Thanks
A citizen lying to federal agents is vigorously prosecuted. On the other hand, federal agents are paid to lie and trick citizens, well paid and promoted when successful. The federal government and some states hire contractors in well known companies to spy on people and sometimes to kill people. Why is this legal?
When someone blows the whistle on this immoral behavior by government, that person is declared a traitor and hunted down, imprisoned or killed. When a government blows up or kills innocent civilians and children by the thousands, government hides it, but even when disclosed nothing is done to stop it, much less to prosecute the perps.
Before long, a false flag operation will burn down our Reichstag too. And the majority will march in lockstep to reveal those who march to a different drummer.
Shame on us all for allowing this.





It was beyond dangerous to move the census to the White House from the Commerce Department, a cabinet level agency of the Executive Branch subject to congressional oversight. That move puts the vitally important census under direct political control.
The census is used to reapportion congressional districts, voting districts, tax districts, and fulfill many duties assigned by law or administrative regulations.
New Obama-driven Agenda 21 regulations define to whom you may sell your home and require community balancing based on an oxymoron known as “social justice,” which is being anomalously promoted by so-called progressives.
The U.S. government is becoming dominated by a single political party, much like Massachusetts, Hawaii and California. The political stage is being set for Islam to dominate America, very much like is already happening in Europe even as I type this. There will be no effective political parties, no free voice, to oppose Islam in America.
Just as the official Republican Party in Hawaii is dominated by closeted or former Democrats with only the tiny voice of The Hawaii Republican Assembly http://hira.hawaiideservesbetter.com/ against the so-called progressive establishment. It is not different in California and Massachusetts. The alterative political parties exist beneath the noise level and are ineffectual as political entities.
Keep in mind that a muslim is now Mayor of London, England and the muslim Mayor of Rotterdam just headlined as a speaker at a memorial in the Netherlands for the deaths of 650 Jews. http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/05/dear-mr-ahmed-aboutaleb/
This comes soon after a hamburger joint in Cologne was forced by fear and threats to close for serving a goat cheese burger named after Turkish President Erdogan. Erdogan is working his way toward becoming Caliph of Europe. The Erdogan goat cheese burger humorously celebrated a poem which made fun of Erdogan’s fondness for goats, an act for which Erdogan demands that Europe punish the poet. The burger looks great in pictures.
Yes, they are already subjugated in Europe. Some just don’t know it yet. But that does NOT mean America must become dhimmis too. We should not become part of the totalitarian collectivist sharia state known as a caliphate.
The census must be put back into the hands of a reasonably objective bureaucratic agency under the oversight of Congress, not managed for political advantage in the White House with no congressional oversight. The census under the White House is a step toward doom.
As was said at Gates of Vienna.net, the global elites believe they can ride the Islamic tiger, even though it means total misogyny. Religion is only a diversion in this context. Already churches cannot endorse politicians or political issues, having been extorted to political correctness by the federal government’s thieving tax policy. I don’t want any part of any totalitarian collective or any collective.
The two party system is ending in America; we are in its death throws. And thrown to the gutter with it is the Bill of Rights and the fundamental distinction of a republic, the rule of law. Our ability to vote for change is being destroyed before our very eyes.
John Stutter, Amazing Body, Painter Johannes, Body Painting, Body Art.
Climate modelers are presumed if not self-claimed climate specialists. As such, these climate modelers would be fully aware that the globe cooled from 1942 to 1975 as the atmospheric CO2 concentration increased during that same period. They would also be aware that from 1942 to 1975 global CO2 emissions increased from under 4 billion tonnes of CO2 per year in 1942 to over 20 billion tonnes of CO2 by 1975.
Most climate models as well as the AGW hypothesis itself rely on a radiative forcing parameter. (1) The radiative forcing parameter for CO2 is dF = 5.35 ln(C/Co) where dF is the radiative forcing in Watts per square meter, C is the concentration of atmospheric CO2, and Co is the reference CO2 concentration. Normally the value of Co is specified at the pre-industrial concentration of 280 ppmv.
The radiative forcing parameter indicates that increases in CO2 concentration will produce an increase in temperature. This did not happen over the entire period from 1942 to 1975. Another example, during the Jurassic period when life was very abundant, for a period lasting over 10 million years, CO2 concentration increased from about 1200 ppmv to over 2000 ppmv and during that same period average global temperature was stable, trendless at about 22 degrees C. Therefore the radiative forcing parameter is clearly not valid.
How is this not fraud?
(1) http://www.globalwarmingequation.info/eqn%20derivation.pdf

Manhattan Institute study: “Since 2005, members of the European Union have aggressively pushed policies aimed at addressing climate change. Those policies are primarily designed to decrease carbon-dioxide emissions and increase the use of renewable energy…These policies have resulted in dramatic increases in electricity costs for residential and industrial consumers…
Key findings include:
1. Between 2005, when the E.U. adopted its Emissions Trading Scheme, and 2014, residential electricity rates in the E.U. increased by 63 percent, on average. In Germany, those rates increased by 78 percent; in Spain, by 111 percent; and in the U.K., by 133 percent. Over the same period, residential rates in the U.S. rose by 32 percent.
2. During 2005–14, residential electricity rates in Germany, which has the most aggressive support for renewables, increased by 13 cents, to 40 cents per kilowatt-hour—an increase larger than the average cost of residential electricity in the U.S. (12.5 cents).
3. E.U. countries that have intervened the most in their energy markets—Germany, Spain, and the U.K.—have seen their electricity costs increase the fastest. During 2008–12, those countries spent about $52 billion on interventions in their energy markets.
4. Emissions reductions achieved by the E.U. since 2005 have been greatly exceeded by increases in emissions in the developing world. During 2005–14, the E.U. reduced its carbon-dioxide emissions by 600 million tons per year. Over that same period, the combined emissions of four developing countries—China, India, Indonesia, and Brazil—increased by 4.7 billion tons per year, or nearly eight times the reduction achieved in the European Union.
5. Bans or restrictions on hydraulic fracturing and, therefore, on natural gas production have made European countries more dependent on imported energy and have contributed to higher electricity prices.
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/sites/default/files/R-RB-0316.pdf
French Society of Mathematics (Société de Calcul Mathématique, SA): “The first conclusion to draw from the climate nonsense is this: a body like the IPCC should not exist. It is the first time in human history that governments and supranational authorities have agreed to set up international bodies with scientific mandates: the World Health Organization, the World Meteorological Organization, and so on. In principle, these bodies exist to collect worldwide data and make them available to every country. They have no powers of their own but, to exist, they do all they can to put out the most alarmist rumors, which journalists then pick up in unison because of the body‘s international‘ status.”
“It is certainly useful to have international bodies to keep track of tornadoes or epidemics, but they have no other objective than to be data bases, and they have no specific powers. It is imperative to keep them strictly in check to prevent them from assuming an importance that they cannot have. The idea that research bodies could exist at a global scale is deeply unhealthy and deeply absurd. Above all, that is what is demonstrated by the inanities of the IPCC, the WMO and even the WHO.”
Published April 26, 2015 in peer-reviewed journal, these two Swiss scientists find that deploying solar panels at high latitudes in countries like Germany and the UK [and by extension New England, Washington, Oregon, the Dakota’s, Idaho, Michigan, Canada, Alaska] is a total waste of time, energy and money.
The scientists conclude in their words: “an electrical supply system based on today’s [photo-voltaic] PV technologies cannot be termed an energy source, but rather a non-sustainable energy sink” and that “it has become clear that photovoltaic energy at least will not help in any way to replace the fossil fuel.” The scientists add, “photovoltaic technology would not be a wise choice for helping to deliver affordable, environmentally favourable and reliable electricity regions of low, or even moderate insolation“.
Assuming this new study is replicated by other scientists, Europe and the United States have wasted very huge sums of money.
All that is achieved is to raise the price of electricity and destabilise the electrical grid. “…more energy is used to make the PV panels than will ever be recovered from them during their 25 year lifetime.”
The scientists’ analysis uses energy-invested versus energy-returned instead of a financial comparison.
A PV panel will produce more CO2 than if coal were simply used directly to make electricity. Worse than that, all the CO2 from PV production is in the atmosphere today, while burning coal to make electricity, the emissions would be spread over the 25 year period.”
~ These comments are from these two extensive reviews except the direct quote from the scientists. The original paper is behind a paywall linked here.
http://euanmearns.com/the-energy-return-of-solar-pv/
http://notrickszone.com/…/devastating-conclusion-new-stud…/…
http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0301421516301379

Liberals/progressives don’t know “who we [Americans] are.” That’s no surprise to conservatives and libertarians. But here a self-admitted liberal NYT journalist “confesses” to liberal “prejudice” against conservatives and Christians, and acknowledges it is a “blind spot” for liberals.
“Eighteen percent of social scientists say they are Marxist.” He wonders, “Should universities offer affirmative action for conservatives and evangelicals?”


You must be logged in to post a comment.