How dare you!

Proponents of human-CO2-caused global warming (AGW) stir up fear and guilt with their CO2 lies and omissions, as they did with ozone years ago.  Fear and guilt is their purpose.  “YOU are making the planet dangerously warm, our generation will not raise families and grow old, HOW DARE YOU!, or some similar infantile rant.  Proponents control the media and the population and the vote with fear.  Their indoctrination by fear has apparently worked on millions of people, especially 40 years of children around the world. Obviously it has worked on the world’s politicians, mainstream media, educators and entertainers. But, you need not be one of their useful idiots and eventual slaves.

Pay attention now children, teachers and politicians:

The following 2 graphs are really what the temperature trend is doing, contrary to most people’s education and daily and continuous news, and contrary to the politicians in something like 160 countries, the UN, the EU, Great Resetters and global bankers:

GISS is NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies

And the following graph is really how carbon dioxide is trending:

By the way, the green line in the graph immediately above is net global average atmospheric CO2 concentration from all sources. Human-produced CO2 is a small fraction of that net CO2.

But the great resetters, government agencies, teachers, mainstream media, and politicians around the world scare you with graphs of CO2 data like the following:

And statements like “97% consensus of scientists agree on climate change!” made by the presidents and prime ministers of nations, multinational organizations and charlatan so-called “environmentalists.”


Yes, the same people producing the global warming fraud are also pushing major reduction of earth’s population of humans. Some of them believe, say out loud and write that humans are a plaque on the earth, for example the late consort to the Queen of England, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, infamously said he wanted to come back as a virus plaque to reduce earth’s population.

In fact, world population growth has been declining for decades, is expected to continue declining, and is now below replacement levels in multiple countries. But you may not perceive that decline yet because the same AGW proponents producing the global warming fraud are inducing people to move to the big cities and out of rural areas. It is no mystery that some of those same AGW proponents are buying up huge amounts of rural land, farms and ranches.

The already powerful and wealthy ideologues who want to control the world first gained control of academia and media. Then they prepared the narrative which was presented to politicians and citizens, beginning when those politicians and citizens were in kindergarten.  The narrative is that human-produced CO2 from fossil fuels is pollution and dangerous to humans and the planet. This narrative is then expanded into all fields of endeavor in all countries and repeated endlessly. This has already happened 4 decades ago. The people you believed were teaching you were in fact indoctrinating you so that you would willingly become feudal slaves, willingly give up your freedoms, own no private property or money, take the drugs they hand out and be happy.

The truth is more CO2 would be good for the planet.  You may be familiar with the Jurassic period of earth’s history, a jungle-covered earth with dinosaurs and abundant life, and imagined in the famous Jurassic Park movie.  Millions of years of abundant and growing life happened when CO2 atmospheric concentration was ten times today’s concentration. As of today, UN, EU, Joe, Boris, Klaus, Jacinda, actors, “journalists” and journals, bankers and many oil companies claim doubling of CO2 is dangerous, and some claim or imply it is already too late, beyond the point of return.

The truth is humans cannot change net global average atmospheric CO2 concentration by using fossil fuels and making cement. We can not increase it nor can we reduce it. It is not in our hands. It is above our pay grade. Net global average atmospheric CO2 concentration is controlled by the laws of chemistry and physics, the laws of nature created by God. Every breath you take is dependent on those same laws. Net global average CO2 concentration in the air today is the same as it would be if humans never existed.

Humans can neither increase nor decrease net global average CO2 concentration, that is, unless we allow crazy billionaire ideologues, politicians and governments to attempt to re-engineer the climate by insane, and if successful then genocidal, projects such as creating artificial clouds to block the sun.  That insane idea could create a new ice age and wipe out life.  The same people pushing such insane geo-engineering concepts are also pushing the overpopulaton lie, vaccines, tests for viruses, and of course the human-CO2-caused global warming fraud.

The truth presented in this post normally is not presented online in wiki pages, nor by NGOs, nor in most schools, universities, worldwide, definitely not in mainstream media and governments.  For example, Al Gore’s propaganda movie “An Inconvenient Truth” was presented to the student body at my son’s high school 12 years ago.  I personally visited the headmaster before the movie was shown and requested to present a rebuttal to the movie.  My request was denied.  This was a headmaster to whom I had donated thousands of dollars for his private school in excess of the expensive tuition.  Already by that date, a high court in London, England had decided that the movie contained major misstatements and ordered English schools to present a rebuttal whenever Gore’s movie was shown. Probably very few educators know that, or if they do they ignore it. Even the UN IPCC removed the scary graphs from its reports.

The late philosopher at University of Chicago, Allan Bloom, called out this mis-education phenomenon and titled his 1987 book, The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students. This phenomenon is a nefarious human invention not limited to America, nor even primarily created in America, nor is it limited to the AGW fraud.  Bloom was not part of the so-called “vast right-wing conspiracy.”  He was a self-claimed lifetime liberal, gay, professor at Cornell and University of Chicago.  There are other intellectuals of Bloom’s status carrying that message in philosophy, psychology, social studies, for example Jordan Peterson and Václav Klaus, Czech economist and politician who served as the second president of the Czech Republic from 2003 to 2013.

There are also tens of thousands of scientists in many countries who put their careers on the line to speak out publicly against the global warming fraud and the viral/vaccine fraud.  But they are ignored, banned, cancelled and scorned. Lists of these honorable and brave scientists, doctors, engineers, etc and be found on my blog, for example:

#climatechange #globalwarming #ipcc #CO2 #climatecrisis #climatescience #CO2science #environment

About budbromley

Bud is a retired life sciences executive. Bud's entrepreneurial leadership exceeded three decades. He was the senior business development, marketing and sales executive at four public corporations, each company a supplier of analytical and life sciences instrumentation, software, consumables and service. Prior to those positions, his 19 year career in Hewlett-Packard Company's Analytical Products Group included worldwide sales and marketing responsibility for Bioscience Products, Global Accounts and the International Olympic Committee, as well as international management assignments based in Japan and Latin America. Bud has visited and worked in more than 65 countries and lived and worked in 3 countries.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to How dare you!

  1. catweazle666 says:

    The temperature graph is even less alarming if it is plotted on the Rankine scale!


  2. petroalbion says:

    Bud, How do we get this data in front of the people who need to see it? Even if human CO2 emissions did have an effect it would only be beneficial, but they are being fed on a diet of how we must make a ‘just transition’ to unreliable and expensive, environmentally destructive renewables to save Gaia and have been for over 40 years. Would a court case against the UN IPCC crowd, on the basis of spreading lies, get their attention?

    Liked by 1 person

    • budbromley says:

      You have a very good point there. I am working with a company called EnergyCite and its sister ClimateCite to help with exactly that question. See Sharing and feedback comments welcome.
      Check out our new video, an early report of our recent study.


    • budbromley says:

      It would be useful to have a court case to stop the cancel culture, censoring, and miseducation. I wish there were a easy way to file an injunction for immediate relief. But proving standing would be difficult if the plaintiff has not been demonstrably harmed. The problem would be proving that harm because the courts seem unwilling to take science cases, that is, cases where they would have to make a decision on the merits of science. They are probably right about their decision on that point. They do not have the right training or background, and are probably biased by the pervasive indoctrination that is out there. They would need to rely on experts.

      On the other hand, if a “skeptical” organization were sued by an AGW proponent, and the case ever made near trial, possibly the defending skeptics could get to discovery phase and thereby uncover evidence of fraud, collusion, etc by AGW proponents. Attorneys for the AGW side would do everything possible to prevent that. Of course, this case would be very expensive since the plaintiff would have access to the richest and most powerful people and governments. AGW proponents would attempt to silence their opponent by out spending them in litigation phase. By the way, this is happening today with the cases about fraud in the 2020 U.S. election. It is a difficult and expensive road which becomes existential.


  3. petroalbion says:

    You have a fine way with word, which I have spread around, and I wondered if you were aware of the forthcoming 30 by 30 biodiversity proposal to be voted on in Kumming China later this year
    Here’s a few words from New scientist that sets the tone, and it is clearly part of the climate change brigade’s assault ‘only tenyears left
    Howard Dewhirst

    IT IS perhaps inevitably being trailed as a last chance to avert disaster. But when the world gathers in Kunming, China, later this year to finalise a much-delayed global deal on biodiversity, the fate of the universe’s only known biosphere will lie in the negotiators’ hands. “We’re in crisis mode,” says Eric Dinerstein, former chief scientist at conservation group WWF. “We have 10 years before we surpass critical tipping points that would lead to irreversible biodiversity loss.”

    At the centre of the deal under negotiation is a new, ambitious target that goes far beyond previous, failed commitments to protect biodiversity. Catchily titled “30 by 30”, it would commit nations to setting aside 30 per cent of Earth’s land and seas for nature by 2030. For many conservation biologists, it is a breakthrough even to see it on the table. But nerves are also jangling. Will 30 by 30 make it through – and if it does, will the world act, and will it be enough?

    Liked by 2 people

    • budbromley says:

      Thanks. No, I don’t know about that meeting or proposal at all. I have only seen a few headlines that scream of extinction of species, etc. The bit you shared above appears to be right of the great resetter’s feudalist mantra.


  4. Pingback: How dare you! — budbromley – New Human New Earth Communities

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.