- Follow budbromley on WordPress.com
-
Recent Posts
- A Lazaretto Primer
- Autism by vax
- The brutal development of Islam
- How can America taxpayers constrain the enormous expense of NGO’s?
- Jeffrey Tucker Reveals The Insidious Reason For The Lockdowns
- The end of the climate change obsession, by Electroverse @Electroversenet on X
- Democratic socialism?
- What’s wrong with public education?
- Reblogging a great post on economics and taxes
- Reblog: “The Hard Truth About the Sanctuary Movement”
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2011
UN is beyond reform
“Perhaps it’s time to recognize that idealistic internationalism has failed, and that we can advance our interests and protect our security by relying on our own political order of electoral audit, free and open debate, and ballot-box accountability, and by making alliances with those nations that serve our interests rather than, like most of the UN member states, actively subvert them. D.C. isn’t the only swamp our new president needs to drain.” ~ Bruce Thornton
More at the link.
Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, a Research Fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution, and a Professor of Classics and Humanities at the California State University. He is the author of nine books and numerous essays on classical culture and its influence on Western Civilization.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Crumbling Consensus (reblog)
“…Kenneth Richard published his list of 500 climate catastrophe skeptic papers appearing in scientific journals in 2016 alone. It is the latest addition to the 282 papers published in 2015, and the 248 papers published in 2014, bringing the total number of peer-reviewed papers published over the past three years to more than 1000.”…
Harvard astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon thinks the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has strayed way off track. “I’m not surprised by the large number or empirical evidence that rejects the CO2 dangerous global warming alarmism,” wrote Soon in an e-mail. “This sort of literature review ought to put the sort of biased, if not anti-science, reports by the UN IPCC to shame.”
Dr. Soon added: “It is high time for the wider public to not only bear witness to the unbalance and corruption of our science institutions, but also to demand answers on why there has been such a disregard for truth and fact.”
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
The Climate Surprise

Steven Koonin, who was undersecretary for science in the Energy Department during President Obama’s first term, wrote in the Wall Street Journal: The contention that the “science is settled” with respect to climate change, is “misguided.” “It has not only distorted our public and policy debates on issues related to energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, and the environment. But it also has inhibited the scientific and policy discussions that we need to have about our climate future.”
At the link below is a pdf file with a few brief articles.
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Good Riddance
And now it is time to replace what sounded good with what worked.
“Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good. In area after area – crime, education, housing, race relations – the situation has gotten worse after the bright new theories were put into operation. The amazing thing is that this history of failure and disaster has neither discouraged the social engineers nor discredited them.”
–Thomas Sowell

Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Real life or a cartoon?
Scott Adams, the well known, expert, cartoonist, has persuaded himself that he is boxed in a corner by his lack of knowledge in science. He admits that one side is right and the other side is wrong. But he has convinced himself that he cannot decide which is which. Scott’s bias is that someone, perhaps Scott himself, convinced Scott that climate science is somehow impenetrable knowledge for mere humans, non-scientists, as if a scientist was some special sort of human being. But a scientist is just a normal human who questions the world around him, rather like Scott has become an expert in persuasion, except a scientist does not stop there. Will Scott categorize my comment as an ad hominem attack? Probably. Scott has created a mental block for himself and wants to persuade you to join him. Misery loves company. Scott has decided not to study or think further about this particular subject, so he has built a persuasive wall to justify his position. He ignores the mathematical fact that every expert in every discipline is growing in ignorance every day. Orthodoxy is a security blanket, a safe place, where you believe you have the freedom to not think about what is happening to you in the real world. Thinking is hard work and is rarely tried. Our society has reached massive conformity about many questions which are still truly open questions. This is done by media, politicians, cartoonists and educators etc simply by getting most people to accept roughly the same parameters on these questions. Then the media, politicians, cartoonists and educators etc rip-off you off. Some expert discusses two or three points of view, as Scott just did, lying safely within the parameters previously presented. People consider those alternatives as presented, as Scott has done. Then, most people adopt the comfortable illusion that they have thought about the alternatives and freely formed their own opinion. They created their own orthodoxy about that question, comfortably boxing themselves into a safe place, just as Scott has done. On the other hand, what a thinker and realist does is to seek out the conceptual parameters that define the range of all possible alternatives on a given question and then to imagine alternatives to those parameters. A scientist does that and then devises experiments to test the alternatives against real world conditions, rather than a thought experiment or computer model. The best scientists will test the hardest alternatives first. For example, measure the greenhouse warming, or the forcing, caused by human-produced CO2 under real world atmospheric conditions. Those experiments have been done and repeated many times. The result is that the warming and the forcing due to CO2 are far too small to measure with acceptable accuracy and reproducibility. Other climate variables are much larger. In fact, no one knows whether the net result is warming or cooling in the real world because the effects of CO2 are too small to measure. But, those who have vested interests will not explore, publish or think about that result or the next questions and dots connected to that result. They are THE experts, comfortable in their orthodox, safe place and they enjoy the benefits you provide them. So, they send you on a wild goose chase, or in this case, a polar bear or hurricane chase. It is not in their interest for you to connect the dots. If you accept that, if Scott persuades you, then tyranny of thought wins.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Burning down the bridges
Burning down the bridges as they retreat, Secretary of State John Kerry, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, other Obama officials met with Palestinian Authority to coordinate the UN resolution against Israel and Trump’s plans. Minutes of secret meeting: Rice “stressed the danger posed by the Trump administration.” Kerry and Rice “advised Palestinian President Mahmoud ‘Abbas to not take any preliminary steps that could provoke the Trump administration. “They [also] stressed the need to avoid military action or martyrdom [attacks], as these would greatly jeopardize the Palestinian position.” Palestinian negotiating team leader Saeb Erekat; ‘If U.S. Embassy Is Moved To Jerusalem, We Will Call To Expel U.S. Embassies From Arab And Muslim Countries.’
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Here’s a deal for you
Obama should offer to stop hassling Syria’s leader, Bashar al-Assad, if Assad agrees to promptly take back all Syrian refugees who repatriate and guarantees their freedom in Syria. If Obama does it now before Trump is inaugurated, at least there would be one positive thing in Obama’s legacy. If Assad or any group harms the repatriated refugees, then the community of nations will remove him. I think Russia, the US, the EU, Iran, Egypt, Syria’s neighbors and other interested nations will agree.

Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
The Impending Collapse Of The Global Warming Scare by Francis Menton
Excellent article at this link. Excerpt:
“Over the past three decades, the environmental movement has increasingly hitched its wagon to exactly one star as the overwhelming focus of the cause, namely “climate change.” Sure, issues of bona fide pollution like smog and untreated sewage are still out there a little, but they are largely under control and don’t really stir the emotions much any more. If you want fundraising in the billions rather than the thousands, you need a good end-of-days, sin-and-redemption scare. Human-caused global warming is your answer!”
Renowned Princeton Physicist Freeman Dyson: ‘I’m 100% Democrat and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on climate issue, and the Republicans took the right side. . .”
Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever: ‘Global warming is a non-problem’ – ‘I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.’
http://manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2016/12/13/some-predictions-for-the-future-in-the-climate-game
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Barking the Beagle
Kalifornians and so-called “progressives” talk about income equality as did Hugo Chavez, but they don’t learn a thing from places like Venezuela. When they get what they asked for, then the bubble bursts and inequality is far worse because the bottom drops out. They are destroying their own safety net and also that of all seniors, who in fact worked their lives to pay for their old age and health insurance.
Sitting here on the beach in Montevideo on the “Day that will live in infamy” wondering whether or not Millennials will step up and be the Next Great Generation or the Generation that will live infamy. When the crisis is eventually triggered and the credit bubble finally bursts, at that point of weakness the free world and “great satan” will be attacked by the overwhelming demographic and single focused mindshare of Islamists…inside and outside our gates. There won’t be enough money for America to fight that war and also to pay to sustain the Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security safety net for their baby boomer parents. Baby boomers worked their lives to pay huge sums for these safety nets for their parents, The Greatest Generation who put their lives on the line in WWII to save their family, their community, their nation and their way of life. Baby boomers will be too old to fight, except a few generals and admirals maybe and except to take on some jihadis in own their yards and towns. The fight will fall to the GenXers and the Millennials the follow them. Even if Boomers give up the safety net they are promised, which they paid for their parents, which is for many boomers all that they have to live on, will GenXers and Millennials in fact take up arms en mass and defend their homeland? Given the prevalence of diaper safety pins, safe zones, microaggression anxiety, sophomoric misinformation and complacency, I wonder whether we will be dead or dhimmi? If I wee alive in the Great Depression when FDR et al installed it, I would be the last person to have supported the collectivist socialist safety net. But that is what we have. I can see a free market replacement for that net too, but I can’t imagine that net being built when the world is at war and unlike WWII there is guerrilla war in American streets similar to that in Lebanon or Irag. It’s like the 1930’s when the American Nazis were marching in American streets while Hitler was preparing to blitz war Europe. But today we have easily 10 times as many jihadis here and a current president and incoming head of the DNC, mass media, Hollywood, and universities preaching tolerance and teaching amorality and weakness to the generations that must fight an internal and external world war against armies demographically 10 times larger than Hitler’s armies and even more brainwashed and ruthless. The theocrats have been waiting and training for this demographic advantage, when they can call their streets to fight big and little Satan, all the while pushing their invasion of Europe and America by their cultural jihad built on tolerance. I think they are more strategic than to attack on Inauguration Day, a high point. They will wait until we are suffering from austerity or economic crash so that our generations are divided. We could grow out of this mess with Trump’s leadership, but that is unlikely with almost half the nation, the UN, the EU, media, and global elites pulling against Trump and us. Baby boomers, most of whom are against war, we have a fight on our hands whether we want it or not.
Looking at the muddy river Rio Plata and far across to the horizon, as far as my eyes can see, Argentina is still far out of sight across this broad river. Somewhere over there is my next destination. Darwin had his revelation on evolution down here on the Beagle voyage on the channel between the continent and Tierra Del Fuego. I hope I have one too.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Survival in an icy future
How will anyone repair or install wind turbines or solar panels in blinding snowstorms or sub-zero temperatures? Whereas horizontal drilling and oil and gas production can be entirely underground or under ice sheets or glaciers or under water if need be.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.