Nein Macron

Posted on November 12, 2018 by budbromley

Macron is badly mistaken or else devious. The old demons are the same old European demons, oligarchy, feudalism and socialism, but not nationalism.

If nations avoided international entanglements as President Washington advised, and instead clung to nationalism, patriotism, their Bibles and their guns, then the world would see – and would have seen – far fewer wars. It was oligarchy and royalty that whipped the flames of war, and entangled nations with treaties, and then insisted God, kings and honor bound all men to fight.  Emmanuel Macron wants a military of the European Union to defend against America. And he wants an arms control deal for cyber warfare.  Beware.  No doubt this deal is designed to end freedom of speech.  He’s a madman with a will to power and his silk panties are twisted.

pa·tri·ot·ism, noun. definition: the quality of being patriotic; vigorous support for one’s country.

On this day honoring veterans who liberated his country in two wars, Emmanuel Macron, President of France, speaking in Paris to gathered world leaders for the 100th anniversary of the end of WWI, caused hundreds of thousands of veterans to roll over in their graves.
‏
Macron said in his speech and on his Twitter page: “Patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism. Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism. By putting our own interests first, with no regard for others, we erase the very thing that a nation holds dearest, and the thing that keeps it alive: its moral values.” Verified account @EmmanuelMacron,

“Le patriotisme est l’exact contraire du nationalisme : le nationalisme en est la trahison. En disant « nos intérêts d’abord et qu’importent les autres ! », on gomme ce qu’une Nation a de plus précieux, ce qui la fait vivre : ses valeurs morales.” @EmmanuelMacron,

Barack Obama commented in response on Twitter: “Preach.”

In defense of the French people, recent polls show 71% of them oppose President Macron.  You know the proven adage of politicians: when things are not going well at home, look abroad.

https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-france-approval-ratings-slip-again-in-latest-opinion-poll/?fbclid=IwAR0S5Vy_B5Qj_guHkEbDdoRupiwZU7C-VlimpwpiZSM-IZ_ZdHbrmMcpgxA

Merci is the only word a Frenchman should say to an American in commemorating either World War. This Veterans day is another day that will live in infamy, thanks to foolish, globe-besotted Emmanuel Macron.  He is just another example of the power absolutely corrupting politicians into madmen. Like the power mad Archduke who began WWI, Macron also wants a military to rule Europe.

Pointing his crooked finger at Americans, calling nationalism leprosy, French President Macron derides Americans and nationalism for weakening the European Union.  The frustration of globalists is palpable since their leader Merkel lost in Germany, and she will resign at yearend. The EU and Macron are feeling the heat rising from anti-EU nationalism in Poland, Hungary, Austria, Italy and more nations pushing back on the unelected globalist bureaucrats of the EU.  George Soros poured another $18 billion into his Open Society Foundation, after both he and his social justice were rejected in his home country.  No surprise Macron needs an external enemy.  His greatest mistake was pointing at America.  His finger stinks.

Macron, and Merkel before him, along with the unelected EU, have been pushing for a one world order, bureaucracies layered on bureaucracies, rungs in the ladder to eliteness. But the EU nations around them are pushing back, starting with rejection of the EU and UN immoral and unfounded edicts that international migration is a human right, while giving lip service to national sovereignty.  Nein Macron.

Do you remember the doom and gloom statements following the UK’s vote to exit the EU (i.e. Brexit)? The global elites, bankers, bureaucrats predicted economic collapse of the UK would result from severing itself from the massive, unelected, expensive European Union. But instead sovereignty and free markets are winning: UK economic growth rate hits highest level since late 2016.  Let freedom ring.

https://www.ft.com/content/2a7b96bc-e3f7-11e8-a6e5-792428919cee?fbclid=IwAR2GkxCwTilfwFxGeUvXa2ujr9jpxB6tRpkYnkuUb9ty5OeFjv54DSqKY2o

Macron, France, Merkel and Germany should heed the advice of Thomas Sowell at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution: “When you are your own worst enemy, someone who tells you that other people are the cause of your problems is no friend.” ~ Thomas Sowell. August 21, 1999.

Macron’s passive aggressive aspirations to global leadership have less chance than the Maginot Line.

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Demo waste

Posted on November 9, 2018 by budbromley

These Democrat counties should not be suing other counties.  Same is true for countries.

It’s the tyrants you worry about.  Like the poor, the tyrants will always be with us.  You can’t put either of them in charge of others.

Baggage.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The alienated

Posted on November 9, 2018 by budbromley

Let’s play this out a few moves.

If the U.S. House passes articles of impeachment against President Trump, [I leave for another discussion the demerits of such a ploy.] the probability is that the U.S. Senate will never bring up the case for trial. It would never pass the Senate’s rules. But, the sake of this argument, let’s say the Senate did vote to impeach Trump. Then the nation would have President Pence. Surely Dems and RINOs know that.  So, many RINOs bailed.

What then is the purpose of Dems, RINOs and media continuing their Trump derangement? Slowing Trump down or stopping him? He can hire more lawyers. In this election cycle, we just saw the man working long days for weeks like a juggernaut without pay.

If you don’t appreciate that Trump is working without pay, then many of us suggest that you will want to remove that railroad tie from your eye before you speak or write. Some of you may have a railroad tie in your living room, over the fireplace, but you call it a mantle. When you carry it on your shoulders up your final hill, your best hope is thanking the man or woman who carved that tie.

Take the time to go back and look at the crowds at President Trump’s rallies with various candidates during the last two weeks. This looks like old American values, popularist yes, nationalist yes, with politicians barnstorming the country, waving from the caboose on trains as they move on to the next town.  Then compare those crowds to Democrats and Antifa and BLM and Black Panthers and Louis Farrakhan Sr.

President Trump wasn’t talking much about the booming economy. But he could have done. He was talking about the border and the immigration problem. He doesn’t need the House or the Senate to stop the immediate immigration crisis created by our last several governments. He already has that authority. But he does need Congress to fix the problem permanently. If not, the next global socialist will undo whatever fix President Trump must use.

Alienation is wanting the other side to win. I put to you that Democrats, RINOs and the left wing, however they choose to identify, are alienated. Only an alienated American wants to flood our country with more aliens, to overwhelm the system, and thereby to change the American culture to something unknown and unpredictable.

That is what the left calls “social justice.” If you don’t agree, they call you and me a racist or worse. But they expect you and me to pay for all of it, whether we like it or not. That’s social justice.

So, apparently, Democrat (and RINO) alternatives are:

(1) to continue to obfuscate, “resist” and deny the will of the American people for independence, sovereignty and liberty. Or,…

(2) (Fill in the blank please.) Or, …

(3) Drive the lemmings over the cliff.

Are there any other alternatives?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Your worst enemy

Posted on November 7, 2018 by budbromley

Ocasio-Cortez

“When you are your own worst enemy, someone who tells you that other people are the cause of your problems is no friend.” ~ Thomas Sowell. August 21, 1999.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stockholm syndrome

Posted on November 7, 2018 by budbromley

The article at the link below is about a person totally confused by her education, and she believes that she is enlightened and has the right values, so we should let her lead us all to the promise land of no fossil fuels and social justice. She believes those who disagree are mysogynist or worse. And of course she is published here by a like-minded organization.

But, I am here to tell you that she and they are wrong, totally wrong. The issues she addresses are dependent on facts and evidence. These issues have nothing to do with who is in charge or how they identify themselves. This is a person suffering from Stockholm syndrome, just as if she had been physically kidnapped and abused, but it is her mind that has been kidnapped and abused.

https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2018/05/meet-scientist-feminist-activist-sarah-myhre/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gratification

Posted on November 5, 2018 by budbromley

 

Deferral of gratification is essential. Then you get to vote!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Tolerance, political correctness, and social justice lead to this

Posted on November 4, 2018 by budbromley

Misogyny

Tolerance, political correctness, and social justice lead inexorably to events like this. If you fail to see the difference between right and wrong, or fail to speak out, or fail to stand against it, or fail to vote for what is right, this will be your future. Contrary to what you have been taught, everyone’s opinion is not equal nor equally moral and all cultures are not equal. The concept of moral equivalency is a logical fallacy. Look it up and understand it. This wedding picture represents their culture, not their religion. You do not have to accept it and you should not.  It is a culture of misogyny. Not so long ago, their culture was not like this. Your vote determines whether America will be like this.

Heather Brooke at the Times newspaper of London, England, says “Mysogyny is a gateway belief, justifying abuse.” Here are 12 ways to spot a misogynist, according to female psychologist Berit Brogaard D.M.Sci., Ph.D.

“The misogynists. You may have heard of them. But what you may not realize is that they can be anywhere around you. They are notoriously hard to spot. They do not come with a label attached, and they may even come across as pro-woman.

In most cases, misogynists do not even know that they hate women. Misogyny is typically an unconscious hatred that men form early in life, often as a result of a trauma involving a female figure they trusted. An abusive or negligent mother, sister, teacher or girlfriend can plant a seed deep down in their brain’s subcortical matter.

Once planted, this seed will germinate and begin to grow, the tiny root working its way into the fear processing and memory areas of the brain as its tiny stem works its way into frontal areas of the brain, affecting emotion and rational decision-making.

The first signs of misogyny are barely noticeable, but with additional exposure to neglect, abuse, or lack of treatment, this behavioral seeding will grow larger and more prominent. But even when the misogyny reaches maturity and the tendency toward acting with hatred toward women can no longer be controlled, the misogynist and the women around him will often fail to notice the condition until it’s too late.

The following traits are typical of the misogynist:

He will zero in on a woman and choose her as his target. Her natural defenses may be down because he’s flirtatious, exciting, fun, and charismatic at first.
As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality. He may change quickly from irresistible to rude, and from rude back to irresistible.
He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.
He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
His behavior toward women in general is grandiose, cocky, controlling, and self-centered.
He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
He will unknowingly treat women differently from men in workplace and social settings, allowing men various liberties for which he will criticize female colleagues or friends.
He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
Sexually, he likes to control women and gives little or no attention to their sexual pleasure. Foreplay, if it occurs at all, is only a necessary means to an end. He likes oral sex but only as a recipient. His favorite positions enable him to avoid looking the woman in her eyes.
He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them. Their ability to lure women in with their charm and charisma adds to the difficulty of spotting the early-warning signs.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.” ~ Berit Brogaard D.M.Sci., Ph.D

The Mysteries of Love
Berit Brogaard is the author of On Romantic Love
https://www.psychologytoday.com/…/2…/12-ways-spot-misogynist

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Climate logic

Posted on November 3, 2018 by budbromley

The test: if your political candidate supports the climate change dogma, then vote against them. There are no exceptions. They will harm you.

Everyday, there are more and longer lists of scientists skeptical of human-caused global warming. On the other hand, the UN and many politicians and media are trying to scare you.  But nothing, no expert, no consensus, changes the simple facts that falsify the hypothesis put forth by the proponents of human-caused global warming. Despite years of trying and spending billions of dollars on research, there is no evidence that a statistically significant trend of increasing CO2 concentration causes a statistically significant trend of warming.

However, there is substantial evidence from multiple sources that falsifies their hypothesis. For example, while CO2 concentration trend was steadily increasing, temperature trends declined for years, then increased for years (see Hadley Temp vs CO2 graphic) and now more recently has been trendless or only slightly increasing for more than 20 years. If CO2 causes warming, as they claim, then there cannot be extended periods of cooling or no temperature trend at the same time CO2 is rising. But, in fact, there are such periods.

As we all know, correlation by itself does not prove cause. However, for there to be a cause, there must be a correlation. An increasing trend of human-produced CO2 was hypothesized to be the cause (trigger, forcing) of significant global warming. Therefore, for that hypothesis to be valid, there must be a strong positive correlation with an increasing temperature trend. But there is only a very weak correlation or none. In other words, in a 2 line graph of CO2 change versus temperature change, the two lines must be parallel or converging if the hypothesis is true. But, the lines are diverging; there is no strong positive correlation. Worse for the AGW hypothesis, there are other trends that more strongly correlate with temperature, for example, total solar irradiance (TSI) and ocean warming (PDO and AMO.)

Then there is the ongoing problem with the year after year progressively lower high temperature readings (or the number of days per year over say 90 degrees or 95 degrees), a measurement process which avoids the problem of data closure caused by averaging averages.

Then there is the problem that ice core drillings smoothed over statistically appropriate long periods show that warming trends always occur BEFORE trends of increasing CO2. Obviously, the hypothetical effect cannot occur before its hypothetical cause. In multiple studies the CO2 change LAGS the atmospheric temperature change, both warming and cooling.

“Petit et al (1999) (ref 1 below) reconstructed histories of surface air temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration from data obtained from a Vostok ice core that covered the prior 420,000 years, determining that during glacial inception “the CO2 decrease lags the temperature decrease by several thousand years” and that “the same sequence of climate forcing operated during each termination.” Likewise, working with sections of ice core records from around the times of the last three glacial terminations, Fischer et al (1999) (ref 2) found that “the time lag of the rise in CO2 concentrations with respect to temperature change is on the order of 400 to 1000 years during all three glacial-interglacial transitions.”

“On the basis of atmospheric CO2 data obtained from the Antarctic Taylor Dome ice core and temperature data obtained from the Vostok ice core, Indermuhle et al (2000) (ref 3) studied the relationship between these two parameters over the period 60,000-20,000 years BP (Before Present). One statistical test performed on the data suggested that shifts in the air’s CO2 content lagged shifts in air temperature by approximately 900 years, while a second statistical test yielded a mean lag-time of 1200 years. Similarly, in a study of air temperature and CO2 data obtained from Dome Concordia, Antarctica for the period 22,000-9,000 BP — which time interval includes the most recent glacial-to-interglacial transition — Monnin et al. (2001) (ref 4) found that the start of the CO2 increase lagged the start of the temperature increase by 800 years. Then, in another study of the 420,000-year Vostok ice-core record, Mudelsee (2001) (ref 5) concluded that variations in atmospheric CO2 concentration lagged variations in air temperature by 1,300 to 5,000 years.”

Then there is the atmospheric physical chemistry problem that increasing CO2 concentration results in progressively (log rate) diminishing amounts of warming because the quantum bands in CO2 molecules available for IR adsorption and re-emission are already occupied by energy radiated from other molecules. Thus, we see over the last 15 years, AGW proponents have been progressively reducing in their peer-reviewed publications their estimates for climate sensitivity attributable to CO2.  Climate-Sensitivity-Value-Estimates-Declining-Scafetta-2017

Then there is the statistical problem that the net amount of warming (or forcing: W/m^2) which can be attributed to human-produced CO2 is less than the standard error in the measurement of the net warming (or forcing) that can be attributed to water vapor/clouds.  Water vapor and clouds are of course the dominant “greenhouse” gases according to all scientists. Forcing due to CO2 at today’s 0.04% concentration (or 400 ppmv) is about 1.5 Watts per square meter (W/m^2), whereas forcing due to water vapor and clouds are each about 10 W/m^2 and both are highly variable because humidity in air is highly variable and far outside human control. We have a 10 times larger variable that is 10 times more variable than CO2. Water vapor/clouds are responsible for about 94.99% of the total “greenhouse effect,” whereas total CO2 is responsible for only about 3.5% and human-produced CO2 is responsible for only about 0.12%. In other words, the warming effect (or forcing) due to CO2 is so small that it cannot be distinguished from noise, i.e. human CO2 is statistically insignificant. How can feedback or feedforward be modelled if one variable is too small to measure?  The amount of warming due to human-caused CO2 is a computer calculation which is so small that it cannot be measured or validated in nature with the precision required by measurement sciences.  Since the effect of CO2 is so small, the models cannot be validated by observations.

According to the rules of science and statistics, AGW is a failed hypothesis.

Hadley Temp vs CO2

(1) Petit, J.R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N.I., Barnola, J.-M.,Basile, I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V.M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V.Y., Lorius, C., Pepin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E., and Stievenard, M. 1999. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399: 429-436.

(2) Fischer, H., Wahlen, M., Smith, J., Mastroianni, D. and Deck B. 1999. Ice core records of atmospheric CO2 around the last three glacial terminations. Science 283: 1712-1714.

(3) Indermuhle, A., Monnin, E., Stauffer, B. and Stocker, T.F. 2000. Atmospheric CO2 concentration from 60 to 20 kyr BP from the Taylor Dome ice core, Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters 27: 735-738.

(4) Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach , A., Flückiger, J, Stauffer, B., Stocker, T.F., Raynaud, D. and Barnola, J.-M. 2001. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the last glacial termination. Science 291: 112-114.

(5) Mudelsee, M. 2001. The phase relations among atmospheric CO2 content, temperature and global ice volume over the past 420 ka. Quaternary Science Reviews 20: 583-589. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222675511_The_phase_relations_among_atmospheric_CO2_content_temperature_and_global_ice_volume_over_the_past_420_ka
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

MAGA

Posted on October 31, 2018 by budbromley

Watch and share onward. About 1 hour. Excellent. Starts scary but gets better and better. Not likely you will forget this documentary. Vote!

https://www.westernjournal.com/trumpatwar/?utm_source=urlredirect&utm_medium=streamtrumpatwar

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fascism is the method of oligarchs not patriots

Posted on October 30, 2018 by budbromley

Oligarchs on the left wing want you to believe that fascism is a tyranny of the right-wing. But that is not true. It is not true logically today nor was it true logically when fascism was created and practiced by Mussolini in Italy and Hitler in Germany. Allow me to explain.

Socialism is control of the economy and the people by the government. Communism is ownership of the economy and the people by the government, the elimination of individuality. Fascism is control of the government by an authoritarian oligarchy or dictator. The government controlled by fascists may be socialist or communist, Islamic or Bathist; the oligarchy does not care. However, it is a logical contradiction to describe a democratic government as fascist or to describe as fascist a political leader who is fighting for individual rights.

Yet exactly that contradiction is being pushed by leftist billionaire oligarchs like Tom Steyer. See article at the link below.

Fascism was created as a response to the militant communism that was spreading rapidly after the Russian Revolutions. Fascism is national socialism also known as Nazism. Fascism was specifically nationalist as a direct response to the claim and practice of socialism and communism to be an international movement that replaced the feudal tyrannies of centuries of royal families who were tied together by blood. The corporations and industries in fascist countries were owned and controlled by wealthy and powerful families who were once members of their royal courts, and owed them fealty, until the oligarchy handed power to politicians, which corrupted politicians into madness and violence just as it had royalty. This was the oligarchy then and it still is today, protecting its status quo, power and wealth. The oligarchy controls but does not own the government or the economy; we are living in fascism and beginning to rebel from it.

Fascism is to the right of socialism and communism, but just barely. However, socialists and communists position fascism as far right, when in fact fascism is far left wing …just not as far left as socialism and communism. Identical to socialism and communism, fascism is denial of individual liberty by government. Nothing about that is right or right wing.

So long as the oligarchy is in control, the wealthy and powerful oligarchs are remain politely hidden by a veil of noblesse oblige philanthropy, satisfied to control events and people by pulling strings behind the curtains from within foundations, NGOs, and banks, corporations, and associations. People only hear from them when their control is threatened or when they stroke each other or themselves. Then they turn up the volume and dominate the press coverage enveloping the people. And of course oligarchy already control the press and PR industries, they are corporations, bought and controlled. But, President Trump and the 61 million Americans (and growing rapidly) have threatened the control of the oligarchy. Hear them scream like the spoiled babies they are.

Today, the oligarchy and their henchmen in the mainstream media are screaming mad. They point their fingers and powers at President Trump, calling Trump a fascist, when in fact they are the fascists. They are the rich and powerful who for generations have controlled corporations and government. They are identical to the powerful families who controlled the steel, chemical, manufacturing and press industries in Italy and Germany before WWII. They supported Mussolini and Hitler to protect their status from loss of control to socialism and communism, so national socialism was created. And today just as back then, they truly believe their empire, their Reich, will rule for a thousand years.

Socialists and communists fear God and religion. They actively work to defeat belief in God, because the moral values and natural laws created and taught by God contradict their belief in humanism. Their religion is humanism. Today, the oligarchy uses socialism and communism as the opiate of the people because valueless people are easily controlled. Identical to the Bolsheviks, Stalinists and Maoists in Russia and China before and during WWI and WWII, the oligarchy itself never intended to practice communism, because, as should be obvious after the foregoing discussion, doing so would require them to give up their power and privilege. Socialism and communism were and are the opiate of the people.

As happens so routinely that it is boring, leftists accuse their opponents of doing exactly what the leftists themselves are doing. It is their defense mechanism, a knee jerk, to protect their status quo. Truth is irrelevant for them. It is another example of using any means necessary to achieve their end goal, including sacrificing an entire generation of young Americans. The end goal of oligarchy is protecting their power, wealth and status. Never forget it. These are dangerous times.

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/10/30/insane-left-wing-billionaire-tom-steyer-sponsors-facebook-ad-comparing-potus-trump-to-saddam-hussein/

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment