What do you think would be the outcome of the governors of the 27 U.S. states, plus members of Congress, plus federal and state court judges presenting their case directly to the American people? The Biden administration is willfully defying the U.S. Constitution which it has sworn duty to protect, and these governors, judges and members of Congress are already saying so in their respective venues. What would happen if our case, the case of the people’s and the states’ rights, were presented in unity and openly to the people?
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals after judicial review VIGOROUSLY “re-affirms” (link below) its “stay,” rejecting Biden’s OSHA mandates on vaccines, testing and masks. “We first consider whether the petitioners’ challenges to the Mandate are likely to succeed on the merits. For a multitude of reasons, they are.”
… “On the dubious assumption that the Mandate DOES pass constitutional muster—which we need not decide today—it is nonetheless fatally flawed on its own terms.”
“The Mandate’s stated impetus—a purported “emergency” that the entire globe has now endured for nearly two years, and which OSHA itself spent nearly two months responding to—is unavailing as well. And its promulgation grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority.”
“This case concerns OSHA’s most recent ETS—the Agency’s November 5, 2021 Emergency Temporary Standard (the “Mandate”) requiring employees of covered employers to undergo COVID-19 vaccination or take weekly COVID-19 tests and wear a mask. An array of petitioners seeks a stay barring OSHA from enforcing the Mandate during the pendency of judicial review. On November 6, 2021, we agreed to stay the Mandate pending briefing and expedited judicial review. Having conducted that expedited review, we reaffirm our initial stay.”
“Whether Congress could enact such a sweeping mandate under its interstate commerce power would pose a hard question. See NFIB v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519, 549–61 (2012). Whether OSHA can do so does not.”
An interesting read. Give it to your CEO, manager.
VIGOROUSLY is my descriptive not the court’s word, but DELICIOUSLY descriptive. The court volunteered information daring the government to “bring it on,” bring on the constitutional case, or the OSHA law case, to say to the Biden administration and its politically weaponized DOJ, notoriously tone deaf to the intent of laws, I dare you to step out behind the bar(n) and deal with this. “Oh no!” screamed Brer Rabbit. “No! Please don’t throw me over there in the briar patch, Brer Fox! I’m begging you!”
The truth of the matter back then and today, is that these parasites who call themselves leaders are not superior beings, they’re not great men and women, they’re not honorable, they’re not even average.
The people who earn an honest living, from sophisticated entrepreneurs to illiterate day laborers doing the most menial tasks you can imagine, those people deserve your respect, those people you treat with courtesy and civility, but the frauds who claim the right to rule you and demand your subservience and obedience, they deserve only your scorn and contempt.
Those who seek so-called high office are the lowest of the low, they may dress better have larger vocabularies and do a better job of planning out and executing their schemes, but they are no better than pickpockets, muggers and car-jackers, in fact they are worse, because they don’t want to rob of just your possessions, they want to rob you of your very humanity, deprive you of your free will by slowly leeching away your ability to think, to judge, to act, reducing you to slaves in both body and mind.
And still you persist in calling them leaders. Leaders??? Where is it that you think you are going exactly that would require you to have a leader?
If you just live your own life and mind your own damn business, exercising your own talents, pursuing your own dreams striving to be what you believe you should be, what possible use would you have for a leader? ~ Larkin Rose
“The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high, because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models. If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice. The major part of the extra CO2 is emitted from oceans [6], according to Henry‘s law. The low clouds practically control the global average temperature. During the last hundred years the temperature is increased about 0.1°C because of CO2. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”
Ian Weinberg • Neurosurgeon and Neuromodulator at Triangles Model Applications (TMA) Academy No time to rejoice
With inadequately researched products they were permitted to come to market. They claimed that the vaccines would put an end to illness and death and indeed to the entire pandemic. They also claimed that the immune complexes that resulted from the jab would remain fixed to the cell membranes at the injection site. But lo … it was not to be.
A recently published Swedish study reveals that at 6 months following the jab the protection is less than 50%. But more concerning was that at 6 months and beyond there was no longer a statistically significant difference in severe illness and death when comparing the vaxed and the unvaxed.
Then an ominous finding. Another Swedish study revealed that the spike protein suppresses nuclear-based P53. This is the chemical that corrects all abnormal DNA splicing. If not corrected, specifically in cell division, we get abnormal genetic products which give rise to compromised adaptive immunity and a predisposition to cancer.
So the way I see things is that we have a gain-of-function Corona virus that inflicts it’s ills upon us through the affixed spike protein; that the vaccines further inoculate us with spike proteins which don’t remain fixed to the cell membranes at the jab site but shower the entire body for up to 13 days after jabbing; that the spikes inflict vascular damage, cardiac damage, neurological damage and more; that future adverse consequences are now a distinct possibility; that there is no difference in the viral loads and spread in the vaxed versus the unvaxed; that the morbidity from the vax in kids is greater than from the Covid illness; that natural immunity is far superior than vaccines. And finally, there doesn’t appear to be significant protection against severe illness and death beyond 6 months. Not a great return on risk investment. We can only hope that the Powers That Be regain their senses sooner than later for they shall be harshly judged – jointly and severally!
Effectiveness of vaccines Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccination Against Risk of Symptomatic Infection, Hospitalization, and Death Up to 9 Months: A Swedish Total-Population Cohort Study by Peter Nordström, Marcel Ballin, Anna Nordström : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949410
You must be logged in to post a comment.