A criminal, not a civil, trial

“What the alarmists call “proof” and “evidence” is nothing more than conjecture. They cannot prove that man’s activities have warmed the planet, even if the next 100 years are twice as hot as they have predicted. They can lay out their “evidence” as if in a courtroom, and urge the jury to make the connection.”

“But the fact they can’t get around is that there is more than enough reasonable doubt to throw out their prosecution. Carbon dioxide simply isn’t the only suspect. Earth’s climate system has far too many influences for the inquisitors to settle on just one.”

In a criminal trial, the state (speaking on behalf of the people) prosecutes the alleged criminals.  It is a not civil case; it is not a matter wherein one citizen files suit against another.  One of us, or a group of us, who have been harmed by the global warming fraud must file a formal complaint with a U.S. attorney against one or more persons or legal entities.  Fraud and RICO laws apply.

About budbromley

Life sciences executive
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s