Perhaps you underestimate the enormity of the global warming fraud

Posted on February 20, 2018 by budbromley

Basically, there is no central organization or funding to refute the extremely well-funded, constant stream of negative, fear mongering stories claiming humans are causing   catastrophic global warming /aka climate change or anthropogenic global warming.  And, those who do speak the truth are up against many NGO’s (e.g. World Wildlife Federation, Greenpeace, Sierra Club, etc.) 100+ governments, bankers, mainstream media, government-grant-funded academia and politicians and their cronies with their agendas and billions in funding direct from the taxpayers and debt bankers.

Contrary to claims of AGW alarmists, most big oil companies support the politically correct AGW green machine; AGW pushes up oil and energy prices.

The bad guys have all the money.  The good guys, although there are tens of thousands of them, are mostly retired scientists and engineers on fixed incomes.  Universities (which get most of their funding from government) do not fund research that is contrary to the AGW fraud and most journals (which are beholden to large government subscriptions) do not publish research which is contrary to the AGW fraud.  Governments around the world (e.g. Obama’s) have spent billions of dollars on PR, propaganda and programs (like the UN’s Green Climate Fund, the EPA, NASA, NOA) to indoctrinate the public in schools and main stream media for over 30 years.

There are now two generations of people who truly believe that carbon is pollution, which is exactly opposite the truth.

AGW is so entrenched that Fannie Mae and a major commodities broker filed and received US Patents to measure “carbon pollution” in homes so that carbon footprints could be calculated and we could all be taxed via devices that would be required in the mortgage paperwork for financing almost all homes.  That system fed into computers designed to enable commodity brokers at the Chicago Climate Exchange and its sister exchange in Europe to trade carbon credit derivatives.   The brokers fees alone on these transactions were estimated at $2 trillion per year.  The president of that exchange was the former Board Chairman of the Joyce Foundation which funded the design of the computer software for trading carbon credit derivatives.  Maurice Strong, formed UN Assist. Sec General, Al Gore and some big bankers owned the Chicago Climate Exchange and its European equivalent.  Barack Obama was a member of the board of the Joyce  Foundation when it funded that carbon trading software.  The CEO of Fannie at the time, Franklin Raines, is named on the patent with an investment banker.  Raines was a crony advisor to presidential candidate Barack Obama.  More here:

Letter from Congress_re_Fannie Mae Patent                                                                             

Patent 6904336_System_and_method_for_residential emissions trading.

http://canadafreepress.com/article/obamas-involvement-in-chicago-climate-exchange-the-rest-of-the-story

https://capitalresearch.org/article/green-tides-money-movers-of-the-left-advance-obamas-anti-energy-agenda/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Rising sea level?

Posted on February 12, 2018 by budbromley
The world’s leading authority on sea level says: Sea level “Absolutely stable.” … Poor quality data from “Office perps”…UN IPCC “False.” Oceanography professor Nils-Axel Mörner tells science journalist Alex Reichmuth of the Basel, Switzerland newspaper that climate and sea level science has been completely politicized and hijacked by an activist agenda and has become a “quasi religion.” Mörner warns readers that the UN IPCC was set up from the get-go with the foregone conclusion man was warming the globe and changing the climate: Mörner says: “And it is sticking to that like a dogma – no matter what the facts are.”
 
He recently visited the Fiji islands for research. When asked if sea level rise poses a problem for the islands, Mörner answers with one simple word: “No.”
 
“Publishers of scientific journals no longer accept papers that challenge the claims made by the IPCC, no matter the paper’s quality.”
 
The interview is in German. Google or Google Chrome will translate.
Note, “absolutely stable” does NOT mean that sea level is not increasing. Sea level has been increasing slowly and steadily since the last ice age began receding. He means that the rate of increase has been “absolutely stable” with no acceleration due to humans or human use of fossil fuels, as is fraudulently claimed by global warming alarmists. The rate of increase has been stable, not accelerating. In geological terms, we are still in the last ice age. Technically, the last ice age has not ended until there is no longer year-round ice glaciation at the Earth’s poles. The glaciation in Antarctica today is miles deep and growing.
In a separate study, scientists from British Columbia find that Tuvalu, which was claimed to be sinking and a prime victim of climate change, is actually rising. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-02954-1
Here is a review of the study regarding the ‘sinking’ Pacific nation that is getting bigger:
February 9, 2018
https://phys.org/news/2018-02-pacific-nation-bigger.html
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Learning

Posted on February 12, 2018 by budbromley

It’s that first section of grapefruit that squirts in your eye.  Don’t forget to wear your glasses.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

De-civilization

Posted on February 12, 2018 by budbromley

“”De-civilization.” Yet here we go, led by a politically correct intelligentsia, churches, and political parties, effectively handing over our civilization to people who hate it.” ~ good essay here.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11811/democracy-death-ii

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Malfeasance

Posted on February 11, 2018 by budbromley
“This is not esoterica. In the investigations biz, this is so basic that to call it “Warrants 101” doesn’t do it justice. If you don’t have witnesses with verifiable, first-hand knowledge, you don’t have anything. Without them, to borrow Director Comey’s notorious dictum, no reasonable prosecutor would bring a warrant application to a federal judge, and no reasonable judge would issue a warrant. If there is no credible sourcing for the factual allegations in the warrant application, that is a probable-cause deficiency that could not have been cured by the reputation of the purveyor of the sources, no matter how sterling. That said, it is obvious that the less identifiable and reliable the informants are, the greater is the government’s obligation to be transparent in conveying the investigator’s potential biases. The Obama administration’s malfeasance on this point is breathtaking.” ~ Andrew McCarthy, former DOJ prosecutor.

malfeasance

n. intentionally doing something either legally or morally wrong which one had no right to do. It always involves dishonesty, illegality, or knowingly exceeding authority for improper reasons. Malfeasance is distinguished from “misfeasance,” which is committing a wrong or error by mistake, negligence or inadvertence, but not by intentional wrongdoing.

“~ Declassified by order of the President January 18, 2018 February 2, 2018 To: HPSCI Majority Members From: HPSCI Majority Staff Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”
“This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to the Committee’s ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle.”
“On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order Casa under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a U.S. citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.
The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. §1805(dX1)), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate folding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Then-DAG Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ. Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public’s confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court’s ability to hold the government to the highest standard—particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the FISC’s rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is remtorced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the govenunent’s production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.
1) The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.
a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.
b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. law final (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOS at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of—and paid by–the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
2) The Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016, Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page’s July 2016 trip to Moscow. This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News. The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News. Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News–and several other outlets—in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Cole was aware of Steele’s initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington D.C. in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.
a) Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations–an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn. Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September—before the Page application was submitted to
UNCLASSIFIED
the FISC in October—but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.
b) Steele’s numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling—maintaining confidentiality—and denaonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.
3) Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, September 2016, Steele admitted to Oho his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about !Ana not being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files—but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.
a) During this same titne period, Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the ANC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.
4) According to the head of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initial Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent Imit within FBI assessed Steele’s reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was–according to his June 2017 testimony—”salacious and unverified.” While hie FISA application relied on Steele’s past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in Deceroper 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.
UNClassified
5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel’s Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page (no known relation to Carter Page), where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an “insurance” policy against President Trump’s election.”
.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Weaponizing government agencies to stop a political candidate is a crime

Posted on February 10, 2018 by budbromley

Two U.S. Senators refer dossier author Christopher Steele to FBI for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-06%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20(Unclassified%20Steele%20Referral).pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hello Democrats!

Posted on February 8, 2018 by budbromley

A real surprise to see this in the Washington Post: “Democrats should rethink their ties to Hollywood, not just Harvey Weinstein ” Watch this short video commentary. http://wapo.st/2i1FW2X

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

81% say reduce immigration

Posted on February 5, 2018 by budbromley
An overwhelming 81% of registered voters in America want the LEGAL immigration rate reduced.  63% want the LEGAL immigration rate cut in half.  Only 19% want LEGAL immigration increased from its current 1 million per year rate.  Only 23% of Hispanics want LEGAL immigration increased.
The question polled:  In your opinion, about how many legal immigrants should be admitted to the U.S. each year?
None                                                                          9%
1 to less than 250,000                                            35%
250,000 to less than 499,999                                19%
500,000 to less than 1 million                             18%
1 million to less than 1.5 million                         7%
1.5 million to less than 2 million                         3%
2 million to less than 2.5 million                         1%
2.5 million or more                                                8%
                                                                                 100%
SEE PAGE 68 below).  And there is much more interesting information in the full poll.  See the pdf at the link.
Monthly Harvard-Harris Poll: January 2018 Re-Field
This survey was conducted online within the United States between January 17-19, 2018 among 980 registered voters by The Harris Poll.
The results reflect a nationally representative sample. Results were weighted for age within gender, region, race/ethnicity, marital status, household size, income, employment, political party, political ideology, and education where necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
Page68
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Brits spied on Trump by request from Obama and Susan Rice

Posted on February 4, 2018 by budbromley
This is one of the TOP SECRET documents mentioned in the four page FISA Abuse Memo released by the House Intelligence Committee. British Intelligence_6
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

These are the Republicans who were bribed by Hillary

Posted on February 3, 2018 by budbromley

Wikileaks Huge Exposure: These Are The Six Republicans That Hillary Had Bribed To ‘Destroy Trump’!

https://theglobalheadlines.net/wikileaks-huge-exposure-these-are-the-six-republicans-that-hillary-had-bribed-to-destroy-trump/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment