The medical doctor being interviewed is Peter A. McCullough MD, MPH, who has over 600 medical publications to his name and is actively treating Covid19 patients.

Here is his bio: https://www.cardiometabolichealth.org/peter-mccullough.html

Buckle your seat belts.  This is fast paced.

This letter contains important information for you and your family. It is not only about colleges and college-age students. The letter at the link is from AAPS, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, representing about 5,000 M.D.s

Dear Deans, Governing Boards and Trustees,

On behalf of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, I am writing to ask you to reconsider your new policy mandating COVID-19 vaccination of students prior to returning to campus.[i] Institutions of higher learning are divided on this issue.[ii] ,[iii] Although, at first glance, the policy may seem prudent, it coerces students into bearing unneeded and unknown risk and is at heart contrary to the bedrock medical principle of informed consent.

There are multiple reasons to reverse your policy. I ask you to consider the following:

1. Young adults are a healthy and immunologically competent and vibrant group that is at, “extraordinary low risk for COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.”[iv]
2. College and University students, however, are under significant mental health strain already from COVID-19 fears, circumstances, distance learning problems and the imposition of government health policy restrictions.[v]
3. Even though the FDA granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for three COVID-19 vaccines, they are not FDA approved to treat, cure or prevent any disease at this time.  Clinical trials will continue for at least two years before the FDA can even consider approval of these vaccines as effective and safe.
4. The COVID-19 vaccines on the market in the U.S., mRNA (Moderna and Pfizer) and DNA (Johnson & Johnson – Janssen), have caused notable side effects, pathology and even death (>2300 deaths per VAERS as of  April 20, 2021). These adverse reactions result in absence from school and work, hospital visits, and even loss of life.[vi]
5. College-age women may be at unique risk for adverse events following administration of the experimental COVID vaccinations currently available. According to the CDC, all cases of life-threatening blood clots, subsequent to receiving the J&J vaccine, reported so far in the United States, occurred in younger women.[vii]  The vast majority of cases of anaphylaxis have also occurred in women.[viii] In addition, “women are reporting having irregular menstrual cycles after getting the coronavirus vaccine,”[ix] and 95 miscarriages have been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccination as of April 24, 2021.[x]
6. Recent research data demonstrates that the spike protein, present on the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the induced primary mechanism of action of COVID-19 vaccines, are the primary cause of disease, infirmity, hospitalization and death.[xi]
7. Students who have had self-limited cases of COVID-19 already possess antibodies, activated B-cells, activated T-cells (detectable by lab testing).  This durable, long-term immunity would not only prevent them from getting recurrent COVID-19, but would also represent herd immunity to protect others in the college or university community.[xii],[xiii]
8. COVID-19 convalescent students may be harmed by college and university policy requiring COVID-19 vaccines.[xiv]They already have extensive immunity and would be likely harmed from a forced confrontation with COVID-19 vaccine induced spike protein causing autoimmune reactions leading to illness and possible death.[xv]
9. Students and their families may justifiably believe these policies discriminate against individuals who aren’t candidates for this vaccine, have pre-existing conditions, previous COVID-19 disease, cite religious objections, or are otherwise exercising their freewill choosing not to participate in this optional vaccine experiment. Refer to the Nuremberg code from WWII, which requires individuals, “to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force….”[xvi]
10. Institutional policies that permit faculty to choose or refuse vaccination, but do not allow students the same options, raise equal protection constitutional issues.
11. The ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act, requires “reasonable accommodations,” be provided based on an individual’s own unique health situation.  This includes rejection of an experimental vaccine intervention which may exacerbate known health problems and thereby cause harm.
12. Colleges and Universities should consider whether they might be liable for damages, poor health outcomes, and loss of life due to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies.[xvii]
13. “Positive cases,” as defined by laboratory testing alone, may be false positive testing errors or asymptomatic infection that is not clinically proven to spread disease.
14. Ambulatory outpatient early treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection / COVID-19 has been demonstrated effective in adults.[xviii]
15. Informed consent is the standard for all medical interventions. The FDA factsheet for the healthcare provider reads, “The recipient or their caregiver has the option to accept or refuse (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine.”

Please reverse your decision to mandate experimental COVID-19 vaccines before more students are harmed and make the vaccines rightfully optional. Both unvaccinated and vaccinated students should be permitted on campus. Thank you for your time and attention. We would appreciate hearing back from you as soon as possible and welcome further discussion with you and other leaders at your institution.

Sincerely,

Paul M. Kempen, M.D., Ph.D. – AAPS President (2021)

References

[i] https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-covid-vaccine-several-colleges-required-20210407-yyfysfahxzbvrcx6n2w63dcwue-story.html

[ii] https://apnews.com/article/us-colleges-divided-student-coronavirus-vaccination-8c46ab65afc4538cb060c320ed94fc54

[iii] https://newjersey.news12.com/rowan-stockton-universities-will-not-require-covid-19-vaccine-to-attend

[iv] https://www.andrewbostom.org/2021/04/audio-dr-andrew-bostom-with-wpros-matt-allen-4-5-21-discussing-roger-williams-universitys-mandatory-fall-2021-covid-19-vaccination-for-students-absent-any-reference-to-their-ext/

[v] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33667243/

[vi] https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-covid-ohio-student-death-johnson-shot-20210416-hm54bbifnvgc7ggxxc4cxrvpui-story.html

[vii] https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/fda-cdc-lift-vaccine-use.html

[viii] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776557

[ix] https://www.ajc.com/life/women-reporting-irregular-menstrual-cycle-after-vaccination/XRN2P4FOWRAV7DIPYTU2MO67VA/

[x] https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

[xi] https://www.qeios.com/read/26GTOD.2/pdf

[xii] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-00436-4

[xiii] https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19

[xiv] https://www.aier.org/article/if-you-had-covid-do-you-need-the-vaccine/

[xv] https://noorchashm.medium.com/uregnt-fda-communication-catastrophic-blood-clot-risk-absent-medical-necessity-of-covid-19-a6bb35b806df

[xvi] http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

[xvii] https://thehill.com/regulation/labor/541173-first-case-against-mandatory-vaccination-filed-in-new-mexico-dention-center?rl=1

[xviii] https://rcm.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.264

Since the amount of CO2 contributed by humans to the atmosphere is too small to be measured by infrared instrumentation and statistics, it is also too small to significantly affect climate change, global warming or global cooling.

Bud Bromley, Hawaii, 5 May 2021

The average net global concentration of carbon dioxide gas (CO2) in the atmosphere is routinely sampled and measured by longwave infrared radiation (LWIR) scientific instrumentation at laboratories such as the laboratory of the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on Mauna Loa volcano on Hawaii Island in Hawaii, USA.  The laboratory results are reported with high accuracy and precision resulting in high confidence in these data, including formation of national and international policies and law and consequent costs to taxpayers and economies measured in billions or trillions of dollars.

The average net global concentration of CO2 measured in these labs is on the order of 400 molecules CO2 per one million other air molecules based on volume (ppmv). Four hundred (400) ppmv is 0.04 percent concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.  Air samples are taken multiple times per week in flasks.  The air samples are dried to remove water vapor in the samples.  Water vapor is the dominant greenhouse gas in the environment since water vapor also absorbs LWIR and is 10 to 100 times more concentrated in air than CO2.  LWIR wavelengths which are absorbed by water vapor gas overlap with most of the wavelengths which are absorbed by CO2 gas.  In combination, the higher concentration of water vapor and its overlapping absorbance wavelengths prevent routine measurement of CO2 gas concentration in ambient air by LWIR scientific instruments in laboratories.        

The concentration of atmospheric CO2 gas at 400 ppmv or 0.04% is technically defined as a trace gas, along with the other atmospheric trace gases that collectively make up less than 1% of the atmosphere.  When the air samples are dried and water vapor is removed, 400 ppmv is near the lower limit of detection but still within the lower limit of quantitation by LWIR detection and routine sampling.  According to the data description provided by NOAA, detection is in a “non-linear” range requiring frequent and diligent calibration with CO2 gas standards in known concentrations.   

The theory of human-caused global warming assumes that CO2 causes “greenhouse” warming by absorbing specific wavelengths of LWIR emitted from earth’s surface and then that CO2 re-emits that same radiation into the atmosphere.  As occurs with undried air samples in the laboratory, most of the LWIR emitted by the earth is absorbed by water vapor gas in the atmosphere.  The atmosphere also contains water aerosol and water droplets in clouds and fog and these forms of water also absorb LWIR.  As occurs with undried air samples in the laboratory, the amount of LWIR in the atmosphere which is available to be absorbed by CO2 is small, obscured and limited because the LWIR already has been absorbed by water vapor, clouds and fog, water aerosol, etc.

According to the theory of anthropogenic or human-caused global warming (AGW), atmospheric CO2 absorbs LWIR emitted from earth’s surface and then re-emits that LWIR into the air, where part of the LWIR is radiated back to earth’s surface, part of that re-emitted LWIR is absorbed by water vapor and clouds or other greenhouse gas molecules, and part of that LWIR is radiated back into outer space.  Thus, according to AGW theory, there is a feedback loop of LWIR radiative emission from atmospheric CO2 gas which causes increased warming of earth, water vapor and clouds. The claimed result of this feedback forcing is a dangerous spiral of global warming that some believe is an existential crisis for humanity and most life on earth. 

Since 400 ppmv of 0.04% CO2 is near the lower limit of detection and barely measurable by LWIR detection when water vapor is removed from the air samples (i.e., dried samples), then most LWIR both to and from 400 ppmv concentration CO2 in natural air will be absorbed by water vapor, clouds, fog, aerosol, water droplets, etc.  CO2 in natural air may absorb a marginal residual of LWIR from earth that escapes absorption by water vapor, but the amount will be small and obscured from measurement by large variance in more concentrated water vapor.  CO2 in natural air may also absorb LWIR emitted by water vapor molecules and the amount absorbed by this route is probably higher than the amount absorbed by CO2 directly from earth’s surface. The AGW hypothetical feedback loop is probably the reverse direction proposed by AGW. In any case it is logically obvious that the amount of LWIR available to be absorbed by CO2 at 400 ppmv is exceedingly small because the radiation already has been absorbed by water vapor. 

Re-emission of LWIR by greenhouse gas molecules occurs upon collision of the gas molecules.  Radiative emission of a gas molecule occurs in a pulse of one wavelength duration at the same wavelengths and frequencies that were originally absorbed by the gas molecule.  The pulse of LWIR is emitted into 3-dimension steradian space, analogous to the surface of a rapidly expanding balloon.  The amount (intensity, or abundance watts per square meter) of the LWIR radiative emission is distributed into 3-dimensional space.  The amount of LWIR absorbed at each subsequent event is reduced in proportion to the solid geometry steradian coefficient and reduced in proportion to the inverse square of the distance between the emitting molecule and absorbing molecule.  The wavelengths and frequencies of the radiative emission do not change. Absorption of LWIR by a greenhouse gas molecule such as water vapor or CO2 is translated into increased internal vibrations among the atoms of the gas molecule.  A fraction of a second after LWIR is absorbed, the molecule collides with another molecule or surface and then re-emits that same radiation into 3-dimensional space.  Then the molecule relaxes to its ground vibration state.  This happens within nanoseconds or picoseconds.  At each successive absorption, collision, and re-emission event by the next molecules the amount of radiative emission received and emitted is significantly reduced.  There is a downward spiraling crescendo of heat.    

CO2 molecules which absorbed LWIR emission from earth’s surface are saturated for a small window of time, probably nanoseconds, during which time they are transparent to LWIR radiation any source.  Saturated molecules can absorb no more LWIR.  LWIR from the earth’s surface and any other emission source is moving at near light speed passing transparently through all saturated CO2 and other greenhouse gas molecules.  It follows that during daylight hours, all greenhouse gas molecules (primarily atmospheric water and CO2) are rapidly saturated, and during this time earth is emitting LWIR directly into space.  By this process, earth is cooling to maintain energy balance with incoming solar sun radiation.  After sunset, the greenhouse gas molecules emit their LWIR in the rapidly declining crescendo described above and continue to absorb and re-emit LWIR from earth’s surface.  The intensity of the LWIR from earth’s surface at night is declining as a function of time, so also LWIR available to be absorbed is declining in a cooling crescendo.  But the delay in emission of earth’s LWIR into space due to the temporary absorption and emission of LWIR by greenhouse gases, primarily due to water vapor and clouds, when integrated over 24 hours results in earth’s troposphere being comfortably warmer than it would be without these greenhouse gases.  Without these gases earth’s energy gained from the sun each day would be rapidly emitted by LWIR (heat) into space after sundown.  Earth’s atmosphere is acting as a temporary layer of insulation.  This distribution of energy is a cooling process, not a warming process.  LWIR (heat) is being distributed in incrementally lower and lower amounts.  Watts per square meter declines at night and during daylight after the time around midday of maximum insolation.    

Last and most important, the human portion of the 400 ppmv average net global CO2 concentration is significantly less than 400 ppmv, probably 40 ppmv or much less. The annual growth rate (or slope) of the NOAA average net global CO2 concentration is about 1.5 ppmv per year.  This means that LWIR radiative emission from this low concentration of human-produced CO2 concentration is significantly less than from the 400 ppmv total CO2.  Since detection of LWIR absorbance at 400 ppmv CO2 is completely obscured by water vapor, then water vapor would also block most LWIR absorption by CO2 at 40 ppmv or less.  Ten to 100 water vapor molecules surround each CO2 molecule, and these water vapor molecules would absorb most LWIR radiative emissions from CO2 at 40 ppmv or less.  Radiative emission from human CO2 cannot reach earth’s surface because it is absorbed by water vapor.  Except during the hottest part of the day during maximum insolation when absorption by water vapor may be saturated, LWIR absorbance by human-produced CO2 is probably nil, not warming earth’s surface, because, as in the laboratory LWIR instruments, water vapor is absorbing the LWIR. LWIR absorbed by water vapor due to AGW’s theoretical feedback from radiative emissions of fossil fuel CO2 must be negligibly insignificant because water vapor is already blocking LWIR from reaching the human-produced CO2.     

The logical conclusion is human-produced CO2 results in no measurable nor significant warming nor cooling, nor radiative emissions, nor greening.  As expected from the above analysis, diligent application of well-known statistical practice by Professor of statistics Jamal Munshi, PhD, Professor of Atmospheric Physics Murry Salby and other scientists can detect no statistical signal from fossil fuel CO2 emission in the NOAA LWIR CO2 dataset, nor does NOAA’s laboratory claim to detect the signal of human-produced CO2 emissions.

Other laboratory technologies have the capability of detecting 40 ppmv CO2 in natural wet air, or even 4 ppmv or 1 ppmv CO2 in natural wet air, for example gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, and Raman spectroscopy; water vapor in natural atmospheric samples does not interfere with detection in these technologies.  But that is beside the point.  Radiation to and from CO2 gas is the same LWIR and physical phenomenon in the laboratory as in natural atmosphere.  Whether in the lab or the natural undried atmosphere, LWIR is dominantly absorbed by 10 to 100 times more concentrated water vapor whose absorbance spectrum overlaps most of CO2’s absorbance spectrum.  Since the LWIR absorbance from CO2 on the order of 400 ppmv concentration cannot be detected in natural undried air, then the logical inference is a lower concentration of fossil fuel CO2 emissions cannot be absorbing or emitting significant amounts of LWIR in the atmosphere.  Since human CO2 cannot be detected by routine, diligent LWIR science and statistics in the lab, then human CO2 cannot be causing global warming, cooling, climate change, melting glaciers, starving polar bears, bleaching coral, raising sea level, or social change. 

U.S. Communicable Disease Center’s VAERS data released today showed 118,902 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 3,544 deaths and 12,619 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 23, 2021.

In the U.S., 222.3 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of April 23. This includes 97 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 117 million doses of Pfizer and 8 million doses of the Johnson &Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.

Of the 3,544 deaths reported as of April 23, 25% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 17% occurred within 24 hours and 40% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

This week’s data included three reports of deaths among teens under age 18, including two 15-year-olds and one 16-year-old who died unexpectedly from a blood clot 11 days after receiving her first Pfizer dose.

A 15-year-old female died of cardiac arrest after receiving the second dose of the Moderna vaccine, and a 15-year-old male died of cardiac failure two days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.

This week’s VAERS data show:

• 21% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
• 54% of those who died were male, 44% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
• The average age of death was 75.3 and the youngest deaths reported include two 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918 and 1242573 ) and a 16-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1225942). There were other reported deaths in children under 16 that could not be confirmed or contained obvious errors.
• As of April 23, 598 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 170 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
• Of the 1,099 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% of cases were reported after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations, 39% following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine and 131 cases or 12% of Bell’s Palsy were reported in conjunction with J&J.
• There were 121 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome with 44% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 43% to Moderna and 17% to J&J.
• There were 33,673 reports of anaphylaxis with 39% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 44% to Moderna and 16% to J&J.

Unfortunately, many born of the Age of Aquarius, the peace and love generation, the Flower Children, are leading the Great Reset, the enslavement of humanity to global governance, collectivism as described by Ayn Rand, and The Technological Society as described by Jacques Ellul.

In the following very short video, Jacques Ellul describes the difficulty of responsibility in The Technological Society

You can download for free The Technological Society as pdf, Kindle, e-book, full text at this link: https://archive.org/details/JacquesEllulTheTechnologicalSociety

Review: “This is undoubtedly one of the most important books of the twentieth century, and if you accept its thesis you won’t be able to look at the political milieu in the same way ever again. (If you agree with it and it doesn’t change the way you look at things, you haven’t grasped its importance.) Most political theorists take ideology to be a central point from which “real world” consequences emanate. In other words, a Communist or libertarian ideology in practical use will produce a particular type society and individual divorced from the actual technical workings of the society. Liberals and conservatives both speak of things in such a manner as if ideology is the prima facie cause of existence – but as Ellul shows in painstaking detail, this is wrong. What almost everyone fails to grasp is the pernicious effect of technique (and its offspring, technology) on modern man.”

“Technique can loosely be defined as the entire mass of organization and technology that has maximum efficiency as its goal. Ellul shows that technique possesses an impetus all its own and exerts similar effects on human society no matter what the official ideology of the society in question is. Technique, with its never-ending quest for maximum efficiency, tends to slowly drown out human concerns as it progresses towards its ultimate goal. “…the further economic technique develops, the more it makes real the abstract concept of economic man.” (p. 219) Technique does not confine itself merely to the realm of technical production, but infiltrates every aspect of human existence, and has no time for “inefficiencies” caused by loyalties to family, religion, race, or culture; a society of dumbed-down consumers is absolutely essential to the technological society, which must contain predictable “demographics” in order to ensure the necessary financial returns. “The only thing that matters technically is yield, production. This is the law of technique; this yield can only be obtained by the total mobilization of human beings, body and soul, and this implies the exploitation of all human psychic forces.” (p. 324).”

Of Ellul’s many books and essays, three were most influential to my understanding of the transformation of humanity that began with WWII into global collectivism (socialism/communism/dominance by government) which is now openly supported by global elites, banks and other corporations, and governments. First The Technological Society, and second Propaganda: the formation of men’s attitudes, and third, the short book The Theological Foundation of Law. These enable consolidation of Ayn Rand’s objectivism, which many incorrectly call secularism but in fact is very different from moral relativism, with Christianity and moralism, exemplified by Jacques Ellul. The result for me was justification of individual liberty and limited government as originally described in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, but practiced in name only by the U.S. government during my 72 years.

Md Kamal Hossain, Majid Hassanzadeganroudsari & Vasso Apostolopoulos Received 10 Feb 2021, Accepted 07 Apr 2021, Published online: 25 Apr 2021

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22221751.2021.1922097?needAccess=true

“A handful of studies are already reporting that the new strains are more than 50% more contagious than the wild-type Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 virus and the approved vaccines may not be as effective against these strains and warrant further studies to confirm the efficacy of the current vaccines. It is un-avoidable that new vaccines will need to be developed to complement or replace the current vaccines and included as a cocktail with the current vaccines. Attacking several sites at once using a cocktail significantly reduces the chances of coronavirus escaping the immune system, making therapy very effective. The development of vaccines using more conserved protein with a low chance of mutation could be another strategy to overcome this emerging issue.”

Jean-Marie Rouart: “Secularism is not capable of responding to conquering Islam.” (Translation.)

“Le laïcisme n’est pas capable de répondre à l’islam conquérant.”

Jean-Marie Rouart is a French novelist, essayist and journalist.

https://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/societe/jean-marie-rouart-le-laicisme-n-est-pas-capable-de-repondre-a-l-islam-conquerant-20210503

Apparently, secularism also cannot handle Black Lives Matter (BLM) or Antifa.

How can mRNA vaccines defeat this virus? Current mRNA vaccines result in translation of only part of the motif for the S spike protein of the virus, one of many proteins that make up the virus. Meanwhile the virus is mutating within hours to adapt to the antibody a healthy immune system produces in response to the partial S protein motif. But also meanwhile the virus is mutating rapidly to adapt to other motifs and immune bodies attacking it. Likely the antibody created will have recognition for S protein motif adjacent or similar to the designed motif. But what then? The virus continues to mutate and adapt to survive and replicate. But the mRNA-designed motif is static and non adaptive.

The same logic applies to virus from less developed countries. Healthy immune systems there are more challenging for the virus compared to most immune systems in more pristine environments. Virus which escapes after surviving in these developing countries is much more dangerous to immune systems in pristine environments.

Meanwhile today’s mRNA vaccines are static, fitting a motif for a virus population whose original sequence and motif will soon disappear or be out-competed and replaced by stronger virus. mRNA vaccines may make sense when they become adaptive to mutations.

I should add that an mRNA vaccine which had the capability to adapt to various and increasing viral mutants likely would be problematic for the host because viruses survive and replicate by sharing chemistries such as enzymes and cellular processes with host cells after penetration/infection. So, if a adaptive vaccine could be made it could easily cause autoimmunity and bigger problems than the virus itself.

Is negation of a negative a good negotiation strategy? Serious question. Could it be a useful way to respond to today’s pervasive cognitive dissonance in today’s upside down culture where giant global corporations, governments, quasi governments and elites promote wholesale destruction and reset of sovereignty, economies, cultures and religions.

Cognitive dissonance definition: psychological conflict resulting from incongruous beliefs and attitudes held simultaneously

For example: “probably not unrelated to” instead of “probably is related to”

Answer by Leslie Shaw, Negotiation Trainer at ESCP Business School:

1. It is likely that uncontrolled immigration will lead to social chaos.

2. It is not unlikely that uncontrolled immigration will lead to social chaos. Sentence number 2 is more convincing for a neutral listener than sentence number 1.

Newspeak:

Definitions

from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

• noun Deliberately ambiguous and contradictory language used to mislead and manipulate the public.

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

• noun A mode of talk by politicians and officials using ambiguous words to deceive the listener.

from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.

• noun deliberately ambiguous and contradictory language use to mislead and manipulate the public

Etymologies

from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition

[From Newspeak, a language invented by George Orwell in the novel 1984.]

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License

https://www.wordnik.com/words/newspeak