Evidence of child abuse by climate alarmists

Ladies and gentlemen, this is evidence of child abuse. This child has been traumatized by global warming/climate change alarmists. One among millions. Where are class action lawyers and their cases? 


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“This is an orchestrated communist assault on America”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The last time.

The last time the Pope and the leaders of the greatest nations got together on anything, they were claiming the world was flat.

And before that they thought the earth was the center of the universe.  Or, do I have that timing reversed?


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


“I suppose I have as much authority as either of them to make predictions so I’ll give us another four and a half billion years, which is the amount of time the climate’s already been changing on the planet.” ~ Tom McClintoch

Representative McClintoch said this referring to comments by Prince Charles, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others who stated that we have 18 months to 35 years until catastrophic climate events occur.  McClintoch spoke to an appreciative crowd at the Heartland Institute’s annual climate convention.

McClintoch is one of the very rare Republicans in California.  He is a U.S. Representative of California.  The “woke” wet themselves over the last sentence.

Here’s the conference:


Hat tip to Ken Haapala at SEPP.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I wonder what is happening with this?

Emails Appear To Confirm That President Obama’s DOJ Funneled ‘Slush Fund’ Money To Leftist Orgs

A $1 billion settlement with the “big banks” appeared to go directly to left-leaning activist organizations.

On Tuesday, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) revealed that documents obtained in a separate, ongoing investigation show that former President Barack Obama’s administration directed money intended for victims of Wall Street mortgage meddling to progressive activist organizations who now form much of the “resistance” to President Donald Trump.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee mentioned several weeks ago that they suspected Obama’s Department of Justice had iced out conservative organizations looking for their share of the more than $1 billion legal settlement the DOJ collected from “big banks” who’d played a part in the housing crisis of the late 2000s. The DOJ required banks included in the settlement agreement to make “mandatory donations” to non-profits working on housing and property rights policies.

Yesterday, the same committee said that emails from Associate Attorney General Tony West (obtained by The Daily Wire and linked here), show West and other DOJ officials had been asking colleagues how to allocate the “slush fund” money to organizations “of our choosing,” and requesting advice on how to avoid directing settlement funds to organizations who leaned conservative.

In one email, a senior official even appears to admit that they worded a memo with a mind to “not allowing Citi to pick a statewide intermediary like the Pacific Legal Foundation” because PLF “does conservative property-rights free legal services.”

The internal discussion, Goodlatte argued on the Senate floor Tuesday afternoon, created an atmosphere of collusion, which ensured that only progressive activist organizations like The National Council of La Raza, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, and the National Urban League, received funds, while conservative organizations who also advocated for improved property rights policies were left out in the cold.

The National Council of La Raza, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, and the National Urban League, of course, all went on to be key organizations in the anti-Trump “resistance,” though DOJ officials could not have known that at the time — largely because they all likely assumed Hillary Clinton would be President Obama’s immediate successor.

This discovery contradicts sworn testimony from the DOJ’s Deputy Attorney General Geoffrey Graber, who told the Judiciary Committee in February that “the Department did not want to be in the business of picking and choosing which organization may or may not receive any funding under the agreement.”


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What has changed?

“What has changed in half a century? As [Laura] Ingraham noted, FDR, [3 term U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt] an icon of liberalism, referred to [General Robert E.] Lee as “one of our greatest American Christians and one of our greatest American gentlemen.”

Asked in 1960 how he could keep a portrait of a man who tried to “destroy our government” in his Oval Office, President Eisenhower wrote his critic back:

“General Robert E. Lee was one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America; he was a poised and inspiring leader, true to the high trust reposed in him by millions of his fellow citizens; he was thoughtful yet demanding of his officers and men, forbearing with captured enemies but ingenious, unrelenting and personally courageous in battle, and never disheartened by a reverse or obstacle. Through all his many trials, he remained selfless almost to a fault and unfailing in his faith in God. Taken altogether, he was noble as a leader and as a man, and unsullied as I read the pages of our history…

“To the degree that present-day American youth will strive to emulate his rare qualities, including his devotion to this land as revealed in his painstaking efforts to help heal the Nation’s wounds once the bitter struggle was over, we, in our own time of danger in a divided world, will be strengthened and our love of freedom sustained.

“Such are the reasons that I proudly display the picture of this great American on my office wall.”

Have some terrible new truths been unearthed about Lee we did not know in 1960?

No. The change has taken place in the poisoned minds of modernity.

Some will never concede there was principle or honor in the cause of a South that declared independence in 1860-61, emulating the 13 colonies that declared their independence in 1776.

In his tribute to Lee in 1960, Ike addressed what was at issue in 1860 that brought on the war.

“We need to understand that at the time of the War Between the States the issue of secession had remained unresolved for more than 70 years. Men of probity, character, public standing and unquestioned loyalty, both North and South, had disagreed over this issue as a matter of principle from the day our Constitution was adopted.”

Ike refers not to a “Civil War,” but to the “War Between the States.” And correctly so. For the South did not seek to bring down the U.S. government, or overturn Lincoln’s election, or seize power in the capital — but to leave the Union, to secede, as Jefferson and John Adams voted to secede from Britain in 1776.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why the double standard?

Why the double standard?  Democrats and Hollywood stars get awards. Obama awarded Clinton, Weinstein, Weiner, Cosby the highest civilian award America can give.  Biden has been groping for years.  Ellison, former head of the DNC is alleged by his girlfriend – with photos and hospital reports in her hand – of beating his girlfriend.  Republicans lose their jobs and go to go to jail or are assumed guilty and have their character assassinated by Democrats and mainstream media. 

“Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R, IL) was sentenced to 15 months in prison for covering up sexual abuse allegations.” Hastert was the longest-serving Republican Speaker of the House in history, and is the highest-ranking politician in U.S. history to have gone to prison.


“Former Joe Biden Secret Service Agent: We Had to Protect Women From Him, ‘Weinstein Level Stuff’” …Speaking on the condition of anonymity, the agent asserted that, “We had to cancel the VP Christmas get together at the Vice President’s house because Biden would grope all of our wives and girlfriend’s asses.” The annual party was for agents and Navy personnel who were tasked with protecting the Biden family.
“He would mess with every single woman or teen. It was horrible,” the agent said.
According to the source, a Secret Service agent once got suspended for a week in 2009 for shoving Biden after he cupped his girlfriend’s breast while the couple was taking a photo with him. The situation got so heated, the source told Cassandra Fairbanks, that others had to step in to prevent the agent from hitting the then-Vice President.”
Comey has confirmed to Congress that there never was any conspiracy between Trump and the Russians and that Steele’s dossier was fake, paid for and used by Obama/Hillary/FBI/DOJ et al to illegally obtain a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign – and the best witness on that spying has not been heard yet – how are Democrats intending to impeach Trump? And Mueller has confirmed that there was no conspiracy by Trump with Russians. 
What is the obstruction charge Democrats want to use for impeachment? Trump allegedly paid some women with HIS money to keep them quiet during the campaign, to which they agreed, and some of them now have volunteered that nothing happened.  But, Congress pays millions of TAXPAYER dollars on behalf of members of Congress who have sexually abused women and men. Congress should be impeached, not the president.
Then there is the U.S. Democrat, EU, Canadian, maintream media soliciting, using and kid-glove treatment of Muslims who have the worst record of violating human rights ongoing for about 1300 years right up to the present time… including slavery, real racism, sexual abuse, pedophilia, murdering of homosexuals, stoning and honor killing, people they consider to have had inappropriate relationships, female genital mutilation and suppression of women, and more.  Yet Democrats in America, EU and Canadian globalists support their behavior.
Half of our nation’s problem is that there is no remorse, no conscience, by Democrats. A moral person, an ethical person would permanently reject such people and policies.” ~ James Kerner
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You are being watched

YOU ARE BEING WATCHED… EPIC (1) has been analyzing law enforcement’s monitoring of social networks and online media for years. EPIC obtained documents (see links below) that reveal that the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) is monitoring social network and media organizations.

For example, from testimony by EPIC to Congress: “These documents reveal that the agency had paid over $11 million to General Dynamics, to engage in monitoring of social networks and media organizations and to prepare summary reports for DHS. According to DHS documents, General Dynamics will “Monitor public social communications on the Internet,” including the public comment sections of NYT, LA Times, Huff Po, Drudge, Wired’s tech blogs, ABC News. DHS also requested monitoring of Wikipedia pages for changes and announced its plans to set up social network profiles to monitor social network users.”

According to the DHS itself, DHS merely announced that it would do this in the Federal Register. DHS document: “The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) Office of Operations Coordination and Planning (“OPS”) National Operations Center (“NOC”), has proposed to establish a new system of records. The “Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness Initiative System of Records” will gather information from “online forums, blogs, public websites, and message boards,” store and analyze the information gathered, and then “disseminate relevant and appropriate de-identified information to federal, state, local, and foreign governments and private sector partners.” (Department of Homeland Security Office Operations Coordination and Planning – 004 Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness Initiative System of Records, 76 Federal Register 5603 Feb. 1, 2011)

As a result of the Obama administration’s pervasive corruption, for example, Susan Rice’s sharing of “de-identified” wire taps on the Trump campaign, we now know that “de-identification” is not protection, but rather a tool of spy craft.

This is not a minor one-off program. EPIC submitted a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request to the DHS seeking agency records detailing the media monitoring program. When the DHS failed to comply with FOIA’s legal deadlines, EPIC filed suit. As a result of this lawsuit, DHS disclosed to EPIC 285 pages of documents, including statements of work, contracts, and other agency records related to social network and media monitoring.

DHS has not established any legal basis for this program. News media reports indicate that the DHS is not the only agency engaging in this sort of monitoring. Recent news stories confirm that the FBI has also been developing a similar social network and media monitoring program.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against the government, but the government continues its illegal programs: “Government programs that threaten important First Amendment rights are immediately suspect and should only be undertaken where the government can demonstrate a compelling interest that cannot be satisfied in other way.” (5)

(1) The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is a non-partisan, public interest research organization established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging privacy and civil liberties issues. EPIC works to promote government accountability and transparency particularly with respect to activities that implicate Constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms. EPIC has been analyzing law enforcement monitoring of social networks and online media for several years.
(2) http://epic.org/privacy/socialmedia/Comments%20on%20DHS-2011-0003-1.pdf
(3) DHS Social Media Monitoring Documents, available at: http://epic.org/foia/epic-v-dhs-mediamonitoring/
EPIC-FOIA-DHS-Media-Monitoring-12-2012.pdf; see e.g. Charlie Savage, Federal Contractor
Monitored Social Network Sites, The New York Times, Jan. 13, 2012, available at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/14/us/federal-security-program-monitored-public-opinion.html; Jaikumar
Vijayan, DHS Media Monitoring Could Chill Public Dissent, EPIC Warns, Computerworld Jan. 16, 2012,
available at:
PIC_warns; Ellen Nakashima, DHS Monitoring of Social Media Concerns Civil Liberties Advocates,
Washington Post, Jan. 13, 2012, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dhsmonitoring-
(4) Marcus Wohlson, FBI Seeks Digital Tool to Mine Entire Universe of Social Media, Chicago Sun Times,
Associated Press, Feb. 12, 2012, available at: http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/Nation/World/2012-02-
(5) See e.g. NAACP v. Button, 83 S.Ct. 328 (1963); Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 130 S. Ct. 876

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The business of government

The business of government is to make government larger and more involved in your life. At their disposal, they have many proven technologies including management technologies, propaganda, and the threat of force under color of authority.  Your obligation, whether you accept it or not, is to control government. Refusal to accept your obligation is agreement to be enslaved.


When the founders and framers designed the Constitution, they assumed an involved citizenry. They were coming out of a period of revolution and their foe was not entirely defeated. Indeed the foe attacked again twenty years after the Constitution was signed and burned down Washington, D.C.  The balance among the federal government and the people and the states was considered critical to success of the American republic… three legs on a stool.  Based on over 200 years history, the founders and framers over-relied on an involved citzenry, which is understandable given their revolutionary circumstances at the time. The irony and mistake given their deep readings in history, humanistic philosophies, and religions is their insufficient cynicism and controls for the ever-present reprobates among us, especially in the political class, the wealthy and the powerful.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Only one party will survive. Reblog


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment