budbromley

Social justice?!  When the Pope sends his paedophile priests to prison, when the U.S. President begins to enforce existing immigration law instead of breaking it, when Hillary, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Al Sharpton, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Holdren and their ilk sit in a prison cell, when politicians at all levels go to jail for deficit spending theft from the people they promised to serve, when the Federal Reserve is audited and shut down, when the U.S. government stops selling and giving weapons to friend and foe and stops trying to disarm its own citizens, when the government stops funding the killing of millions of babies, then we can talk about social justice. Until then, I will keep telling you social justice is just another con job. So-called “social justice” means one person controlling another, because the former thinks they are smarter than the latter. This is tyranny not justice. (Hat tip to Joel Kolbo.)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2690575/Pope-Francis-admits-two-cent-Roman-Catholic-priests-paedophiles-interview-Italian-newspaper.html

Entangling Alliances and Women’s Suffrage

Having the right to vote is significant only to the extent it means you can vote for some meaningful office or issue. Saudi Arabian women can now vote in municipal elections. This is progress for a kingdom in which men, particularly men of the royal family, hold virtually all political and commercial power, but it is far from revolutionary.

Saudi women do have one advantage over citizens of the so-called Western democracies. They at least know their national rulers care little for their happiness and well-being. This is not the case in the United States. Our authorities hide behind a façade of concern for the public while mostly pursuing their own self-interest.

This self-interest of American politicians often coincides with that of the Saudi royals. The Saudis have energy resources while the U.S. has military power. The two ruling classes have traded in both directions for decades. The American lives and treasure lost in the Middle East were transaction costs.

Saudi Arabia’s routine disregard for basic human rights forces American politicians to disguise their support for the regime. Those opposed to the Iranian nuclear agreement, for instance, often claim they want to defend Israel. Maybe they do, but their policy goal coincides with Saudi Arabia’s goal. They can defend the Saudis while claiming their only goal is to defend Israel.

In fact, American politicians should defend America, not Israel or Saudi Arabia. Those who assume George Washington’s and Thomas Jefferson’s roles should take the Framers’ advice and avoid foreign alliances.

Obligating ourselves to defend other countries is a recent development. These alliances are the foundation for today’s leviathan state. Removing them is a necessary step in restoring freedom.

– See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36497/Entangling-Alliances-and-Womens-Suffrage/?uuid=138BA992-5056-B11F-C5E2C5FDF371A0E4#sthash.bnWTyjrK.dpuf

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, 2004: “Far more natural gas is sequestered on the seafloor—or leaking from it—than can be drilled from all the existing wells on Earth. The ocean floor is teeming with methane, the same gas that fuels our homes and our economy.”

“In more and more locations throughout the world’s oceans, scientists are finding methane percolating through the seafloor, bubbling into the water column, collecting in pockets beneath seafloor sediments, or solidifying in a peculiar icelike substance, called methane hydrate, in the cold, pressurized depths of the ocean.”

Literally thousands of trillions of cubic feet of natural gas (methane) are present undersea on continental shelves and ocean bottoms and millions of cubic feet per year have been ‘leaking’ into the oceans and atmosphere for at least hundreds of years (that we know about). These gas vents are not only in remote locations, they are also just offshore of the East, West and Gulf Coasts of the U.S. Nature continues to make more natural gas. Wells that have been pumped for decades refill themselves. Worldwide about 85 trillion cubic feet per year of natural gas are used for energy generation.

Methane is one of the building blocks of the universe. Some planets are covered by methane oceans. You may recall that Pluto was recently shown to have methane ice sheets and mountains.

Contrary to what you have been told and taught, the supply of fossil fuels on earth is not running out and probably never will run out unless population trends unexpectedly change significantly.

And now the Obama administration’s EPA wants to regulate natural gas as a ‘greenhouse’ warming gas that endangers humans. And the UN wants to regulate the seas and all resources including methane in the open oceans. That is what they claim.  Most countries have already agreed to that.  These regulations of nature have nothing to do with endangerment and everything to do with controlling you and industry and generating tax revenue to grow the government and the international oligarchy. Government intends to control the supply and the price and will unless YOU stop them.

We are being enslaved and robbed by our own governments while they claim to be protecting us from global warming. So-called “progressive” organizations like Friends of Earth, and ThinkProgress, The World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace and The Woods Hole Institute fully support the oligarchy’s plan. For example, ThinkProgress writes that, “Regulating Carbon dioxide, by far the most common greenhouse gas, is critical to halt the emissions that cause climate change. But methane is a very close second, and for the first time, the federal government is moving to significantly rein in methane pollution.” “We applaud the Obama administration for taking an important step toward addressing this significant contributor to climate disruption,” said Friends of Earth.  NGO’s like these and more along with mainstream media are the propaganda agencies and cronies of the oligarchy that are enslaving us all.

These strategies to enslave have been planned for decades and are happening now. Obama was a director on a foundation board that provided the grant to develop the model for pricing and trading carbon and carbon derivatives. The head of that board subsequently became CEO of the Chicago Climate Exchange, which traded carbon credits. Fannie Mae, The Federal National Mortgage Association, determines the mortgage requirements for almost all homes in America and since the 2008 recession holds the mortgages of millions of homes. But an investment bank and Fannie Mae patented the systems to measure and price carbon use in homes. Franklin Raines, CEO of Fannie Mae is listed as an inventor on the patents. U.S. Patent No. 6904336 was approved by the U.S. Patent and Trade Office on Nov. 7, 2006 — the day after Democrats took control of Congress.  That patent is filed and in effect in many other countries.  Mr. Raines, who paid himself as much as $90 million at the head of essentially a government monopoly agency, has been the subject of many investigations and legal suits. Former U.S. Senator John Sununu, R-N.H., criticized the patent award at the time, pointing out that it had “nothing to do with Fannie Mae’s charter, nothing to do with making mortgages more affordable.”

“John Paul Holdren is the senior advisor to President Barack Obama on science and technology issues through his roles as Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.”

“Holdren was previously the Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, director of the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program at the School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, and Director of the Woods Hole Research Center.” (from Wikipedia.)

Holdren, Obama, Al Gore, the EPA, the DOE and their equivalents in the nations of the UN will be holding the next conference of enslavement in December, 2015. They call it an IPCC climate conference and they intend to sign treaties on “climate change.”  “The United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 or CMP11 will be held in Paris, France in 2015…The conference objective is to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate, from all the nations of the world.”  (Wikipedia quote)

The noose of socialist fascism already around your neck is tightening rapidly now. Will you be fooled again?  Or, will you stop it?  Will you donate to and support those who will shut down the party of big government?

When Seafloor Meets Ocean, the Chemistry Is Amazing

http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/21b8983ffa5d0e4685257dd4006b85e2/e5f2425e2e668a2b85257ea5005176fa!OpenDocument

http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/6904336

Alan Carlin, former senior economist at the EPA explains.

http://www.carlineconomics.com/archives/2034

* “At a fundamental level, carbon dioxide is the basis of nearly all life on Earth, as it is the primary raw material or “food” that is utilized by plants to produce the organic matter out of which they construct their tissues.”

* “Typically, a doubling of the air’s CO2 content above present-day concentrations raises the productivity of most herbaceous plants by about one-third; this positive response occurs in plants that utilize all three of the major biochemical pathways of photosynthesis.”

President Obama and his administration, the UN, top management of many scientific and publishing organizations, and a small group of scientists are spending billions of dollars of money borrowed from your grandkids’ future to stop that.

* quotes are from Dr. Craig Idso, an expert on CO2, and editor of this work.  http://nipccreport.org/reports/ccr2b/ccr2biologicalimpacts.html

Obama’s constitutional law professor at Harvard (and also Justice Robert’s and Kagan’s prof), legal adviser to the Obama White, a liberal/progressive, says Obama’s EPA regulations on coal companies, an attempt to regulate greenhouse gases, is “an unconstitutional power grab.” Legal scholar Laurence Tribe is preparing the Supreme Court case against Obama’s EPA on behalf of Peabody Energy, one of the nation’s largest coal companies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/07/us/laurence-tribe-fights-climate-case-against-star-pupil-from-harvard-president-obama.html?_r=0

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/07/laurence-tribe-climate-change.html

http://www.wsj.com/articles/laurence-tribe-the-epas-clean-power-plan-is-unconstitutional-1419293203

Don’t be fooled by Donald the bully. As I said before, he is a tyrant just like Obama. He is an example of the ugliest of the ugliness of politics and politicians that all reasonable people want to be rid of. His only value now is that he is telling you openly how the tyranny of the oligarchy works. Trump’s behavior is the same as Obama, Clinton and their cronies. Essentially, Trump is asking Americans, are you going to blame the john or the prostitute? Trump’s argument is that as a businessman he had no choice but to buy politicians. Trump says he gives to all of them. But, that is NOT OK. That is wrong. There is another choice and a better choice.
BRETT BAIER: “When you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do?”
TRUMP: “You’d better believe it…as a businessman, I give to everybody. When they call, I give.”
“And do you know what?”
“When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me.”
RUBIO responded, “Actually, to be clear, he supported Charlie Crist.” (Rubio’s competitor for Rubio’s Senate seat.)
Trump claims he is a fighter and apparently many Americans believe that, so far. But Trump is not a fighter, he is a bully and runner. Bullies don’t fight unless they have an overwhelming advantage, and when they don’t, they run. If the GOP does not support him, Trump will take his ball and go elsewhere. Trump can’t argue his case like everyone else is expected to do. “You just don’t get it,” Trump says. That’s an ad hominem attack on his fellow candidates on stage, the moderator and the voters. He just gave you his middle finger salute. Trump’s response is to run away from logical argument and facts unless they suit him. I am going to take my ball and go home, Trump is saying. This is the same bullying as Obama’s threatening Congress and Americans, ‘If you don’t like my nuke agreement, then there will be war.”
Don’t be fooled again America.

President Obama’s Clean Power Plan is built upon a pack of lies. This I know because for the past two decades I have read and published reviews of literally thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers that show rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations have little impact on global climate. These reviews, along with some of my own original research, are archived on the CO2 Science website, http://www.co2science.org, as well as in the 2013 publication Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science. This massive collection of papers definitively refutes the narrative President Obama is attempting to sell America and the rest of the world; for there is nothing unusual, unnatural or unprecedented about the planet’s current level of warmth, extreme weather events are not increasing, and the net impact of rising temperatures is to actually save human lives.

Furthermore, it is equally disingenuous of the President and his Administration to characterize CO2 as a “pollutant.” Carbon dioxide is a well-known aerial fertilizer, and many thousands of studies have proven the growth-enhancing, water-saving and stress-alleviating benefits it provides for the biosphere, which benefits were recently summarized in the 2014 publication Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts…

The Obama Administration should be fully aware of all of these truths. Copies of both Climate Change Reconsidered publications have been submitted to the EPA and other government agency officials over the years in one form or another. Sadly, however, rather than acknowledging these verities, the Administration has been hell-bent on disregarding them. This is where the real story lies and where the debate should be centered; for how in the world can a substance so beneficial and essential to life on Earth be so incorrectly demonized and regulated as a pollutant when literally thousands of scientific measurements and observations indicate otherwise?

Clearly, the people behind these actions care little for the truth, little for fossil fuels, little for affordable energy and little for the millions of unfortunate people who will suffer the negative consequences of the President’s misguided plan.

Dr. Craig D. Idso
Chairman
Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change

http://www.co2science.org/articles/V18/aug/a22.php

Contrary to the claims of President Obama, based on this study published in Lancet, a respected British medical journal,

“it seems pretty clear that any successful attempt to reverse or slow any potential increase in Earth’s mean global temperature would likely come at a net cost of many human lives the world over, not a savings as President Obama recently claimed.” …”Based on data pertaining to a total of 74,225,200 human deaths that occurred between 1985 and 2012, the 23 researchers determined that 7.71% of the lives lost were caused by non-optimum temperatures; and among this group they found that “more temperature-attributable deaths were caused by cold (7.29%) than by heat (0.42%)”  http://www.co2science.org/articles/V18/aug/a11.php

“…the Clean Power Plan rules [being implemented by the Obama administration] will affect climate by less than two-hundredths of a degree Celsius by 2100, an amount so miniscule that it’s nearly impossible to measure.” but cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421992/clean-power-plan-will-cost-billions-wont-lower-temperature

And here from July 15, 2015 is former EPA economist Alan Carlin’s take on all of this, titled: “The Fantasy World of Climate Alarmism”  http://www.carlineconomics.com/archives/1924

And here is Carlin again on the politics of climate change:  http://www.carlineconomics.com/archives/1978

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/07/editor_of_emscienceem_magazine_should_resign.html