The Bankers Did It

When you are sitting there in real time you realize that you are neither one nor the other. We are neither a democracy nor a republic. That is the beauty and genius of it. Ideology be damned, they said. Give us freedom or give us death. Crazy King George went nuts.

Now it is the almighty dollar (bearing the stamp of a different George, one who was not crazy,  and to be king of America) that holds the world back along with the gravity of all its souls. The bankers created a monster.

The people must regain control of the dictionary, the definitions of words.

The government and mainstream media are writing the dictionaries.

Social media does that for them.

Therefore, freedom of speech, press, religion, thought and right of assembly must be protected by the U.S. government.

The people and their government must protect search engines from any monopolizing forces, which includes the NSA, Facebook, Microsoft, ARM, the courts, the military and its industrial complex, the CFR.  All of these can be bought.

If you owe anything, you can be bought.

Genius isn’t it.

Debt is institutionalized transaction fees.

They turned the U.S. dollar from an asset to a liability.

And they will expect the rest of us to pay for their mistake.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


F.B.I. Sent Investigator Posing as Assistant to Meet With Trump Aide in 2016

Carter Page FISA Documents Are Released by Justice Department

Then Special Prosecutor (Robert Mueller, former head of the FBI) was appointed by the DOJ with unlimited legal powers who hired an army of lawyers and investigators and spent more than two years and millions of taxpayer dollars looking for evidence that Trump or his campaign had colluded with the Russians.  All of those investigators and lawyers were anti-Trump, in fact so anti-Trump that Mueller had to fire several of them because their pre-election anti-Trump internal communications became evident in the investigation.

It was not out of his goodness or his legal ethics that Muelller fired them.  If Mueller did not fire them, if they had found any evidence, that evidence would have been useless and thrown out of court along with the lawyers.

Mueller and his army found no evidence that Trump or his team colluded with Russians.  They ended their investigation 2 weeks ago and submitted their report.

However, Mueller’s investigation revealed evidence that the warrant was obtained illegally from the FISA court by the Obama DOJ and FBI.  Musical chairs is in play among the evil doers and soon we will see where that illegal buck stopped.  The documents used by the Obama DOJ and FBI as evidence presented in the FISA court were faked.  They had been created by a former British government spy named Steele.  Steele was paid to create that ‘dossier’ of fake information by the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democrat National Committee, and the FBI under former FBI Director Comey.  Steele delivered the Steele documents to Senator John McCain and McCain delivered them to Comey, who no doubt already knew they were being prepared.  This back-door delivery method gained some support for the Special Prosecutor investigation among McCain and his Republican never-Trump friends.

Reminds me of binge-watching the Godfather movie series.

Trump knew all of this nefariousness officially from his first day as President.  Unofficially, Trump knew this in 2016 because a high-level U.S. intelligence official told Trump in 2016.  That intel official knew the spying was happening and knew it was illegal, and that person risked their career and life to blow the whistle.  That day, Trump closed his campaign headquarters in Trump Tower in Manhattan and relocated his headquarters.  Thanks to the insider whistleblower, Trump knew his headquarters was bugged.

In addition, Stefan Halper, a longtime source for the CIA and British intelligence, had been tasked during the FBI’s Russia investigation to chat up three Trump campaign advisers: Carter Page, George Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis. This was in addition to the earlier revelations discussed above that the Obama Justice Department and FBI had obtained warrants to eavesdrop on Carter Page’s communications, beginning about three weeks before the 2016 election.  All of this spying was based on false pretenses… aka lies.

In addition, it is also known that the information gathered was shared with Obama administration people and Hillary Clinton’s campaign before the election and continued after Trump’s inaugeration, in other words after those bad people were out of office.  This is the unmasking scandal involving Susan Rice.  Obama people still held their top security clearances and many remained inside the government, the deep state swamp as well as former Obama administration people had access to it.

Now you know why Democrats, former Obama officials and RINO Republicans are very afraid and behaving so badly.  They are in big, big trouble and they know it.  They are distracting people with talk of impeachment, Trump’s taxes, continuing investigations, etc.   But, reality is, if Trump were impeached and then tried in the Senate and removed from office, then Mike Pence would become President.  First, Pence is a true conservative and neither Democrats nor RINO Republicans want that.  Second, they all know an impeachment trial occurs in the U.S. Senate, which is controlled by Republicans, and that a 2/3 vote of the Senate is required for impeachment.  In other words, especially now in light of the Special Prosecutor’s investigation and report, there is no chance of removing Trump by the impeachment process.  All the press noise, Democrat hand wringing, Hollywood vibe, and sophomoric Congresswomen are a distraction for the attention of never-Trumpers.  It is a deception in the public and mainstream media to give the criminals and swamp-dwellers time to prepare their defense.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Problem: what do we do with the global warming religionists?

Anthropogenic warming WELL BELOW the potentially dangerous range has been reported by Idso (1998), Miskolczi (2007), Paltridge et al. (2009), Gerlich and Tscheuschner (2009), Lindzen and Choi (2009, 2011), Spencer and Braswell (2010), Clark (2010), Kramm and Dlugi (2011), Lewis and Curry (2014), Skeie et al. (2014), Lewis (2015) and Volokin and ReLlez (2015), among others.

Estimates for CO2 “climate sensitivity” to CO2 in peer-reviewed science papers is declining over the years.


The so-called climate models, except the Russian one, are not producing accurate climate numbers even when known, measured climate facts are substituted for climate variables in the computer programs.

Climate models versus climate observations


The volume of ice at the poles is increasing, opposite the doom and gloom melt down scenarios by global warming proponents.


And there is evidence of slight cooling as has been predicted by Russian climate models and a growing number of scientists.


And there are reasonable theories to explain their cooling forecasts.

Climate Bicentenial component of Solar Irradiance

And we know scientifically and intuitively that warmer is better for humans and most other living things.  Weather-related fatalities are higher in colder weather and longivity is better in warmer climates.  The world is still waiting for the warmth promised more than three decades ago.

Flat temperature

The so-called “social benefits” of increasing CO2 are well known in both science and economics. 



Bezdek 2014 p127

The long term CO2 concentration trend has been in decline for millions of years.


CO2 in the atmosphere is the only pathway for carbon, the building block for all cellular life on earth, to enter the food chain and since science has discovered that higher total CO2 concentration is making the planet greener, and since the human contribution of CO2 by our use of fossil fuels, concrete production, etc is negligible to the growth rate of  total CO2 concentration, and since real pollution (non-CO2 pollution) from fossil is

Fossil Fuel Impact on Environment

steeply declining as fuels and engines are engineered for cleaner burning, then…

A rational person – even a politician or talking head media thing – would logically conclude that something is wrong with so-called climate scientists and their supporters.  Proponents might conclude that they might be included in the inevitable list of defendants.  But, the there is a problem with the clique of climate scientists and their supporters.

The problem is: what does society do with these hysterical deniers of reality and facts?  What will replace the billions of dollars per year in the economy which has been flowing to these flat-earth religionists and social engineers?  It would be a big hole in the GDP if  these billions of dollars were stopped.

In America at least the two wings of the big government political party have decided to borrow and spend on infrastructure, roads, bridges, powergrid, airports, powerplants, pipelines, that sort of thing, rather than waste it on more failed computer models and modelers and distribution of public weath to their cronies and the so-called sustainable or green projects supported by the UN and the EU and their other co-religionists.


Where do citizens sign up to pay our share of engagement fees to class-action plaintiffs attorneys to sue these mendacious religionists and benevolent liars for billions of dollars in damages, triple that amount, due to their fraud?  The infrastructure fixes will take decades.  Meanwhile, some people will have increasing heating bills and will need to recover the money that has been nefariously directed to millionaires and their cronies under false pretenses.

As the Editorial in Investors Business Daily stated it March 29, 2018, titled “The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind the Global Warming Scare,” “Global Warming: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, bt it has an important job: It measures U.S. temperatures.  Unfortunately, it seems to be a captive of the global warming religion.  Its data are fraudulent.”  Then there is the carbon credit fraud.  Then there is the mail fraud solicitation of funds under false pretenses.

Attention and funds have been drained away from real issues by people who proclaimed themselves to be experts and some colluded together to blacklist and threaten those who did not believe in their religion.   And now they are essentially yelling “Fire!” in a theatre with no doors.  What do we do with them?


Idso, S.B. 1998. CO2-induced global warming: a skeptic’s view of potential climate change. Climate Research 10: 69-82.

Miskolczi, F. 2007. Greenhouse effect in semi-transparent planetary atmospheres. Quarterly Journal of the. Hungarian Meteorological Service 111: 1-40.

Paltridge, G., Arking, A. and Pook, M. 2009. Trends in middle- and upper-level tropospheric humidity from NCEP reanalysis data. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 98: 351-359.

Gerlich, G. and Tscheuschner, R.D. 2009. Falsification of the atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse effects within the frame of physics. International Journal of Modern Physics B 23: 275-224.

Lindzen, R.S. and Choi, Y.S. 2009. On the determination of climate feedbacks from ERBE data. Geophysical Research Letters 36: 10.1029/2009GL039628.

Lindzen, R.S. and Choi, Y.S. 2011. On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 47: 377-390.

Spencer, R.W. and Braswell, W.D. 2010. On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research 115: 10.1029/2009JD013371.

Clark, R. 2010. A null hypothesis for CO2. Energy and Environment 21: 171-200.

Kramm, G. and Dlugi, R. 2011. Scrutinizing the atmospheric greenhouse effect and its climatic impact. Natural Science3: 971-988.

Lewis, N. and Curry, J.A. 2014. The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates.Climate Dynamics 45: 1009-1023.

Skeie, R.B., Berntsen, T., Aldrin, M., Holdren, M. and Myhre, G. 2014. A lower and more constrained estimate of climate sensitivity using updated observations and detailed radiative forcing time series. Earth System Dynamics 5: 139-175.

Lewis, N. 2015. Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation. WCRP Grand Challenge Workshop: Earth’s Climate Sensitivities, Rindberg, Germany.

Volokin, D. and ReLlez, L. 2015. Emergent model for predicting the average surface temperature of rocky planets with diverse atmospheres. Advances in Space Research 10.1016/j.asr.2015.08.006.

Salby, Murry L. 2012. Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate, 2nd Edition. ISBN-13: 978-0521767187.



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

No correlation between fossil fuel emissions and atmospheric CO2

“This short note is a validation of a previous work which found no correlation between changes in atmospheric CO2 and fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale. In this work, this result is tested for robustness with respect to sample period selection within a range of data availability. A resampling procedure similar to bootstrap is used. Resampling ensures that the failure to find a correlation is not an artifact of the sample period chosen. The results validate the robustness of the previous finding and imply that there is no evidence that atmospheric CO2 is responsive to fossil fuel emissions at an annual time scale net of long term trends. This result is robust. It holds for all possible combination of years in the study period 1958-2015 1 .”
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Anthropogenic Emissions: by Professor Jamal Munshi

The paper below is exceptionally informative science by Professor Jamal Munshi.  The examples used are helpful to understanding the statistical tools used.  Since this work only involves two components of a single climate variable, CO2, the many other climate variables cancel out and may be ignored for the purpose of this work.  This is extremely important because simultaneity bias, which should always be removed from the many entangled, interdependent climate variables but unfortunately has been rarely considered in climate studies, requires difficult math including many assumptions and uncertainties, which are not needed in this method.  This is a home run.

Summarizing, the human contribution to CO2 by burning fossil fuels is so small that it has no measurable effect on the overall natural growth rate of CO2. By logical inference, human CO2 cannot have any measurable effect on global temperature.

Dr. Munshi is Professor Emeritus at Sonoma State University.  He taught applied statistics in the Business Administration department.  He earned a BS Chemical Engineering at San Jose State University, MS Chemical Engineering Colorado School of Mines, and PhD from University of Arkansas.

I have copied below only the abstract, introduction and conclusions.  I strongly encourage you to take the time to read and consider the other sections of this excellent and brief paper including the excellent graphics and references. A link to the online paper is below where you can download a pdf version.





8/8/2015, Revised 12/13/2015

ABSTRACT: A statistically significant correlation between annual anthropogenic CO2 emissions and the annual rate of accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere over a 53-year sample period from 1959-2011 is likely to be spurious because it vanishes when the two series are detrended. The results do not indicate a measurable year to year effect of annual anthropogenic emissions on the annual rate of CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere.1


The theory of anthropogenic global warming is that since 1750, human activity, involving the use of fossil fuels, the manufacture of cement, and changes in land use, has been injecting an artificial flow of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere at such an accelerated rate that it has overwhelmed nature’s delicate carbon balance and caused a steadily rising unnatural and unprecedented accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere. The change in atmospheric composition has enhanced its greenhouse effect causing surface temperatures to rise unnaturally and dangerously and threaten catastrophic consequences in terms of climate change (Hansen, 2006) (IPCC, 2007) (IPCC, 2014) (Plass, 1956). An important policy implication is that since these changes were created by artificial means they can also be moderated by artificial means simply by making significant reductions in our emissions of CO2 (IPCC, 2014).

Since the recent accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere is ascribed solely to human emissions, a testable implication of the theory of anthropogenic global warming is that there should be a close correlation between the rate of anthropogenic emissions and the rate at which CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere; and this correlation should be observable at the inter-annual frequency level (Patra, 2005) (Raupach, 2008) (Keeling, 2001) (Plass, 1956) (Lorius, 1990). This means that, net of long term trends, we should find that years of higher annual emissions should correspond with years of greater annual increase in atmospheric CO2 and years of lower emissions should correspond with years of lower rates of accumulation of atmospheric CO2. In this short note, we test this hypothesis by applying detrended correlation analysis, a tool that is often used by financial analysts to detect higher frequency changes net of long term trends (Prodobnik, 2008) (Granger, 1964) (Haan, 2002). The method tests the relationship between two variables that share a common direction in their long term drift in time by removing the drift component and comparing the detrended series in terms of correlation at shorter intervals. When applied to atmospheric CO2, this procedure shows that the correlation between the annual rate at which anthropogenic emissions are introduced into the atmosphere and the annual rate at which CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere, though significant, does not survive into the detrended series and is therefore likely to be spurious or an artifact of the common direction of their long term drift in time to which no anthropogenic cause can be ascribed.



A necessary condition for the theory of anthropogenic global warming is that there should be a close correlation between annual fluctuations of atmospheric CO2 and the annual rate of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Data on atmospheric CO2 and anthropogenic emissions provided by the Mauna Loa measuring station and the CDIAC in the period 1959-2011 were studied using detrended correlation analysis to determine whether, net of their common long term upward trends, the rate of change in atmospheric CO2 is responsive to the rate of anthropogenic emissions in a shorter time scale from year to year. It was found that the observed correlation between these variables derives solely from a common direction in their long term trends and not from a correspondence in their annual fluctuations. As a corollary to this finding, a further study reveals that change in atmospheric CO2 is responsive to surface temperature both in long term trends and in short term annual fluctuations. The results have significant implications for interpreting the observed increase in atmospheric CO2 in terms of the climate system and the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

All data and computational details used in this note may be downloaded from its online data archive (Munshi, 2015).


Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Battle of Britain is now

Hear ye, hear ye! Pat Condell perfectly understands and explains the issue in Brexit, the EU, the UN and globalism…a watershed moment for the people of all nations. 8 minute video published today. Hear ye, hear ye!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Obama the pathological liar

Here is the pure and complete pathological liar. Learn to recognize it and learn the lesson well.  All the “tells” and signs are there, just like Bubba and Hillary. Learn how he makes you feel, learn that feeling in yourself and trust it so that you can recognize it in the future. Then you can avoid them like the plague.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Obama agrees with Trump on illegal aliens


Obama agrees with Trump on illegal aliens.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Electric vehicles worse than diesel

Even if CO2 were a climate problem, and it is not, this study from Germany concludes “Electric Vehicles are not a Panacea for Climate Change.” …”the CO2 emissions of battery-electric vehicles are, in the best case, slightly higher than those of a diesel engine, and are otherwise much higher” due to the significant amount of energy used in the mining and processing of lithium, cobalt, and manganese, which are critical raw materials for the production of electric car batteries.
Apr 17, 2019
“Electric vehicles will barely help cut CO2 emissions in Germany over the coming years, as the introduction of electric vehicles does not necessarily lead to a reduction in CO2 emissions from road traffic. Natural gas combustion engines are the ideal technology for transitioning to vehicles powered by hydrogen or “green” methane in the long term.”
“Considering Germany’s current energy mix and the amount of energy used in battery production, the CO2 emissions of battery-electric vehicles are, in the best case, slightly higher than those of a diesel engine, and are otherwise much higher. This has been confirmed by a new study by Christoph Buchal, professor of physics at the University of Cologne; Hans-Dieter Karl, long-standing ifo energy expert; and Hans-Werner Sinn, former ifo president and professor emeritus at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. The researchers carried out their detailed calculations using the concrete examples of a modern electric car and a modern diesel vehicle. In addition to CO2 emissions from battery production, they looked at alternative energy sources for electricity in order to calculate the impact electric vehicles have on CO2 emissions. They show that even with today’s technology, total emissions from a combustion engine powered by natural gas are already almost one-third lower than those of a diesel engine. “Over the long term, hydrogen-methane technology offers a further advantage: it allows surplus wind and solar power generated during peaks to be stored, and these surpluses will see a sharp increase as the share of this renewable energy grows,” Professor Buchal explains.”
“In their study, the authors criticize the fact that EU legislation allows electric vehicles to be included in calculations for fleet emissions with a value of “zero” CO2 emissions, as this suggests that electric vehicles do not generate any such emissions. The reality is that, in addition to the CO2 emissions generated in the production of electric vehicles, almost all EU countries generate significant CO2 emissions from charging the vehicles’ batteries using their national energy production mixes. The authors also take a critical view of the discussion about electric cars in Germany, which centers around battery-operated vehicles when other technologies also offer great potential: hydrogen-powered electric vehicles or vehicles with combustion engines powered by green methane, for instance. “Methane technology is ideal for the transition from natural gas vehicles with conventional engines to engines that will one day run on methane from CO2-free energy sources. This being the case, the German federal government should treat all technologies equally and promote hydrogen and methane solutions as well,” emphasizes Professor Sinn.”
Hat tip to F. Bastiat on Twitter and Tyler Durden at
Electric vehicles
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Identity politics?

Identity politics in all of its forms is manipulation.  You are being manipulated.

You must step through the window of identity politics that has been cast before us all, step through that window to personal responsibility, liberty and freedom.

Or else, pick a caste, a rung on the ladder.

But what really matters is which ladder.

And you can only see one ladder.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment