Attorney @IJ. Watching the Surveillance State | Speaker. @DissidentProj American Dream Enjoyer | Metalhead | views are mine. Washington, DC
The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world.
Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime.
Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it. Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine. This confusion is rooted in historical illiteracy. Western liberal media routinely collapses entire civilizations into a single stereotype: “all Middle Easterners are Arabs,” “all Arabs are Muslim,” and “all Muslims are a monolithic, oppressed identity group by white European colonizers.” Iranians disappear entirely in this framework. Their language, history, and culture—Persian, not Arab; ancient, not colonial; distinct, not interchangeable—are erased. By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely. There is another reason the Iranian uprising is so threatening to Western media is economic issues. As you know, Iran is not only a religious dictatorship. It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government’s dark void of empty promises. Covering Iran honestly would require acknowledging that these policies are harmful. They have been tried. They have failed. Catastrophically. This is deeply inconvenient for Western media institutions that routinely promote expansive state control, centralized economic planning, and technocratic governance as morally enlightened alternatives to liberal capitalism. Iran demonstrates where such systems lead when insulated from accountability and enforced by ideology. It shows that when the state controls livelihoods, non-conformity becomes existentially dangerous. That lesson cannot be acknowledged without undermining the moral authority of those who advocate similar ideas in softer language. Western liberal media prefers not to hear this. Acknowledging it would require abandoning the lazy moral categories that dominate modern discourse: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, white and non-white. Iranian protesters do not fit. They show that authoritarianism is not a Western invention imposed from outside, but something many societies are actively trying to escape. That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the Iranian people are being ignored. So the silence continues.
Powerful words from Iranian native @DeTahmineh about the disasters of the 1978 revolution in Iran. Unlike liberals who (for reasons known only to God) idolize Khameini, Tahmineh actually grew up in post-1979 Iran and knows its horrors.
Chris Wright, U.S. Sec. of Energy: “Germany invested half a trillion (dollars in renewables) and now produce 20% less electricity at 3x the price”…”that doesn’t reduce emissions”…”that’s de-industrialization but never doing the math.”
The article at the link below is for those Bernie-bros who were fooled or fooled themselves into believing that socialism/communism is progressive instead of regressive.
The federal government is responsible for regulating interstate commerce within the U.S. as well as U.S. commerce with foreign nations. Clearly, artificial intelligence (AI) is interstate and international commerce. The federal government was authorized to regulate U.S. interstate and international commerce by the U.S. Constitution through its Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, which states that Congress shall have power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”
Congress exercised this authority through comprehensive legislation in the Interstate Commerce Act, passed on February 4, 1887. The scope of the Commerce Clause expanded significantly through Supreme Court interpretations. Landmark cases like Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) established the broad reach of federal authority over interstate commerce. The power became effectively unlimited starting in 1937.
Socialists /communists are flat earthers trying to walk us into a trap laid by globalists to take civilization back to feudalism and tyranny, eliminating nation-states, national sovereignty, individual sovereignty, rights and liberties such as free speech, freedom of movement and assembly, freedom of religion, right to carry, etc. These rights are directly from God, as the founders and framers of America as well as the philosophers and economists of the enlightenment reminded us about 250 years ago. But many of these rights already have been stolen except for rhetorical lip service in many countries, states and most international organizations, entities who commonly and nefariously claim to be “protecting our democracy.”
These supposed comrades have discovered they cannot take us back to feudalism and return themselves to power, where we the people bend the knee and kiss their rings, until individual rights and national sovereignty are eliminated in the United States of America; they believe they must destroy America and western civilization by any means before they can “build back better” their utopia. There utopia has never been successful when tried and each time millions of their comrades have died, and this does NOT include those who died in wars.
I just saw the following three comments below, which fit the subject above:
[UN] Agenda 2030 is presented as a blueprint for a better world – but behind the curtain, it’s a masterplan for global control disguised as sustainability.
The 17 goals are not just about ending poverty or protecting the planet. They’re about centralizing power, monitoring every human, and digitizing every aspect of life – from your health and finances to your food, movement, and even thoughts.
No Poverty & Zero Hunger = Total dependency on state-issued digital currencies and lab-grown food.
Quality Education & Gender Equality = Ideological reprogramming of the next generation.
Good Health = Biometric surveillance, forced medication, and control of your biological data.
Clean Energy & Climate Action = Elimination of personal property, carbon tracking, and restricted movement.
Sustainable Cities = Smart prisons, 24/7 surveillance, and algorithmic governance under the label of “efficiency.”
“Lived Reality” is a term derived from the subjective, personal experience of an individual. Similar terms like “direct experience” and “firsthand experience” help define the specific meaning of “lived reality.” What is most descriptive, however, is its antonyms. The Power Thesaurus lists ten opposites of lived reality as: acted, playacted, feigned, faked, played, pretended, simulated, bluffed, fooled, and play-acted. Words matter, and the ten opposites listed infer that anything that is not experienced firsthand is not authentic. The actual antonym for lived reality is objective reality. In the woke realm of subjective reality, where “lived reality” is the metric, only feelings matter. In the impersonal, verifiable realm of objective reality, facts are the metric. In objective reality, gravity exists–it is a fact. In subjective reality, little Johnny feels he can fly, but if he jumps off the roof, he will fall to his death because gravity is a fact. Objective reality always prevails.
Daniel Greenfield’s December 27, 2025, article “Tucker Carlson: ‘I don’t Know Anyone Who’s Been Killed by Radical Islam’” dramatizes the consequences of adults living in subjective reality. Tucker Carlson is quoted as saying, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” The statement is patently absurd on two levels. First, it infers that if Tucker Carlson did not personally know anyone in the United States killed by radical Islam, then it did not happen. That is as preposterous and infantile as saying that if you close your eyes, no one can see you. The statement denies any reality outside your own perceptions. Second, Carlson’s statement separates doctrinal Islamic religious obligations from the Islamists who act out those religious obligations. The gift of Tucker Carlson’s surrender to the madness of subjective reality is that his statement highlights the calamitous social consequences of living in the subjective, woke world of leftist relativism, where facts in objective reality are conveniently denied, and only personal feelings matter. In subjective reality, if Tucker Carlson’s “living reality” is that he doesn’t personally know anyone in the United States who’s been killed by radical Islam, then society is expected to believe that no one has been killed. If that is true, then Martin Richard, the eight-year-old boy killed by Muslim terrorists in the Boston Marathon bombings, is still alive. But Martin is dead. And the Muslims who killed him were acting out the doctrinal religious obligation to kill infidels (any non-believer, especially Jews and Christians) as stated in their holy book, the Koran.
The ideological moorings of ordered liberty require consensus on what is real. This is no small matter. Language is based on such a consensus. Laws are based on such consensus. Without agreement on what is real, there is no societal order; there can be only chaos. It is for this reason that globalists support the leftist Culture War on America and its attack strategy to replace factual, objective reality with subjective multiple realities based on feelings. If the Left can shatter the reality-based foundation of language and laws, then it has succeeded in shattering our ordered liberty and the Judeo-Christian morality that supports it. The Judeo-Christian tradition is not only the infrastructure of our Constitution, but also the foundation of Western civilization.
We are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not: Globalism vs. nation-states. The globalist war on the world’s nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from a constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of the objective world of facts into the madness of the subjective world of feelings. Psychological warfare subdues the enemy without destroying the physical infrastructure of society. It replaces brute force with mind control, shattering consensus on what is real by denying the existence of objective reality.
The globalist social engineers exploit the “lived reality” of woke leftists and the doctrinal religious obligations of Islamists as tactical weapons in globalism’s strategic war on nation-states. Woke leftism is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in communism. Communism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is convinced its manifest destiny is to rule the world. Islam is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology with a religious wing that is convinced its destiny is to rule the world in a global caliphate. Globalism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is funding and fomenting Marxist/Muslim (red/green) hatred to do their dirty work of destabilizing and collapsing Western democracies from within, in preparation for their own planetary dystopian Unistate administered under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated agencies and organizations.
The intentional escalation of antisemitism and anti-Christianity are tactical weapons in globalism’s overarching war on Western nation-states. Using the familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalists are targeting the Judeo-Christian foundation of Western civilization. It is my opinion that antisemitism is, always has been, and always will be political. In biblical times, there was no separation between church and state–religious power was political power. So, when Jesus (the most famous Jew) left Judaism and Christianity was born, so was antisemitism. But it was the shared Judeo-Christian tradition that birthed Western civilization, and it is my opinion that the globalist elite are determined to divide, conquer, and collapse our Judeo-Christian infrastructure and replace our political infrastructure with their dystopian, totalitarian Unistate. First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. The globalists are escalating antisemitism and using the progressive left (Marxists) and the Muslims in every Western country to create the required chaos to make society ungovernable. Israel, like the United States and every other Western nation, will cease to exist as free and sovereign nations if the progressives and their Muslim partners continue to tear those nations apart from within–the red/green alliance funded and fomented by the globalist elite will end in Kissinger’s predictive statement:
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991
Notice Kissinger said U.N. troops–internationalized world troops–to bring order in a world government. Personally, I think the United States should withdraw from the United Nations and let it collapse because it is the instrument of one-world government and infrastructure of the Unistate. For me, antisemitism, anti-Zionism, Jew-hatred, is all being fomented to divide and collapse our Judeo-Christian tradition–it is political, not religious. I believe that we are in a critical moment in history when it is essential that Jews and Christians unite to protect and preserve Western civilization because united we stand, divided we fall.
Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, finally said the unsayable in her December 16, 2025, post on X that referenced the horrific Bondi Beach Islamist terror attack on Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Australia:
The tragic Islamist terror attack against those at a Hanukkah celebration in Australia sadly should not come as a surprise to anyone. This is the direct result of the massive influx of Islamists to Australia. Their goal is not only the Islamization of Australia but the entire world—including the United States. Islamists and Islamism is the greatest threat to the freedom, security, and prosperity of the United States and the entire world. It is probably too late for Europe—and maybe Australia. It is not too late for the United States of America. But it soon will be. Thankfully, President Trump has prioritized securing our borders and deporting known and suspected terrorists, and stopping mass, unvetted migration that puts Americans at risk.
My question is how President Trump is going to resolve the staggering hypocrisy of protecting Qatar, a major funder of Islamic terrorism worldwide, including the Islamic terrorism inside the United States, which Tucker Carlson does not acknowledge in his lived reality.By: Linda Goudsmit | pundicity
“Lived Reality” is a term derived from the subjective, personal experience of an individual. Similar terms like “direct experience” and “firsthand experience” help define the specific meaning of “lived reality.” What is most descriptive, however, is its antonyms. The Power Thesaurus lists ten opposites of lived reality as: acted, playacted, feigned, faked, played, pretended, simulated, bluffed, fooled, and play-acted. Words matter, and the ten opposites listed infer that anything that is not experienced firsthand is not authentic. The actual antonym for lived reality is objective reality. In the woke realm of subjective reality, where “lived reality” is the metric, only feelings matter. In the impersonal, verifiable realm of objective reality, facts are the metric. In objective reality, gravity exists–it is a fact. In subjective reality, little Johnny feels he can fly, but if he jumps off the roof, he will fall to his death because gravity is a fact. Objective reality always prevails.
Daniel Greenfield’s December 27, 2025, article “Tucker Carlson: ‘I don’t Know Anyone Who’s Been Killed by Radical Islam’” dramatizes the consequences of adults living in subjective reality. Tucker Carlson is quoted as saying, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” The statement is patently absurd on two levels. First, it infers that if Tucker Carlson did not personally know anyone in the United States killed by radical Islam, then it did not happen. That is as preposterous and infantile as saying that if you close your eyes, no one can see you. The statement denies any reality outside your own perceptions. Second, Carlson’s statement separates doctrinal Islamic religious obligations from the Islamists who act out those religious obligations. The gift of Tucker Carlson’s surrender to the madness of subjective reality is that his statement highlights the calamitous social consequences of living in the subjective, woke world of leftist relativism, where facts in objective reality are conveniently denied, and only personal feelings matter. In subjective reality, if Tucker Carlson’s “living reality” is that he doesn’t personally know anyone in the United States who’s been killed by radical Islam, then society is expected to believe that no one has been killed. If that is true, then Martin Richard, the eight-year-old boy killed by Muslim terrorists in the Boston Marathon bombings, is still alive. But Martin is dead. And the Muslims who killed him were acting out the doctrinal religious obligation to kill infidels (any non-believer, especially Jews and Christians) as stated in their holy book, the Koran.
The ideological moorings of ordered liberty require consensus on what is real. This is no small matter. Language is based on such a consensus. Laws are based on such consensus. Without agreement on what is real, there is no societal order; there can be only chaos. It is for this reason that globalists support the leftist Culture War on America and its attack strategy to replace factual, objective reality with subjective multiple realities based on feelings. If the Left can shatter the reality-based foundation of language and laws, then it has succeeded in shattering our ordered liberty and the Judeo-Christian morality that supports it. The Judeo-Christian tradition is not only the infrastructure of our Constitution, but also the foundation of Western civilization.
We are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not: Globalism vs. nation-states. The globalist war on the world’s nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from a constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of the objective world of facts into the madness of the subjective world of feelings. Psychological warfare subdues the enemy without destroying the physical infrastructure of society. It replaces brute force with mind control, shattering consensus on what is real by denying the existence of objective reality.
The globalist social engineers exploit the “lived reality” of woke leftists and the doctrinal religious obligations of Islamists as tactical weapons in globalism’s strategic war on nation-states. Woke leftism is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in communism. Communism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is convinced its manifest destiny is to rule the world. Islam is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology with a religious wing that is convinced its destiny is to rule the world in a global caliphate. Globalism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is funding and fomenting Marxist/Muslim (red/green) hatred to do their dirty work of destabilizing and collapsing Western democracies from within, in preparation for their own planetary dystopian Unistate administered under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated agencies and organizations.
The intentional escalation of antisemitism and anti-Christianity are tactical weapons in globalism’s overarching war on Western nation-states. Using the familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalists are targeting the Judeo-Christian foundation of Western civilization. It is my opinion that antisemitism is, always has been, and always will be political. In biblical times, there was no separation between church and state–religious power was political power. So, when Jesus (the most famous Jew) left Judaism and Christianity was born, so was antisemitism. But it was the shared Judeo-Christian tradition that birthed Western civilization, and it is my opinion that the globalist elite are determined to divide, conquer, and collapse our Judeo-Christian infrastructure and replace our political infrastructure with their dystopian, totalitarian Unistate. First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. The globalists are escalating antisemitism and using the progressive left (Marxists) and the Muslims in every Western country to create the required chaos to make society ungovernable. Israel, like the United States and every other Western nation, will cease to exist as free and sovereign nations if the progressives and their Muslim partners continue to tear those nations apart from within–the red/green alliance funded and fomented by the globalist elite will end in Kissinger’s predictive statement:
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991
Notice Kissinger said U.N. troops–internationalized world troops–to bring order in a world government. Personally, I think the United States should withdraw from the United Nations and let it collapse because it is the instrument of one-world government and infrastructure of the Unistate. For me, antisemitism, anti-Zionism, Jew-hatred, is all being fomented to divide and collapse our Judeo-Christian tradition–it is political, not religious. I believe that we are in a critical moment in history when it is essential that Jews and Christians unite to protect and preserve Western civilization because united we stand, divided we fall.
Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, finally said the unsayable in her December 16, 2025, post on X that referenced the horrific Bondi Beach Islamist terror attack on Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Australia:
The tragic Islamist terror attack against those at a Hanukkah celebration in Australia sadly should not come as a surprise to anyone. This is the direct result of the massive influx of Islamists to Australia. Their goal is not only the Islamization of Australia but the entire world—including the United States. Islamists and Islamism is the greatest threat to the freedom, security, and prosperity of the United States and the entire world. It is probably too late for Europe—and maybe Australia. It is not too late for the United States of America. But it soon will be. Thankfully, President Trump has prioritized securing our borders and deporting known and suspected terrorists, and stopping mass, unvetted migration that puts Americans at risk.
My question is how President Trump is going to resolve the staggering hypocrisy of protecting Qatar, a major funder of Islamic terrorism worldwide, including the Islamic terrorism inside the United States, which Tucker Carlson does not acknowledge in his lived reality.
Provided by Grok, below is the transcript of Liz Truss’s statement from the short video clip (based on the visible subtitles, clear audio in the ~60-second clip, and the context from the post’s description where she speaks about the changed nature of political opposition):
You just can’t negotiate with these people. You can’t compromise with them. You can’t do bipartisanship. You can’t do media charm offensives. All of those things worked in the 1990s, in the 2000s. They don’t work now. Because the other side has fundamentally changed. They want to tear down Western civilisation. And that’s what Donald Trump gets, better than almost anybody else in the Western world.
(The clip appears to be from a recent conservatism/Vanity Fair-related event or interview panel, where she’s discussing modern political strategy, the “deep state,” and comparing approaches by leaders like Trump, Orbán, and Bukele. The phrase “You just can’t” starts her key point, matching the on-screen subtitle in the preview you shared.) This is the core spoken part in the short excerpt that’s circulating — powerful and direct, as described in the post!
Short bio on Liz Truss by Grok: Liz Truss’s political views have undergone a significant evolution over her career, shifting from youthful radical liberalism to a hardline, populist brand of Thatcherite/neoliberal conservatism with increasingly Trump-aligned cultural and anti-establishment rhetoric by late 2025.
Early Ideological Roots and Transformation
Truss began her political life as a Liberal Democrat at Oxford University in the mid-1990s, where she served as president of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats. During this period, she advocated for:
Abolishing the monarchy (calling it undemocratic at a 1994 party conference),
Decriminalizing cannabis,
Opposing aspects of Thatcher-era policies (she even marched against Margaret Thatcher as a teenager).
Her parents’ left-leaning background (to the left of Labour, with her mother in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) influenced this phase. However, she switched to the Conservative Party in 1996 and gradually moved rightward, adopting free-market, small-state principles. This transformation is often described as opportunistic or chameleon-like by critics, driven by ambition rather than fixed ideology.Core Economic Views — “Trussonomics”Truss remains most associated with neoliberal/supply-side economics (often called “trickle-down” by detractors):
Strong support for tax cuts (especially for high earners and corporations) to stimulate growth,
Deregulation and free trade,
Reducing the size of the state and rejecting “economic orthodoxy” (e.g., criticizing institutions like the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England).
Her 2022 premiership’s infamous mini-budget exemplified this: unfunded tax cuts led to market chaos, a plummeting pound, and her rapid downfall. In 2025, she continues defending these ideas, blaming failure on sabotage by the “deep state” (including central banks, bureaucrats, and the establishment). She has praised Trump’s attacks on the Federal Reserve and predicted a “reckoning” for independent central banks globally.
Foreign Policy and Geopolitics: Truss is a foreign policy hawk:
Tough on Russia (pushing sanctions post-2022 Ukraine invasion),
Pro-Brexit (despite initially supporting Remain),
Supportive of alliances like AUKUS and CPTPP.
She frames global threats in civilizational terms: warning that China, radical Islam, and Western internal “left-wing ideology” could lead to the West’s collapse within a decade without strong conservative leadership.
Social and Cultural Positions: On social issues, Truss leans libertarian-conservative:
Supports same-sex marriage but opposes expansive transgender rights (e.g., rejecting self-identification, emphasizing biological sex),
Critical of “woke” ideology, identity politics, cancel culture, net zero extremism, DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion), and what she calls “Islamism.”
Post-2022 Shift to Populism and “Culture War” ConservatismAfter her 49-day premiership and losing her seat in the 2024 election, Truss has embraced a more populist, anti-establishment stance:
Frequent criticism of the “deep state” (unelected bureaucrats, judiciary, media, central banks, and even parts of her own party) as sabotaging elected leaders,
Calls for a UK version of MAGA (“Make America Great Again”) and a “Trump-style counter-revolution,”
Praise for leaders like Trump, Orbán, Bukele, and Meloni who confront entrenched power.
In late 2025 statements (including her new YouTube show The Liz Truss Show, launched December 2025), she has escalated this rhetoric dramatically:
Claiming modern left/Democrats/left-wing forces are no longer moderate social democrats but aim to “destroy Western civilisation” through ideology, excessive government, net zero policies, mass migration, and cultural battles,
Arguing traditional compromise, bipartisanship, and media charm offensives no longer work — the “other side has fundamentally changed,”
Positioning Trump as uniquely understanding this existential threat and the need for direct confrontation.
This places her firmly in the global populist right ecosystem, appearing at events like CPAC, associating with figures like Steve Bannon, and framing politics as a battle to save Western values from internal subversion and external enemies (China, radical Islam).
In summary, Truss’s current worldview (as of late 2025) combines classic Thatcherite economics with culture-war populism, deep suspicion of institutions, and apocalyptic warnings about the decline of the West unless conservatives adopt aggressive, Trump-like tactics. Critics see this as conspiratorial or self-serving (blaming others for her failures); supporters view it as a bold wake-up call. Her trajectory reflects a broader realignment on the international right.
With reference to many posts on this blog, please see the referenced paper below and the related descriptive posts of that paper.
“Temperature is an intensive property [of matter] that is defined only in equilibrium systems and cannot be meaningfully averaged across non-equilibrium systems.” − Cohler, 2025
As the papers and descriptions below explain, since there is no global average temperature, nor is there a global average sea surface temperature (SST), thus there is no global average CO2 concentration, methane concentration, nitrous oxide concentration, nor global average concentration of any other “greenhouse gas”.
Intensive property of matter definition and examples:
Intensive property of matter: A physical property that does not depend on the amount or size of the sample. Its value remains the same regardless of how much matter is present.
Common examples:
Temperature — A cup of water or a swimming pool full of water at the same temperature both have identical temperature values.
Density — Pure gold has a density of about 19.3 g/cm³, whether it’s a small nugget or a large bar.
Boiling point — Water boils at 100°C (at standard pressure) regardless of the quantity.
Melting point — Ice melts at 0°C no matter the volume.
Color, refractive index, and conductivity — These are characteristic of the substance itself, not its quantity.
The Henry’s Law constant (aka co-efficient or partition ratio) — At a given temperature, the ratio: a/b:
Where a = concentration or amount of a trace, unreacted gas in a liquid surface matrix,
Where b = concentration or amount of the same gas in the head space or gas phase matrix or atmosphere above and in contact with the liquid surface,
the resulting ratio a/b is the Henry’s Law constant for the specified gas and liquid and surface interface temperature.
Adding or subtracting more gas to the headspace or to the liquid does not change the Henry’s Law partition ratio at the specified temperature. The ratio is an intensive property of matter.
Why? Because the diffusion rate of any gas within a gas, liquid, or solid matrix is a function of the molecular weight of the gas. The molecular weight of any gas is by definition a constant. Many industries depend on this.
In other words (although it may seem counter-intuitive), adding CO2 gas to the atmosphere does not increase (except momentarily) the concentration of CO2 gas in the atmosphere. Why? When the gas concentration (or partial pressure of the gas) increases, it is offset by an equal increase in solubility of that gas in all liquids with which it is in contact until the equilibrium ratio is restored. This law holds for all known trace, unreacted gases and all known liquids in the range of earth’s temperatures and pressures.
In contrast, extensive properties of matter (like mass or volume) scale with the amount of matter.
As demonstrated in the following articles, since there cannot be a global average temperature, then also there cannot be a global average CO2 concentration (nor any other trace gas.)
Meridional Distributions of Historical Zonal Averages and Their Use to Quantify the Global and Spheroidal Mean Near-Surface Temperature of the Terrestrial Atmosphere Gerhard Kramm1, Martina Berger2, Ralph Dlugi2, Nicole Mölders3.
The following post ox X including the first video was shared by General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn [Lt General, US Army retired]: “A daily reminder @realDonaldTrump. Take a listen while you’re sipping on your Diet Coke”
Yossi BenYakar @YossiBenYakar “After yet another horrific terror attack, I’m reposting this video because it explains exactly what we’re dealing with. Former FBI agent @JGuandolo54271 explains Islam in three minutes. Clear, direct, impossible to ignore.”
And below is a short video by Muslim Brotherhood calling for dismantling the USA:
Below is another short video of Muslim Imam in Michigan claiming that all of Europe, the USA and Russia will be Muslim:
Lastly, below is a short video of an interview by Charlie Kirk of Professor Dr. Gad Saad on Islamization of the west by using our freedoms against us:
All, parts or most of the items in this post blog post above may be found on the X platform. I encourage you to look or confirm these items there. However the similar and closely related items will be independent items spread across the X platform, not as a consolidated thread here on my non commercial blog for educational purposes.
The German government has shifted into hyper-mode to defend its green patronage economy. To pay for it, heirs, high performers and savers are being drafted into service. The end of the eco-socialist nightmare will be convulsive and chaotic.
On Friday, the federal cabinet agreed to introduce a new EV subsidy. Roughly three billion euros are set to flow into this bloodless market segment over the coming years – a drop in the bucket compared to the vast sums used to artificially keep the green patronage complex alive. But it is a signal.
A Negatively Sloped Learning Curve
The decision joins a long list of political misfires in recent months – a list unlikely to end with subsidised industrial electricity, heat pumps or refinancing packages for wind turbines. The state simply has too much money at its disposal to be forced to abandon its wasteful, destructive project.
For Bavaria’s minister-president Markus Söder, the revival of this failed subsidy instrument was cause for a small celebration. He promised a “huge boost” for the domestic market, claiming state intervention would secure value creation and jobs – a thoroughly “Söderized” view of reality.
Once again, Söder proved that his personal learning curve has flattened into a downward-sloping line – a phenomenon broadly visible across European politics.
Debt Union And Professional Manipulators
Germany’s EV subsidy stands pars pro toto for the broader European situation. Public debt is exploding across nearly all EU member states. Next year, Germany will post net new debt of around 5.6% of GDP – placing it among Europe’s top debt creators.
This figure is honest – and shows the true fiscal position once the government’s accounting tricks, exemptions, “special funds” and skyrocketing municipal debts are properly added back in.
France and the UK look equally grim. Even once-disciplined Finland is stumbling toward 90% debt-to-GDP with a similarly large deficit. It can no longer be denied: Europe is trapped in a debt spiral.
Schäuble and the Troika
How times have changed. Some may recall the theatrically staged visits of former German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble and the Troika, who – with maximal media firepower – pinned the sovereign debt crisis squarely on Greece.
In reality, it was perfect camouflage – designed to divert attention from the bailout of Germany’s banking and insurance sector, which had sailed into heavy waters due to political mismanagement.
The public was never meant to see what is now obvious: the EU has degenerated into a debt club trying to execute its ideological mega-projects – like the green transition – through a credit pump, with taxes and inflation serving as the extraction mechanism from ordinary citizens.
Heirs, asset holders, small business owners and the productive middle will pay the bill. The emotionally charged debate over inheritance taxes – and the faux rhetoric about “fairness” – reveals that the political class is now openly planning the confiscation of accumulated private capital.
Inflation as a Hidden Tax
The permanent crisis will inevitably lead to a growing state apparatus – a debt-financed Leviathan that accelerates the inflation spiral with every intervention. No one is supposed to notice how quickly money loses value in this environment. The seigniorage – the hidden gain – goes to the biggest debtor of all: the state.
With every new green initiative, every EV subsidy, every publicly funded wind turbine, the bill rises. Only the delayed price effect helps politicians obscure cause and effect and decontextualise the economic damage of their intervention.
Von der Leyen, Merz, Macron & Co. rely heavily on this effect. They hope the majority of voters never add one and one together – and never question the soft-edged tax squeeze and deliberate erosion of their savings.
The State Versus Economic Reason
The intellectual collapse of politics reveals itself precisely in this moment of fiscal breakdown. One gets the impression none of today’s political representatives have ever opened a book on 20th-century economic history. Had they looked into Europe’s past, they would know their attempt to escape a deep productivity crisis through debt-financed state demand is doomed.
What Merz and his economically illiterate cabinet are doing is nothing less than a direct assault on the private economy. The expanding state sector – already consuming more than 50% of German GDP and 57% in France – crowds out private economic activity. This has been so severe that German productivity growth has trended negative since 2018.
And everything rests upon this: the social state – from education to welfare to generous migration policy – requires real economic growth of at least 2.5% annually. The illusion of stability is in free fall. Public faith in the omnipotent state shrinks with every month of recession and absent growth.
The 90% Threshold
Who will explain to future citizens that the exalted climate narrative served primarily to construct a new socialist regime, replacing what remained of the social market economy? Who will tell them that the push to control digital platforms and private communication merely aimed to silence dissent over this civilisational rupture?
Merz and finance minister Lars Klingbeil are steering Germany toward the critical 90% debt-to-GDP threshold – likely to be breached by 2030 – after new borrowing of 4.2% this year and 5.6% next year.
The 90% mark, according to the landmark 2013 Reinhart-Rogoff study, represents an economic tipping point: beyond it, the public sector adopts increasingly aggressive, parasitic policies that crowd out private investment.
In short: the state commandeers growing portions of the productive sector for debt service, bureaucracy and interventionism – erasing growth and prosperity.
Critics Targeted According To State Logic
Predictably, this analysis came under heavy fire from Keynesian economists and state-aligned media. It emerged during the post-2008 debt crises, when the political class discovered it could “solve” systemic damage by increasing the dose of the very medicine that caused it.
A return to market economics has thus been suspended.
No system limits political power more effectively than the free market. Policymakers in Brussels, Berlin, Paris and London know this – which is why its defenders are systematically ridiculed.
We watch helplessly as libertarian leaders like Argentina’s Javier Milei or the deregulatory agenda of Donald Trump are reflexively smeared, distorted and degraded by state-friendly media.
Waiting For The Shock
The end of the technocratic illusion and its eco-socialist command system arrives the moment the first domino in the debt chain falls. We cannot say when this will happen – but the probability that France, an unreformable statist colossus, will be the first to receive the red card from bond markets rises daily.
A French default is something even massive European Central Bank (“ECB”) intervention may no longer prevent. It would trigger a simultaneous fire sale of European sovereign bonds – vaporising the common currency.
Friedrich Merz, Lars Klingbeil, and Ursula von der Leyen will then blame Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin – or perhaps the Chinese. Citizens will be left to pick through the wreckage of this latest socialist experiment. In the midst of the politically manufactured migration crisis, they will be fighting for their economic survival in increasingly heterogeneous social pressure zones.
Many will ask themselves whether it was worth sacrificing their freedom, prosperity and political stability to a climate deity that ultimately reveals itself as nothing more than a political power construct – a destructive narrative.
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.