Professor Jordan Peterson on climate change and climate policy at the Cambridge Union
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=58&v=pBbvehbomrY
Like this:
Like Loading...
About budbromley
Bud is a retired life sciences executive. Bud's entrepreneurial leadership exceeded three decades. He was the senior business development, marketing and sales executive at four public corporations, each company a supplier of analytical and life sciences instrumentation, software, consumables and service. Prior to those positions, his 19 year career in Hewlett-Packard Company's Analytical Products Group included worldwide sales and marketing responsibility for Bioscience Products, Global Accounts and the International Olympic Committee, as well as international management assignments based in Japan and Latin America. Bud has visited and worked in more than 65 countries and lived and worked in 3 countries.
Reblogged this on Climate- Science.press.
LikeLike
I think Nick pointed at ordinary readers, not on you, Bud đ
LikeLike
RGHE theory says the atmosphere performs similar to a greenhouse, âtrappingâ energy making the âwithâ it atmosphere 33 C warmer than âwithoutâ it, i.e. 288 K – 255 K.
The 288 K is a WAG pulled out of WMOâs butt. The 255 K is an unrelated S-B calculation for the average 240 W/m^2 OLR at ToA (got it? w/ atmos!!) requiring a 30% albedo.
The earth w/o atmosphere cannot have a 30% albedo, more likely 14% like the moon.
The atmosphere is not like a greenhouse, it is like that reflective panel you put behind your carâs windshield. By reflecting away 30% of the ISR the w/ atmosphere COOLS the earth compared to w/o.
In actual physical and mathematical fact removing the atmosphere exposes the earth to 20% to 40% more kJ/h and the ASR temperature increases 20 C to 30 C. Thatâs warmer not colder.
The greenhouse effect does not exist and 30 years of crap science stacked upon it goes straight in the trash.
(If you donât understand the acronyms maybe you should do the homework.)
LikeLike
Yes, I agree. Thanks for your comment. And I say that in multiple articles posted on my blog that the greenhouse effect is not trapping energy. Perhaps before you make ad hominem attacks you should read more, Nickreality65.
LikeLike
Ad hominem? How?
LikeLike
nickreality65: “(If you donât understand the acronyms maybe you should do the homework.)
LikeLike