Over 20 years ago (1), real scientists and doctors, those who were not beholden to pharma companies and other conflicts of interest, knew that leaky vaccines were not a viable prescription for an epidemics in progress. But governments, global corporations, supranational governments (e.g. EU,), NGOs etc., did it anyway. Left to their own devices, the Iron Law of Bureaucracy guarantees these organizations will take precisely the wrong thing for the people they were initially designed to protect. This is how technocracy (or the Technological Society) works…domination of the people is the end result of management technology, one of those technologies being propaganda. Many writers, philosophers, thinkers warned us repeatedly, for example George Orwell, Franz Kafka, Jacques Ellul, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Eric “The True Believer” Hoffer, and many more. But, instead of learning the lesson of “The Tragedy of the Commons” …which is: no one takes responsibility for the shared pasture … people to continue to trust governments, the ultimate shared pasture.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche explains beautifully: https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT POST.

(1) Nature 2001 Dec 13;414(6865):751-6.

doi: 10.1038/414751a.

Imperfect vaccines and the evolution of pathogen virulence

S Gandon  ¹ , M J Mackinnon, S Nee, A F Read

Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.

• PMID: 11742400
• https://www.nature.com/articles/414751a

Abstract

Vaccines rarely provide full protection from disease. Nevertheless, partially effective (imperfect) vaccines may be used to protect both individuals and whole populations. We studied the potential impact of different types of imperfect vaccines on the evolution of pathogen virulence (induced host mortality) and the consequences for public health. Here we show that vaccines designed to reduce pathogen growth rate and/or toxicity diminish selection against virulent pathogens. The subsequent evolution leads to higher levels of intrinsic virulence and hence to more severe disease in unvaccinated individuals. This evolution can erode any population-wide benefits such that overall mortality rates are unaffected, or even increase, with the level of vaccination coverage. In contrast, infection-blocking vaccines induce no such effects, and can even select for lower virulence. These findings have policy implications for the development and use of vaccines that are not expected to provide full immunity, such as candidate vaccines for malaria.

Consider this precise analogy and reality: At this moment, the chief science officer of the WHO is being indicted in her own country (India) for her misinformation about Ivermectin, which appears to be a clear cut case where thousands of lives were lost due to following her professional recommendation.

If you are a corporate HR executive or manager, General Counsel, or CEO, or union executive and your policies are coercing your employees to take a vaccine jab or else face a penalty, and meanwhile federal governments, state governments, and vaccine manufacturers are NOT requiring vaccination, then you and your company are in misfeasance and liable for all legal and financial responsibilities. You don’t stand a chance in front of a jury.

“Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19” A D Santin  1 , D E Scheim  2 , P A McCullough  3 , M Yagisawa  4 , T J Borody  5 Affiliations.
1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
2 US Public Health Service, Inactive Reserve, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
3 Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
4 Ōmura Satoshi Memorial Institute, Infection Control Research Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
5 Centre for Digestive Diseases, New South Wales, Australia.
PMID: 34466270
PMCID: PMC8383101
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100924
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/

“In the provinces where Ivermectin was used—Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa— Covid cases declined sharply by 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%. This success, which cleared large areas of India from Covid, was kept from you by the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, AMA, Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, and the rest of the criminals who control the narrative.”

The brief by the Indian Bar Association “accused the WHO of being complicit in a vast disinformation campaign. Point 61 states, “The FLCCC and the BIRD have shown exemplary courage in building a formidable force to tackle the challenge of disinformation, resistance, and rebuke from pharma lobbies and powerful health interests like WHO, NIH, CDC, and regulators like the US FDA.” The Indian Bar Association posted an update on their website June 5, 2021, noting that Dr. Swaminathan had deleted her now-infamous tweet. They wrote, “However, deleting the tweet will not save Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and her associates from the criminal prosecution which is to be launched by the citizens with active support from the Indian Bar Association.”

In related news, vax narrative is falling apart: https://reason.com/2021/09/06/ivermectin-overdoses-oklahoma-hospitals-rolling-stone-hoax/

Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants. https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post

Dr. Robert Malone calmly explains in non-technical terms our situation with covid and vaccines.

“Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19”

This says it all: “During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus. The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains..”

Hat tip to Dr. Robert Malone.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/

Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19

A D Santin  ¹ , D E Scheim  ² , P A McCullough  ³ , M Yagisawa  ⁴ , T J Borody  ⁵ Affiliations

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
• ² US Public Health Service, Inactive Reserve, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
• ³ Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
• ⁴ Ōmura Satoshi Memorial Institute, Infection Control Research Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
• ⁵ Centre for Digestive Diseases, New South Wales, Australia.

• PMID: 34466270
• PMCID: PMC8383101
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100924

“We have no confidence in President Joseph R. Biden’s ability to carry out his duties as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces,” they wrote. “His unilateral, reckless decision to retreat from Afghanistan was done against the advice of military and national security experts and it has now put thousands of American military personnel, citizens, and Afghan allies in grave peril. Tragically, at least 12 service members have lost their lives in the deadliest attack on U.S. forces in the last decade. President Biden refuses to take responsibility for his actions and continues to mishandle the deteriorating situation at every step. In addition, he has deliberately misled the American people in response to questions posed by the media. Free nations around the world look to the United States for leadership, and President Biden has proven definitively, and repeatedly, since this crisis began that he is not capable of effectively executing his duties as our Commander-in-Chief and leader of the free world.”

“As members of Congress, we have the duty to oversee the Executive Branch and provide for the common defense of the United States of America,” the letter concluded. “We do not have confidence in President Biden’s ability to continue serving as Commander-in-Chief. It is after much consideration and with heavy hearts at the current state of our nation that we call upon you, Speaker of the House of Representatives, to begin impeachment proceedings immediately.”

“The American people must have full confidence in their Commander in Chief’s judgement and ability to protect our country and respond decisively to national security threats,”

Reps. Claudia Tenney (R-NY),

Ronny Jackson (R-TX),

Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ),

Pete Sessions (R-TX),

and Yvette Herrell (R-NM)

Let me see if I understand this properly. Person A feels that they need the vaccine to be protected, so they get vaccinated.

However, Person A doesn’t feel protected unless Person B also gets the vaccine. And if Person B refuses to get the vaccine, Person A shames, shuns them until they do.
Let’s take this a step further.

Person A, who is #vaccinated, can still catch and transmit the same #virus, but is not subjected to going through daily/weekly testing. Person B, who is not vaccinated, and who can catch and transmit the virus, has to go through daily/weekly testing and #potential quarantine. Why does Person A not have to go through testing and #quarantine if they can still catch and transmit the virus?

And to go even further than that: Person A is vaccinated and, even though they can catch and transmit the virus, can walk into any number of locations that state they will only allow the vaccinated inside. Person B is not vaccinated and, even though they may test negative for the virus, are not allowed inside any of the locations that state they will only allow the vaccinated inside.

The vaxed can even carry the same viral load as the unvaxed. In one instance of testing the vaxed had a greater viral load than the unvaxed. BTW all this info is being deliberately censored to increase pressure to be vaxed.

Wanna piece this together now? It boils simply down to #segregation and #discriminations with no real basis for doing so.

1. Person A is vaccinated.
2. Person B is not vaccinated.
3. Both Person A and Person B can catch and transmit the virus.
4. Person A does not have to get tested, but Person B does.
5. Person A can go wherever they want, but Person B cannot.
6. Person A is allowed to live their lives, while Person B cannot.
7. Person A perpetuates the shaming of Person B by stating that Person B needs to be vaccinated for Person A to be protected.

Even if 100% are vaccinated this virus won’t be stopped because coronavirus has the ability to mutate itself around any number of vaccines and the ability to hide in animal reservoirs. Polio, smallpox, childhood diseases could not do that.

The only way to stop SarsCov1, Sarscov2, common cold and any other #coronavirus is what has worked since time began….natural acquired herd immunity from exposure to recovery.
The mutations will vastly outnumber the vaccines.

Natural immunity in my humble opinion is the only way forward….. to vaccinate the world and children is utter lunacy.

#marketingcampaign for #covid has gone too far.

The right decision is to refuse to take the jab. The consequences of that decision will be less in the long run, for members of the U.S. military, for all children, for women who hope to bear children, for employees and anyone else who is being forced to take the jab. Your body and the bodies of your children and grandchildren do not belong to the government. Advocate for yourself and your family.