Soft on crime prosecutors and corrupt judges must be impeached by Congress and defunded. The judiciary does almost nothing to control itself. It has become a political body. MAGA is hamstrung until the judiciary is limited to the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the founders and framers intended.
This lawfare crisis is prevalent in many countries, not only the U.S.A. For example, the rogue judges at the highest level in Brasil interfering in elections and prosecuting former President Bolsonaro, and the judges in Germany illicitly holding in jail world class lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, or in U.S.A. the atrocious behavior of the courts (e.g. many cases in DC federal district court, appellate court, FIA court and some of the justices on the Supreme Court), not to mention a list of corrupt prosecutors.
Has anyone else had enough of the rogue judiciary, unable to discipline itself, expecting citizens to file multi-million dollar legal cases through multiple courts taking years to maybe, perhaps get justice or even find a fair judge and court?
Cases in point:
Federal Judges Keep Defying Supreme Court Orders Against Trump Admin
It was barely more than a year ago that climate activists and federal bureaucrats thought they had maneuvered the internal combustion engine (ICE) automobile to the brink of extinction. ICE vehicles had become like dinosaurs, inferior to their new competitors the EVs, and therefore headed for the scrap heap of history. Customers were flocking to the trendy new EVs, which were seeing rapidly rising sales.
So all the pieces were in place. By some time in the early 2030s, it would be effectively illegal to sell new ICE cars, and they would be rapidly disappearing from the roads.
Well, not so fast. Suddenly, the rapid advance of the EV may have stalled out completely. The federal regulators have reversed their direction. And customer preferences seemingly favorable to EVs may turn out to evaporate as soon as federal tax benefits end, an event now just a couple of months away.
NHTSA’s CAFE standards just got eviscerated by the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act. Although the standards themselves have not yet been rescinded, the OBBB re-set the enforcement mechanism to have a maximum penalty of zero. This is from a July 8, 2025 memo from the law firm Sidley & Austin:
In one of its many changes, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted on July 4, 2025, eliminated civil penalties for noncompliance with federal fuel economy standards. Specifically, Section 40006 of the Act amends the language of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) statute to reset the maximum civil penalty to $0.00. Although the statute and its implementing regulations otherwise remain in place, this amendment removes any civil penalties for producing passenger cars and light trucks that do not meet fuel economy requirements.
As to the EPA-mandated CO2 emissions limits for vehicles, EPA announced on March 12, 2025 that it was beginning a process of reconsidering the vehicle greenhouse gas emissions rule that had just been adopted less than a year before. Excerpt:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the agency will reconsider the Model Year 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles regulation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles. In addition to imposing over $700 billion in regulatory and compliance costs, these rules provided the foundation for the Biden-Harris electric vehicle mandate that takes away Americans’ ability to choose a safe and affordable car for their family and increases the cost of living on all products that trucks deliver.
That one may be in the regulatory grinder for many months, but with little doubt as to what the final result will be, namely full rescission.
And the $7500 per new vehicle tax credit? After just having been extended to 2032 by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, the credit has now been modified by the OBBBA to end as of September 30, 2025. From Kiplinger, July 12:
With the passage of President Donald Trump’s 2025 tax reform, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) the federal EV tax credit will expire for vehicles purchased or leased after September 30, 2025. As a result, buyers have only a short window left to take advantage of these federal savings.
All of a sudden, EVs and ICE vehicles are set to compete on a completely level playing field, with no mandates or tax credits propping up the EV side of the competition. How will that turn out? It remains to be seen, but data from the first half of the year indicate that the previous rapid increase in EV sales may already be stalling out. In a reversal for a previously rapidly-growing market segment, sales of EVs in the second quarter of 2025 declined significantly from the same period the prior year. From Cox Automotive, July 14, 2025:
[S]ales of new electric vehicles (EVs) in the second quarter of 2025 were lower year over year by 6.3%, in line with the Cox Automotive forecast. A total of 310,839 new EVs were sold in the U.S, down from 331,853 in the same period a year earlier. Sales in Q2 were higher than in Q1 by 4.9%, and total EV sales through the first half of 2025 set a record at 607,089, representing a 1.5% year-over-year increase.
Cox continues to predict a spike in EV sales in the third quarter of 2025, in the run-up to the expiration of the tax credit on September 30. However, after that, it is entirely likely that there will be a significant decline. Without the government mandates and subsidies, it’s hard to see EVs expanding much beyond being a niche product used as a second (or third) vehicle by affluent buyers.
Bud’s comment:
I will be interested in an EV when the battery technology improves and EV charging does not harm the electric grid in communities, including not increasing the cost of electricity for everyone and everything else produced with electricity. EV batteries today and EV’s do not produce electricity, but only store it. The electricity charging the EV battery comes from the community grid unless you generate your own electricity. We all pay for the community grid by our electric bill, fees and taxes. Community electric grids cannot be supported by solar panel or wind farms or biofuels; this is shown elsewhere to be totally impractical, dangerous, and environmentally destructive. Nor should grids be supported by so-called renewable ‘green’ or ‘blue’ hydrogen power, which require more energy to produce than is yielded, not to mention that hydrogen gas is extremely dangerous. Hydrogen, a very small molecule, leaks through all know materials and is extremely explosive. This list of EV problems is not exhaustive, there are more. Until these are fixed, then an EV is merely virtue signaling, false virtue signaling: there is no problem adding more CO2 to the environment, and contrary to the pervasive climate narrative and what most have been taught, human addition of CO2 to air does not increase net total CO2 concentration in air.
Multiple studies by competent scientists using different methods report that there is no correlation between the trend of CO2 emissions from so-called “fossil fuels” and the trend of net global CO2 measured by the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory such as the one on Mauna Loa on Hawaii Island. Adding a trace gas to the atmosphere is a minor perturbation to the physical phase-state equilibrium of that trace gas with all of the liquids in the environment with which the gas is in contact, dominantly ocean surface (~71% of Earth’s surface), forests, soil, rain, etc. After a short period of time, 100% of the added trace gas (e.g. CO2) will be absorbed by the environment.
This vaccine testimony may move you to tears. “We saw so much death, so much death following baby vaccines.”
@ChildrensHD’s Polly Tommey has been traveling the country, listening to parents share their horrific stories. “These parents would vaccinate their perfectly healthy child—and then their child would die.” She described case after case of devastating injuries: a premature baby vaccinated against whooping cough, then found lifeless in his crib. Toddlers who could no longer lift their heads after a single Hepatitis B shot. Teenage girls whose ovaries shut down after the HPV vaccine, etc. Story after story from families who trusted the system only to pay the ultimate price with their children’s health. “Over 12,000 signatures on those two buses of death, death, death,” Tommey said. This one is worth listening to in full. 3 minute video of her testimony.
The anti-American left presents an unresolved paradox to the White House, the Congress and ‘we the people’…regardless of political party. This paradox also applies to some NATO partners.
At present, it would be unwise, irresponsible and derelict of duty for a U.S. President to warn, inform or seek permission of any political body, especially members of the anti-American left but also neo-con RINOs. Informing them would put soldiers, sailors, air crews and national security at risk, which of course is the opposite of a president’s duty; that is the paradox.
If this communist, muslim, radical does become mayor of New York City, then a President cannot warn or inform the mayor of New York City, an obvious target for enemy attack, of the possible significant risk of retaliation before the President authorizes an action such as President Trump 47 did recently in Iran. Instead, President Trump 47 allegedly warned Iran in advance. That is just one example among many.
Derived from that, how can it be legal for communist, muslim, anti-nationalist, etc radicals to run for elections (in America or any nation), much less be elected or appointed, to any government positions in the political chain of command carrying duty for national security and public safety? Such people should be vetted and security cleared by FBI, NSA, CIA etc or local equivalent for loyalty to the republic.
There are many of such anti-American radicals in the American government, like AOC, this NYC mayoral candidate, Representative Blumenthal, and they are not all Democrats. No doubt when challenged under oath their rhetoric will claim loyalty to the republic or the alliance, but their words and actions incite destruction of the republic as it is devised in law, for example encouraging, aiding and abetting invasion of the homeland and culture by millions of illegal aliens for political reasons masked as humanitarian; nevertheless, their actions and words are illegal. A republic is based on laws, not on an proposition even if made by a democratic majority.
The paradox results from a difference between a democracy and a republic.
As far as I know, today, even candidates for U.S. presidency are not vetted by the government, but supposedly vetted by the political party and hypothetically vetted by the press and public. But the press and much of social media is bought. Political parties have a serious conflict of interest. I have not seen any evidence of appropriate vetting by government agencies of politicians, and as we saw in recent U.S. elections many in those government agencies are corrupted and biased. Have you seen any serious effort at vetting? What is to prevent this mayoral candidate in New York from running for President, essentially out of nowhere like Obama?
It is a more than reasonable bet that if Congress, governors, mayors of major cities, even the supposedly secure “gang of eight,” or any of them, had been informed of the plan to bomb Iran, then one or more of those people, likely many of them, would have warned Iran…and greatly increased risk to the mission and military. Loose lips sink ships, as the old saying goes.
Gen. Mark Milley, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Biden administration, according to a book by Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, Milley allegedly had a conversation with a Chinese general in October 2020, where he allegedly made a conditional statement about informing China in case of a military attack by the US under the Trump 45 administration. Woodward’s book and word were enough to initiate impeachment of President Nixon in the Watergate scandal without revealing Woodward’s source.
Wouldn’t a courts martial of Milley, for example, for treason be a deterrent and set the stage for much needed legislative correction of this paradox?
Bud’s note: This is not usual subject matter for my blog, but trust me please, the same sort of abuse is happening in the so-called hard sciences of STEM in academia, peer reviewed journals, government institutions at all levels, NGO’s, etc.Enjoy the 6 minute video below.
It’s Saturday, and the world is a mess. Perhaps it’s a good time for a little humor with a point. To that end, allow me to reintroduce the “Grievance Studies Affair” to the world. The Grievance Studies Affair (or, “Sokal Squared”) was an academic hoax project done seven years ago by @peterboghossian, @HPluckrose, and I with the help of @MikeNayna, who also produced a documentary (The Reformers, 2023) about what we affectionately named “the project” as we did it.
It involved writing 20+ academic hoax articles and sending them to peer-reviewed journals in the “theoretical humanities,” things like gender studies and sexuality studies, to reveal a kind of ideological academic rabies we now refer to as “Woke (Leftism)”. In the end 7 of these papers were accepted, 4 were actually published, 1 received recognition for excellence in scholarship in the field of “feminist geography,” and 7 more were still under peer review on October 2, 2018, when the Wall Street Journal blew our cover.
What we learned from the project is ultimately that peer review is only as good as the peers. If the peers are corrupted in some way, that corruption will be validated as “knowledge” and passed into the intellectual foundations of society through the existing system. The implications are vast. Of course, while we revealed a form of ideological corruption in academia, there are other forms as well: political, economic, corporate, etc., all of which matter in exactly the same way and for exactly the same reasons. While the Grievance Studies Affair itself is now over six and a half years old and thus an article of history, I don’t think it has ever been more relevant. To this day, it still has not been reckoned with in the slightest. Our knowledge-producing institutions have ideological rabies and corporatist cancers that will be our undoing. Until we see complete reform or replacement of much of our research, higher-education, and primary and secondary education institutions and apparatuses, we are at risk of complete societal collapse. It really is that serious, and absolutely none of it has been stopped yet. This thread isn’t just a reminder of the Grievance Studies Affair, however. It’s also an introduction to a Grievance Studies Portal I have published on
@NewDiscourses through much effort of my team. In this thread, each of the 20+ papers will be introduced individually with direct links to their new home on New Discourses so that you can read them and laugh (or cry, or be horrified) and share them with ease. I hope you appreciate them and all the hard work that went into them and their publication here. For my part, it has been a great opportunity to take a day to reflect and reminisce about one of the most challenging and most fun times of my entire life. I don’t think I will ever be blessed with the opportunity to work so hard while laughing my head off ever again, nor will I ever regain the innocence I had going into this project. I thought it was funny when I started. By the middle, I realized it wasn’t just serious but a legitimate threat to civilization. I changed my entire life as a result, and not a lot of that has been so funny. I hope you enjoy this thread. Below, you will find the release video Mike Nayna produced that we put out on October 2, 2018, minutes after the Wall Street Journal outed us. It has been seen millions upon millions of times now and legitimately has changed the world, just not enough. It will serve as your reminder and introduction to the absolute insanity you’ll find in the posts below. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Like I said from the start, mostly I hope you’ll find this at least as hilarious as it is terrifying, and maybe you’ll share it with your friends. The Grievance Studies Affair has never been more relevant.
Here’s the video link. If this does not work, please let me know. about 6.5 minutes
It's Saturday, and the world is a mess. Perhaps it's a good time for a little humor with a point. To that end, allow me to reintroduce the "Grievance Studies Affair" to the world. This will be a longer thread (20+ posts) introducing every single paper of the Grievance Studies… pic.twitter.com/4KJJCM0wPT
— James Lindsay, anti-Communist (@ConceptualJames) June 21, 2025
In case you don’t do X, here is the video in a usual mp4 format. This is funny, sad, but true.
The only possible moral justifications for abortion are (1) rape, (2) incest, or (3) because the health of the unborn child and/or (4) the mother are in serious danger.
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.