To defeat our lying and power hungry elites, to deny them control, all we have to do is stop playing along

by Baruch Pletner,PhD,MBA February 28, 2019

Today, like in 1776, it takes courage to stand up to power. There are possible and even likely adverse consequences, but let’s not kid ourselves: being banned from Twitter or even fired from a job is not the same as being shot by redcoats. Those Americans that chose to overthrow their obnoxious British rulers by risking their very lives have made it easy for us. All we need to do to get rid of our no less odious elites is simply tell them to their faces that they have no clothes. Stay away from them, shun them and their stupid “activities”, refuse to acknowledge their obvious lies about sex, and unborn babies, and the climate, and Islam, and immigration, and so much more. Whatever they want you to do, whatever they want you to say, wherever they want you to be, JUST SAY NO.


The Hi-Tech Traditionalist – Baruch Pletner is an entrepreneur, a scientist, an inventor, and a private pilot. He is passionate about education, the outdoors, and the war on globalism. Baruch holds a PhD degree from the Technion in Haifa, Israel and an MBA from Northeastern University in Boston.

This is the last paragraph of an article by Dr. Pletner in Tsarism

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin announces that he will propose at an upcoming meeting of the Council of Ministers the dissolution of 2 Islamic NGOs: the CCIF (French Collective Against Islamophobia) and humanitarian association Baraka City as “enemies of the French Republic.”

“It is clear how political Islam, allied with radical Islam, leads to terrorism. Political Islam must be fought with the same force as terrorism.”

This is equivalent to the US Secretary of Homeland Security announcing the dissolution of CAIR and Islamic Relief USA.

Post by Leslie Shaw, President at FIRM in Paris Area, France.

News from LE FIGARO in France

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Social media is not a good thing.

Social media is a distraction from life. It is addictive. But, you will recover.

Like all other addictions, recognition that you have a problem is the first requirement before healing can begin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dr Mike Yeadon on required vaccination

Dr. Michael Yeadon comments on the possible requirement for SARS CoV-2 vaccination and possible coercion to vaccinate.

His bio…

Dr Yeadon is a co-founder of Ziarco and CEO. He is an Allergy & Respiratory therapeutic area expert, developed out of deep knowledge of biology & therapeutics, and is an innovative drug discoverer with over 25 years of experience in drug discovery and development. Dr Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and since 2011 has consulted to more than 20 biotechnology companies. Prior to consulting as an independent, he was Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of the A&R Research Unit of Pfizer. At Pfizer, Dr Yeadon was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008. Under his leadership the unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive external collaborations and was involved in product and device licensing.

Prior to Pfizer, Dr Yeadon worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers. He attended the University of Surrey in Guildford, U.K, where he received his PhD (under Professor Ian Kitchen), with thesis work in the respiratory field, and a BSc, First Class, with Joint Honours, in Biochemistry and Toxicology.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Gordian Knot Protecting Obamagate Secrets

By Charles Lipson  Real Clear Politics October 15, 2020  

Charles Lipson is the Peter B. Ritzma Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Chicago, where he founded the Program on International Politics, Economics, and Security.   

Email Link–Obamagate-Secrets.html?soid=1126214090059&aid=XMGDRKHZpOo
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The COVID-19 cart is still in front of the horse

Following up on my previous posts, regarding PCR tests and vaccines for SARS CoV-2 (Covid-19), the cart is still in front of the horse.  Read the CDC document linked below and see for yourself.  Here are a few quotes excerpted from that CDC document dated July, 2020.  I provided the bolding for emphasis:

From the official CDC Covid-19 method document for the PCR Covid-19 test, with revisions (full citation and link below.)

Page 2

“Results are for the identification of 2019-nCoV RNA. The 2019-nCoV RNA is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.  Negative results do not preclude 2019-nCoV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.”

Page 39

Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

Bud’s comments:  The PCR test has multiple probes designed insilico (i.e. in a computer) from the GenBank sequence database based on the N gene, not from isolated and validated sequence of SARS CoV-2.  The N gene sequence codes for the glycoprotein coating that encapsulates and protects the RNA in the virus from nucleases in the body which would break apart the RNA sequence of the virus. 

The human immune system does not work by recognition of RNA, DNA or protein sequence.  Both T-cells and antibodies function by a 3D pattern recognition of the conformation (or epitope) of the glyco- (i.e. sugar) groups on the surface of the protein.  These sugar groups are post translational modifications to the protein, that is, the sugar groups are added after the protein has been created from amino acids specified in the template of sequence of nucleotides.  Small changes in the RNA and DNA sequence code (as small as a single nucleotide, a SNP) can move a methyl group (-CH3) from one position on the protein to another position on the protein and result in major changes in the 3D surface of the glyco- groups attached to the protein and in the 3D structure of the protein itself.  A small change in RNA sequence or sequence homology can change the ability of a test or the immune system to recognize a virus.  Or, that change may be and likely is a post translational change due to an entirely different, untested protein molecule, e.g. a chaperone, with entirely different sequence not found in the PCR test.  Changes in 3D conformation of the protein can make major changes in the binding function of the S spike protein, or the conformaton of the glycoprotein coating, or other functions of the protein which in turn can result in major changes in infectivity of the virus.  The changes can also prevent or change recognition of the virus by natural or synthetic antibodies, T-cells and pcr tests.      

For example, in this informative recent paper:  “An increasing body of evidence suggests that the tight binding of the S protein to ACE2 is the reason for the high person-to-person transmission rates and severity associated with this disease11,12,45. This is most evident when comparing the SARS 2002–2004 pandemic with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with 8,098 cases versus over 16 million cases (26th July 2020) respectively. Our analysis demonstrated that the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S proteins have substantial differences in their ACE2 binding motifs (50% identity), which results in an increased number of contacts between the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and ACE2. This correlates with the observed 10- to 20-fold higher affinity of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein for ACE2, compared to SARS-CoV S protein11.” “…the high level of TMPRSS2 similarity between species does not appear to affect viral entry, but instead it is the species-specific differences in the structure of ACE2 that affects SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infectivity.”  Brooke GN, Prischi F. Structural and functional modelling of SARS-CoV-2 entry in animal models. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15917. Published 2020 Sep 28. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72528-z.  :

Recall that the experiments that were underway at the top security U.S. labs, but ruled too dangerous, and were then transferred along with funding to the lab in Wuhan, China were “gain of function” experiments. The function of infectivity is changed by changing the 3D conformation of proteins.  A synthetic sequence created from a computer model could create a protein vaccine for which some people have no immune defense, essentially a poison.   

It bothers me that the world is running millions of PCR tests and antibody tests which have not been validated against the RNA from isolated and filtered SARS CoV-2 virus.  At least, I have not been able to find publication of this information.  The CDC document is very concerning.  And now, without validation against isolated, filtered virus using either standard Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates (methods which have been used to validate cause for every other pandemic including SARS CoV-1 from the 2002-2004 pandemic), vaccines are being created based on synthetic sequence designed to cause invivo human cells in the living, healthy patient to produce one or more proteins from the S-spike protein on the virus, but neither this sequence nor the protein it produces has been validated against the sequence of the S-spike protein on isolated SARS CoV2.  Billions of dollars are being spent on tests and vaccines which have not been validated against actual SARS CoV-2.  Does it bother you?

  1. CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions for Use Catalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01 1000 reactions For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use Rx Only.  Division of Viral Diseases / Respiratory Viruses Branch CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel – Verification Requirements *** DO NOT DISCARD: Important product-specific information *** Document #: CDC-006-00005Revision #: 05
  2. Brooke GN, Prischi F. Structural and functional modelling of SARS-CoV-2 entry in animal models. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15917. Published 2020 Sep 28. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72528-z.
  3. Viruses and Koch’s Postulates, Thomas M. Rivers.
  4. (2) Koch’s postulates fulfilled for SARS virus. Ron A. M. Fouchier, et al.
  5. (3) Amending Koch’s postulates for viral disease: When “growth in pure culture” leads to a loss of virulence, Joseph Prescott, Heinz Feldmann, and David Safronetz.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Burning movies and books

You may recall that I have not had TV, newspapers, magazines, etc for more that 10 years.

But I watched pieces of the Senate confirmation hearings online.

This jumped out at me:

I hope you are able to view this very short video.



Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Why should you and I be concerned about disinformation on the climate?

The following quote is taken from the abstract of a peer reviewed science paper published September, 2020: …”We examine the relationship of global temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration at the monthly time step, covering the time interval 1980–2019, in which reliable instrumental measurements are available. While both causality directions exist, the results of our study support the hypothesis that the dominant direction is T → CO2. Changes in CO2 follow changes in T by about six months on a monthly scale, or about one year on an annual scale.”  In other words, warming is causing the increase in atmospheric CO2, not humans burning fossil fuels.  This paper confirms the work of several other scientists.  (Full science paper at this link:

Why should you and I be concerned?

“The world spent US$3,660 billion [$3.66 TRILLION] on climate change projects over the eight-year period 2011–2018.  A total of 55% of this sum was spent on solar and wind energy, while only 5% was spent on adapting to the impacts of extreme weather events,” according to recently released calculations by The Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES), a multi-disciplinary and independent research group.  The world spent over $2 Trillion on wind and solar power in the period 2011 to 2018, and only one-tenth that on adapting to extreme weather events. That is counter-productive, upside down investing.  Wasted public resources.

Humans must adapt to hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, tropical and winter storms, i.e. weather events.  Fossil fuels are necessary for that adaptation.  Contrary to what has unfortunately become common knowledge, CO2 from fossil fuels does not cause any measurable warming or climate change.  In an essay posted on its web site, CERES goes through some of the problems created by governments attempting to shift from reliable sources of electricity to unreliable solar, wind and other so-called sustainable types of energy. This huge malinvestment is hurting the poor the most. These damages are largely ignored by the misleading statistic: “the social cost of carbon.”

Leftists, the UN, the EU and “The Squad” of Democrats in Congress want far more money and control.  The U.S. House of Representative recently passed a new bill targeting greenhouse gasses and climate change.  The title of the bill is: The Moving Forward Act.  One section of interest is: Subtitle G—Treasury Report on Data From the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. This section authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to: “[Determine] the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by each taxpayer for the purpose of imposing a fee on such taxpayers with respect to such emissions.”

Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson is reportedly planning a 200% increase in electricity rates for the UK.  But experts say that will not be enough to cover the cost of his wind and solar expansion.  If this fraud continues, the same will happen in America and everywhere.

Prof Fritz Vahrenholt, one of the founders of the Germany’s environmental movement who formerly ran Germany’s national energy program, said in an interview last week that the claimed climate catastrophe “is not taking place” and that policymakers are trying to use “panic and fear to get the people to act.” “Vahrenholt also believes electric cars powered by batteries is not a feasible technology, and that other experts quietly call it “a crackpot idea”, and don’t speak up for fear of losing research funding. The vast majority of funding comes from the German government.” “Climate science is exaggerated, filled with fairy tales and the Paris Accord is “already dead.” He says “there is no tipping point” and he expects “civilization to go on for another 7,000 years.”

Mr. Rupert (R.C.E.) Wyndham of Cornwall, UK considers this global warming fraud to be a crisis of morality.  I agree.  Teaching children fear and false information is a form of child abuse, is it not? Mr. Wyndham knows how to turn a phrase and has written multiple letters to those in positions of moral authority.  The following is an excerpt from a letter he addressed to Archbishop Vincent Nichols, Westminster Cathedral, with cc: to Pope Benedict XVI, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Archbishop of York, the Bishop of London, the Prime Minister, the Abbott of Downside Abbey, and Ed Miliband, MP.

To those who come to “Climate Change” with open eyes (not to mention open minds), it merely constitutes a trend – as unmistakeable as tracks in the snow, the cupidity and mendacity of politicians, the poltroonery of establishment scientists and their journalistic lapdogs or the catastrophist phantasmagoria of anthropogenic global warming pseudo-environmentalists. Furthermore, the perception is strengthened to the point of absolute confirmation by the predictions of dissenting mavericks…

And, dare it be said, for those such as yourself, in the vanguard of so called “faith communities”, who arrogate to themselves the role of moral leadership, this gives rise to serious questions, does it not? Indeed, in many ways, “Climategate” is less about the “science” – which anyway is garbage – than it is about the integrity of the scientific process, an issue of immensely greater ethical significance for all who value truth as well as democratic accountability.  AGW science has been exposed as a fraud, by far the gravest in the entire history of science. The AGW hypothesis itself is no better than a glib and distorted misrepresentation of a 100 year old speculation relating to the so-called Greenhouse Effect allied to invented evidence concocted within the guts of a computer by individuals with a predetermined agenda coupled with huge personal vested interests – financial and otherwise. We now know unequivocally that not just the notorious Mann, Bradley Hughes hockey stick, beloved of AGW propagandists, is a worthless contrivance, but even the very temperature record itself is largely a fiction – maybe entirely. … AGW is a hypothesis that is intellectually so indefensible, so tawdry, so dishonest, so self-serving, so mean spirited, so corrupting that, quite simply, it cannot be espoused with honourable motivation; it has to be the product either of nefarious purpose, of unassailable gullibility or of mental aberration. Any person who describes him/herself as a scientist, who promotes or condones AGW, is no better than an alarmist, a mountebank, a bare faced liar. By virtue of that fact alone he/she is a scoundrel.

That, of course, leaves you in a quandary, does it not? Either you repudiate this ethical obscenity and, in a spirit of Christian repentance, exercise moral authority or you continue to promote it and abrogate moral authority. Although religious leaders often seem to find the concept seductive, what you cannot do is both to wolf your bun and hang on to your penny.

On 3 November I wrote to you in response to your call for a moral crusade on the subject of “climate change”. At the suggestion of Prof. David Bellamy, I sent a copy to The Tablet. From you nothing has been heard – well except second hand, 350 ppmv (Lordy, lordy!). That is no surprise. One gets very used to AGW protagonists seeking the shadows. From The Tablet came what read like rather a startled holding letter, since when nothing. As a New Year resolution, perhaps it could be suggested that you try to be braver, and preach not simply to the converted but debate also with those who might bring to bear a more detached and questioning approach…

I do not live in hope, however.

Yours sincerely

R.C.E. Wyndham

PS The seer of Lambeth Palace, of course, has a real problem. Two thirds of his clergy’s pension fund is tied up in investments founded in this claptrap. Compared to that, down the road what matters a few female or fairy prelates?

(If you enjoyed Mr. Wyndham’s turn of phrase, here is his letter to the head of the Royal Society, the UK’s premier science establishment.

Finally, recently there have been the usual eruptions of summertime pseudo-scientific and media reports that Greenland, the Arctic and Antarctica are melting, etc.  Coincidentally, this past week the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) reported the Greenland ice sheet has never before increased 4 gigatons (Gt) during summer, but it has just done that, citing records that go back to 1981.  The records show that the 4 Gt increase exceeded the mid-August record by over two gigatons.  Keep your ski clothes.


Bud Bromley

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Whistleblowing video on Bin Laden, Benghazi and Seal Team 6

Amazing whistleblowing video on Bin Laden and Benghazi and murder of Seal Team 6

First published at 06:47 UTC on October 13th, 2020. The second half of this video includes an interview with Allen Perreau (spelling?) which is excellent.

Flashback: One day after Osama bin Laden was killed, Joe Biden publicly outed the Navy Seals, 90+ days later the Taliban shot down a U.S. helicopter killing 15 Seal Team 6 warriors and 23 others Watch >

Now these whistleblowers (at the “betrayal” video) are claiming they have evidence that Bin Laden was not killed and Bin Laden and about 100 Al Qaida were moved to Iran before the raid on the Bin Laden’s supposed hide out in Pakistan. The man killed by Seal team 6 was a body double, and the Seals learned that, and Bin Laden’s body was not buried at sea. There is more in this amazing interview…

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The great American mask rip-off

The second half is stronger than the first half.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment