budbromley

What is the right adjective for this? Please comment below. Is it deplorable? Despicable? Unacceptable? Detestable? Sinful? Inhuman? Unacceptable? Criminal?

Related posts on this blog:

https://btv.social/1693486_6077/#cp

This is a very important interview. Do not forget Afghanistan! Biden administration is funding ~$47 million per week to terrorists there now, terrorists who are very well armed and used the money to build 2,000 madrassas to train more terrorists.

Cmdr. Ahmad Massoud – The Assassination that Changed the World | SRS #121

“Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction.
It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation.” ~ Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan, Inaugural Address, January 5, 1967, https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/january5-1967-inaugural-address-public-ceremony (accessed March 14, 2023).

Every voter and citizen will not understand the importance of this video, unfortunately. 

This video will be useful here in true blue Hawai’i where I am accosted by “Karens” (male and female) almost every time I leave my property.  Literally today, for example, these Karens are protesting about routine multi-national military preparedness drills that are occurring in the central Pacific beyond the visible horizon (curve of the earth) and I am at 1000 feet above sea level.  The Karens would go defenseless and have you defenseless.

But, the same Karens will demand that you stand on a designated spot for social distance, mask up, and get boosted to protect them, not you. This is simple hypocrisy, but hypocrisy has no meaning for them because they think they are better than thee.

Now, just for the sake of comparison, imagine for a Rod-Serling-Twilight-Zone-moment a one world government, or a new world order of the type described by the Rockefeller’s Council of Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, George H.W. Bush, George Soros, Mitt Romney, the Clintons, the UK royal family, the UN, the WHO, WEF, the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, globalist bankers, the CIA, etc.  This transcendentalist communal utopian peace is the proverbial, Biblical, impossible, Tower of Babel at this point in human history.  In other words, peace is impossible except by the détente of real politic (as the video perfectly described) because of the many differences among cultures, morals, ethics and logic… aka diversity. 

Unity, strength and will power are necessary. Complacence, apathy and diversity are weaknesses.

Yet diversity, equity and inclusion are held out by most but not all governments as a positive. Hungary, Japan, China, and Islamic countries are outstanding contrary examples. Each opposes cultural diversity and incoming emigration, and by that I intend no criticism or negative.

Karens will say that what I write here is a conspiracy theory; but that is not true. DEI is an example of a psychological defense mechanism known as transference and projection. Karens usually are the most discriminatory of people, preferring their own company or their ilk, but Karen’s project their discrimination on others to defend Karen’s self-identity from guilt, unconsciously transferring to other people their own discriminations which they cannot accept. The mistake is that discrimination is not necessarily wrong, but they think it is wrong. Karens feel guilty about it and that guilt is transferred to others. Projection and transference are self-deceptions, hiding guilt to protect self. Discrimination in protection of values is not necessarily wrong nor a valid reason for guilt. The cultures may be entirely different, and may have been different for a millennium.

Open borders multi-culturalism (i.e., DEI, diversity, equity and inclusion), as broadly practiced in Europe has resulted in weakened societies, loss of culture, loss of languages, suppression or complete loss of history and truth, as well as more violence, more revolutions, and more wars. The diversity of Norther and Southern U.S. states led to civil war. Cultural differences are not resolved. On the other hand, assimilation results in appreciation of different cultures and histories and peaceful co-existence, for example assimilation of Italian and Irish emigrants (not without struggles) into America and Argentina, and assimilation of Maori in New Zealand, in contrast to apartheid Boer and English settlers’ diversity from South African natives prior to the 21st century. What is the difference? The clear difference is the emigrants wanted to assimilate rather than to diversify and remain divided. Politicians divide and build constituencies rather than unity.

DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) is identity politics, that is, a tactic of divide and conquer, regardless the diversity is based in race, religion, income, gender, social rank, vaccination status, etc. DEI is a strategy for politicians to build constituency and separation from their political opponents.

DEI should be severely questioned wherever and whenever it is encountered. Almost always the encounter will be attempted political manipulation.