At this link is an example and symbol of the sickness, depravity and loss of critical values in western society, in New York City of course. Imagine if this were your property or your neighborhood. This is people, a jury, lawyers and a judge, all who failed to learn the lesson of the “tragedy of the commons,” punishing an individual who is attempting to take personal responsibility for their private property.
https://ny.curbed.com/2017/11/7/16617490/5-pointz-long-island-city-trial-verdict
In 15 years or less, the technology will be available to control the mental problems that result in wanton, senseless slaughters like New York City, Las Vegas, ISIS, 9-11 etc, either by genetic modifications like CRISPR or brain chips or both. However, the paths of ethics and morality which would enable good and best use of these technologies are not only lagging behind, they are far down the road and going in the wrong direction…which means that the two technologies are ultimately dangerous for liberty. Unless and until authoritarian, cradle to grave government is shut down and reversed, these technologies are dangerous to free people.
Chips http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/877457/brain-function-dementia-super-power-human-kernel
Genes https://www.outsideonline.com/2238276/ultimate-life-hack?utm_content=buffer834ef&utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkedin.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Bjørn Lomborg: “Moreover, these [Paris Agreement] promises will not *solve* global warming – indeed, they will together achieve almost nothing: By the UN’s own estimate, the Paris Treaty will reduce emissions by less than 1% of what would be needed to keep temperature rises under 2°C and yet cost $1-2 trillion per year by 2030, mostly in reduced GDP growth. So Paris will deliver far less than what most people expect, yet will cost much more than most people are willing to pay.”
“Of course, most smart people would be against paying lots for achieving little or nothing. If anything, this suggests that democracy works just fine.”
“But [Norwegian professor] Randers instead takes this unwillingness to spend fortunes on little benefits as an argument for ending democracy. ‘if people don’t want my preferred solution, then people are stupid, shouldn’t be allowed to decide their fate, and we should install a climate dictatorship instead.’ The argument literally seems to be: If I can’t have my way in a democracy, I want my way with a dictatorship.”
“That is hardly a good argument. It is also phenomenally expensive: Look at the costs to achieve the sort of climate policies that Randers and many others are advocating. If the EU fulfils its promise of cutting emissions by 80% in 2050 (which is the most ambitious climate policy in the world today), the average of the best peer-reviewed models show that the cost would run to at least $3 trillion per year, and more likely double that – meaning $6,000 for each EU citizen per year. Of course, few will vote for that.” …
more and references: https://www.facebook.com/bjornlomborg/posts/10156188900228968:0
Nikki Haley, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. hit one out of the park yesterday. Well worth the 9 minutes to watch this video.
Amidst calls from UN members for her removal, she tells the UN, “Our principles are not up for a vote.”
She refers to a UN vote on Wednesday this week, when the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted for a resolution condemning the United States’ embargo on Cuba. The vote was 191-2, with Israel again being the only country to side with the U.S. ISRAEL, THE ONLY COUNTRY TO VOTE WITH THE US.
Among several other important things, she said, “Let’s be honest about what we really see going on here. This assembly does not have the power to end the U.S. embargo. It is based in U.S. law, which only the United States Congress can change.”
‘The statement from Ambassador Haley reiterated that the United States is an independent and sovereign nation that will not be bullied by nations that talk a good talk while at the same time carry out human rights abuses against their people. It was made clear that the United Nations does not control the U.S. Congress.’
‘Speaking to the assembly, Ambassador Haley explained that the United States is a democracy and that the people exercised their constitutional right to elect President Trump and that President Trump’s decision to leave the embargo in place is not up for debate.’ (Succinct explanation in single quotes by Micah Rate at Townhall.com)
After a few sentences to apologize for the 2016 decision by the Obama administration in the 25th of 26 consecutive annual votes by the UN to coerce the U.S. to end the embargo, Ambassador Haley stands her ground and pushes back against the UN oligathugs, “To those who are confused as to where the United States stands, let me be clear: as is their right under our Constitution, the American people have spoken. They have chosen a new president, and he has chosen a new ambassador to the United Nations.” She also clears the table with that statement regarding several calls within the UN for her resignation.
“The United States does not fear isolation in this chamber, or anywhere else. Our principles are not up for a vote.”
Watch Ambassador Haley’s speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=75&v=ZGy85B1pk5A
When you promote diversity, one result is divisiveness and another is identity politics. It is an indoctrination tool of Saul-Alinsky-trained community organizers / collectivists whose goal is revolution. After the run-down murders in Manhattan by a crazed man yelling something about akbar, isn’t it time to end the false mantra that diversity and tolerance are virtues? There is a point where, after which, more diversity is a bad thing, and the US and Sweden are well past that point. Instead, it is time for free people everywhere to discriminate with prejudice against by-the-book Muslims in favor of and to protect those Muslims who would reform their culture and societies.
“There will always be a ghost to chase somewhere… as Demetrius says below. nation building. Lets focus on national prosperity and leaving dollars in our people’s hands, not in the State’s for guns and so-called “terrorist” fighting. I think we manufacture “terrorists” on these outings – and if we focused on fiscal and entrepreneurial power – we will be able to wipe the bad out when the time comes, and many of the People will encourage their nations to voluntarily become the 51st and 52nd state based upon our laws and what we can do for their people. That’s the only worthy nation-state building worthwhile – inspiring people who beg to share w/ us what we have created beneath the blanket of freed and Divine Providence. ~ Ted Alexander Nov/1/2017
I think they have a great business idea. “The search engine that doesn’t track you.”
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the McCarran-Walter Act), allows the “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the President, whenever the President finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. The President may, by proclamation, and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.”
The McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”
President Jimmy Carter used this process in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States after Iranians took over the US Embassy in Tehran and kidnapped U.S. diplomatic staff. President Carter made ALL Iranian students in the United States check in regularly with the government. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, and a total of 15,000 Iranians were deported from the USA in 1979.
Since the Koran/sharia forbids Muslims to swear allegiance to any government or constitution (but instead Muslims swear allegiance to and submit to Islam and Allah) and since U.S. law already REQUIRES immigrants to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, then should not ALL Muslims be refused immigration to OUR country unless and until they make a formal and credible renouncement of the superiority of this requirement in Koranic law?
Assimilation is the intention of U.S. law and assimilation contradicts Koranic law. The incompatibility of the two cultures is not difficult to understand.
In addition, we and all immigration authorities and security people must keep in mind permanently that the Koran authorizes Muslims to lie to legal authorities if it benefits Muslims or Islam. That is another fundamental incompatibility with U.S. law and culture. This means trust, and the appearance of trust, is for sale. It’s not a truth or a goal. It’s a giant con game. That is a mafioso characteristic that Americans reject.
It should be obvious that no devout Muslim should be allowed in the U.S. government at any level, much less in Homeland Security or defense forces. There are other places they may contribute to U.S. society and where Americans would protect reformist Muslims from their brothers and sisters in Islam.
It’s not a religious test. It’s a survival test, a test of your free will and sovereignty versus their indoctrinated-from-birth dark ages barbarianism whose intent, clearly and often expressed, is world domination. Thus far in the 21st century, almost all of our political leaders in America and western society have failed this test.
Abraham casting out young and beautiful Hagar and her son Ishmael by Abraham, as God instructed him, to go and make a great nation to be separate from another great nation to be built by Isaac, his son by a different mother, Sarah. Abraham went with Isaac and Sarah. Genesis 21:8-21
“We’re digging into the most pervasive and sinister attempt in U.S. history to force a president from office…the “Deep State” intelligence leak conspiracy. This scandal began during the 2016 campaign and continues today. The Deep State seems to unlawfully target President Trump and his team. We’ve filed TWELVE lawsuits against agencies including the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the State and Justice Departments, to expose the Deep State operation to undermine the rule of law. More lawsuits to follow.” ~ Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch, letter. www.judicialwatch.org Donations appreciated or for more information.
Letter received in U.S. Mail, undated, irregular post markings, October 30, 2017.
“…it appears that the climate establishment has discarded the so called “hot-spot”, once called the distinct human fingerprint. First so proclaimed in an IPCC Physical Sciences Working Group meeting in Madrid in late November 1995, the “hot-spot” became the justification for the statement: “the balance of evidence points towards a discernible human influence on global climate.” It was important in helping obtain the over $40 billion US government has spent in “climate science” since 1993, tens of billions on “climate change financing” and the tens of billions in tax subsidies for poor alternatives to fossil fuels – mainly solar and wind [the amounts are based on government reports and government definitions]. In “fighting” climate change, the US is spending almost as much as it did on all the Apollo missions, in 2012 dollars. The funds do not include the moneys the state department turned over to UN organizations in the closing days of the Obama Administration.”
“Part of the funds spent by the US went to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and one of its parent organizations, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), largely through the State Department and the USAID. The IPCC has become an established political organization continuing to investigate the influence of greenhouse gases, mainly CO2, on the earth’s temperatures, but not rigorously rejecting or modifying hypotheses found faulty. Thus, the IPCC is masking its activities and undermining its own scientific credibility….” ~ THIS WEEK: By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)
http://www.sepp.org/twtwfiles/2017/TWTW10-28-17.pdf
TO ME:
In other words, the Obama administration funded a massive growth in government agencies which will be able to do absolutely nothing of importance for the people, about a hypothetical problem that, by the laws of science, does not exist. But, the ongoing solution that has been implemented by the governments of more than 150 nations already has cost the people many, many billions of dollars and there will be many billions more in this ongoing scam. That money could have been better spent elsewhere. For example, many millions of people have no electricity still. Much to do about nothing, Shakespeare said. Perhaps a trillion U.S. dollars have been wasted worldwide, ostensibly on reducing CO2 emissions, about reducing a trace gas in the atmosphere which is the primary nutrient of plants. But, actually what we have done is employ many thousands of people in non-productive jobs, that is, jobs which produce nothing of value.
10/29/2017 4:22 PM
You must be logged in to post a comment.