PCR and the U.S. Supreme Court today

Today in the U.S. Supreme Court we heard an example of the problem with PCR kits, which points to the problem with this entire “pandemic.”

Two lawyers who tested positive for COVID-19 delivered their arguments remotely during the hearing where half of U.S. states and many businesses challenged Biden’s mandates, which was held in a building that has been closed to the public for almost two years.

Ohio’s Solicitor General Ben Flowers delivered an argument by telephone, according to the Ohio attorney general’s office:

‘Ben who is vaccinated and boosted, tested positive for COVID-19 after Christmas. His symptoms were exceptionally mild and he has since fully recovered,’ the office said.   

‘The Court required a PCR test yesterday which detected the virus so for that reason he is arguing remotely.’

As I have said since before the PCR test was authorized for non-diagnostic emergency use (EUA) by CDC/FDA:

(1) it is not possible for the test to determine whether or not the person who tested positive has SARS-CoV2 versus the person had corona virus sometime in the past, and

(2) it is not possible for the test to determine whether or not a person who tested positive is infectious to others, and

(3) it is not possible to determine whether or not the person who tested positive will or will not become ill.    

(4) it is not possible for the PCR test to determine if the virus is dead or alive.   

And this is the same test used to validate safety and efficacy in clinical trials for the “vaccines.” And the same test used to determine and report “cases,” hospitalizations, and deaths associated with Covid-19, for which the health care facility collects large bonuses for covid patients.  And the same test which politicians, media, etc. have used to hype fear, control populations, and destroy businesses and income.  The databases and history of this “pandemic” using PCR data are worthless.  The story does not end there.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Biggest environmental frauds of 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Human CO2 is not causing climate change

CO2 in atmosphere is a cumulative value since volume of a gas is an extensive property of matter.  Area is the correct representation of a cumulative value, not a line.  The blue area is compared to the orange area, the entire orange area.  

The blue area is fossil fuel and cement CO2 emission (2), which are the largest sources of human CO2 emission; in the blue area, fossil fuel and cement CO2 emission which is absorbed in the environment has not been subtracted from fossil fuel and cement CO2 emission. On the other hand, the orange area is CO2 emission minus CO2 absorption, or net emission.  Human-produced CO2 emission from fossil fuels and cement is too small to be detected. Human CO2 emission = Human CO2 absorption. (3) The blue area and B would not be visible if net fossil fuel and cement CO2 were graphed here. The signal of human-produced CO2 in net global CO2 concentration is not detectable by statistical tools used by skilled statistical data analysts (4). Not only is the signal too small to be quantified, it is too small to be detected as a reproducible signal.  The signal of fossil fuels CO2 and cement CO2 emission is too small to be distinguished from random variations in the 100 times larger CO2 signal of natural CO2 concentration.      

CO2 emitted by humans from all sources is offset continuously by an equivalent amount of CO2 absorbed by the environment.  The rate of natural CO2 emission and natural CO2 absorption are both more than 10 times larger per year than the rate of human CO2 emission.  The amount of human emission is easily absorbed in the environment. Human CO2 emission is continuously mixed with CO2 reservoirs in both atmosphere and ocean surface and each of those reservoirs are about 100 times larger than annual human emission.  The relative percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere which was emitted by humans is irrelevant; the environment is not selecting one CO2 molecule versus another CO2 molecule in any significant amount.  The CO2 molecule emitted at one point source (for example your exhaled breath) is not the same CO2 molecule that is absorbed by ocean, land or plants. The partial pressure change is transmitted, not the CO2 molecule itself. The concentrations of CO2 in air and in ocean surface are independent of the source of the CO2.  An amount of CO2 equal to the amount of CO2 produced by humans is absorbed by the environment.(3) The source of the CO2 (whether human, biosphere, ocean) is not a variable in the phase-state equilibrium equation that determines atmospheric CO2 concentration at a given temperature of ocean surface or land surface.  In other words, humans cannot change the net global average CO2 concentration nor the rate of change of CO2 concentration by controlling CO2 emissions from fossil fuels or cows. 

On the other hand, humans could implement catastrophic planetary climate engineering and eugenics decisions, for example producing artificial clouds or population reduction programs, or taxing carbon footprints and limiting use of fossil fuel energy. Such foolish actions needlessly keep millions of people in poverty and could make earth uninhabitable and uninhabited.

References:

(1) NOAA ESRL GML and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). “The carbon dioxide data on Mauna Loa constitute the longest record of direct measurements of CO2 in the atmosphere. They were started by C. David Keeling of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in March of 1958 at a facility of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [Keeling, 1976]. NOAA started its own CO2 measurements in May of 1974, and they have run in parallel with those made by Scripps since then [Thoning, 1989].” https://gml.noaa.gov/webdata/ccgg/trends/co2/co2_annmean_mlo.txt File Creation: Mon Dec 6 12:07:43 2021

(2) Friedlingstein, P. et al. 2021. Territorial Emissions. 2021v0.4 https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2021-386/ Carbon values in million tonnes per year were multiplied below by 3.664 to yield CO2 per year.

(3) Salby, Murry L. Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate. 2nd Edition. Date Published: January 2012. isbn: 9780521767187. https://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/earth-and-environmental-science/atmospheric-science-and-meteorology/physics-atmosphere-and-climate-2nd-edition?format=HB&isbn=9780521767187    http://www.cambridge.org/9780521767187

“Equally significant are transfers of carbon into and out of the ocean. Of order 100 GtC/yr, they exceed those into and out of land. Together, emission from ocean and land sources (∼150 GtC/yr) is two orders of magnitude greater than CO2 emission from combustion of fossil fuel. These natural sources are offset by natural sinks, of comparable strength. However, because they are so much stronger, even a minor imbalance between natural sources and sinks can overshadow the anthropogenic component of CO2 emission.”

“At an absorption rate of 100 GtC/yr, the ocean will absorb the atmospheric store of CO2 of 1000 GtC in about a decade. That absorption of CO2, which is concentrated in cold SST [Sea Surface Temperature] at polar latitudes, is nearly offset by emission of CO2 from warm SST at tropical latitudes. Warming of SST (by any mechanism) will increase the outgassing of CO2 while reducing its absorption. Owing to the magnitude of transfers with the ocean, even a minor increase of SST can lead to increased emission of CO2 that rivals other sources.” (3) Salby, p546. 

(4) Munshi, J. “Responsiveness of atmospheric CO2 to fossil fuel emissions: Updated”. SSRN; 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2997420

#climatechange #globalwarming #CO2 #netzero #Environment

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

DOES CLIMATE ACTION WORK???

Thongchai Thailand

IN THIS POST WE PRESENT EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE CLIMATE SCIENCE POSITION OF A CAUSATION RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS AND GLOBAL WARMING.

NOTE: .

Airliner - Wikipedia

THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON THE RATE OF GLOBAL WARMING.

THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON THE RATE OF GLOBAL WARMING.

BUT PLEASE ALSO SEE THE POSTSCRIPT BELOW

POSTSCRIPT:

Electricity production by source, World

THE CHART ABOVE PROVIDED BY {OUR WORLD IN DATA} SHOWS THAT ALTHOUGH THERE HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN RENEWABLE ENERGY 1985 TO 2020, THE SHARE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY IN 2020 IS STILL LESS THAN 15% AND THAT SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE SHARE OF RENEWABLES IN TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION MAY EXPLAIN WHY NO EFFECT IS VISIBLE ON THE RATE OF WARMING.

Senegal included in The Rockefeller Foundation's $150m Investment in Renewable  Energy

Renewable Energy Definition and Types of Renewable Energy Sources | NRDC

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Even mild SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived immunity

“Abstract: Long-lived bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) are a persistent and essential source of protective antibodies1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 have a substantially lower risk of reinfection with SARS-CoV-28,9,10    …Consistently, circulating resting memory B cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 S were detected in the convalescent individuals. Overall, our results indicate that mild infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces
robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune memory in humans…”

“Discussion…Overall, our data provide strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans robustly establishes the two arms of humoral immune memory: long-lived BMPCs and memory B cells. These findings provide an immunogenicity benchmark for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and a foundation for assessing the durability of primary humoral immune responses that are induced in humans after viral infections.”

SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans. Turner, J.S., Kim, W., Kalaidina, E. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans. Nature 595, 421–425 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03647-4

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Large study: No need for jab if you have been infected

Conclusions Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before.”

Summary Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was examined among 52238 employees in an American healthcare system. COVID-19 did not occur in anyone over the five months of the study among 2579 individuals previously infected with COVID-19, including 1359 who did not take the vaccine.”

Full text of study https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v3.full-text

Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals.

Nabin K. Shrestha,1 Patrick C. Burke,2 Amy S. Nowacki,3 Paul Terpeluk,4 Steven M. Gordon 1
From the Departments of:

1 Infectious Diseases,

2 Infection Prevention,

3 Quantitative Health Sciences, and

4 Occupational Health,

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Don’t miss this covid punchline

US Representative Jim Jordan (R, Ohio) questions Dr. Marty Makary, M.D., Masters in Public Health, surgeon, Professor of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University. (Video below)

Dr. Makary, what’s the budget at the CDC do you know what that is?

Dr. Marty Makary: It’s about $9 billion sir.

Jordan: How about at NIAID what’s the budget there?

Makary: 6 billion there.

Jordan: What about NIH, what’s the budget there?

Makary: Between 42 and 43 or 43 billion.

Jordan: That’s like $57, 58 billion, that’s annual right?

Makary: Annual.

Jordan: Do you know how many people work at CDC?

Makary: 31,000 people between CDC and NIH.

Jordan: 31,000 people spending $58 billion a year. Why hasn’t our government done a study on natural immunity?

Makary: If I can be honest representative Jordan I don’t think they want to know the answer it would undermine the indiscriminate Vaccine vaccination policy for every single human being including extremely low-risk people.

Jordan: I saw in your opening statement that you’re actually doing a study on natural immunity is that right?

Makary: That’s right. With Private funding Johns Hopkins my research team is doing a study.

Jordan: Other countries have done this study, Is that correct?

Makary: Most of our learnings come from Israel in other countries, yes sir. The Israel study is the largest study done worldwide and it found that natural immunity adjusted for age and comorbidity is 27 times more effective than vaccinated immunity.

Jordan: The scientists in our government at the at CDC and NIH they don’t account for that, they don’t talk about that, What do they say about that study?

Makary: They never talk about it unless I asked but I would say that they are doing worse than being absent on the topic they are undermining natural immunity through two studies that the CDC did that are so flawed That are so poorly put together honestly they would not qualify for a seventh grade science fair.

Jordan: We can spend money some of that 58 billion resources at NIH and CDC can be used to find gain of function research and give a grant to EcoHealth who then send some of that money to a lab in Wuhan China that just fine but we can’t find any resources to deal with a fundamental question about natural immunity so much so that you have to go in to do it yourself. It’s either they know the answer and don’t want the American people to know, or they do know the answer and are trying to hide it.

The video continues beyond this transcript a bit.

https://www.martymd.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Prof. Ian Plimer interviewed. The whole truth on the global warming agenda.

Here is the recent video interview with Ian Plimer. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interesting climate data

Data on the website of the Global Carbon Budget is interesting.  Generally a new “budget” has been published for the last several years and they contain different data sets.

https://www.icos-cp.eu/sites/default/files/inline-images/essd2021_FossilFuel_and_Cement_emissions_1959.png

NOAA conveniently avoided discussing the contradiction with IPCC “consensus science” et al which these data reveal. NOAA claimed: “Based on preliminary analysis, the global average atmospheric carbon dioxide in 2020 was 412.5 parts per million (ppm for short), setting a new record high amount despite the economic slowdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, the jump of 2.6 ppm over 2019 levels was the fifth-highest annual increase in NOAA’s 63-year record. Since 2000, the global atmospheric carbon dioxide amount has grown by 43.5 ppm, an increase of 12 percent.” By  Rebecca Lindsey Reviewed By  Ed Dlugokencky . Published August 14, 2020 Updated October 7, 2021.  https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide

The overall rate of change of CO2 concentration is diligently measured by the NOAA observatory on Mauna Loa. Their data is often seen described and graphed as the Keeling Curve below.

As is easily seen in the Keeling Curve, and as the NOAA authors above acknowledge, the dip in estimated human emission due to Covid has not affected global CO2 concentration or its rate of change. The disservice and disinformation is that they fail to point out that the concentration and rate of change (the slope of that Mauna Loa’s Keeling Curve) is not controlled by human emission. IPCC et al claim human emission is the primary cause of increasing atmospheric CO2, a claim which is echoed in mainstream media and schools worldwide.  

CO2 flux is controlled by the largest flux. Almost nowhere is this mentioned in climatology, one exception is Professor Murry Salby.  Flux is the mass (or volume) of material flowing through a plane (in this case ocean surface) per unit time, for example, gigatonnes of CO2 per square meter per year. Flux is controlled by the area of the surface through which the mass is flowing.  Flux is not the same as flow rate. 

There is a reservoir of CO2 in the atmosphere estimated at 750 gigatonnes (750 billion metric tonnes), see carbon cycle graphic below.  There is a reservoir of aqueous CO2 gas in the surface of the ocean estimated at 1020 gigatonnes.  In the middle and deep ocean is a reservoir of CO2 as dissolved inorganic carbon and non-ionized CO2 estimated at 38,000 to 40,000 gigatonnes. This vast, slow deep oceanic CO2 reservoir connects to the surface layer through slow currents and through the hydration reaction of CO2 gas with H2O which yields carbonic acid, H2CO3, which in turn is connected to the carbonate chemistry cycle described in reaction cycle image (30) below.  The ionic chemicals of the carbonate cycle react with and are moderated by the vast oceanic buffering systems which convert CO2 gas to calcium carbonate stone (e.g. limestone) and other mineral stone.

Stumm & Morgan, Aquatic Chemistry, 1981. P. 210.

There is a flux of CO2 from the surface of the ocean into the atmosphere estimated at 90 gigatonnes per year.  There is another CO2 flux from atmosphere into ocean surface estimated at 92 gigatonnes per year.  These two fluxes circulate between the 750 gigatonne CO2 reservoir in the atmosphere and the 1020 gigatonne reservoir of CO2 in the ocean surface.  The fluxes are continuously back and forth through the surface of the ocean. CO2 is absorbed into cold ocean surface (less than 25 C) and is emitted from warm ocean surface (greater than 25.6 C).  These two 90 gigatonne fluxes dominate the rate of CO2 changes in the atmosphere and ocean surface.  Human emission is immediately mixed with these two larger fluxes and will have not affect global CO2 concentration or rate of change. CO2 will be absorbed into ocean surface, land and biosphere to balance human CO2 emission. Anthropogenic CO2 emission EA equals Anthropogenic CO2 absorption AA. (See Salby derivation below and his explanation in first video below.)

Murry Salby, PhD

The temperature of the ocean surface area acts as a temperature-controlled valve on these two large fluxes, the fluxes absorbed into and emitted out of ocean surface.  Net global CO2 emission (the net difference between all CO2 emission and all CO2 absorption) and its slope (i.e. the NOAA graph and data) are controlled by net emission to and from ocean surface, which is controlled by the area of ocean surface above 25 C (emission) versus below 25 C (absorption.)  In local conditions, higher alkalinity in ocean surface favors dissolution of CO2 into the surface, which is opposed by higher salinity in ocean surface which favors emission from the surface. Surface winds, ocean surface disturbances and currents affect local CO2 partial pressure conditions in air and ocean surface. In these local conditions the rate limiting step to achieve CO2 equilibrium between ocean surface and air above that surface is the migration rate of aqueous CO2 gas in the ocean water matrix. Globally averaged, these local conditions cancel out leaving area of ocean surface temperature above or below 25 C as the primary control of net global average CO2 concentration and its growth rate. Since ocean has enormous thermal mass and momentum, the CO2 trend is likely to continue for years to come. That would be a good thing. The human contribution of CO2 to total CO2 concentration and its rate of change are both insignificant with regard to warming and climate change.

References

These two video lectures are different.

“The premise of the IPCC that increased atmospheric CO2 results from fossil fuels emissions is impossible.” ~ Dr. Murry Salby

Salby, Murry L., editor, Fundamentals of atmospheric physics. Volume 61. pages 1-627. 1996. ISBN-13:978-0-12-615160-2 and ISBN-10:0-12-615160-1. Full text downloadable as pdf: https://www.sciencedirect.com/bookseries/international-geophysics/vol/61

Salby, Murry L., Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate. 2nd Edition. Date Published: January 2012. isbn: 9780521767187. http://www.cambridge.org/9780521767187

Stumm, Werner and Morgan, James J. Aquatic chemistry : an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters. 2nd Ed. 1981. Page 210. Available for online loan: https://archive.org/details/aquaticchemistry00stum/mode/2up

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Social media censorship is government censorship and theft of your privacy

Social media companies allow government contractors to impersonate people. And the bigger problem is that governments impersonate people on social media. Government (at least the U.S. government) cannot legally do that without a warrant, so they hire major third party prime contractors to do it for them. Lip service by Congress to punish social media companies does not approach the real crimes or thugs.

Government is out of control, and these social media outlets are symptoms of that. Social media censorship IS government censorship and theft of your privacy. Governments (NSA in the case of U.S.A.) capture all of your electronic information, permanently, every electronic transaction, photo, phone call, email, text message, cell phone location, etc. which they can and will use against you when they want. Just need to know the right politically-connected people to unmask the information. It is a morally sick and repugnant mentality.

FBI instigates riots at the U.S. capitol and then “rioters” are hunted down and arrested, held without their due process rights … now for almost a year, gassed in their jail cells, and beaten by their jailers, because it suits some politicians who no doubt supported the instigation. But, other riots which burned businesses and towns, and killed police, went on for months, a political instrument of Democrats against President Trump, and those arrested were released and had access to free legal counsel, funded in part by Democrats including the person occupying the office of U.S. vice president.

Andrew McCabe, an attorney, Deputy Director of the FBI, conspired with others inside the government to defeat and remove a sitting U.S. president, Trump, and leaked information about an FBI probe into the Clinton Foundation, all intended to impeach President Trump with false information, then lied to Congress multiple times. He was fired by President Trump, but the government under Biden / i.e. U.S. tax payers paid his legal fees, and rather than be punished under the law, McCabe is released under Biden, his record cleared, he is given full retirement and hundreds of thousands of dollars. Full-on treason by a conspiracy including a top director of the FBI who walks away rewarded by the U.S. taxpayers. https://nypost.com/2021/10/17/doj-plays-politics-in-letting-andrew-mccabe-escape-punishment/

The same FBI raided in full military SWAT the home of the CEO of Project Veritas, who was handcuffed and charged with no crime, to retrieve a diary of Joe Biden’s daughter. Meanwhile, the so-called U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to use taxpayer money to defend assistant U.S. Attorney General Rob Rosenstein, former FBI official Shawn Henry and a former Secret Service agent who are being sued for spying on journalist Sharyl Attkisson. It appears to be a slam-dunk case against these government operators, and the Secret Service agent who is a defendant in the case wants the crimes exposed. https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/05/attkisson-v-doj-and-fbi-for-the-government-computer-intrusions-the-definitive-summary-2/

The same government has hounded for years Edward Snowden and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for transparently telling people of the world about these despicable, contemptible practices which are occurring and often coordinated across multiple governments. They have been telling people about government acts that people need to know and have a right to know. Government is unable to fix itself.

Governments are intimidating citizens, even a sitting U.S. president and his senior advisors, using every means available to remove freedom of speech. And of course most governments are duty bound to protect freedom of speech. This problem is not limited to the U.S. government.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment