Judges vs. America: How the Deep State Is Overruling Your Vote

by Kevin McCullough | Mar 20, 2025 on https://townhall.com/

Another day, another judicial blockade. Three more executive orders—each designed to advance the will of the American people—were unceremoniously put on ice by unelected black-robed obstructionists yesterday. That brings the total to 15 since President Trump took office in January 2025. That’s 15 direct assaults on the policies Americans voted for when they rejected the corruption and incompetence of the radical left.

Let’s be clear: This isn’t about “the law,” “checks and balances,” or “democracy” (a term the left constantly redefines). This is about deep-state operatives and activist judges blocking reform, hamstringing the administration’s efforts to clean up the mess left behind by Biden’s regime. The same establishment class that spent four years ignoring open borders, skyrocketing inflation, and a weaponized FBI now insists that every procedural technicality be followed before President Trump can act.

Consider what was just blocked. Among the three executive orders frozen yesterday was one expediting the deportation of violent criminal aliens, another targeting the corruption that allows bureaucrats to profit from their positions, and a third cracking down on federal grants abused by activist organizations masquerading as nonprofits.

Let me repeat that: judges intervened to stop the removal of dangerous criminals, protect corrupt bureaucrats, and ensure taxpayer money keeps flowing to left-wing political groups.

Someone, somewhere, please explain to me what law requires America to fund its own destruction. I’ll wait.

Of course, there is no such law. What we’re seeing is a coordinated legal resistance—engineered by well-funded leftist legal outfits, cheered on by corporate media, and rubber-stamped by judges who treat the Constitution as a Choose Your Own Adventure novel. The game is “Lawfare,” an endless stream of lawsuits designed to bog down the administration, tie up policies in court, and hope Trump runs out of time.

The pattern is unmistakable. The first round of blocks targeted Trump’s border security orders—because apparently, enforcing immigration laws is radical. Then came economic reforms meant to rein in the unelected bureaucracy—blocked. Now, it’s anti-corruption measures. What’s next? Will a judge rule that Trump breathing unapproved air is unconstitutional?

What makes this even more infuriating is the hypocrisy. Biden issued 117 executive orders in his first year alone, many of which reshaped policy overnight—no pushback. When he unilaterally extended the eviction moratorium, despite the Supreme Court ruling it unconstitutional, the CDC did it anyway—no lawsuits, no injunctions. When he ordered OSHA to impose a vaccine mandate on private businesses, blatantly exceeding executive authority, the courts took months to respond—by then, the damage was done.

But the second Trump lifts his pen? Emergency lawsuits! Nationwide injunctions! Indignant CNN panels! The entire system is wired to protect the left’s interests while kneecapping anyone who challenges them.

So, who wins when judges override the duly elected president? The usual suspects. Open-borders cartels, government grifters, climate racketeers, and Washington bureaucrats who treat elections as suggestions. These are the people desperate to stop Trump’s America First agenda.

Trump already faces a hostile media, a corrupt DOJ, and a rabid opposition. Now, unelected judges have decided that the voters’ will is subject to their personal whims. The left couldn’t stop Trump at the ballot box, so now they’re trying to stop him in the courts.

Here’s the bottom line: if this continues, the presidency will cease to function. We will enter an era where only Democrat presidents get to govern, while Republican presidents are treated as placeholders under legal supervision. Elections will become meaningless. Activist courts will veto the will of the people, ensuring permanent rule by lawsuit.

That is the endgame. If they can paralyze Trump, they can paralyze any future Republican. If they can stall every executive action with endless legal challenges, no conservative reform will ever see the light of day. The left isn’t trying to “uphold the rule of law.” They are weaponizing the legal system to nullify elections they don’t like.

So, what do we do? First, Republicans in Congress must fight back. They control the House and have leverage in the Senate—use it. Stop funding corrupt agencies waging war on this administration. Demand accountability from judges who repeatedly overstep their authority. Treat this legal warfare as the existential threat it is.

Second, we need to fix the courts. The next Supreme Court vacancy must go to a warrior, not a compromiser. Lower courts must be purged of ideological activists who see themselves as policymakers. The left spent decades infiltrating the judiciary, and now we are reaping the consequences. If we don’t take judicial appointments seriously, we might as well surrender now.

Finally, the American people need to wake up. This is not just a legal battle. It is a fight over whether the people we elect actually get to govern. If unelected judges systematically dismantle the America First agenda, our votes will become meaningless.

The courts have become the last line of defense for the corrupt status quo. If we don’t fight back now, they will bury Trump’s reforms in legal quicksand and ensure no outsider ever challenges their grip on power again.

The question is simple: Who runs this country—the voters, or the judges? If we don’t settle that now, we may not get another chance.

Read the original here: https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/03/20/judges-vs-america-how-the-deep-state-is-overruling-your-vote-n2654089?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=d0073504a6c6af3b7f447560940151bd5fb46cacd10d64c295a5aecec2cf9406&lctg=27342845

Biography

Kevin McCullough (@KMCRadio) breaks news as it happens in New York on Salem Media’s AM 570/970 weekday afternoons. He’s nationally syndicated. He operates a boutique media firm which produces broadcast/podcast content airing on 1600+ outlets, seven days per week. He’s a 3 time best-selling author. He’s committed to God, his family, and his fellow man. He is burdened by injustice. He pursues clarity above everything… and wishes more people would to!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The ongoing covid disaster, deaths and maiming

Reports on three studies below with pdfs attached and a report below by a very large life insurance company on excess deaths. A link to a review of the 3rd study is down below also.

Aloha,

Bud

  1. Summarized by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher
    Epidemiologist and Administrator at the McCullough Foundation (@mcculloughfund)
    https://thefocalpoints.com This study aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination from 10 sites across eight countries.

The largest COVID-19 “vaccine” safety study ever conducted, involving 99 million individuals, confirmed that the injections are NOT SAFE FOR HUMAN USE:

➊ 610% increased risk of myocarditis following mRNA platform injection.

➋ 378% increased risk of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following mRNA injection.

➌ 323% increased risk of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) following viral-vector injection.

➍ 249% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following viral-vector injection.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub  and attached as pdf

  1. “Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits”
  • Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal. ⚰️
  • Excess Mortality – 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 ‘vaccination’ led to a catastrophic number deaths — up to 17 million. ⚠️
  • FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%. 📉
  • Negative Efficacy – 6 studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 ‘vaccination’ increases your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. 🧬
  • DNA Contamination – 11 reports have found DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, documented across multiple manufacturers, vaccine platforms, and geographic regions, with levels exceeding regulatory thresholds by up to 65,500%. Please share this study far and wide so we can finally put an end to the catastrophic COVID-19 “vaccination” program and initiate the justice phase of the pandemic.

Summarized above by @P_McCulloughMD, @McCulloughFund, @MdBreathe

  1. Https://dailysceptic.org/2025/03/19/the-study-showing-the-mrna-vaccine-cancer-link-that-they-don’t-want-you-to-see/

The Study Showing the mRNA Vaccine Cancer Link That They Don’t Want You to See  (study attached pdf)

Review by Rebekah Barnett at the link immediately above of the study.  19 March 2025 1:00 PM

  1. Crossroads Report

BREAKING: Fifth largest life insurance company in the US paid out 163% more for deaths of working people ages 18-64 in 2021 – Total claims/benefits up $6 BILLION

Company cites “non-pandemic-related morbidity” and “unusual claims adjustments” in explanation of losses from group life insurance business: Stock falling, replaces CEO

by Margaret Menge

Jun 15, 2022


Five months after breaking the story of the CEO of One America insurance company saying deaths among working people ages 18-64 were up 40% in the third quarter of 2021, I can report that a much larger life insurance company, Lincoln National, reported a 163% increase in death benefits paid out under its group life insurance policies in 2021.

This is according to the annual statements filed with state insurance departments — statements that were provided exclusively to Crossroads Report in response to public records requests.

The reports show a more extreme situation than the 40% increase in deaths in the third quarter of 2021 that was cited in late December by One America CEO Scott Davison — an increase that he said was industry-wide and that he described at the time as “unheard of” and “huge, huge numbers” and the highest death rates that have ever been seen in the history of the life insurance business.

The annual statements for Lincoln National Life Insurance Company show that the company paid out in death benefits under group life insurance polices a little over $500 million in 2019, about $548 million in 2020, and a stunning $1.4 billion in 2021.

From 2019, the last normal year before the pandemic, to 2020, the year of the Covid-19 virus, there was an increase in group death benefits paid out of only 9 percent. But group death benefits in 2021, the year the vaccine was introduced, increased almost 164 percent over 2020.

Here are the precise numbers for Group Death Benefits taken from Lincoln National’s annual statements for the three years:

2019: $500,888,808

2020: $547,940,260

2021: $1,445,350,949

Here are the key numbers for 2021, below, shown on the company’s annual statement that was filed with the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services. These are national numbers, not state-specific:

Lincoln National is the fifth-largest life insurance company in the United States, according to BankRate, after New York Life, Northwestern Mutual, MetLife and Prudential.

The company was founded in Fort Wayne, Indiana in 1905, getting the OK from Abraham Lincoln’s son, Robert Todd Lincoln, to use his father’s name and likeness in its advertising.

It’s now based in Radnor, Pennsylvania.

The annual statements filed with the states do not show the number of claims — only the total dollar amount of claims paid.

Group life insurance policies, in most cases, cover working-age adults ages 18-64 whose employer includes life insurance as an employee benefit.

How many deaths are represented by the 163% increase? It is not possible to determine by the dollar figures on the statements.

But the average death benefit for employer-provided group life insurance, according to the Society for Human Resource Management, is one year’s salary.

If the average annual salary of people covered by group life insurance policies in the United States is $70,000, this may represent 20,647 deaths of working adults, covered by just this one insurance company. This would represent at least 10,000 more deaths than in a normal year for just this one company.

The statements for the three years also show a sizable increase in ordinary death benefits — those not paid out under group policies, but under individual life insurance policies.

In 2019, the baseline year, that number was $3.7 billion. In 2020, the year of the Covid-19 pandemic, it went up to $4 billion, but in 2021, the year in which the vaccine was administered to almost 260 million Americans, it went up to $5.3 billion.

The statements show that the total amount that Lincoln National paid out for all direct claims and benefits in 2021 was more than $28 billion, $6 billion more than in 2020, when it paid out a total of $22 billion, which was less than the $23 billion it paid out in 2019, the baseline year.

$6 billion increase in expenses is something few companies could absorb, but Lincoln National has been working to do just that — by increasing sales of new insurance polices.

In the press release accompanying its annual report, and in its press release announcing the first quarter 2022 results — in which the company announces a $41 million loss in its Group Protection business — it trumpets an increase in sales. For first quarter 2022 that increase was 42 percent. The company also mentions that premiums have gone up 4 percent.

Interestingly, in the press release accompanying the first-quarter 2022 results, Lincoln National attributes the $41 million operating loss to “non-pandemic-related morbidity” and “unusual claims adjustments.”

“This change was driven by non-pandemic-related morbidity [emphasis added], including unusual claims adjustments [emphasis added], and less favorable returns within the company’s alternative investment portfolio.”

Morbidity, of course, means disease. A lot of people are sick.

This matches what I was told by OneAmerica in January in emails following the publication of my story in The Center Square — that it was not only deaths of working-age people that shot up to unheard-of levels in 2021, but also short- and long-term disability claims.

Annual statements for other insurance companies are still being compiled and reviewed. So far, Lincoln National shows the sharpest increases in death benefits paid out in 2021, though Prudential and Northwestern Mutual also show significant increases — increases much larger in 2021 than in 2020, indicating that the cure was worse than the disease — much worse.

Lincoln National’s stock price fell from about $70 a share on January 3 to $50 a share this week, and last month, a new CEO was installed. It doesn’t appear to be a sudden change, but could have been timed to assuage major shareholders who have no idea what’s really happening and may think that a fresh face and fresh ideas can turn this around. Could I suggest instead an honest and thorough assessment of what’s really driving these stunning numbers?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Low Energy-IQ Politicians, Be Gone! Reblog of post by Ron Clutz with added comment

Bud: What is the difference and meaning of buffered vs unbuffered EROI?

Grok 3 beta (03/20/2025 1:10 PM HST): In the context of energy systems, EROI stands for Energy Return on Investment, a metric used to evaluate the efficiency of an energy source by comparing the amount of energy it delivers to the amount of energy required to produce it. The terms “buffered” and “unbuffered” EROI refine this concept by addressing how energy inputs and outputs are accounted for, particularly in relation to societal energy needs and system boundaries.

Unbuffered EROI

  • Definition: Unbuffered EROI (sometimes called “standard EROI” or “point-of-extraction EROI”) measures the energy return at the point where the energy resource is extracted or produced, without considering the additional energy costs required to refine, transport, or convert it into a form usable by society.
  • Meaning: It focuses solely on the direct energy inputs and outputs at the source. For example, in oil production, unbuffered EROI would compare the energy content of crude oil extracted from a well to the energy spent drilling and pumping it out, ignoring downstream processes like refining or distribution.
  • Formula:

Unbuffered EROI=Energy Output (e.g., crude oil energy content)Energy Input (e.g., extraction energy)\text{Unbuffered EROI} = \frac{\text{Energy Output (e.g., crude oil energy content)}}{\text{Energy Input (e.g., extraction energy)}}\text{Unbuffered EROI} = \frac{\text{Energy Output (e.g., crude oil energy content)}}{\text{Energy Input (e.g., extraction energy)}}

  • Significance: This gives a raw, high-level view of an energy source’s efficiency but can overestimate its practical value because it doesn’t account for the energy losses or investments needed to make the energy usable.

Buffered EROI

  • Definition: Buffered EROI (sometimes referred to as “net EROI” or “delivered EROI”) expands the system boundary to include additional energy costs beyond extraction, such as processing, refining, transportation, and delivery to the end user. It reflects the energy available after these “buffering” steps.
  • Meaning: This metric provides a more realistic picture of how much usable energy society actually gets from a resource. For instance, in the oil example, buffered EROI would subtract the energy used to refine crude oil into gasoline and transport it to gas stations, giving a lower but more practical value.
  • Formula:

Buffered EROI=Energy Delivered to SocietyEnergy Input (extraction + processing + transport, etc.)\text{Buffered EROI} = \frac{\text{Energy Delivered to Society}}{\text{Energy Input (extraction + processing + transport, etc.)}}\text{Buffered EROI} = \frac{\text{Energy Delivered to Society}}{\text{Energy Input (extraction + processing + transport, etc.)}}

  • Significance: It highlights the diminishing returns as energy systems become more complex or as higher-quality energy (e.g., electricity) is required to support the process, making it more relevant for understanding energy sustainability.

Key Differences

  1. System Boundary:
    • Unbuffered: Narrow focus on extraction/production.
    • Buffered: Broader focus, including downstream energy costs.
  2. Value:
    • Unbuffered EROI is typically higher because it ignores additional energy losses.
    • Buffered EROI is lower but more representative of real-world usability.
  3. Application:
    • Unbuffered: Useful for comparing raw energy potential across sources (e.g., oil vs. solar at the point of capture).
    • Buffered: Better for assessing an energy source’s contribution to societal needs or economic viability.

Example

  • Solar Panels:
    • Unbuffered EROI might measure the energy generated by a solar panel divided by the energy used to manufacture it, yielding a high ratio (e.g., 10:1).
    • Buffered EROI would also subtract energy losses from storage (e.g., batteries), transmission, and conversion inefficiencies, resulting in a lower ratio (e.g., 4:1).
  • Oil:
    • Unbuffered EROI for a new oil field might be 20:1 (energy in crude oil vs. drilling energy).
    • Buffered EROI might drop to 5:1 after refining and transport costs are included.

Why It Matters

The distinction is critical for energy policy and sustainability debates. A high unbuffered EROI might make an energy source look promising, but a low buffered EROI could reveal that it’s less viable when all societal costs are considered. As energy transitions progress (e.g., from fossil fuels to renewables), buffered EROI becomes increasingly important to ensure the net energy available supports civilization’s needs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The feminism trap explained by Elizabeth Warren

Short video interview below by Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren, one of the two U.S. Senators from Massachusetts. She is a left wing Democrat. Pocahontas is a derogatory due to Warren who has been publicly criticized for lying about her ancestry, claiming to be part Native American. Pocahontas was a Native American woman belonging to the Powhatan people, notable for her association with the colonial settlement at JamestownVirginia.

Written by @MatrixMysteries on X.com

March 17, 2025

What if I told you that a single income once provided a home, a car, and a comfortable life for an entire family? One shift in the economy made sure that would never happen again. Here’s how they used feminism to double the workforce, slash wages, and turn two incomes into a necessity.

In the 1960s, a factory worker, teacher, or small business owner could afford a house, raise a family, and retire comfortably—all on one income. Today, two full-time salaries barely cover rent. What changed?

Feminism was pushed as a movement of “empowerment,” but who really benefited when women flooded the workforce?

Corporations gained double the labor supply.

Wages stagnated, as the market became saturated with workers.

Taxes doubled because the government now had two incomes to tax instead of one.

Before the 1970s, businesses had to pay men enough to support a family. But once women entered the workforce, the market became flooded with workers, and wages stagnated.

Instead of one paycheck being enough, families now needed two just to keep up with rising costs.

What was sold as “choice” was really a necessity, as the middle class became financially dependent on dual incomes. The result? A shift from financial independence to a system where families were stuck in the grind to survive, rather than thrive.

In the 1970s, a home cost 2-3 times the average yearly income. By the 2000s, that price had skyrocketed to 7-10 times the average income.

Banks, investors, and landlords adjusted prices to accommodate the rise of dual-income households.

What was once a middle-class goal—homeownership—became an unattainable dream for many. Instead of seeing a rise in wealth, families were locked into an endless cycle of debt, with owning a home no longer a symbol of success, but a financial burden.

With both parents working, someone had to raise the children. Enter daycare, public schools, and media indoctrination.

Children were no longer raised by their families, but by institutions and strangers.

The system shaped young minds, grooming them to accept the new reality and lose connection with family values. The result? A generation of kids raised by the state, with family stability eroded, and parental influence fading.

To keep people distracted, they were sold an illusion of happiness through consumerism.

Credit cards, loans, and vacations were marketed as the key to fulfillment.

Instead of families building generational wealth, they were pushed into debt, working harder than ever to sustain an image of success. While banks and corporations profited, families found themselves trapped in the perpetual rat race, endlessly chasing a dream they could never fully reach.

So, who really won?

Corporations gained double the workforce without raising wages

Banks created a nation of lifelong debt slaves

The government doubled its tax revenue overnight

Investors and landlords made homeownership out of reach for most And the average person? Overworked, underpaid, and robbed of the comfortable life their grandparents had.

The short video is here:

Bud: Today the very woke Senator Warren probably would not agree with her statements in the video.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

High miscarriage and abnormalities rates in covid vax

In Pfizer’s trial, 25 women became pregnant by accident. 15 suffered miscarriages. Of the nine babies born, five had severe abnormalities. Yet the CDC declared it “safe and effective,” urging pregnant women to get vaccinated.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Parable of the Fisherman and the Businessman

Here’s a well-known Mexican parable: The Parable of the Fisherman and the Businessman.

A businessman was vacationing in a small Mexican fishing village when he noticed a local fisherman docking his boat with a small catch of fish. The businessman asked, “How long did it take you to catch these fish?”

“Just a little while,” the fisherman replied.

“Why don’t you stay out longer and catch more?” the businessman asked.

“I have enough to support my family’s needs,” the fisherman said.

“But what do you do with the rest of your time?” the businessman pressed.

The fisherman smiled. “I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take a siesta with my wife, and in the evening, I stroll into the village, sip wine, and play guitar with my friends. I have a full and happy life.”

The businessman scoffed. “I have an MBA! I can help you. You should fish longer, sell more, buy a bigger boat, then a fleet! You could move to the city, start a company, and eventually sell it for millions!”

“And then what?” the fisherman asked.

“Then, you could retire, move to a small village, sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take siestas with your wife, and sip wine while playing guitar with your friends.”

The fisherman just smiled and walked away.

Moral of the Story This parable teaches the value of simplicity, contentment, and questioning the endless pursuit of wealth. Sometimes, we already have the happiness we seek—we just don’t realize it.

author unknown

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What does this chart show?

by Roman Bystrianyk

@RBystrianyk

What does this chart show? Think about it for a moment—once you see it, you can’t unsee it, and it will forever change how you think of infectious diseases.

Much more information here: https://theylied.ca/Vaccines.shtml

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Gigantic Climate Slush Fund Inside The Biden White House, by Liz Peek at ClimateChange Dispatch

by Liz Peek

 Feb 26, 2025

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Canada Facing Fork in the Road

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lecture by Emeritus Prof Kees de Lange on the climate scam

Thursday, February 27, 2025

You may be interested in this lecture from yesterday’s Zoom call by Dr. Kees de Lange, a scientist and also a Dutch politician. He is properly introduced in the video. I attended live along with John Clauser (Nobel prize in Physics 2020), and more than 40 others. 

Feel free to share this with your friends and family, newsletters, social media, politicians, news media, etc.

  • Dr. de Lange contradicts comprehensively the assertions by United Nations, European Union, world bankers, Canada’s Mark Carney, World Economic Forum (WEF), Bill Gates, McKinsey & Company, cruelly mistaken state net zero laws like Hawaii’s, ICLEI, etc such as $9 TRILLION per year out to 2050 must be spent to reach net zero carbon to fix a climate crisis.  ($9 Trillion per year per McKinsey & Company report – exec summary attached – which was presented in another Zoom conference introduced, attended and promoted by Mark Carney, who at that time headed the Bank of England.)
  • The new Trump administration is walking away from the globalist climate scam and downsizing the EPA and funding to non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
  • Dr. De Lange’s lecture is mostly in layman terms. 
  • His slides are attached to this email as a pdf file. 
  • His lecture may be viewed at one of the two links https://youtu.be/IIJSvlsdVSw, and also on https://www.icsf.ie/lecture-series-2025

Regards,

Bud Bromley

Holualoa, Hawaii


From: ICSF Admin <icsfcomm@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 4:07:06 AM
To: ICSF Admin <icsfcomm@gmail.com>
Subject: RECORDING of ICSF/CLINTEL Lecture by Emeritus Prof Kees de Lange on Wednesday February 26

Dear ICSF/CLINTEL Colleagues and Friends,

We had an excellent lecture by the eminent Emeritus Prof Kees de Lange on Wednesday February 26. In his presentation on “Natural Science and Earth’s Climate – IPCC: Facts or Fiction?”, he gave a comprehensive overview of the latest climate science, which indicated that much more than CO2 was at play, pointing to a need for more research on the impact of clouds. He concluded with some valuable advice on future energy generation, indicating that nuclear is the real answer in the medium to longer term. His lecture stimulated a very lively Q&A/discussion session. His presentation may be seen at https://youtu.be/IIJSvlsdVSw, as also on https://www.icsf.ie/lecture-series-2025, and his slides are attached. 

We will keep you posted on upcoming ICSF events. Meantime, very best wishes to all, Jim O’Brien, Chair ICSF, www.ICSF.ie.

A synopsis and mirror of Dr. De Lange post https://rclutz.com/2025/03/01/climate-crusade-is-a-dead-end/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment