We will be free again

Posted on December 13, 2015 by budbromley

I have not read the final version of the UN COP21 agreement. I will post a summary when I do.

No matter what the UN agreement says there will be no perceptible or even measurable change in global temperature or atmospheric CO2 concentration resulting from this agreement. That would be impossible under the laws of chemistry and physics. And that is not really the intention of the agreement. They intend nothing less than enslavement under the name of social justice.

The preliminary version of the agreement which I read last week intends to tax or fine countries who do not comply with the agreement. This is intended to provide a permanent source of funding for the UN, not subject to approval at the national level. What I have heard about the final version so far is that the agreement is voluntary. We will see.

It is unlikely that any UN climate agreement would be ratified by the U.S. Senate as it is configured today. However, the climate religion will continue to press its revolution. The environment is their chosen path (i.e. idiomatic dictionary of code words) to implement global social fascism. Obama probably will pay the fees “required” by the UN agreement via an executive agreement. The U.S. Senate probably will allow him to get away with it.

The change we will all feel in our wallets is the unnecessarily high cost of energy due to the global fungibility of oil, gas and coal, commodities which still supply most of the energy to civilization. And second, we will continue to feel the increasing cost of government and compliance with government regulations. Both of these costs are built into the prices of everything we buy. The inevitable result of these excessive costs is a global and national economy which will continue to slow and which will be unable to pay its rapidly accumulating debt.

The debt bubble will burst and there will be a true global crisis. We will all be hurt. No asset will be immune. Every day this fraud continues, the worse the crisis will be. When nations refuse to negotiate the massive debts allowed and socialized by the laws of their country and accumulated by their banks, then there is war. The regime change wars of convenience of the last few decades and today are preliminary battles of global war.

Unbridled hubris is the greatest human failure, bar none, especially the hubris of noblesse oblige elites.

“The ultimate objective of American policy should be benign and visionary: to shape a truly cooperative global community, in keeping with long-range trends and with the fundamental interests of humankind. But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book.” Zbigniew Brzezinski Washington, DC. April 1997” http://www.takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf

Zbigniew Brzezinski was national security adviser to Presidents Carter and Obama and a perennial favorite of academics and elites in the west. He dedicates his book, THE GRAND CHESSBOARD American Primacy and Its – Geostrategic Imperatives to his “students.” (see link above.)

The adoption of Dr. Brzezinski’s strategy by the U.S. government and NATO is responsible for the west’s involvement in most of the death and destruction that has occurred in the last three decades.

We are watching the madness of crowds, like several similar tulip bulb and currency bubbles down through history. Like those bubbles, this one too will continue until it bursts. They intend to destroy capitalism, tax net worth, increase taxes on inheritance, severely limit private property, remove all weapons from the people, and eliminate except for lip service the rights expressed in the Bill or Rights. Sovereignty will be only lip service. This is written in the objectives of leftists in governments outside the U.S. In the U.S. they don’t talk or write about it publicly … yet.

For example, from the Wikipedia page for the German Die Linke Party (Die Linke translates to Left or The Left):

(quote) Ideology
The Left aims for democratic socialism in order to overcome capitalism. As a platform for left politics in the wake of globalization, The Left includes many different factions, ranging from communists to social democrats. In March 2007, during the joint party convention of Left Party and WASG, a document outlining political principles was agreed on. The official program of the party was decided upon by an overwhelming majority at the party conference in October 2011 in Erfurt, Thuringia.

The party’s fiscal policies are based on Keynesian economics, originating from the 1930s when governments responded to the Great Depression. The central bank and government should collaborate with expansionary fiscal and monetary policies in order to ameliorate business cycles, to support economic growth, and to reduce unemployment. Wage rises in the private sector should be determined through the productivity growth, the target inflation rate of the European Central Bank, and master contracts.

The party aims at increasing government spending in the areas of public investments, education, research and development, culture, and infrastructure, as well as increasing taxes for large corporations. It calls for increases in inheritance tax rates and the reinstatement of the individual “net worth” tax. The Left aims at a linear income tax progression, which would reduce the tax burden for lower, while raising the middle and top tax rates. The combating of tax loopholes is a perennial issue, as The Left believes that they primarily benefit people with high incomes.

The financial markets should be subject to heavier government regulation, with the goal, among others, to reduce the speculation of bonds and derivatives. The party wants to strengthen anti-trust laws and empower cooperatives to decentralise the economy. Further economic reforms shall include solidarity and more self-determination for workers, a ban on gas and oil fracking, the rejection of privatization and the introduction of a federal minimum wage,[28] and more generally the overthrow of property and power structures in which, citing Karl Marx’s aphorism, “man is a debased, enslaved, abandoned, despicable essence”.[29]

Foreign policy.

Concerning foreign policy, The Left calls for international disarmament, while ruling out any form of involvement of the Bundeswehr outside of Germany. The party calls for a replacement of NATO with a collective security system including Russia as a member country. German foreign policy should be strictly confined to the goals of civil diplomacy and cooperation, instead of confrontation.

The Left supports further debt cancellations for developing countries and increases in development aid, in collaboration with the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Bank, and diverse bilateral treaties among countries. The party supports reform of the United Nations as long as it is aimed at a fair balance between developed and developing countries. All American military bases within Germany, and if possible in the European Union, enacted within a binding treaty, shall be dissolved… (unquote)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Left_(Germany)

Of course, as usual, much of the above ideology sounds good even to conservatives and libertarians. That is how propaganda works.

The UN Agenda 21 and Millennium programs (which Obama has already agreed to, was the only legislation Obama brought forward as a Senator, the reason for the Nobel Peace Prize) comply with the leftist ideology above, except that the language is hidden in labyrinthine UN code speak.

It’s not a pretty picture immediately ahead. And I don’t see our children having the will to resist. I would love to be proven wrong.

People will be free again, because that is God’s way.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We are now at war

Posted on December 8, 2015 by budbromley

Speaking of Shia only, the U.S. and NATO already replaced the leader of Iran and installed the Shah of Iran, and the Iranian Revolution overthrew our U.S./NATO-friendly Shah and replaced him with a theocrat.  The U.S. Navy already shot down an Iranian commercial passenger airliner full of innocent civilians.  The U.S./NATO already supplied Saddam Hussein with all manner of weapons including WMD which Saddam used to make war on Iran, killing hundreds of thousands or millions of Iranians.  And then US/NATO/UN put economic boycotts and blockades on Iran (for doing exactly the same clandestine activities we were doing), causing an economic depression in Iran which harmed the people but not the theocrats.  And finally, our military bases surround Iran.  We would not accept that.  Why should they accept it?

Most Americans don’t want Iranian theocracy here in America, but our political leaders, elites and so-called liberals do.  Why is that?

Prior to WWII, fascism, Mussolini and Hitler were the cat’s meow, the talk of the town.  Globalist elites, royalty and corporations in America and Europe scrambled for contracts with them.

War is a racket built on the fear and the blood of the people – and money for the elite – and the people never win.  War is a liquidity event for banks and weapons industries, among others.

But nothing I have said here implies that Iranian theocrats and American culture can co-exist in a multi-cultural society.  They can’t.  Islam was designed to exploit and convert other cultures.  The Hegelian dialect is to fight them all-out or to retreat.  However, the unmentionable-in-the-west third solution, the middle road, is to profile them with the assistance of peaceful, reformist Muslims and eject the extremists.

So-called liberals are unable to wrap their little ideologically warped minds around that imminently practical concept because that would mean  that all people are not equal under our laws.  So, they illegally disregard and do not enforce existing U.S. laws which were written specifically to reject and remove extremists, laws which specifically would reject communists, anarchists, fascists and many of so-called liberals like Bill Ayers and Barrack Obama’s father, mentor and preacher.

Goering_Quote_on_WarYou are being led to war.  “We are now at war,” Donald J. Trump said. “We have a president that doesn’t want to say that, but we are now at war.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

David Stockman re-blog

Posted on December 7, 2015 by budbromley
By David Stockman, Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Reagan:  … After all, is it not evident after two decades now of jihadist style terrorism—–whether quasi-organized, remotely-inspired or lone wolf executed—–that it is fostered by blowback from Washington’s imperial mayhem? And most especially the terrible 21st century military violence it has inflicted on the Moslem populations of the middle east?
The fact is, terrorism did not suddenly sprout up from the teachings of a 1300 year old religion, nor from a belated discovery in struggling middle eastern nations that they hate America’s freedom, prosperity and materialistic culture.
No, jihadist style terrorism came to America only after Washington trained and armed the Mujahedeen in the 1980s, waged unprovoked war in Arabia and Mesopotamia in the 1990s and fostered the anarchy of failed middle eastern states thereafter.
Indeed, once the neocons fully took power in the 2000 elections, Washington has mowed them down—–Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen——- with the alacrity of a jihadist gunman. Now all these failed states are breeding grounds of terrorism, but none of them trafficked in it until the beltway regime changers had their way with the assorted tyrannts and authoritarians who previously ruled these misfortunate lands.
There probably is no better symbol of that than the fact that in recent months Khadafy’s hometown of Sirte has become ISIS’ second capital; or that the so-called “government” Washington installed in Baghdad can’t even manage to hold Saddam’s hometown of Tikrit.
Nor is the Islamic State anything new under the sun or inherently more threatening to the US homeland than was al-Qaeda in its heyday. The only reason it can even posture as a “state” is owing to the endless gifts of Washington and its allies.
That is, the Islamic State managed to occupy a narrow, desolate strip of dusty, impoverished villages on the upper Euphrates in Syria, the desert expanse of Western Iraq, the war-shattered towns of Anbar province and Mosul by dint of seizing massive troves of the best weapons the Pentagon could leave behind after Washington “liberated” Iraq; and by augmenting them with even more lethal firepower seconded to ISIS by killed, captured, defecting and fleeing so-called “moderates” in Syria, who were supplied the latest and greatest US weapons by the CIA, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and various and sundry arms merchants and smugglers of the region.
Furthermore, the Islamic State’s brutal tyranny even in its backwater redoubts would not last more than a few months without the oil revenues that are smuggled in plain sight through NATO ally Turkey, and by all accounts with the intermediation of Erdogan’s own family trading company.
The notion that this crypto-state could actually sustain itself by taking ransoms, selling women into sex-slavery and levying internal tariffs on the virtually non-existent economic activity within its putative borders is pure Washington fiction. Seal the Turkish border, and ISIS’ days are numbered.
Moreover, Turkey does not possess the largest military organization in NATO with 500,000 men under arms, 1,000 aircraft and 3,000 tanks because it is incapable of sealing its border. Its border outside the Kurdish controlled northeast is an open air souk for the transit of oil, arms and recruits only because Washington and the West have greenlighted its campaign to overthrow the government of its Syrian neighbor.
If our well-intentioned but feckless President really wants to “eliminate” the Islamic State he only needs to make peace with Damascus; and then to tell Erdogan to scamper back north of his border and seal it off or face expulsion from NATO.
That would do more do extinguish ISIS than all the bombing sorties that have come back 75% loaded with their bombs undelivered to date; or that will be launched in the foreseeable future.
Washington could do three more things to further reduce the already marginal risk of lone wolf terrorism in the homeland. First, stop the bombing and get the US military presence out of Iraq and Syria entirely. No one wants us there—–not even our so-called allies.
For crying out loud, last week our clueless career warmonger who heads the DOD, Ashton Carter, said he was going to put a few more special forces on the ground in Iraq. Yet lickety-split, the Iraq militias said they would hunt them down, and the puppet prime minister Washington recently installed in Baghdad publicly and pointedly said “no thanks”.
And then over the weekend, that very same Baghdad government threatened to bring in Russian forces to help it expel uninvited Turkish-NATO troops from its territory outside of Mosul. To clarify, that would be the same Turkish government that is allied with the Kurdish regional authority in Erbil, but which is making war on the Kurdish militias of northern Syria that Washington claims to be the only effective force against ISIS on the ground.
Secondly, Washington could acknowledge that there is no coalition of the willing, anyway; its a gang of the unglued. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are in Syria not to defeat ISIS, but to score a sectarian and political victory against Assad and his Iranian-Shiite Crescent allies; and to secure gas pipeline rights that Assad and his Russian backers oppose.
Here’s the thing. There has never been a single Shiite attack—–organized or inspired—-on American soil. Jihadist terrorism is essentially a poison arising from the Wahhabi-Sunni world—–that is to say, Saudi Arabia.
The way to combat that particular curse is to get the Fifth Fleet out of the Persian Gulf. Indeed, it just so happens that the oil provinces along the Persian Gulf are inhabited by as many Shiite as Sunni.
So were the despicably corrupt, tyrannical and insatiably greedy rulers of the House of Saud to be forced to hightail it to Geneva in their 747s, their loathsome Wahhabi clerics would be sentenced to an Hobbesian life in the Arabian interior; they certainly would not be in a position to wax any longer on the drippings of Riyadh’s oil rents.
Finally, if Obama really wanted to make San Bernardino safer, he would get some gumption in his final 400 days, and tell the Washington War Party that its campaign against Assad and the so-called Shiite Crescent is over and done.
With the Turkish border sealed in the North, the alliance of Iran, Shiite Iraq, the Alawite government in Damascus, Hezbollah and their Russian ally would make short work of the medieval Sunni barbarians crouched along the Euphrates valley.
At the end of the day, the so-called Islamic State’s main recruiting arm is not its bloody perversion of Islam, but the bombing campaigns of the US Air Force; and the fighters it fields are retained not by religious zealotry, but by the payroll financed by oil receipts. Stop the bombing and the recruits would dry-up; cut off the oil revenue and its fighters would steadily vanish just as have all unpaid soldiers from time immemorial.
Obama’s Sunday night speech was mostly an attempt to placate the War Party and the rabid politicians who feast off from its lies and depredations. But he at least made an effort near the end to say what we can’t do.
He said Washington can’t put boots on the ground and the nation can not throw away its liberties in a fit of Islamophobia and hysteria about terrorism. Perhaps his Homeland Security Chief didn’t hear the speech or get the memo. Said Jeh Johnson,
“We have moved to an entirely new phase in the global terrorist threat and in our homeland security efforts.” Terrorists have “in effect outsourced attempts to attack our homeland……This requires a whole new approach, in my view.”
Why, yes it does. They way to lessen even the tiny threat of terrorism that now confronts the nation is to stop Washington’s imperial interventions and the blowback it so self-evidently fosters.
There is also one other thing that can be done. We might as well recognize that America is an armed camp; that this unfortunate condition does contribute to the fear of wanton terror and violence that pervades the land; and that the Second Amendment fetishism of the Right has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
At last count there were 300 million guns in private hands in the US—-114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, 86 million shotguns and some several millions of military-style assault weapons. This means that about 40% of all the known non-military guns in the world are in the hands of our 4% of the population.
No, this insanely huge arsenal is not about hunting—-there are probably not even that many ducks, pheasants, rabbits and deer in America. Nor does the mere fact of this arsenal give rise to the demented psychopaths, racists and whackos who are responsible for the non-jihadist terrorism and mass killings that recur in the nation. Sick people do that.
But there have been 400,000 gun deaths in America since 9/11. We have a culture of guns so endemic and an arsenal so immense that no conceivable further gun control laws could make any difference. Its a hopeless cause—-even if a 1787 notion of the right to bear arms is a relic of agrarian society.
At the same time, the anti-terrorism hysteria of right-wing politicians is truly misbegotten and dangerous. The threat that it poses to our constitutional liberties dwarfs into insignificance the Left’s ineffectual arm-waving at the Second Amendment.  [end quote]
Difference Between Us
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tolerating the intolerable

Posted on December 5, 2015 by budbromley

In my experience at least, most Democrats and most Europeans have been brainwashed to the point that they completely believe (i.e. they have no doubt) that: (1) multiculturalism is good, (2) moral relativism is good, (3) unlimited tolerance and political correctness are good, (4) more government is a good thing, (5) less religion is good, and (5) judgment by individuals is bad but judgment by the media and the courts is good.

I am not alone in my opinion. Even liberal philosophers like the late Allan Bloom agree. The minds of Americans (following the path of European socialism) have been closed by dis-education and dis-information. Literally, they are unable to accept concepts different from what they have been taught for so long. Higher education as an institution has failed them, though they would reject that idea. It is hardly possible for so-called liberal Democrats (and even less so with European socialists) to imagine profiling a group of people who openly state their intention to harm Americans and this country. Europe is probably beyond the point of return.

I would love to hear a counter argument.

Reference:  The Closing of The American Mind  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Closing_of_the_American_Mind

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ignore this at your peril

Posted on December 3, 2015 by budbromley

photosynthesis_equation1354260592094

The Obama administration and the UN want to control this, which means they want to control life itself. The meeting to negotiate and sign an agreement to this effect is happening right now in Paris, France.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The geostrategic question

Posted on December 3, 2015 by budbromley
Then there is the geostrategic question.
The world of 2015 is nothing like Truman’s world of 1952 or Reagan’s world of 1982. The adversary we confronted then, the Soviet Empire and Soviet Union, has not existed for a quarter century.
Why then does NATO, created to defend Western Europe against that adversary, still exist?
Why are we still committed to fight Russia not only to defend Germany, but Estonia and Erdogan’s Turkey, and if the neocons get their way, to be committed in perpetuity to fight Russia for Georgia, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Moldova, Ukraine, Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk?
If the history of the 20th century teaches anything, it is that war guarantees all too often lead to war.
But in this war against “radical Islamic terrorism,” who is the real ally: Erdogan, who has been aiding and abetting Islamic jihadists in Syria, or Putin, who has been bombing them?
~ Pat Buchanan
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Illegal aliens are changing elections

Posted on November 23, 2015 by budbromley

Illegal aliens are already changing U.S. elections and they are doing it without going to the polls.  Here is how it works.  This is important to understand and important to change. Pass it around.

http://sfppr.org/2015/11/how-illegal-immigrants-give-democrats-the-edge-in-close-elections/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Progressives?

Posted on November 23, 2015 by budbromley

“Conformity will be the only virtue and any man who refuses to conform will have to pay the penalty.” ~ U.S. President Woodrow Wilson,  Democrat, arch-Progressive, led America into the disastrous WWI, was against the right of women to vote until he was about to lose his re-election and then he was for it, reversed GOP-led gains for black people, and he signed into law and supported the creation of the Federal Reserve, which he later called his worst mistake. He intervened militarily in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Nicaragua, and supported the White Russians in the Russian Revolution, setting the stage for dictators of Batista, Trujillo, the Duvaliers, the Somozas, and the Soviet Union.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How Western Civilization Can Be Destroyed by Herbert London

Posted on November 22, 2015 by budbromley

“Civilizations die as a result of suicide, rather than murder.” ~ Arnold Toynbee

This is an excellent opinion piece by Herbert London.

http://www.aim.org/guest-column/how-western-civilization-can-be-destroyed/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email111915&utm_medium=email

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This migration crisis

Posted on November 20, 2015 by budbromley

“We” were not alone in causing this crisis. Politicians of all stripes and colors in all countries create crisis by profession. That is what they do. This particular crisis is not new either, having been underway since at least 1948. The western NATO countries and Muslim countries caused this particular crisis as much as did the U.S. That subject by itself is a whole book. But Middle Eastern leaders, Russian and Chinese political leaders were the teachers, the instructors. They have been forcing mass migrations of their people since history began, and most of those were very deadly to the migrants.

Here are a few examples of the beginning of the current crisis:

1). Emil Guri, secretary of the Supreme Arab Council (interview with the London “Daily Telegraph” in Beirut on September 6, 1948): “I do not want to blame anyone, I just want to help the refugees. The situation in which they found themselves – the direct result of the actions of the Arab countries who opposed the division and the creation of the Jewish state. The Arab states unanimously agreed to this policy, and they are required to participate in solving the problem. ”

2). Newspaper “Nasser” May 7, 1948: “Victory is assured, but to achieve it can be much easier and with fewer losses if the local Arab population frees the way. It will be back after the victorious Arab armies not only to their homes and property, but still get home and property of the conquered and murdered Jews. ”

3). Arab radio station in the Middle East, which broadcasts from Cyprus (April 3, 1949): “We must remember that the Arab Higher Council supports the withdrawal of the Arabs living in Jaffa, Haifa and Jerusalem.”

4). The newspaper “Akhbar Ol-Pum” (Cairo, 1963): “There comes a May 15 … The Mufti of Jerusalem called on the Arabs of Palestine to leave their country because the Arab armies were ready to invade and expand in the country large-scale hostilities.”

5). Newspaper “Falastyn” Jordan (October 19, 1949.): “The Arab states supported the Arabs in their decision to temporarily leave home, so as not to interfere with the invasion of Arab armies.”

am

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment