Cleveland Clinic Study. 50,000 healthcare workers.

https://rumble.com/v23x33u-more-vaccines-causes-more-infections.html

BREAKING NEWS: Virologist and Vaccine expert gives a dire warning to all parents. “I beg you, I really beg you don’t vaccinate your child against Covid-19, because in many cases it will be a Death Sentence for the Child. It will be a 1000 times worse. Irreversible and dangerous,” Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche  pic.twitter.com/6efuv4fb3r— Truth Justice ™ (@SpartaJustice) January 5, 2023

“It is 5 past 12.” 46 minute video presentation by Dr. Geert Vanden Bossch

https://rumble.com/v1n5274-it-is-5-past-12.html

Geert Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development.

Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer; he then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola and to build plans for global pandemic preparedness.

Back in 2015, Geert scrutinized and questioned the safety of the Ebola vaccine that was used in ring vaccination trials conducted by WHO in Guinea. His critical scientific analysis and report on the data published by WHO in the Lancet in 2015 was sent to all international health and regulatory authorities involved in the Ebola vaccination program. After working for GAVI, Geert joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office. He is at present primarily serving as a Biotech / Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines.

Email: info@voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org

Dr. Vanden Bossche’s new blog: https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/blog/scientific-blog

Bud’s comments:

(1) Natural gas is definitely the way to go.  Earth will never run out of natural gas unless life is extinguished.  Methane is still being produced in enormous quantity by the natural degradation of biological molecules in the environment.  Known natural deposits of methane hydrates or clathrate are more that 1000 times larger than all other “fossil fuels” ever discovered.  Imagine if humanity had used the financial and intellectual resources which have already been wasted on solar and wind energy but instead used these resources on R&D of methane hydrates and engineering of subsea recovery of this natural gas resource.  Lithium and uranium resources will be exhausted long before natural gas.  Also, assuming a worst case return to a deep ice age, natural gas could be recovered from continental shelves and sea floor even if higher latitudes were again buried in ice sheets.  Even if practical fusion is developed, natural gas and reformates of natural gas may be the most practical portable fuels.  Theoretically endless fusion energy could be used to generate natural gas and reformates from garbage, sewage and green waste.   

(2) 280 ppm for a pre-industrial CO2 concentration is a dubious number.  Better to use for example a 1970’s CO2 measurement from NOAA-Scripps Mauna Loa or Hadley CRU.  Ice core proxy measurements are problematic.  Ernst George Beck compiled the works of many scientists who measured CO2 by chemical means and the variation is very high. (attached graphic) G.S. Callender ‘cherry picked’ the pre-industrial CO2 value.(attached graphic.)

(3) Per NOAA-Scripps Global Monitoring Laboratory Mauna Loa (attached spreadsheet), for example, average global atmospheric CO2 concentration for 2020 was 414.24 ppm.  For 2019 it was 411.66 ppm.  This is a one-year annual net CO2 increase of 2.58 ppm.  This 2.58 ppm increase was the same for 2020 to 2021.  NOAA proclaimed these 2.58 ppm “amounts tied for 5th-highest annual increase in NOAA’s 63-year record.” Let’s consider what that really means.  This 2.58 ppm increase is the net increase in CO2 due to the combined sum of all CO2 sources and CO2 sinks, natural and human.  It is the residual difference of all CO2 emissions minus all CO2 absorptions, natural and human.  This means the net increase due to humans could not have exceeded 2.58 ppm for year 2020 or year 2021.  Dividing 2.58 ppm by 414.24 ppm equals 0.006228 or 0.6%.  Thus 0.6% is the maximum possible net contribution from humans as a percent of total CO2 concentration; that is, on average for 2020, net human CO2 did not exceed 0.6% of net global CO2 concentration.  2.58 ppm is 2.58 divided by 1,000,000 or 0.00000258, which is 0.000258%. 

In other words, the net human CO2 contribution to air for 2020 did not exceed 0.000258% of air.  No one is concerned about the other 99.4% of the CO2, but UN, WEF, national governments, bankers, world corporations and NGO’s and virtue signalers are claiming they want to spend trillions of dollars on the 0.6% of CO2 of which only part of that 0.6% is human produced. It is no surprise that UN, WEF, national governments, bankers, world corporations and NGO’s and virtue signalers are steadily losing credibility and the confidence of the general population.

(4) When the net global atmospheric CO2 concentration, i,e. the total CO2, is de-trended, then the apparent dramatic increasing trend in atmospheric CO2 disappears. This is the work of emeritus professor of business statistics, Dr. Jamal Munshi. The effect of incorrectly, repetitiously counting cumulative data is removed. Correlations between cumulative values are spurious. The apparent correlation does not capture the uncertainty in cumulative annual CO2 means. (ref. 1)

“the correlation in the source data derives from a shared long term drift in time and not from a relationship between their annual fluctuations net of long term trend.” (ref 2 page 6)

“In statistics, a spurious relationship or spurious correlation is a mathematical relationship in which two or more events or variables are associated but not causally related, due to either coincidence or the presence of a certain third, unseen factor (referred to as a “common response variable.” (Wikipedia)

Above graphic (ref 2, page 7)

References:

(1) Munshi, Jamal, The Spuriousness of Correlations between Cumulative Values (February 1, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2725743 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2725743

(2) Munshi, Jamal. Responsiveness of Atmospheric CO2 to Fossil Fuel Emissions: Updated (July 5, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997420 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2997420

Human population growth has been declining for decades. In most developed countries, population is below replacement level.

Excerpt of peer-reviewed conclusion: “Free spike antigen detected in blood of adolescents & young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into potential underlying cause.”

Originally published4 Jan 2023 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025 Circulation. 2023;0

• Lael M. Yonker,
• Zoe Swank,
• Yannic C. Bartsch,
• Madeleine D. Burns,
• Abigail Kane,
• Brittany P. Boribong,
• Jameson P. Davis,
• Maggie Loiselle,
• Tanya Novak,
• Yasmeen Senussi,
• Chi-An Cheng,
• Eleanor Burgess,
• Andrea G. Edlow,
• Janet Chou,
• Audrey Dionne,
• Duraisamy Balaguru,
• Manuella Lahoud-Rahme,
• Moshe Arditi,
• Boris Julg,
• Adrienne G. Randolph,
• Galit Alter,
• Alessio Fasano and
• David R. Walt

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cases of adolescents and young adults developing myocarditis after vaccination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–targeted mRNA vaccines have been reported globally, but the underlying immunoprofiles of these individuals have not been described in detail.

METHODS:

From January 2021 through February 2022, we prospectively collected blood from 16 patients who were hospitalized at Massachusetts General for Children or Boston Children’s Hospital for myocarditis, presenting with chest pain with elevated cardiac troponin T after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We performed extensive antibody profiling, including tests for SARS-CoV-2–specific humoral responses and assessment for autoantibodies or antibodies against the human-relevant virome, SARS-CoV-2–specific T-cell analysis, and cytokine and SARS-CoV-2 antigen profiling. Results were compared with those from 45 healthy, asymptomatic, age-matched vaccinated control subjects.

RESULTS:

Extensive antibody profiling and T-cell responses in the individuals who developed postvaccine myocarditis were essentially indistinguishable from those of vaccinated control subjects, despite a modest increase in cytokine production. A notable finding was that markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein (33.9±22.4 pg/mL), unbound by antibodies, were detected in the plasma of individuals with postvaccine myocarditis, whereas no free spike was detected in asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects (unpaired t test; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Immunoprofiling of vaccinated adolescents and young adults revealed that the mRNA vaccine–induced immune responses did not differ between individuals who developed myocarditis and individuals who did not. However, free spike antigen was detected in the blood of adolescents and young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into its potential underlying cause.

Footnotes

*L.M. Yonker, Z. Swank, and Y.C. Bartsch contributed equally.

†A. Fasano and D.R. Walt contributed equally.

Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/circulationaha.122.061025.

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page XXX

Correspondence to: Lael M. Yonker, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Jackson 14, Boston, MA 02114. Email Lyonker@mgh.harvard.edu

David R. Walt, PhD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115. Email dwalt@bwh.harvard.edu

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025

Never forget the war that was waged against the unvaccinated. Never.

@EndWokeness

Here in this short composite video are these liars:

But it was not only Stanford Professor Paul Ehrlich and his wife Anne, it was also John Holdren, President Obama’s chief science advisor, and many others.

Prince Philip, the late consort to the late Queen Elizabeth of England, said more or less in different versions that he would like to be reincarnated as a deadly virus as a form of revenge against human overpopulation. A mis-educated man whose ideology apparently influenced his children and grandchildren who then became nominal leaders of World Economic Forum, World Wildlife Fund, etc.

A short video: https://budbromley.blog/2022/12/23/depopulation/

Glenn Greewald _ today 4 January 2023 Media Silent as Twitter Files Expose Flagrant Misconduct in Govt. & Journalism | SYSTEM UPDATE #15

Glenn Greenwald Published January 4, 2023 1,013 Views

Elon Musk @elonmusk

23h

Replying to @elonmusk and @pmarca Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife.

The De-Population Bomb on Uncommon Knowledge

In 1970, Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich published a famous book, The Population Bomb, in which he described a disasterous future for humanity: “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” That prediction turned out to be very wrong, and in this interview American Enterprise Institute scholar Nicholas Eberstadt tells how we are in fact heading toward the opposite problem: not enough people. For decades now, many countries have been unable to sustain a #population replacement birth rate, including in Western Europe, South Korea, Japan, and, most ominously, China. The societal and social impacts of this phenomenon are vast. We discuss those with Eberstadt as well as some strategies to avoid them.

Wednesday, September 14, 2022  interview with Peter M. Robinson, Nicholas Eberstadt

The Hoover Institution

audio https://www.hoover.org/research/de-population-bomb

video  https://youtu.be/uNdnlrkx-wg

Transcript: https://www.hoover.org/research/de-population-bomb

Bud’s comment:

Eberstadt’s commentary dovetails perfectly with Klaus Schwab, WEF, UN, the Pope, King Charles, Bill Gates, Al Gore, etc (i.e., the Great Rest cabal) on open borders immigration and de-population except the cabal is pressing aggressive depopulation, whereas Eberstadt, Musk and others think depopulation is dangerous existentially for societies. Unfortunately, Peter’s questions did not probe the WEF de-population open conspiracy, the elephant in the room. Eberstadt’s analysis ignores the intentional, planned, lack of assimilation of some cultures, obviously Islam, into many countries. Perhaps Eberstadt’s book covers this most important existential point; without explaining that crisis, his entire analysis is dubious, a scatter of facts with no answers. For example, large numbers of Muslim immigrants in many countries are not working, instead becoming dependent (or, continuing to depend) on governments, which contradicts his implied thesis that mass migration is a solution to de-population.

Will you lose your civilization to the islamic invasion or to de-population of your civilized society? The former is a certain strategy.