Warning alarms for liberals By Tammy Bruce

 – – Monday, November 9, 2015

According to Real Clear Politics, 63.8 percent of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track. This could explain, in part, the amazing victories for conservatives during last Tuesday’s local and state elections.

Across the board, liberal pet issues lost while conservatives won elected office. Liberal cities led the pack in rejecting what we’ve always been told are “trends” or a reflection of a “changing” America. Well, not so fast.

The Matt Bevin gubernatorial victory in Kentucky made the biggest news. Here was an outsider businessman who challenged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2014 and lost, came back and was handily elected governor of Kentucky Tuesday night.

Polls said Mr. Bevin would lose, another example of polls projecting the preferred liberal result. Even the leftist rag Salon covered Mr. Bevin’s win by noting it “undermines” Democratic theory but also is bad news for Democrats across the country.

Why? Because Mr. Bevin ran against everything liberals hold dear including their own Rosemary’s Baby also known as Obamacare. He approached the issues in an unapologetic way, rejecting political correctness and the notion that, in order to win, Republicans have to find “common ground” on liberal issues.

Bunk.

Beyond the Bevin victory there was a whole host of issues that if you allowed the Legacy Media and pollsters to determine reality, you would think have already been embraced, heralded and accepted by the American people — things like the joys of sanctuary cities, legalized marijuana, gun control, a $15 minimum wage and more so-called equality laws that simply expand the footprint of government on our necks.

But what if Americans have been bullied into believing that they were on the wrong side of the liberal bullet train? What if, in fact, Americans had been conditioned by political correctness into not trusting their own judgment, into believing that they were the only ones who still thought legalizing pot was a bad idea, and sanctuary cities were destroying our quality of life, and that a higher minimum wage made no sense economically?

Tuesday’s election results should indeed frighten liberals in that, I contend, it represents a renewed trust by the voter in their own opinions and assessment of the facts, and they are now willing to vote what is right regardless of the names and abuse hurled at them by the left.

And we have one man to thank for that: Donald Trump.

Personally, I’m not a fan of Mr. Trump politically. I believe him to be a liberal, but one thing is undeniable: He has demonstrated to the American people that it’s safe to reject the leftist Thought Police, to cultivate your own opinion and to trust your judgment. Liberals will wail this is bad news, as the dogs of racism, homophobia and sexism will be unleashed.

This, of course, is just more projection, as liberal policies enacted throughout this nation continue to destroy the lives and futures of people of color and women in particular. Tuesday should be seen as an indication that the American people have had enough with the lies of the left and are ready, willing and able to take this nation back from a fantasy world only a masochist could love.

Mr. Trump reinforces the rejection of leftist orthodoxy every day with television viewers and the tens of thousands who attend his rallies. His plain, honest talk usually contradicts the leftist narrative, which is virtually unheard of in the public sphere.

Finally, Americans are realizing they’re not alone in being appalled at what is transpiring in the nation and are realizing a house won’t fall on them if they dare to think, consider and judge the left for the scourge they are.

Cases in point:

Despite being told legalized marijuana is something the American people want, Ohio rejected their state initiative making the drug legal by an overwhelming 65 percent of the vote. This despite pre-election polls saying it would pass. Who knows, maybe the pollsters were high.

Portland, Maine, rejected an initiative to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 58 percent of the voters. Portland. Maine. Not exactly a conservative barnburner, yet they still know when something is a job killer.

In Houston, voters overwhelmingly said no to a so-called gay and transgender rights ordinance that opponents noted would have allowed men access to women’s bathrooms. Supporters said that was ridiculous fear-mongering, but it’s a problem unfolding across the country, including at high schools. At least two-thirds of the voters said absolutely not to the notion that equality has devolved into allowing men into girls’ bathrooms.

San Francisco rejected an initiative that would have trimmed the sails of Airbnb by limiting the number of days someone could rent their property.

Entrepreneurship won; liberals trying to kill small business lost.

At the same time, San Franciscans fired the sanctuary city supporting sheriff who defending the city’s position in the aftermath of the Kate Steinle murder.

Liberals have been full of excuses in the days following Tuesday’s blowout. They insist it’s because Democrats don’t vote in midterms. And that’s true, largely due to a lack of enthusiasm.

The “enthusiasm gap” as it’s known, is a key factor in election results as it affects turnout, and 2016 doesn’t look any better for the Democrats.

The Washington Examiner reports, “Entering the 2016 elections, Democrats face a wide ‘enthusiasm gap’ benefitting Republicans, according to a new poll. The survey conducted by Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg found that 67 percent of Republican voters are jazzed to vote compared to just 52 percent of Democrats for a 15-point gap … Asked if the 67 percent enthusiasm was a floor or ceiling of GOP enthusiasm, Greenberg said, ‘I think it’s a floor.’ “

Considering the fantasy world liberals live in, it makes perfect sense that they resist facing facts, and they can make all the excuses they want, but not only are Americans sick and tired and not going to take it anymore, we’re not afraid to say so, either.

  • Tammy Bruce is a radio talk show host, gay and conservative. Opinion Columnist — Tammy Bruce, an Independent Conservative, is a radio talk-show host, New York Times’ bestselling author, blogger, Fox News’ on-air political contributor and a columnist at The Washington Times. Ms. Bruce served as president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) and worked on several political campaigns as well. Her nationally syndicated talk show, “The Tammy Bruce Show,” ranks number one on TalkStreamLive and her editorials and commentaries on social issues are published nationally and internationally, including The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, San Francisco Chronicle, Esquire, and The Advocate. In addition to her media work, Ms. Bruce speaks to a variety of groups nationwide with her speech, “Contrary to Popular Belief: How Conservative Ideas Empower Women, Gays and Blacks.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/9/tammy-bruce-warning-alarms-liberals/?page=1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“On the Present Halting of Global Warming” by Syun-Ichi Akasofu, PhD

Title: “On the Present Halting of Global Warming.”

First line of abstract: “The rise in global average temperature over the last century has halted since roughly the year 2000, despite the fact that the release of CO2 into the atmosphere is still increasing.”

… Paragraph 2 in section 2.1 “Based on various climate change data, such as those of tree rings [5], glacial retreat [6] and river ice breakup [7], Akasofu [8] showed that global warming began as early as 1800 ~ 1850 and NOT AFTER CO2 began to increase very rapidly around 1946. Further, among these factors, the sea level increase from about 1850 to 2000 was also almost linear, though with a slightly decreasing rate [9].”

Capitalization of the words “NOT AFTER” is mine for emphasis. (The effect cannot occur before the theorized cause.) Full pdf of science paper at the link below. Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA. Published: 3 May 2013.  http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/1/1/4/pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Antarctic Is Getting Bigger? A New NASA Study Explains

Nov 2, 2015: “A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers, according to NASA.”

“The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice, according to NASA.” …”The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. http://news.weathernationtv.com/2015/11/02/antarctic-actually-getting-bigger-new-nasa-study-explains/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Get on your knees.

You can’t co-exist with people whose most fundamental belief is that they must either kill you or enslave you. It’s never going to work.

Here’s an example of a bleeding heart liberal teacher who stood for tolerance,  multiculturalism and moral relativity.  He was killed for Allah. http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/260590/year-old-connecticut-principal-promoting-daniel-greenfield#.VjglUG4oe69.facebook

Here’s a short video with English subtitles of an interview on Palestinian TV with the defiant mother of a son recently killed after an attack in Israel.  http://lilofeia.livejournal.com/725566.html

This is a difficult lesson for so-called liberals or progressives to learn: Muslims took their solution from their so-called prophet 1400 years ago. The solution of Islam’s prophet was totalitarian domination. And the solution executed by today’s as well as 1000 years of history’s neo-cons of the left and right is to totally dominate Muslims. It’s a difficult lesson.

So long as leaders and people on this planet continue to process ideas and all the decisions of life by the Hegelian dialectic, then the serious problems of life will never be solved. All Lawrences of Arabia will go mad. And, you will be dominated.

You must think outside of the box. Let your attention deficit go wild. Consider all of the other alternatives you have not been presented and have never thought about. Make it your usual and customary process to connect all of the dots you can brainstorm. “Look at the familiar as if it were unfamiliar and at the commonplace as if thou hadst never seen it before.” Do not allow yourself to think atomistically.

Do not drink the koolaid.  “Thou shalt not accept the fixed boundaries marked off by the current divisions of knowledge into subjects and disciplines.”  If you have ever even considered the possibility of your own enlightenment, congratulations for that, but then you must think through until you understand the Hegelian dialectic and how it controls your life. Otherwise, you can never be free. Instead, you will have the temporary security of one orthodoxy or another.  In other words, you will have freedom FROM thought…”and the bonus of never being able to think intelligently about what is happening to you in the real world.”

Philosophy Professor Nordenhaug taught: “Everyone in every discipline is growing in ignorance every day.” His law of disciplinary ignorance states that if one’s own knowledge in a discipline increases by a factor of ny – x, where n is the number of all other disciplines less one’s own, and y is the factor of increase in knowledge in each of those disciplines. Since ny is always greater than x, then everyone in every discipline is growing in ignorance every day.  This situation, Nordenhaug concludes, is pornographic or naked, or “dead to rights.”

Listen to the experts, but think for yourself. “Seek out the conceptual parameters that define the range of possible positions on a question, and then try to imagine an alternative to those parameters.  The difference between a thinker and an idiot is roughly that the latter takes the conceptual parameters of any discussion as they are given, while the former always tries to imagine alternatives even to his own alternatives.”

And, of course, the freedom to do that is blasphemy according to Islam. Are we human or are we dancer? Get on your knees.

Here’s a short video on the Hegelian dialectic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_F4WomLlq0

Apologies to The Killers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aUnNjzfkME

Abraham casts out Hagar and Ishamel

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

97%

“Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Literature: A Re-analysis,” by Richard S.J. Tol.  Energy Policy, Volume 73, October 2014, Pages 701–705 

Abstract

A claim has been that 97% of the scientific literature endorses anthropogenic climate change (Cook et al., 2013. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024024). This claim, frequently repeated in debates about climate policy, does not stand. A trend in composition is mistaken for a trend in endorsement. Reported results are inconsistent and biased. The sample is not representative and contains many irrelevant papers. Overall, data quality is low. Cook׳s validation test shows that the data are invalid. Data disclosure is incomplete so that key results cannot be reproduced or tested.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514002821

P.S.  Yet the paper by Cook et al is the reference for the claims by Obama, Gore, UN, EPA, et al that 97% of climate scientists agree.  Dr. Tol is a proponent of AGW and is one of the scientists who were misquoted by Cook et al.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

IMF and World Bank: Putting a price on life

Carbon pricing is putting a price on life, selling death, by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.  You should be very afraid.  This is the face of insanity and self-destruction wrapped up to make you feel guilty, complicit and willing to sacrifice yourself.

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/carbon-pricing-fiscal-policy-by-christine-lagarde-and-jim-yong-kim-2015-10

“This child does not need a solar panel.”

http://www.wsj.com/articles/this-child-doesnt-need-a-solar-panel-1445466967

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

1350 peer reviewed papers skeptical of human-caused climate change

1350 peer-reviewed science papers supporting skeptical arguments against human-caused climate change.

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tough love

Obama has been running a drone assassination program for about 7 years, killing innocent people in multiple countries, costing billions of taxpayer dollars. For several years, Obama had his own hit list. In some countries and time periods, more than 90% of the people killed by these Obama drones were innocent non-terrorists. The number of innocent people killed by Obama’s drones is greater than the number of people killed by all of the mass murderers during Obama’s administration. But, instead of reporting on the continuing killing by the Obama administration under Obama’s orders, the sycophant media report on gun violence in America. Here is a tough love question for you: what more evidence do you need to demand removal of the mass murderer in the White House? https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/the-assassination-complex/

“The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, based on extensive research in mid-2011, claims that at least 385 civilians were among the dead, including more than 160 children. In July 2009, Brookings Institution released a report stating that in the United States-led drone attacks in Pakistan, ten civilians died for every militant killed.” quote wikipedia. http://www.brookings.edu/…/07/14-targeted-killings-byman (Note, the Brooking Institution is certainly not part of the “right wing conspiracy.)

“It is simply murder,” says Björn Schiffbauer of the Institute for International Law at the University of Cologne. Legal experts interviewed by Der Spiegel claimed that U.S. personnel could be charged as war criminals by German prosecutors. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/ramstein-base-in-germany-a-key-center-in-us-drone-war-a-1029279.html

“Creech Air Force Base in Nevada is central to multiple prongs of the U.S. drone war. Personnel stationed at the facility are responsible for drone operations in Afghanistan — which has been on the receiving end of more drone strikes than any country in the world — and Pakistan, where the CIA has conducted a covert air war for the last decade. The agency’s campaign has killed thousands of people, including hundreds of civilians. Some drone missions are operated from other locations, such as Fort Gordon in Georgia and Cannon Air Force Base in Clovis, New Mexico.”  https://theintercept.com/2015/04/17/ramstein/https://theintercept.com/2015/04/17/ramstein/

“Our family are not your enemy. In fact, the people you killed had strongly and publicly opposed al-Qa’ida. Salem was an imam. The Friday before his death, he gave a guest sermon in the Khashamir mosque denouncing al-Qa’ida’s hateful ideology. It was not the first of these sermons, but it was his last.”  https://theintercept.com/2015/04/17/victim-u-s-drone-strike-gets-day-german-court/

Between and Drone and Al Qaeda   https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/10/22/between-drone-and-al-qaeda/civilian-cost-us-targeted-killings-yemen

In Yemen, Human Rights Watch investigated six selected airstrikes since 2009 and concluded that at least 57 of the 82 people killed were civilians, including a pregnant woman and three children who perished in a September 2012.  In Pakistan, Amnesty International investigated nine suspected U.S. drone strikes that occurred between May 2012 and July 2013 in the territory of North Waziristan. The group said it found strong evidence that more than 30 civilians were killed in four of the attacks.”  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/drone-strikes-killing-more-civilians-than-us-admits-human-rights-groups-say/2013/10/21/a99cbe78-3a81-11e3-b7ba-503fb5822c3e_story.html

Human Rights Groups Write Letter to Obama   https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/drone-strikes-killing-more-civilians-than-us-admits-human-rights-groups-say/2013/10/21/a99cbe78-3a81-11e3-b7ba-503fb5822c3e_story.html

White House admits killing innocents … http://www.nbcnews.com/news/other/white-house-admits-killing-civilians-drone-strikes-denies-breaking-law-f8C11435816

Secret ‘Kill List’ …

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?_r=0

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The End of free Germany and free Europe

The U.S. is not far behind.

Merkel’s Muslim Madness

Daniel Greenfield’s article: Merkel’s Muslim Madness

Merkel’s Muslim Madness

Posted: 20 Oct 2015 08:48 PM PDT
German Chancellor Angela Merkel insisted that refusing to take in Muslim migrants is a “danger for Europe.” Merkel as usual had it backward. It’s her program of taking in Muslim migrants that represents the gravest threat to the freedom and future of Europe since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Merkel may have already doomed Germany. The Bild newspaper published a leaked secret government document estimating that the number of migrants invading Europe this year might reach 1.5 million.

And that bad news gets much worse because the document estimates that each migrant will bring in as many as eight family members once they’re settled in, bringing the year’s true total to 7.36 million.

That’s almost 10 percent of the population of Germany. In just one invasion.

And the migrants are mostly young men entering a rapidly aging country whose young male population is under 5 million. Germany’s Muslim population already approaches 5 million. The median age of Germany’s Muslim population is 34, while the median age for the overall population is 46.

Merkel has rapidly sped up the rate at which Germany’s young male population becomes Muslim.

The document predicts up to 10,000 invaders entering every day. It foresees no end to the arrivals even when it gets cold. These words add up to the end of Germany and the end of Europe.

With numbers like these it’s no wonder that Merkel is frantically trying to shift the burden, berating Eastern European countries for their nationalism and failing to learn from history even though as a former Communist and a German leader, she represents the two political forces that historically did the most to deprive these nations of their national rights and their independence.

Merkel invokes the Berlin War to claim that fences don’t work. But the Berlin Wall kept people from leaving. The fences that Hungary has built are constructed in self-defense, not to keep Hungarians in, but to keep invading Muslims out. It’s Merkel whose EU totalitarianism represents a new Berlin Wall that mandates open borders for Muslim migrants while preventing countries from leaving the EU.

When Merkel states, “The refugees won’t be stopped if we just build fences. That I’m deeply convinced of, and I’ve lived behind a fence for long enough,” she is not only deliberately mangling the moral difference between a fence that keeps invaders out and a fence that keeps people in, but her own complicity in these fences. East Germany needed a fence because people wanted to flee its totalitarian regime. The European Union needs political fences to keep countries from escaping its political regime.

The choice isn’t between open borders and the Berlin Wall. Rather the open borders that Merkel advocates are another form of the Berlin Wall. Communist countries don’t make immigration difficult. They make emigration impossible. Free countries make immigration difficult, but emigration easy.

That’s how democracy is supposed to work. It allows the people of a nation to decide who can enter while allowing anyone to leave. Merkel’s EU brings back the USSR’s ‘Prison of Nations’ where everyone can enter, but no one can leave.

Merkel warns European countries that refusing Muslim immigrants is “not negotiable.” This is the type of language that totalitarian regimes use.

Europeans are told that they will lose their credibility if they don’t take in Muslims. “Who are we to defend Christians around the world if we say we won’t accept a Muslim or a mosque in our country?” she asks. “That won’t do.”

But taking in Muslims has prevented Germans from defending Christians even in their own country, not only in the Middle East.

Christian refugees in Germany report being persecuted, threatened and beaten by Muslims. An Iranian Christian refugee spoke of death threats from Syrian Muslim migrants. An Iraqi Christian family was beaten and told, “We will kill you and drink your blood.”

A Lutheran pastor says that he is asked by refugees, “Will we have to hide ourselves as Christians in the future in this country?”

That question is better addressed to Angela Merkel and her mad Muslim vision for Germany.

Islamizing Germany will not enable it to defend Christians in the Middle East. Instead it will make the government even more vulnerable to terrorist blackmail and political pressure from Muslims. And if Merkel were really concerned about Christians, she wouldn’t be fighting European countries that want to take in Christian refugees instead of Muslim migrants. Not only hasn’t her appeasement of Muslims done anything to help Christians in the Middle East, but it has endangered Christians in Germany.

Despite resistance from her own party, Merkel continues doubling down. She has seized control of refugee policy from her own interior minister, who was skeptical of her action and who may have helped leak the Bild document, and she continues to ignore calls for refugee limits from her own party.

Meanwhile Muslims in Germany are vocal about refusing to accept any limitations of Muslim immigration.

Merkel isn’t really an open borders fanatic. She’s a political hack who made a tragic mistake and is desperately trying to dump it on the rest of Europe. After originally taking the correct line, Merkel folded and rather than admit that she made a mistake whose implications will destroy her country, she is desperately manufacturing one ridiculous excuse after another to defend her actions.

Her calls for sharing the burden amount to dumping the consequences of her unilateral policy on the rest of Europe. It’s exactly the type of behavior she condemned from Greece, only to hypocritically practice a version of it that is far more disastrous, both from the standpoint of security and economics.

Merkel’s plan is to unilaterally demand that the rest of Europe “share” in the welfare, crime and terrorism of the Muslim migrants that she chose to take in. And there’s nothing fair about that. But the Eurocrats can’t wrap their heads around the idea of border fences. The closest they can come to the idea is to hypocritically plead with Turkey to secure the borders that they refuse to secure.

The Turkish solution still requires Europe to take in another 500,000 Muslims from Turkey in exchange for its tyrannical Islamist ruler agreeing to secure its borders. This means outsourcing European border security to a hostile Muslim country whose ruler dreams of reviving the Ottoman Empire and boasted, “The mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.”

That’s the sort of man that Europe will be turning over its security too. Meanwhile those 500,000 Muslims will also have to be “shared” all across Europe.

Merkel claims that the migrants “present more opportunities than risks.” What opportunities are these exactly? Half the Muslim “youth” in Germany are already unemployed.  Barely a third of Muslim immigrants earn a living through professional employment.

What opportunities will adding millions of Muslims to the welfare rolls accomplish except to create more jobs for the government bureaucrats who sign their welfare checks?

Merkel’s allies claim that she deserves the Nobel Prize. She certainly does. Hitler and Stalin were both nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. And Merkel has done more damage to Germany and Europe than any leader since these two worthy gentlemen before her had.

Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This is one brave Canadian. Reblog “I am embarrassed to be an Arab”

Fred Maroun

I am embarrassed to be an Arab

OCTOBER 8, 2015,

I have long resisted saying this, but the ongoing Arab violence in Jerusalem has pushed Arab idiocy beyond my capacity for tolerance.  I now need to say it and to say it publicly: I am embarrassed to be an Arab.

From the start, we have refused to accept the existence of one tiny Jewish state.  We fought that state tooth and nail using all the venom and anti-Semitism that we could muster.  We isolated and mistreated our own Palestinian siblings so we could use them as tools against the Jews. We have not relented.  We have not shown an ounce of compassion, humanity, or even smarts.  We made the destruction of the Jewish home our signature cause.  We made hate our religion.  When will this nonsense stop?

Even some of us Arabs who have the privilege of also being Israeli have not learned to behave like civilized people.  We dismissed, threatened, and silenced Mohammad Zoabi, one of our own, because he dared profess love for his country and revulsion towards terrorists.  We have demonstrated in support, not of our own state, Israel, but in support of the terrorists who want her destroyed.

Those of us who are able to accept Jews as the brothers and sisters that they are, are few and far between.  I can count on the fingers of my hands the honorable Arabs who take such a stand publicly.  The rest of us are an embarrassment, the plague of the Middle East, and a blotch on humanity.

We created Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Daesh, and scores of other terrorist groups.  We also created generations of tyrannical dictatorships across the Middle East.  Some of those dictatorships are the best we can show for in a world that sees us as leeches incapable of building democracies or even economies.

Jerusalem belongs to the Jews, not only because it is rightfully theirs, but also because we don’t deserve any of it.  Those of us Arabs who live in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza, would long ago have been deported if Jews behaved like us.  Yet we keep pushing and pushing, hoping to break them.

The Jews will not break.  They will not break in Jerusalem or anywhere else because they are much better than us.  We will continue to wallow in our own victimhood complex while the Jews thrive, and this, my fellow Arabs, is all that we deserve.

Fred Maroun Fred Maroun is a Canadian of Arab origin who lived in Lebanon until 1984, including during 10 years of civil war. Fred supports Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, and he supports a liberal and democratic Middle East where all religions and nationalities, including Palestinians, can co-exist in peace with each other and with Israel, and where human rights are respected. Fred is an atheist, a social liberal, and an advocate of equal rights for LGBT people everywhere. More blogs by Fred Maroun can be found at http://www.jpost.com/Blogger/Fred-Maroun and http://fredmaroun.blogspot.com/.

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/i-am-embarrassed-to-be-an-arab/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment