PCR and the U.S. Supreme Court today

Today in the U.S. Supreme Court we heard an example of the problem with PCR kits, which points to the problem with this entire “pandemic.”

Two lawyers who tested positive for COVID-19 delivered their arguments remotely during the hearing where half of U.S. states and many businesses challenged Biden’s mandates, which was held in a building that has been closed to the public for almost two years.

Ohio’s Solicitor General Ben Flowers delivered an argument by telephone, according to the Ohio attorney general’s office:

‘Ben who is vaccinated and boosted, tested positive for COVID-19 after Christmas. His symptoms were exceptionally mild and he has since fully recovered,’ the office said.   

‘The Court required a PCR test yesterday which detected the virus so for that reason he is arguing remotely.’

As I have said since before the PCR test was authorized for non-diagnostic emergency use (EUA) by CDC/FDA:

(1) it is not possible for the test to determine whether or not the person who tested positive has SARS-CoV2 versus the person had corona virus sometime in the past, and

(2) it is not possible for the test to determine whether or not a person who tested positive is infectious to others, and

(3) it is not possible to determine whether or not the person who tested positive will or will not become ill.    

(4) it is not possible for the PCR test to determine if the virus is dead or alive.   

And this is the same test used to validate safety and efficacy in clinical trials for the “vaccines.” And the same test used to determine and report “cases,” hospitalizations, and deaths associated with Covid-19, for which the health care facility collects large bonuses for covid patients.  And the same test which politicians, media, etc. have used to hype fear, control populations, and destroy businesses and income.  The databases and history of this “pandemic” using PCR data are worthless.  The story does not end there.

About budbromley

Bud is a retired life sciences executive. Bud's entrepreneurial leadership exceeded three decades. He was the senior business development, marketing and sales executive at four public corporations, each company a supplier of analytical and life sciences instrumentation, software, consumables and service. Prior to those positions, his 19 year career in Hewlett-Packard Company's Analytical Products Group included worldwide sales and marketing responsibility for Bioscience Products, Global Accounts and the International Olympic Committee, as well as international management assignments based in Japan and Latin America. Bud has visited and worked in more than 65 countries and lived and worked in 3 countries.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to PCR and the U.S. Supreme Court today

  1. Sunface says:

    Well exposed Bud.
    “PCR is not a test; it is a process. PCR does not verify any disease.” Kary Mullis PCR inventor.

    PCR is a technique or means or procedure or process for doing something to study biological material.
    A process or technique of magnification or amplification and replication. It was never diagnostic.
    For some reason it is impossible for people to grasp this.
    Anyone with rudimentary knowledge of bio-luminescence understands the principal on PCR.

    PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus or whatever needs to be replicated has to be executed. Without this knowledge whatever sequence is created is meaningless.

    Though it is an indispensable technique with a broad variety of applications, such as biomedical research and criminal forensics, it is unreliable in terms of establishing infection. Because it is non-binary and relies upon formulas with arbitrary thresholds of magnification. It doesn’t reliably distinguish between positive or negative or live or dead or infectious or not.Therefore it is not diagnostic.

    The process is now being used to create sequences which are digitised and stored and labelled as sequences that were presumed to come from something assumed and claimed as viruses.
    They the (virologists) in service of vaccine manufacturers and more specifically in the case of SARS and Covid it is being manipulated to exploit ignorance. It is quite frankly lies based on Gene banks of presumed and digitally constructed nucleic acid sequences. It’s fraud on a grand scale.

    It is also exposing the ignorance of US attorneys and justices. Portugal was the first court system has exposed the hoax.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.