The pattern is so familiar. And still, almost no one is asking the fundamental questions: Why did the US and NATO remove Muammar Gaddafi and his regime? In what way was this violent and deadly action important to U.S. national security? What was the U.S. national interest in Libya?

Investigating Benghazi ignores the problem of our reason for being in Libya and then in Benghazi and, after U.S. having already taken nefarious actions, investigates which band-aid to use after being being injured.

“The pattern is familiar: When news first breaks, say what needs to be said to escape the news cycle unscathed. Next, when the truth starts to emerge, deny wrongdoing and state that any comprehensive judgment should be withheld pending a full investigation. When the investigation commences, stonewall the investigators and accuse conservatives of being “obsessed” or on a “witch hunt.” By the time wrongdoing is finally confirmed beyond any reasonable doubt, the average voter will have forgotten why the scandal was a scandal to begin with, or, if he hasn’t forgotten — and actually did withhold judgment — the waters will have become so muddied he won’t know whom to believe.” (1)

Elizabeth Stuart contributes: “There will be people who will take up the “nothing new, no new evidence” mantra, and repeat it at every occasion as if it were the most insightful set of words ever. Every news story in every rag and mainstream broadcast will contain this phrase as if it was the only logical thing to be said. They’ll say “the GOP is conducting a witchhunt, trying to destroy Hillary’s campaign. To that, the only response possible is, DUH! We’re not the GOP, so much as conservatives, and we’re not conducting a witchhunt because we, by God Almighty, found the witch already. It’s not like she was hiding. Her name is Hillary, aka, “the pantsuited one”!

Washington D.C., mainstream media, and especially liberals and so-called “progressives” do not have the intellectual integrity to investigate – much less to stop – the continuing regime change wars in Libya, Syria, Egypt, Ukraine, and other countries. Benghazi was just a minor symptom of our collective corruption as a nation. Whether we like it or not, we are the evil empire.

Read more at:

(1) http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437262/hillary-clinton-benghazi-scandal-how-she-survived

“To be clear, so there is no confusion, anyone who believes that it is okay to plunder others’ property and that it is somehow acceptable to coerce others to their own ideological will, is not my friend. Now, if one desires to read what I write to understand the principles of liberty and freedom applied, contrasted with the ideologies of hatred, plunder, coercion, and evil–i.e. collectivism*–carry on. However, to attempt to promote collectivism of any genre’ in my domain will not be received kindly. The only ‘free’ that matters is individual liberty. All other promises of ‘free’ and ‘guaranteed’ this and that from the State, are simply promises of increasing tyranny to individuals and producers. Charlatans like Sanders and Clinton are simply peddling the age old evil of ‘we’re here to take care of you’, disguising their planned plunder of all to fund their disingenuous ‘charity’ and mostly their own wealth and power. Further, any other candidate from any party who promises to use the State to fix everything, is either naive or peddling another form of collectivism, be it fascism, communism, Statism itself, or any other hybrid. Now, if one is so naive as to believe in the socialist, collectivist rhetoric, I feel for them. But, that feeling of sadness for their foolishness and misguided understanding of historical reality goes away when their ignorance and foolishness impacts myself, my family, and future generations of Americans. To be clear, all forms of collectivism are simply evil, as they, at the core, institutionalize the coercion and plunder of all and always eventually enable a ruling oligarchic elite to tyrannize all for their own power and gain. Finally, to be clear, I didn’t force this need on my part to fight daily to restore and sustain individual liberty in America. The Collectivist in Chief and his many comrades who have accelerated the collectivization of America have forced my hand into a very strong and unwavering repudiation of their evil. Hopefully this helps anyone understand where I stand and where our ‘friendship’ stands. Carry on.” DM Chaney “Thoughts on Liberty” (Drafts)

Obama and Kerry stole your money and gave it to the World Bank under the auspices of the Green Climate Fund. The global elites are advancing their plan to control all resources and you. Warning! Disregard this at your peril. Trump, Cruz and Rand Paul oppose it. All other major presidential candidates from other parties support it. Wake up. You are being scammed.

“The further a society moves away from both understanding and paying for their liberty, in blood, the more they are susceptible to tyranny. The longer a society is suppressed by tyranny, the more they begin to hunger for liberty and an understanding of it, and the more they are willing to pay for liberty, in blood, once again. Until enough members of a society are willing to lay their down their lives in defense of, or the reclaiming of, individual liberty–self-determination sans coercion–they will always increasingly be tyrannized by individual, gang and State tyranny. Today, we live in a society where a vast majority are brainwashed that they are free, but live in a time of the greatest tyranny since our founding–a tyranny at so many levels our founders would never have tolerated for even one minute. The ‘progressive’ collectivist movement in America over the last one hundred years has known that an overt, direct and immediate revocation of rights that would enable their Utopic ‘one world government’ (really an elite, global oligarchy), would spawn a great uprising that could never be contained. But, they determined to progressively erode liberties and shift power to the central government away from the individual, the family unit, the city, the individual states towards the federal government, over time (Fabian Socialism). Individual liberties were to be gradually eroded. Power was to be shifted slowly and almost imperceptibly towards the central powers–banks, and powers-that-be behind the curtains–those who control the banks, commerce, the military and politics at the highest levels. The shadow government, the deep State, would be more and more controlled by the global elite through many mechanisms which would be imperceptible to the average individual voter. This increasing tyranny, however, that has resulted in intrusions into every area of our lives and a restriction by the State leviathan’s tentacles at ever level of our existence–from healthcare (Affordable Care Act) to security in our papers and privacy (Patriot Act), to ownership and control of our own property (Agenda 2030, 2021–U.N.), and to the basic natural rights to the most effective tools of self-defense codified in the Second Amendment (Small Arms Treaties and other local, national push for encroaching laws)– has brought about increasing uprisings and willingness to fight the Leviathan towards restored liberties. From Nevada, to Oregon, to elections that are displacing the powers-that-be, we are seeing the resistance mount. For any society that wishes to be free, it must first, draw a line in the sand at any encroachment. Second, it must elect those self-government representatives who would never allow such encroachment. Third, it must be willing to remove these [encroachers] from office by any means. And, finally, it must be willing to fight to restore liberty lost. How far are you willing to move away from liberty before you are willing to fight to restore and sustain liberty lost? Carry on.” DM Chaney “Thoughts on Liberty” (Drafts) (Remembering the Tiananmen Square uprising in June, 1989, may those freedom fighters who fought and died, RIP)

Why isn’t this more widely reported? Dirty Wars, the outstanding documentary by journalist Jeremy Scahill, is now available full length on YouTube. If you believe you are a patriot, then watch this documentary of your government at work.

This is the well reported true story of secret joint U.S. special operations (JSOC) reporting directly to the President with orders to kill people based on a hit list of thousands. It began secretly during the Irag war under G.W. Bush and has expanded and continues under Obama to more 75 countries and thousands of innocent dead. This is the hit list and special forces command that killed Osama bin Laden. Among others, this report also includes the drone assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki and later by a separate drone of his 16 year old son and his friends, American citizens assassinated by drone without due process or trial or charges under direct orders of President Obama. This is not for children. 1 hour 26 minutes.

Available on Amazon Prime and other streaming video channels

trailer     https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2532528/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2532528/

Like alcoholism or drug addiction, irresponsibility is a disease. And like almost all known diseases, it is inherited via both nature and nurture, even though we don’t yet understand precisely how all this biology works. Irresponsibility, that is, failure to respond in a way that is not self-preserving or adaptive of yourself and your family to events will eventually result in elimination of your biology from the gene pool, and, this is the final effect of narcissism…excessive love of oneself … excessive selfishness. Homosexuality is a reflection of narcissism. A failure to discriminate, differentiate, and then properly judge your own feelings – your natural sensory mechanism – is a failure to adapt. You might be able to drive through red lights once or a few times. You can rationalize as much as you wish. But, continuing to respond improperly to your senses will most probably, eventually harm you and those around you. Any other alternative would defy the Copernican Principle, a fundamental principle of science; there are no special observers; the earth is not the center of the universe. If you feel my words abuse your sensibilities, instead of freeing you of misunderstanding as intended, then you may take your dung ball and go elsewhere. I will not harm you.

Try any ole AA meeting or similar. Or any psychotherapy session, which I used to conduct daily. Or any shrink’s couch. They all make you responsible for your own actions, your feelings and your thoughts. A disease is still one’s own responsibility. What one sees as a disease, another man can see as an opportunity. Stephen Hawking comes to mind. Irresponsibility is the failure to respond, without regard of the reason for the failure.

A “disease” is merely a classification, meta-information, made by statistical groupings, a type of taxonomy, that is, technical semantics used to describe observations. Reality is not changed by observation except at the levels of quantum physics and spirit. Classification does not change responsibility, i.e. the ability to respond. Individuals are responsible. Otherwise there is no liberty.

There is an organization of Muslims that is aware of this fundamental problem and is trying to reform Islam. Given Islam’s 1,400 year old history of eliminating reformers, the prospects are not bright, but there are intelligent people and excellent speakers among this group. They deserve our support. Profiling to eliminate radicals can only be successful if done by people inside their culture. Putting yourself in the shoes of the reformers, they would risk turning in Muslim fundamentalists only if they trusted the rest of us. They cannot trust the rest of us now, with Obama and Democrats appointing members of the Muslim Brotherhood to U.S. Homeland Security. In other word, the first action required is on our side.

http://muslimreformmovement.org/

Our culture is now built on tolerance and apathy and is confronted by the full onslaught of another culture built on passionate true-believers. The prospects are not good for us.

A very difficult period is ahead of us. This means nothing less than getting government to eliminate Muslims in government; if one looks at Islam as a religion, then that would conflict with the 1st amendment.  That shield must be removed first by general and legal agreement that Islam as configured is much broader; Islam is not only a religion. Only then could a humane policy of profiling members of the Muslim community by members of the Muslim community begin. Otherwise, we would be increasing the risk to the lives of reformers whose lives are in fact already at risk of attack by jihadists.  As outsiders, we cannot reform their culture.

I expect to see beheadings and honor killings at Democrat conventions in a Roman circus-like environment before we are done. Government will do nothing to stop it because government has already been infiltrated, as David Chaney said. The rest of us will be called out as deniers if we refuse to submit.