The Next Big Upset

I thought that by now you would have heard enough from me about global warming.  But as I write this, ten thousand people are gathered in Marrakesh under the UN banner to continue their expensive and deadly fraud on the people of earth.  All of us in a massive demand to redress this grievance can shut down this fraud.  This is far bigger than any U.S. election.

Evidence of warming or evidence of global warming or evidence of ice melting, none of these is not evidence that the cause of the warming is anthropogenic.  The global warming they claim, but they are unable to prove the warming is caused by humans. Such claims confuse the effects or consequences of warming with the causes of warming. That is a fundamental error in logic. Worse, most proponents of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) know that their claim is erroneous.  The, on top of that, the fact that they obtain money and power or allocate money and power through policies and laws or the stroke of a presidential pen make it fraud, subject to triple damage awards from the fraudsters.  The fact that they collude with many people and organizations means this giant fraud eventually will be the subject of RICO prosecutions.  The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, RICO, is a U.S. federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

So far, no one has been able to measure any warming of the atmosphere or any warming of the oceans that results from human-produced CO2. Without experimental evidence from the real world, there is no science.  Without real world evidence, they have no case.  A computer model is at best a hypothesis until it is validated by real world evidence.  So far, all but one of those tens of models produce wrong answers, and one model by the Russians, which in a few runs has closely tracked temperature, indicates a cooling trend.

The measurement of temperature change (whether warming, cooling or trend-less) which is caused by human-produced CO2 cannot be made with the accuracy and precision required in science. The temperature change due to human-produced CO2 is far too small when measured against the much larger background noise of the larger variables of climate in real world conditions.  Moreover, the temperature change due to total atmospheric CO2, of which only about 4% is contributed by humans, is so small that it is not known whether the net effect is cooling or warming.  There are many interacting, co-dependent variables.

The UN Second Assessment Report [IPCC-SAR 1996] contained the conclusion, “the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.” The UN report prepared by scientists was altered by politicians.  A key graph was altered to suggest a human influence and the presented evidence was bogus.  They have no real world evidence, yet the U.S. government promoted these UN reports as evidence in Supreme Court cases, and similar situations occur in most nations.

The global surface temperature record is unreliable. It is a patchwork of judgments and curve fitting. Surface temperature sampling methodology fails the tests of statistics.  The data sets are loaded with averages of averages of averages, etc.  Most people learn in high school math that an average of averages usually gives the wrong answer.  But this is a worst case of that.  The measurement points are not evenly distributed and daily, monthly and yearly variance at many locations is much larger than other locations.  A wrong answer is almost guaranteed.  According to arguments by proponents of human-caused global warming,  they are alarmed about a 1.5 to 3 degree C temperature change averaged across the entire planet which they claim will occur before the end of the 21st century, more than 80 years from now, but daily temperature variation in many locations can be plus or minus 30 degrees C or more and there are many thousands of square miles with no temperature measurement at all.  Temperature records are very limited beyond more than 150 years ago.  The various agencies which maintain these temperature records are endlessly adjusting those records.  Yet, the global warming fraudsters attempt to project temperatures decades and hundreds of years into the future without understanding other natural causes of climate change.

This is not science, though the fraudsters including 190 governments claim it is science.  It is a giant con job.  They want trillions of dollars and engineering-level control of the planet for an effect that is so small that they are unable to measure it, despite having spent billions of dollars in their attempt.    But every day NPR, National Geographic, Sierra Club, grant recipients, so-called environmentalists, the management bureaucrats of scientific societies and countless “news” and weather stations and similar around the world are filling the airwaves and pages of propaganda and policies that result in harm to the health and finances of millions of people while enriching themselves at your expense.  Their fellow crony group of elite bankers, entrepreneurs, NGOs, “researchers,” media, and bureaucrats are now worried about the upset of their scam.

The global warming fraud is the second largest fraud in history, second only to the far bigger credit bubble underway now.  It is a giant class action fraud case with triple damages waiting to be filed against many of the wealthiest and elite people and organizations in the world.  You probably thought Trump’s upset of the Clintons, the Democrats and establishment Republicans was a big deal.  But we have not seen anything yet.

“According to the last report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, climate models are converging on a temperature rise of 1.5 to 4.5 degrees Celsius, or even higher, by the end of the century if emissions continue unabated. That’s become more than just an opinion. But in the WSJ editorial, the authors say carbon emissions will warm the planet by only 1 degree Celsius. “When a claim falls that far from established science, even heroes owe us an explanation.”  from the Bloomberg link immediately below.
“I would say that when the models fall so far from reality, the modelers owe us an explanation! – Clyde Spencer”   Pay wall.

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate
S. Fred Singer, Editor, NIPCC, 2008

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science

About budbromley

Life sciences executive, retired
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s