1963 speech delivered by Martin Luther King Jr. in Washington D.C. to 250,000 people of the civil rights movement, regarded as one of the most important speeches in US history. Jon Meacham writes that, “With a single phrase, King joined Jefferson and Lincoln in the ranks of men who’ve shaped modern America”.[8]
“A half-century after his death, Martin Luther King Jr. is as revered as ever. But have we been following his example, or merely paying lip service to his ideas? Jason Riley, Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, weighs in.”
By Jason Riley. Read or watch the original here where you can also find references:
It’s been 50 years since Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot to death on a motel balcony in Memphis, Tennessee, and over the decades he has become one of the most revered figures in American history. There is an impressive memorial to him in Washington, DC, and a museum celebrating his life in Atlanta, Georgia. Countless schools and boulevards have been named after him, and a national holiday is dedicated to his memory.
How is it, then, that so much of his legacy — what he hoped to pass on to the future — has been lost?
King wanted equality under the law and said, famously, that people ought to judge one another based on character, not skin color. But he also believed that blacks had an important role to play in their own advancement.
The black civil rights battles in America are now over, and King’s side won. The best indication of that may be that King has had no real successor. If black Americans were still faced with legitimate threats to civil rights—such as legal discrimination or voter disenfranchisement—it’s likely that leaders of King’s caliber would have emerged to carry on the fight. Instead, what we have today are pretenders who have turned the civil rights movement into an industry, if not a racket.
And what have these racketeers accomplished? A lot for themselves and very little for their constituents. Racial gaps in income, education and home ownership were narrowing in the 1940s, ’50s and ’60s, but after King was replaced as the spokesman for black America by the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others, these gaps began to widen in the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s.
This suggests that the racial disparities that continue today aren’t driven by whatever racism that still exists, despite all the claims to the contrary from progressives and their allies in the media. It also suggests that black culture — attitudes toward marriage, education, work and the rule of law — plays a much larger role than the left wants to acknowledge.
More marches won’t address out-of-wedlock childbearing. More sit-ins won’t lower black crime rates or narrow the school achievement gap.
Electing more black politicians and appointing more black government officials can’t compensate for these cultural deficiencies, either. Black mayors, congressmen, senators, police chiefs and school superintendents have become commonplace since the 1970s.
Even the election of a black president—twice—failed to close the racial divide in many key measures. Black-white differences in poverty, homeownership and incomes all grew wider under President Obama.
Discussion of antisocial behavior in poor black communities, let alone the possibility that it plays a significant role in racial inequality, has become another casualty of the post-’60s era.
King and other black leaders at the time spoke openly about the need for more-responsible behavior. After remarking on disproportionately high inner-city crime rates, King told a black congregation in St. Louis that “we’ve got to do something about our moral standards. We know that there are many things wrong in the white world,” he said, “but there are many things wrong in the black world, too. We can’t keep on blaming the white man. There are things we must do for ourselves.”
The pretenders to King’s legacy mostly ignore this advice, preferring instead to keep the onus on whites. Where King tried to instill the importance of personal responsibility and self-determination, his counterparts today spend more time making excuses for counterproductive behavior and dismissing any criticism of it as racist.
Activists who long ago abandoned King’s colorblind standard, which was the basis for the landmark civil-rights laws enacted in the 1960s, tell young black Americans today that they are victims, first and foremost. White society is against you, they say, even if you have no clear examples of discrimination to point to. They are told that fire hoses and poll taxes have been replaced by unconscious racism, white privilege and microaggressions.
A generation of blacks who have more opportunity than any previous generation are being taught that America offers them little more than bigoted teachers, biased employers and trigger-happy cops. It’s not only a lie, but as King understood, it’s also self-destructive.
Black activists and white progressives stress racism because it serves their own interests, not because it actually improves the station of blacks. But this neglect of the role that blacks must themselves play in righting their own lives can only make things worse. A half-century after King’s death, plenty of people are paying him lip service. Far too few are following his example.
Imagine a basketball game where the teams are forced by color of law or the squeaky wheel of rioters and media to hire their players based on an algorithm decided by community consensus, aka democracy (small “d”). Would you be a paid spectator?
Now imagine the dating scene where your mate is chosen by color of law or the squeaky wheels of pervasive media, government eugenics, or religion. Would you marry? Would you procreate?
Martin Luther King, Jr. would have disavowed affirmative action as a dystopian dream.
As a person around at the time of MLK Jr. and sympathetic to the cause, yet observing people of today regardless of their nation and culture, it is obvious there are many of my generation and younger generations who somehow believe they are “woke”, when in fact they have been conditioned as in Gattaca and Nineteen Eighty Four.
Bud
P.S. In 1963 when MLK Jr. made his famous speech, I was working beside Moses. I became his student. We were cleaning the cages and runs etc in my dad’s animal hospital in Atlanta. I did that until graduating high school in 1967, growing into learning to do the laboratory analyses and finally couple of live surgeries. Around that time, I and a good many of my friends demonstrated against Atlanta and Georgia authorities outside our school because Willie Jean Black and other kids, who lived across the street from our school, were being bused across town to a segregated school. This practice was unacceptable to us. We were not under the influence of rare media exposure in those days, nor politicians or teachers of any persuasion. This was a time when Lester Maddox stood at the street by his restaurant in Atlanta (The Pickrick*) with an axe handle deciding who could enter the parking lot.
*The Pickrick Restaurant was a prominent Atlanta eatery owned by Lester Maddox, who later became Governor of Georgia. Opened in 1947 on Hemphill Avenue near the Georgia Institute of Technology campus, it specialized in skillet-fried chicken with all the fixin’s and became a thriving business. The Pickrick served great old fashioned Southern Cooking, “soul food”, well known in the South. But the restaurant gained national notoriety for its segregationist policies, particularly after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
J.J. CARRELL (bio below) : “I state without reservation that the United States federal government under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is the world’s largest child sex trafficking organization in modern history. The probability…that thousands of these children are being raped at this very moment is one hundred percent.”
“I served in the United States border patrol for twenty four years until I retired as a deputy patrol agent charged in San Diego sector. I worked under five presidential administrations, and only one president secured the border president Donald Trump. Border Patrol agents went from working and being supported by the greatest border president in American history… To the worst, president Joe Biden. My last year in the board patrol was Joe Biden’s first year in office On his first day in office I watched in disbelief as ninety four executive orders cascaded down from Washington DC obliterating every immigration policy that had been provided the most secure border in America’s history. Border agents were forced to carry out unconstitutional orders, and that violated every law in the Immigration Nationality Act.
President Biden, through Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorcus, created policy out of thin air, ignored federal immigration law and facilitated the largest mass invasion into America that the world has ever seen…. The United States of America will have spent hundreds of billions of dollars…in four years to fund the needs of over fifty million illegal aliens that populate our nation. Between one in six and one in seven residents in America is an illegal alien. America has suffered the greatest demographic shift in modern history.
After serving in the United States Border Patrol for twenty four years… I state with complete certainty that Biden Harris and Mayorkas are intentionally strategically, and purposely weaponizing illegal immigration and using it as a tool to fundamentally transform America.
Inside this invasion the unspoken evil of child trafficking and more specifically child sex trafficking has flourished. At the end of this current administration, the number of children traffic will have grown to over five hundred and fifty thousand unaccompanied alien children known as UACs. Death penalty!!“
Bio:
J.J. Carrell is a retired U.S. Border Patrol agent, author, documentary filmmaker, and conservative commentator specializing in border security, immigration policy, and national sovereignty issues.He served 24 years with the United States Border Patrol, rising from a frontline Journeyman Agent to Deputy Patrol Agent in Charge in the San Diego Sector. During his career, he supervised units including the Coastal Border Enforcement Team (CBET), which targeted Sinaloa Cartel operations and contributed to efforts against figures like Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.After retiring (notably during the early Biden administration), Carrell became a prominent critic of U.S. immigration policies. He authored two bestselling books:
Invaded: The Intentional Destruction of the American Immigration System (2023)
Treason: The Biden Administration’s Strategic and Malicious Destruction of America’s Sovereignty
He has also produced documentaries, including the “What is Treason?” series (#Trafficked and #Invaded), which address child trafficking, government policies, and border-related issues.Carrell gained widespread attention for his November 2024 congressional testimony before a House subcommittee, where he accused the Biden-Harris administration of facilitating mass illegal immigration and enabling child sex trafficking on an unprecedented scale.He hosts The J.J. Carrell Show, a daily conservative news program, writes weekly commentary, speaks publicly on these topics, and maintains an active presence on platforms like X (
@JJCarrell14) and his website jjcarrell.com.(Note: He also appeared earlier in reality TV, including as a contestant on The Amazing Race Season 20 and in Border Wars, but his current work focuses on border policy and commentary.)
The British Empire’s 80-year playbook is dead. Trump isn’t creating chaos. He’s ending it. Venezuela. Iran. Gaza. The Muslim Brotherhood. Watch how he’s dismantling their system:
It would be helpful to the majority of American voters who elected Congress and who elected President Trump if the GOP and U.S. Congress supported their constituents and their president instead of their own agendas and wallets.Congress has forgotten or is ignoring its duty and responsibility to its constituents.
Trump is about to bankrupt China’s CCP the Soviet Union way.
Attorney @IJ. Watching the Surveillance State | Speaker. @DissidentProj American Dream Enjoyer | Metalhead | views are mine. Washington, DC
The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world.
Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime.
Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it. Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine. This confusion is rooted in historical illiteracy. Western liberal media routinely collapses entire civilizations into a single stereotype: “all Middle Easterners are Arabs,” “all Arabs are Muslim,” and “all Muslims are a monolithic, oppressed identity group by white European colonizers.” Iranians disappear entirely in this framework. Their language, history, and culture—Persian, not Arab; ancient, not colonial; distinct, not interchangeable—are erased. By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely. There is another reason the Iranian uprising is so threatening to Western media is economic issues. As you know, Iran is not only a religious dictatorship. It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government’s dark void of empty promises. Covering Iran honestly would require acknowledging that these policies are harmful. They have been tried. They have failed. Catastrophically. This is deeply inconvenient for Western media institutions that routinely promote expansive state control, centralized economic planning, and technocratic governance as morally enlightened alternatives to liberal capitalism. Iran demonstrates where such systems lead when insulated from accountability and enforced by ideology. It shows that when the state controls livelihoods, non-conformity becomes existentially dangerous. That lesson cannot be acknowledged without undermining the moral authority of those who advocate similar ideas in softer language. Western liberal media prefers not to hear this. Acknowledging it would require abandoning the lazy moral categories that dominate modern discourse: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, white and non-white. Iranian protesters do not fit. They show that authoritarianism is not a Western invention imposed from outside, but something many societies are actively trying to escape. That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the Iranian people are being ignored. So the silence continues.
Powerful words from Iranian native @DeTahmineh about the disasters of the 1978 revolution in Iran. Unlike liberals who (for reasons known only to God) idolize Khameini, Tahmineh actually grew up in post-1979 Iran and knows its horrors.
Chris Wright, U.S. Sec. of Energy: “Germany invested half a trillion (dollars in renewables) and now produce 20% less electricity at 3x the price”…”that doesn’t reduce emissions”…”that’s de-industrialization but never doing the math.”
The article at the link below is for those Bernie-bros who were fooled or fooled themselves into believing that socialism/communism is progressive instead of regressive.
The federal government is responsible for regulating interstate commerce within the U.S. as well as U.S. commerce with foreign nations. Clearly, artificial intelligence (AI) is interstate and international commerce. The federal government was authorized to regulate U.S. interstate and international commerce by the U.S. Constitution through its Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, which states that Congress shall have power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”
Congress exercised this authority through comprehensive legislation in the Interstate Commerce Act, passed on February 4, 1887. The scope of the Commerce Clause expanded significantly through Supreme Court interpretations. Landmark cases like Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) established the broad reach of federal authority over interstate commerce. The power became effectively unlimited starting in 1937.
Socialists /communists are flat earthers trying to walk us into a trap laid by globalists to take civilization back to feudalism and tyranny, eliminating nation-states, national sovereignty, individual sovereignty, rights and liberties such as free speech, freedom of movement and assembly, freedom of religion, right to carry, etc. These rights are directly from God, as the founders and framers of America as well as the philosophers and economists of the enlightenment reminded us about 250 years ago. But many of these rights already have been stolen except for rhetorical lip service in many countries, states and most international organizations, entities who commonly and nefariously claim to be “protecting our democracy.”
These supposed comrades have discovered they cannot take us back to feudalism and return themselves to power, where we the people bend the knee and kiss their rings, until individual rights and national sovereignty are eliminated in the United States of America; they believe they must destroy America and western civilization by any means before they can “build back better” their utopia. There utopia has never been successful when tried and each time millions of their comrades have died, and this does NOT include those who died in wars.
I just saw the following three comments below, which fit the subject above:
[UN] Agenda 2030 is presented as a blueprint for a better world – but behind the curtain, it’s a masterplan for global control disguised as sustainability.
The 17 goals are not just about ending poverty or protecting the planet. They’re about centralizing power, monitoring every human, and digitizing every aspect of life – from your health and finances to your food, movement, and even thoughts.
No Poverty & Zero Hunger = Total dependency on state-issued digital currencies and lab-grown food.
Quality Education & Gender Equality = Ideological reprogramming of the next generation.
Good Health = Biometric surveillance, forced medication, and control of your biological data.
Clean Energy & Climate Action = Elimination of personal property, carbon tracking, and restricted movement.
Sustainable Cities = Smart prisons, 24/7 surveillance, and algorithmic governance under the label of “efficiency.”
“Lived Reality” is a term derived from the subjective, personal experience of an individual. Similar terms like “direct experience” and “firsthand experience” help define the specific meaning of “lived reality.” What is most descriptive, however, is its antonyms. The Power Thesaurus lists ten opposites of lived reality as: acted, playacted, feigned, faked, played, pretended, simulated, bluffed, fooled, and play-acted. Words matter, and the ten opposites listed infer that anything that is not experienced firsthand is not authentic. The actual antonym for lived reality is objective reality. In the woke realm of subjective reality, where “lived reality” is the metric, only feelings matter. In the impersonal, verifiable realm of objective reality, facts are the metric. In objective reality, gravity exists–it is a fact. In subjective reality, little Johnny feels he can fly, but if he jumps off the roof, he will fall to his death because gravity is a fact. Objective reality always prevails.
Daniel Greenfield’s December 27, 2025, article “Tucker Carlson: ‘I don’t Know Anyone Who’s Been Killed by Radical Islam’” dramatizes the consequences of adults living in subjective reality. Tucker Carlson is quoted as saying, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” The statement is patently absurd on two levels. First, it infers that if Tucker Carlson did not personally know anyone in the United States killed by radical Islam, then it did not happen. That is as preposterous and infantile as saying that if you close your eyes, no one can see you. The statement denies any reality outside your own perceptions. Second, Carlson’s statement separates doctrinal Islamic religious obligations from the Islamists who act out those religious obligations. The gift of Tucker Carlson’s surrender to the madness of subjective reality is that his statement highlights the calamitous social consequences of living in the subjective, woke world of leftist relativism, where facts in objective reality are conveniently denied, and only personal feelings matter. In subjective reality, if Tucker Carlson’s “living reality” is that he doesn’t personally know anyone in the United States who’s been killed by radical Islam, then society is expected to believe that no one has been killed. If that is true, then Martin Richard, the eight-year-old boy killed by Muslim terrorists in the Boston Marathon bombings, is still alive. But Martin is dead. And the Muslims who killed him were acting out the doctrinal religious obligation to kill infidels (any non-believer, especially Jews and Christians) as stated in their holy book, the Koran.
The ideological moorings of ordered liberty require consensus on what is real. This is no small matter. Language is based on such a consensus. Laws are based on such consensus. Without agreement on what is real, there is no societal order; there can be only chaos. It is for this reason that globalists support the leftist Culture War on America and its attack strategy to replace factual, objective reality with subjective multiple realities based on feelings. If the Left can shatter the reality-based foundation of language and laws, then it has succeeded in shattering our ordered liberty and the Judeo-Christian morality that supports it. The Judeo-Christian tradition is not only the infrastructure of our Constitution, but also the foundation of Western civilization.
We are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not: Globalism vs. nation-states. The globalist war on the world’s nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from a constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of the objective world of facts into the madness of the subjective world of feelings. Psychological warfare subdues the enemy without destroying the physical infrastructure of society. It replaces brute force with mind control, shattering consensus on what is real by denying the existence of objective reality.
The globalist social engineers exploit the “lived reality” of woke leftists and the doctrinal religious obligations of Islamists as tactical weapons in globalism’s strategic war on nation-states. Woke leftism is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in communism. Communism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is convinced its manifest destiny is to rule the world. Islam is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology with a religious wing that is convinced its destiny is to rule the world in a global caliphate. Globalism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is funding and fomenting Marxist/Muslim (red/green) hatred to do their dirty work of destabilizing and collapsing Western democracies from within, in preparation for their own planetary dystopian Unistate administered under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated agencies and organizations.
The intentional escalation of antisemitism and anti-Christianity are tactical weapons in globalism’s overarching war on Western nation-states. Using the familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalists are targeting the Judeo-Christian foundation of Western civilization. It is my opinion that antisemitism is, always has been, and always will be political. In biblical times, there was no separation between church and state–religious power was political power. So, when Jesus (the most famous Jew) left Judaism and Christianity was born, so was antisemitism. But it was the shared Judeo-Christian tradition that birthed Western civilization, and it is my opinion that the globalist elite are determined to divide, conquer, and collapse our Judeo-Christian infrastructure and replace our political infrastructure with their dystopian, totalitarian Unistate. First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. The globalists are escalating antisemitism and using the progressive left (Marxists) and the Muslims in every Western country to create the required chaos to make society ungovernable. Israel, like the United States and every other Western nation, will cease to exist as free and sovereign nations if the progressives and their Muslim partners continue to tear those nations apart from within–the red/green alliance funded and fomented by the globalist elite will end in Kissinger’s predictive statement:
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991
Notice Kissinger said U.N. troops–internationalized world troops–to bring order in a world government. Personally, I think the United States should withdraw from the United Nations and let it collapse because it is the instrument of one-world government and infrastructure of the Unistate. For me, antisemitism, anti-Zionism, Jew-hatred, is all being fomented to divide and collapse our Judeo-Christian tradition–it is political, not religious. I believe that we are in a critical moment in history when it is essential that Jews and Christians unite to protect and preserve Western civilization because united we stand, divided we fall.
Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, finally said the unsayable in her December 16, 2025, post on X that referenced the horrific Bondi Beach Islamist terror attack on Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Australia:
The tragic Islamist terror attack against those at a Hanukkah celebration in Australia sadly should not come as a surprise to anyone. This is the direct result of the massive influx of Islamists to Australia. Their goal is not only the Islamization of Australia but the entire world—including the United States. Islamists and Islamism is the greatest threat to the freedom, security, and prosperity of the United States and the entire world. It is probably too late for Europe—and maybe Australia. It is not too late for the United States of America. But it soon will be. Thankfully, President Trump has prioritized securing our borders and deporting known and suspected terrorists, and stopping mass, unvetted migration that puts Americans at risk.
My question is how President Trump is going to resolve the staggering hypocrisy of protecting Qatar, a major funder of Islamic terrorism worldwide, including the Islamic terrorism inside the United States, which Tucker Carlson does not acknowledge in his lived reality.By: Linda Goudsmit | pundicity
“Lived Reality” is a term derived from the subjective, personal experience of an individual. Similar terms like “direct experience” and “firsthand experience” help define the specific meaning of “lived reality.” What is most descriptive, however, is its antonyms. The Power Thesaurus lists ten opposites of lived reality as: acted, playacted, feigned, faked, played, pretended, simulated, bluffed, fooled, and play-acted. Words matter, and the ten opposites listed infer that anything that is not experienced firsthand is not authentic. The actual antonym for lived reality is objective reality. In the woke realm of subjective reality, where “lived reality” is the metric, only feelings matter. In the impersonal, verifiable realm of objective reality, facts are the metric. In objective reality, gravity exists–it is a fact. In subjective reality, little Johnny feels he can fly, but if he jumps off the roof, he will fall to his death because gravity is a fact. Objective reality always prevails.
Daniel Greenfield’s December 27, 2025, article “Tucker Carlson: ‘I don’t Know Anyone Who’s Been Killed by Radical Islam’” dramatizes the consequences of adults living in subjective reality. Tucker Carlson is quoted as saying, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” The statement is patently absurd on two levels. First, it infers that if Tucker Carlson did not personally know anyone in the United States killed by radical Islam, then it did not happen. That is as preposterous and infantile as saying that if you close your eyes, no one can see you. The statement denies any reality outside your own perceptions. Second, Carlson’s statement separates doctrinal Islamic religious obligations from the Islamists who act out those religious obligations. The gift of Tucker Carlson’s surrender to the madness of subjective reality is that his statement highlights the calamitous social consequences of living in the subjective, woke world of leftist relativism, where facts in objective reality are conveniently denied, and only personal feelings matter. In subjective reality, if Tucker Carlson’s “living reality” is that he doesn’t personally know anyone in the United States who’s been killed by radical Islam, then society is expected to believe that no one has been killed. If that is true, then Martin Richard, the eight-year-old boy killed by Muslim terrorists in the Boston Marathon bombings, is still alive. But Martin is dead. And the Muslims who killed him were acting out the doctrinal religious obligation to kill infidels (any non-believer, especially Jews and Christians) as stated in their holy book, the Koran.
The ideological moorings of ordered liberty require consensus on what is real. This is no small matter. Language is based on such a consensus. Laws are based on such consensus. Without agreement on what is real, there is no societal order; there can be only chaos. It is for this reason that globalists support the leftist Culture War on America and its attack strategy to replace factual, objective reality with subjective multiple realities based on feelings. If the Left can shatter the reality-based foundation of language and laws, then it has succeeded in shattering our ordered liberty and the Judeo-Christian morality that supports it. The Judeo-Christian tradition is not only the infrastructure of our Constitution, but also the foundation of Western civilization.
We are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not: Globalism vs. nation-states. The globalist war on the world’s nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from a constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of the objective world of facts into the madness of the subjective world of feelings. Psychological warfare subdues the enemy without destroying the physical infrastructure of society. It replaces brute force with mind control, shattering consensus on what is real by denying the existence of objective reality.
The globalist social engineers exploit the “lived reality” of woke leftists and the doctrinal religious obligations of Islamists as tactical weapons in globalism’s strategic war on nation-states. Woke leftism is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in communism. Communism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is convinced its manifest destiny is to rule the world. Islam is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology with a religious wing that is convinced its destiny is to rule the world in a global caliphate. Globalism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is funding and fomenting Marxist/Muslim (red/green) hatred to do their dirty work of destabilizing and collapsing Western democracies from within, in preparation for their own planetary dystopian Unistate administered under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated agencies and organizations.
The intentional escalation of antisemitism and anti-Christianity are tactical weapons in globalism’s overarching war on Western nation-states. Using the familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalists are targeting the Judeo-Christian foundation of Western civilization. It is my opinion that antisemitism is, always has been, and always will be political. In biblical times, there was no separation between church and state–religious power was political power. So, when Jesus (the most famous Jew) left Judaism and Christianity was born, so was antisemitism. But it was the shared Judeo-Christian tradition that birthed Western civilization, and it is my opinion that the globalist elite are determined to divide, conquer, and collapse our Judeo-Christian infrastructure and replace our political infrastructure with their dystopian, totalitarian Unistate. First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. The globalists are escalating antisemitism and using the progressive left (Marxists) and the Muslims in every Western country to create the required chaos to make society ungovernable. Israel, like the United States and every other Western nation, will cease to exist as free and sovereign nations if the progressives and their Muslim partners continue to tear those nations apart from within–the red/green alliance funded and fomented by the globalist elite will end in Kissinger’s predictive statement:
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991
Notice Kissinger said U.N. troops–internationalized world troops–to bring order in a world government. Personally, I think the United States should withdraw from the United Nations and let it collapse because it is the instrument of one-world government and infrastructure of the Unistate. For me, antisemitism, anti-Zionism, Jew-hatred, is all being fomented to divide and collapse our Judeo-Christian tradition–it is political, not religious. I believe that we are in a critical moment in history when it is essential that Jews and Christians unite to protect and preserve Western civilization because united we stand, divided we fall.
Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, finally said the unsayable in her December 16, 2025, post on X that referenced the horrific Bondi Beach Islamist terror attack on Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Australia:
The tragic Islamist terror attack against those at a Hanukkah celebration in Australia sadly should not come as a surprise to anyone. This is the direct result of the massive influx of Islamists to Australia. Their goal is not only the Islamization of Australia but the entire world—including the United States. Islamists and Islamism is the greatest threat to the freedom, security, and prosperity of the United States and the entire world. It is probably too late for Europe—and maybe Australia. It is not too late for the United States of America. But it soon will be. Thankfully, President Trump has prioritized securing our borders and deporting known and suspected terrorists, and stopping mass, unvetted migration that puts Americans at risk.
My question is how President Trump is going to resolve the staggering hypocrisy of protecting Qatar, a major funder of Islamic terrorism worldwide, including the Islamic terrorism inside the United States, which Tucker Carlson does not acknowledge in his lived reality.
Provided by Grok, below is the transcript of Liz Truss’s statement from the short video clip (based on the visible subtitles, clear audio in the ~60-second clip, and the context from the post’s description where she speaks about the changed nature of political opposition):
You just can’t negotiate with these people. You can’t compromise with them. You can’t do bipartisanship. You can’t do media charm offensives. All of those things worked in the 1990s, in the 2000s. They don’t work now. Because the other side has fundamentally changed. They want to tear down Western civilisation. And that’s what Donald Trump gets, better than almost anybody else in the Western world.
(The clip appears to be from a recent conservatism/Vanity Fair-related event or interview panel, where she’s discussing modern political strategy, the “deep state,” and comparing approaches by leaders like Trump, Orbán, and Bukele. The phrase “You just can’t” starts her key point, matching the on-screen subtitle in the preview you shared.) This is the core spoken part in the short excerpt that’s circulating — powerful and direct, as described in the post!
Short bio on Liz Truss by Grok: Liz Truss’s political views have undergone a significant evolution over her career, shifting from youthful radical liberalism to a hardline, populist brand of Thatcherite/neoliberal conservatism with increasingly Trump-aligned cultural and anti-establishment rhetoric by late 2025.
Early Ideological Roots and Transformation
Truss began her political life as a Liberal Democrat at Oxford University in the mid-1990s, where she served as president of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats. During this period, she advocated for:
Abolishing the monarchy (calling it undemocratic at a 1994 party conference),
Decriminalizing cannabis,
Opposing aspects of Thatcher-era policies (she even marched against Margaret Thatcher as a teenager).
Her parents’ left-leaning background (to the left of Labour, with her mother in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) influenced this phase. However, she switched to the Conservative Party in 1996 and gradually moved rightward, adopting free-market, small-state principles. This transformation is often described as opportunistic or chameleon-like by critics, driven by ambition rather than fixed ideology.Core Economic Views — “Trussonomics”Truss remains most associated with neoliberal/supply-side economics (often called “trickle-down” by detractors):
Strong support for tax cuts (especially for high earners and corporations) to stimulate growth,
Deregulation and free trade,
Reducing the size of the state and rejecting “economic orthodoxy” (e.g., criticizing institutions like the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England).
Her 2022 premiership’s infamous mini-budget exemplified this: unfunded tax cuts led to market chaos, a plummeting pound, and her rapid downfall. In 2025, she continues defending these ideas, blaming failure on sabotage by the “deep state” (including central banks, bureaucrats, and the establishment). She has praised Trump’s attacks on the Federal Reserve and predicted a “reckoning” for independent central banks globally.
Foreign Policy and Geopolitics: Truss is a foreign policy hawk:
Tough on Russia (pushing sanctions post-2022 Ukraine invasion),
Pro-Brexit (despite initially supporting Remain),
Supportive of alliances like AUKUS and CPTPP.
She frames global threats in civilizational terms: warning that China, radical Islam, and Western internal “left-wing ideology” could lead to the West’s collapse within a decade without strong conservative leadership.
Social and Cultural Positions: On social issues, Truss leans libertarian-conservative:
Supports same-sex marriage but opposes expansive transgender rights (e.g., rejecting self-identification, emphasizing biological sex),
Critical of “woke” ideology, identity politics, cancel culture, net zero extremism, DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion), and what she calls “Islamism.”
Post-2022 Shift to Populism and “Culture War” ConservatismAfter her 49-day premiership and losing her seat in the 2024 election, Truss has embraced a more populist, anti-establishment stance:
Frequent criticism of the “deep state” (unelected bureaucrats, judiciary, media, central banks, and even parts of her own party) as sabotaging elected leaders,
Calls for a UK version of MAGA (“Make America Great Again”) and a “Trump-style counter-revolution,”
Praise for leaders like Trump, Orbán, Bukele, and Meloni who confront entrenched power.
In late 2025 statements (including her new YouTube show The Liz Truss Show, launched December 2025), she has escalated this rhetoric dramatically:
Claiming modern left/Democrats/left-wing forces are no longer moderate social democrats but aim to “destroy Western civilisation” through ideology, excessive government, net zero policies, mass migration, and cultural battles,
Arguing traditional compromise, bipartisanship, and media charm offensives no longer work — the “other side has fundamentally changed,”
Positioning Trump as uniquely understanding this existential threat and the need for direct confrontation.
This places her firmly in the global populist right ecosystem, appearing at events like CPAC, associating with figures like Steve Bannon, and framing politics as a battle to save Western values from internal subversion and external enemies (China, radical Islam).
In summary, Truss’s current worldview (as of late 2025) combines classic Thatcherite economics with culture-war populism, deep suspicion of institutions, and apocalyptic warnings about the decline of the West unless conservatives adopt aggressive, Trump-like tactics. Critics see this as conspiratorial or self-serving (blaming others for her failures); supporters view it as a bold wake-up call. Her trajectory reflects a broader realignment on the international right.
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.