is growing in the culture, and to ask why it does what it does, what it is asking of us, why it is so tightly wedded to commerce, and where it is leading. The trans lobby screams civil rights, but transgenderism looks and functions just like the worst of capitalism.

Jennifer Bilek is an artist, environmental activist, writer, and an engaged citizen.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment