“All charges manufactured against Trump have been brought for only one reason – to keep him out of the White House. Falsely labeling J6 as an “insurrection” and denying J6 prisoners their constitutional rights has been done ONLY to falsely discredit Trump and keep him out of the White House. Calling Trump an “existential threat to America and democracy” is the very definition of hypocrisy, as the greatest threats to our constitutional republic and Bill of Rights is the Democrat party. Trump’s most heinous crime is exposing and opposing The Swamp. So The Swamp has fought back by falsely prosecuting and persecuting Trump for every crime they can conjure up – using their corrupt DAs and judges.”
“[U.S. Attorney General] Garland epitomizes the pathological liars and corrupt traitors who dominate the entire Democrat party. It’s obvious to all rational people that DOJ targets opponents of Democrat corruption and criminality. It’s obvious that DOJ, FBI and Democrat DAs have been weaponized against “right wing and MAGA extremists” whose only crimes are demanding that our Constitution and Bill of Rights be followed and government corruption cease. It’s obvious to all rational people that Democrats have dismissed the Constitution and rule of law. As just one of many examples, the entire J6 false narrative was manufactured to target Trump and anyone who tries to expose elections fraud. All Bill of Rights have been trashed over the J6 events and its political prisoners. It’s obvious to all rational people that the Democrat party is the greatest threat of all to our constitutional republic and freedoms.”
Bud: 100% agree. If we ever return to actual justice and rule of law, Garland and his unconstitutionally appointed special prosecutor Smith should spend the rest of their lives in federal prison, along with a few other traitors.
“In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”– Thomas Jefferson
This is a recording of an epic live discussion of power versus prosperity by John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs. Do not miss it.
If this video disappears, please let me know.
Bud’s opinion: Occam’s razor With respect Dr. Sachs, there is no evidence that Hamas, or Hezbollah, or Iran will stop attacking Israel. There is abundance evidence the attacks will continue regardless the appeasement offered by Israel.
There is no punishment by so-called “international law” against the hundreds of thousands of attacks against Israel, over 10,000 rockets launched against Israel just since October 7, 2023. Instead, international agencies as well as nations including the U.S., E.U., etc. continue to fund and supply the attackers. Some countries also supply Israel.
Based on the words and actions of Hamas, PLO, Hezbollah and Iran, even if the people of Israel walked away from the entire land of Israel and Palestine and moved somewhere else, the most probable (near certain) scenario is that Hamas, PLO, Hezbollah and Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, Wahabis, etc will pursue and continue killing Jewish people wherever they go.
Here is a short video by a Hamas commander explaining that this is not about Palestine, but about eliminating Jews and Christians from the earth.
Occam’s razor: this war is not about a piece of real estate or holy lands. This war is driven by the belief of Muslims that they are duty bound to eliminate Jews and in fact eliminate all who do not convert to Islam or become slaves (dhimmi); Islam has held that belief and executed people upon that belief including their own family members since it was formed. There has been no reformation on that part of their belief. In fact, as you will see in the Islamic document below, some believe the coming period will be the most savage in their history. Occam’s razor says Muslims will continue doing what they preach and continue what they have been doing for over 1000 years.
Professors Mearsheimer and Sachs ignore the elephant in the room. These esteemed professors mentioned India a few times, but never mentioned the largest, most severe and longest genocide in history by far which was the Muslim-conducted genocide of non-Muslims in India. Hindi, Buddhists, Sikh, animists, non-religious people were all eliminated proudly by the method taught supposedly by Muhammad and reported back to the caliphate by the generals of Islam’s armies. Mountains of bones of dead Indians.
“The genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognized by the World.“
“The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis.”
“The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Panjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700’s.”
“We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.”
“These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed – and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World’s biggest holocaust.” https://www.sanskritimagazine.com/islamic-india-biggest-holocaust-world-history-whitewashed-history-books/
BUD: IMHO, the most likely nuclear war scenario will be between China’s CCP and Islam; subjects living under these tyrannies will be spectators and cannon fodder in the war launched by their dictatorial oligarchies. Likely, this will also be our outcome as citizens of democracies everywhere. I doubt it is possible to avoid the winter of a nuclear war, even if the U.S. managed to stay out of it. China’s CCP and Islam are both sworn to dominate the entire earth, which will lead to nuclear war. Both believe such is their destiny, and they are prepared to die as martyrs in their cause. The following booklet by an Islamic guru (translated to English) is followed by a translated video speech given by Chinese General Chi Haotian to his people…both anticipate giant wars and their eventual world dominance.
“CHINA WILL ATTACK AMERICA” by HON. BOB SCHAFFER of Colorado in the House of Representatives. Thursday, November 14, 2002. [[Page 22783]] [Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 148 (2002), Part 17] [Extensions of Remarks]. [Pages 22782-22784] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRECB-2002-pt17/html/CRECB-2002-pt17-Pg22782-4.htm
“As mentioned in my previous remarks, in December 1999 China’s Defense Minister, General Chi Haotian, declared war “is inevitable” between China and the United States. He noted, “The issue is that the Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war.” Outlined in my remarks were considerations for the United States in recognizing China’s threat and our ability to control initiative during battle.”
The leaked speech General Haotian excerpted above briefly in the official U.S. Congressional Record by U.S. Congressman Schaeffer is read in English and analyzed section by section in the video below by Seth Holehouse. Attributed to General Chi Haotian (retired), the speech raises concerns about China’s military strategy and potential conflict with the United States. Haotian views CCP attack on the U.S. as inevitable. Its authenticity and credibility are disputed by some, but it was openly published in China. General Chi Haotian was born in 1929 and served as Minister of National Defense from 1993 to 2003. He was also a Politburo member and held various senior positions within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. His military career spanned multiple decades, including the Chinese Civil War and the Korean War.
If you have read and followed this far, you probably have surmised that I agree with Professor Mearsheimer and not Professor Sachs. However, I disagree with Mearsheimer about his claim that no one is looking over America’s shoulder or above America to moderate its hegemonic power. God is doing that. I do not imply that God intends or supports America’s hegemony.
Dr. Mearsheimer, there can be more than one. There can be more than one hegemon, maybe more than three. Look at major industries. Exxon-Mobil and Saudi-Aramco. Toyota and Ford. Microsoft and Apple. But rules and agreements for fair competition do not apply when the competitors (i.e., the hegemon contenders) do not agree – agree in fact not only in words – agree to not attempt to exterminate their competitor. Is not this failure to agree in fact the existential problem on the global chessboard? Perhaps, Dr. Mearsheimer explains this is his books.
There are many places where Jeffrey Sachs is, ‘blame America first.’ He has been that way for years. For example, Sachs repeats the tired, disproven mantra of leftists that Colin Powell lied at the UN about Saddam Hussein’s possession of WMD. The U.S. government and other governments knew Saddam Hussein had WMD because those governments supplied the WMD, and those governments learned to regret doing so and finally took action against Saddam. Sachs repeats the long-disproven claim that there were no WMD in Iraq. The U.S. State Department, Presidents, Pentagon, intel agencies, Rochester University all knew that the U.S. sent WMD, bioweapons and chemical weapons, to Saddam Hussein during Iraq’s war with Iran. Other western nations knew also since they equipped Iraq with various other WMD, bunkers and pre-cursors to weapons. The Soviet Union equipped Iraq with a nuclear reactor and chemical and bio weapons. The Russia-supplied reactor was blown up by Israeli jets before the Gulf War. Early in 2003, before the U.S. and allies invaded Iraq in 2003, war materials sent by Russia were removed from Iraq to next door Syria in caravans of trucks guarded by Spetsnaz Russian special forces, seen in the photo below. How do we know that? Several confirming sources. A U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense held a live press conference days before the U.S. invasion showing aerial photos (including the one below) of long lines of heavily guarded trucks exiting Iraqi bases, guarded and trucked by Russian special forces.
Those Russian Spetsnaz special forces and Russian generals moved weapons out of Iraq and then returned to Moscow to proudly receive awards and announcements in Russian news of their successful Iraqi mission.
When U.S. and allied forces arrived in Iraq, old and new biological and chemical weapons and delivery systems were discovered in Iraq and destroyed. Some allied troops were injured by these WMD that were said to not exist. Yet still today Jeffrey Sachs and others claim WMD did not exist. Today, Jeffrey Sachs would have you believe that China’s CCP has no plans for world domination. Sachs is well spoken, but not believable.
“I have reputable sources where generals say yes, we gave Iraq weapons-specific biological agents and we knew what we were doing, figuring they were going to use it against Iran. But then they were prepared to use it against us. Now when we blew up some of these factories to do this, it spewed all this stuff in the air and some of our people over there also inhaled this. So you have the vaccine, you have the particles of this stuff in the air, you have chemical weapons in the air, you have depleted uranium. And as I said today 50,000 people suffering from Gulf War Syndrome and it is slowly moving into the population. I have not seen any recent studies on it that there are cases of it being conveyed to immediate family relatives, and health care workers, which indicates a biological agent at work.” ~ Faculty Lecture onBio / Warfare / Terrorism / Weapons. Francis A. Boyle. Professor of International Law. 18 April 2002, University of Illinois.
About a year later, “The US-led coalition invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003, marking the beginning of the Iraq War.” Wikipedia.
U.S. law compelling the U.S. President to implement regime change in Iraq was passed by Congress and signed by then President Bill Clinton. Support for this law was fully bi-partisan and also supported by the UN which had passed repeated ineffectual actions against Saddam’s regime. Any U.S. President elected in 2000 was compelled by US law to regime change in Iraq. Of course Democrats were expecting Al Gore to be elected in 2000. Indeed Al Gore was for war in Iraq before he was against it, just like 99% of Democrats who, after G.W. Bush was elected, proceeded to commit treason by politicizing a war they had voted for. Public Law 105-338 (the “Iraq Liberation Act”) signed into law by Clinton Oct 31, 1998. This is only one of several laws and policies with regard to Iraq which were implemented first in the Clinton administration, even though Democrats and mainstream media try to blame G.W. Bush for this war. It was this Act that was cited as authorization for President Clinton to use U.S. military to enforce a no-fly zone over most of Iraq, which included bombing Iraq, killing Iraqi civilians and military, shooting down planes and helicopters, special forces on the ground and arming and covertly supporting military acts with anti-Saddam forces in-country. It was this Act that was cited as authorization for G.W. Bush in 2002, post 9-11, to remove Saddam Hussein. President G.W. Bush had the opportunity to halt the Iraq invasion before it began when a CIA operative and her CIA officer and a UN Ambassador negotiated Saddam’s complete surrender under very favorable terms for the U.S. Deplorably, President Bush and his administration jailed the CIA operative without due process.
In addition, there were multiple, large contingents of Iraqis who also wanted regime change in Iraq, including the Iraq National Congress, which released the following statement upon Clinton’s signing of the Act, “Saddam is the problem and he cannot be part of any solution in Iraq. Therefore, President Clinton’s action today is the most appropriate response to Saddam. Let him know that Iraqis will rise up to liberate themselves from his totalitarian dictatorship and that the US is ready to help their democratic forces with arms to do so. Only then will the trail of tragedy in Iraq end. Only then will Iraq be free of weapons of mass destruction.”
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” ~ U.S. President John Adams
Socialist, Marxists, Communists and dedicated Democrats are as religious as the most dedicated Muslim. Their religion is their meaning in life. History, facts, data can’t dent their faith. [Biden is a brilliant master of the universe (Until he isn’t.) Kamala is a source of joy (except for her staff and its 92% attrition rate)] The comrades religiously confirm their shared beliefs and religiously attack and persecute (and prosecute) the heretics with the confidence of the Wahhabi. They are the forty-percent of our population who believe the emperor with no clothes has clothes. Their faith in their superiority justifies their Machiavellian war for power.
During next week’s debate, let’s hope Trump can stick to the facts and the data that supports him and avoids the generalities and name calling. Underestimating Kamala, who is supported by the Democratic media and who is not restricted by the truth is a worthy debater.
This links to a detailed science paper in Nature as well as links to a less technical summary of the science paper. The article does not address the spike proteins which are produced by humans in their cells for unknown time periods by so-called mRNA “vaccines” and boosters.
Right to the chase: I have been thinking about this a lot and where once I might have claimed that there was no such thing as subjective morality, I think now a better way to look at it is like this: subjective morality exists, but it is something that should be invoked under specific (perhaps even rare) circumstances.
What is subjective morality, objective morality and morality in general (definitions based on my thoughts and observations)
Morality to me is actually knowing that there is a difference between right and wrong. To act in a moral way, is to act in the “right way”, which embodies a decision to “do the right thing”. In my opinion, every single human being knows the difference between right and wrong. It’s a heart thing. Logic is more a brain thing. We can argue about what is right, and what is wrong, but I don’t want to now.
Subjective morality is thinking that what is right for you may not be right for others or vice versa. Subjective reality might be applicable according to age and circumstances. An example of this could be a child being raped, getting pregnant and wanting not to have the baby. Terminating the pregnancy might be considered to be subjectively good for this little girl, even though objectively, it might not be considered to be so. This particular morbid example of something we must all think about (because this is happening all the time) is a good example of when subjective morality can over-ride objective morality for the benefit of the community of all. Just so that you know, I think child rapists should be castrated. This would be objectively good because they wouldn’t be able to rape children anymore.
Objective morality is the big gun morality of us humans. It refers to the good and bad that certainly applies universally – the governing dynamics of humans. We all know (or perhaps feel is a better word) that some things are good, and that some things are bad. For example, hurting animals with the intention to inflict pain and suffering is bad. Objectively, it hurts the whole and breeds unnecessary conflict, chaos and pain. Making another person laugh is good. Objectively, the ripple effect of a laughing human would be beneficial for the mood of all, at least locally. But what about our little girl who was force-impregnated who does not want to be a mother yet? What is good for her? What is bad for her?
To illustrate the deployment and the nature of the balance of these moralities in decision-making, we can use the morbid example from above. Again, a person may believe that terminating pregnancies (objective morality) is bad, but this same person might also believe that in the case of this little girl, the objective morality thing doesn’t cut it, and that perhaps there must be a subjective morality invoked and deployed in her case. In other words, what is generally the right thing to do is not the right thing to do in this specific case and under these specific circumstances (age, force). This is the invocation of subjective morality; not really in lieu of objective morality, but a balancing of both.
After quite a bit of thinking about this, I have decided that both must co-exist, but that subjective morality must only be invoked in specific circumstances wherein violations of objective morality dwell and ultimately, the integrity of objective morality is maintained.
This is where it gets interesting on the subject matter of the cabalists. I call them this – rather than globalists (in this article) – because I believe that the globalists are just an off-shoot of a much older, darker, sect of human cults.1 Everyone should watch the following, by the way. Thank you to Matthew Ehret and Del Bigtree for one of the most interesting conversations I have listened to in years.
It seems to me from my own considerably shallow investigations into the history of these ‘underground’ culty people that they share a characteristic that is seated in hubris, narcissism and most importantly, ego. From what I understand, there is a separation of God as an ‘outside’ entity, and God as some kind of manifestation of man. Sort of like the idea that God made us versus we made/are God. I might be wrong about that. But it makes sense to me. If ideologies from a long time ago were passed on through the ages in the men and women who took ‘an interest’ in these cults, then who’s to say this isn’t exactly what we’re being put through now? Who else here thinks this is the ‘culmination’ of another cycle of “God purging” going on right now?
The reason I brought up the difference between – and balance of – subjective and objective moralities is because I believe that in order to be the type of person who thinks that there is no objective God (like many cultists), they must also believe that subjective morality far outweighs any notion of objective morality. A ruler, for example, rife with hedonistic, war-mongering ideals, would likely be characterized as being very egotistical, self-important and truly believe in the idea that they are subjectively right about everything, including what’s right for you according to them. How else would they believe they had the right to command others?
Side note: I would argue that a true leader would be far less egotistical and be found on the objective morality side of the scale in a far more pronounced way. In other words, in order to be the type of person who might succeed at leading others in a productive and sustainable way, one should suspend the ego. One should be able to acknowledge the existence of both subjective and objective moralities, but place far more importance on the latter, and again, invoke the former upon careful and specific examination.
What I think the cabalists do, and have been doing for a very long time, is abuse and abscond the balance between these moralities with the intention of confusing people when in a weakened state to adopt the belief that only subjective morality – not only matters – but exists.
Think: ENTITLEMENT/woke/DEI
THM: Do not succumb to the tricks of the cabalists. They will try to convince you – once in a weakened state of their making – that you are entitled to your own version of right, AT ALL TIMES.
Think about the entirely outlandish and in some cases, revolting, bullshit that we are subjected to every day, whether we want to tolerate it or not. Remember how they abused the notion of “do the right thing for everyone” by brainwashing us into believing that letting our loved ones die alone and in horrific mental and physical pain was best for them and us? This is literally the invocation – on a global scale – of what I believe is a plan to confuse people to the point of not living by an objective morality. This might be why a whole lot of Christians are having big ass problems with all the garbage being tossed at us by the truck load every day by the cabalists. It’s on the TV, it’s in the media, it’s on the Olympic stage, it’s everywhere. And why are so many churches, including Notre Dame in Paris, being burned?
Think about it. If the goal of the old-age cultists was to destroy objective morality because they themselves didn’t believe in it, how would that manifest today?
Hold tight to your sovereign, unique and creative self by living by an objective morality balanced by a subjective one, and don’t fall for the cabalist tricks to divide and confuse. Stay grounded in a solid and binding unspoken ‘code’ that serves us all.
All in all, good stuff is better than bad stuff. Knowing is easy. Look to your heart. And use your brain.
I asked Venice.ai to generate an image using the keywords “destruction of objective morality cultists”. I think it’s good that this AI sees cults this way.
A cabal is a group of people who are united in some close design, usually to promote their private views or interests in an ideology, a state, or another community, often by intrigue and usually without the knowledge of those who are outside their group.
Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign
Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), spoke at a kickoff event for the Democratic National Convention last week and denigrated the Bill of Rights, calling it ” a little piece of paper.”
The Human Rights Campaign is America’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer civil rights organization.
Robinson said during the DNC LGBTQ+ Kickoff event that the U.S. needs to rethink “freedom” in a more “revolutionary” way than when the Founding Fathers created a “little piece of paper.”
Robinson even suggested that “we can’t just worry about protecting democracy at this moment” but should “reimagine it with people that look and love like us at the center.”
“And I think for us right now, it’s about reimagining freedom and this American story in a way that is more revolutionary than what our founders actually put down on that little piece of paper, but instead is the type of democracy that’s by and for all of the people of this country,” she said.
That “little piece of paper” affirms that all men are created equal and our rights are inalienable. What exactly is Robinson suggesting needs to be ‘reimagined’ here?
Watch:
Human rights campaign @HRC president says quiet part out loud:
“We can’t just worry about protecting democracy… we have to reimagine it”
“More revolutionary than what our founders put down on that little piece of paper”
HRC, which has endorsed Kamala Harris, has lost some of its sway in recent weeks as several major corporations have publicly distanced themselves from its woke efforts to strong-arm companies into “mandated activism.”
Listen to @ConceptualJames explain how @HRC enforces the Corporate Equality Index (CEI), or as he describes it, mandated activism.
HRC was exposed in 2023 as the forefront of the leftist LGBTQ mafia in utilizing a social credit score to force companies to advance their poisonous agenda.
HRC publicly threatens organizations every year by sending a list of demands over what they want to be displayed in public, or corporations will face a price.
Corporate Equality Index (CEI) is a corporate social credit score that rewards or punishes companies based on the number of woke issues they are forcing on their workforce and customers.
Their CEI scores are tied to their financial futures as the global financial network that includes Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, and others use the CEI index as a means to determine investment.
Robby Starbuck reports that Lowe’s recently announced they are ending their participation in the HRC’s woke Corporate Equality Index social credit system.
Big news: I messaged @Lowes executives last week to let them know that I planned to expose their woke policies. This morning I woke up to an email where they preemptively made big changes.
Starbuck also reports that corporate policies at Tractor Supply, John Deere, Harley Davidson, Polaris, and Indian Motorcycle have also ended their participation.
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.