budbromley

Since the Democrats passed a new law to fund 80,000 new IRS armed tax agents, it is a good time to remind.

By Guy K. Mitchell, Jr.

August 19, 2022

A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.

—Albert Einstein

In 1912, amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson claimed to have discovered the “missing link” between ape and man, known as “The Piltdown Man.”  He had found part of a human-like skull in Pleistocene gravel beds near Piltdown village in Sussex, England.  Dawson submitted the find to Arthur Smith Woodward, keeper of geology at the Natural History Museum.  Smith Woodward made a reconstruction of skull fragments, and the archaeologists hypothesized that the find indicated evidence of a human ancestor living 500,000 years ago.  They announced their discovery at a Geological Society meeting in 1912.  For the most part, their story was accepted as fact.  However, subsequent chemical testing showed that the skull and jaw fragments actually came from two different species, a human and an ape.

The conclusion: Piltdown Man was an audacious fake and sophisticated scientific fraud.  Forty-one years elapsed between the discovery of the “Piltdown Man” and the determination that it was a fraud.

In 1988, the United Nations formed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (U.N. IPCC).  In its seminal report in 1990, the U.N. IPCC stated that “at the then current rate of world emissions of CO2, the global mean temperature would likely increase by 1°C by 2025.”  This statement formed the basis for the hypothesis that anthropogenic (man-made) global warming resulted from the increased concentration of CO2 in the Earth’s lower atmosphere resulting from man-made activities.  Central to the hypothesis was that the temperature of the lower troposphere would increase as the concentration of CO2 in the troposphere increased.  Therefore, in its 1990 report, the U.N. IPCC established a direct linkage between the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the lower troposphere.

The scientific method of inquiry has guided scientific research and investigation for over 400 years.  In summary, the scientific method requires that a researcher observe a phenomenon, postulate a hypothesis for the cause of the phenomenon, and then conduct experiments or scientific investigations in an effort to falsify the hypothesis.

In adherence to the scientific method, a climate scientist who thinks that man has caused global warming should develop a complex hypothesis as follows:

1. Global warming has occurred; that is, the temperature of the world’s oceans, land mass, and relevant atmosphere has risen during the period under investigation by a statistically significant amount.
2. Man’s activities are responsible for the global warming that has occurred.
3. The extent to which global warming has occurred, or is reasonably projected to occur in the future, will adversely affect life on Earth.

If any of the conjectures in the complex hypothesis above are found to be invalid, the complex hypothesis is determined to be falsified and either discarded or modified.

In 1978, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) began to launch a series of satellites to polar-circumnavigate the globe using microwave sounding technology to measure the temperature of the lower troposphere (first 8 km of the Earth’s atmosphere).  The results show that during  the period 1979–1998, the average monthly temperature anomaly of the lower troposphere decreased approximately  0.3° C each year, while the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere increased from 335 ppm to 370 ppm.

Sometime during the period 1979–1998, an unbiased climate scientist at the U.N. IPCC should have observed that the temperature of the troposphere had significantly cooled while the concentration of CO2 had increased, contradicting the fundamental precept of the global warming hypothesis.  A committee should have been assembled to verify the accuracy of the temperature and CO2 concentration data.  The man-made global warming hypothesis should have been declared falsified if the data were accurate.  No such action occurred

Until the advent of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, the Piltdown Man was the most remarkable scientific fraud in history.  The anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has now assumed that title.

Guy K. Mitchell, Jr. is the author of a new book titled Global Warming: The Great Deception — The Triumph of Dollars and Politics over Science and Why You Should Care.  Published on Amazon.com on January 4, 2022.

Bud’s note:

I agree. The temperature trend and the trend of CO2 concentration cannot be diverging over a significant time period if CO2 is a statistically significant cause of global warming. There are no exceptions to this logic. But the two trends did diverge 1979-1998, and also in other periods. This means the theory of human-CO2-caused or fossil-fuel-burning-caused global warming and climate change is false.

#ClimateChange #IPCC #GlobalWarming #ClimateCrisis #Sustainability #NetZero #EPA #EndangermentFinding #CO2 #ClimatePolicy #EnergyPolicy #FossilFuel #Henry’sLaw

Thanks to Andy May and IceCap for providing the tabulated results of the debate between Dr. Steven Koonin and Dr. Andy Dessler at the Soho Forum “climate change” debate August 15, 2022 in Manhattan.

Of course, thank you to Dr. Steven Koonin and Dr. Andrew Dessler. Real debates on this subject are very rare.

Thanks also to Soho Forum for hosting the debate.

Francis Menton, one of the sponsors, provides additional commentary on his excellent blog here: https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2022-8-16-report-on-yesterdays-soho-forum-climate-change-debate

Note to self: learn how to post those emoji things on WordPress.

“The scientific reality is that even the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been unable to demonstrate a cause-and-effect scientific connection between rising human CO2 emissions and dangerous warming. To support global limits on CO2 emissions, in the absence of real-world data showing clear cause and effect, is scientific and policy incompetence on the highest order.”

Willie Soon, Robert Carter, and David Legates, IBD, Oct 29, 2010

By Henry I. Miller, M.D.

“When I joined the Food and Drug Administration in 1979, I was essentially apolitical and knew next to nothing about federal regulation. I was a science nerd who had spent the previous 16 years in college, graduate school, medical school, and postdoctoral training. It didn’t take long until I learned about the jungle of government bureaucracies, and one of the harshest lessons concerned the perfidy and incompetence of one of the FDA’s siblings, the EPA.

I found the EPA to be relentlessly anti-science, anti-technology, and anti-industry. The only thing it seemed to be for was the Europeans’ innovation-busting “precautionary principle,” the view that until a product or activity has been definitively proven safe, it should be banned or at least smothered with regulation. In fact, during international discussions and negotiations over the harmonization of biotechnology regulations in which I participated, the EPA often seemed allied with the European Union and committed to working against U.S. interests.

To my astonishment, I found that there were entire groups within the EPA whose function it was to lie to the Office of Management and Budget and to Congress about the rationale for and impacts of their proposed regulations. And over the years, I discovered that there is a kind of underground railway by which the most incompetent, disaffected, and anti-industry employees from other regulatory agencies find their way to the EPA, creating a miasma of dysfunctional governance.”

— Henry I. Miller, a physician and molecular biologist, was formerly with the FDA, and from 1994 until 2018 the Robert Wesson Fellow in Scientific Philosophy and Public Policy at Stanford’s Hoover Institution He is an Adjunct Fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Excerpt from: https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/12/scott-pruitt-abolish-epa/

• PHILIP LENCZYCKI INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER

August 14, 2022 9:04 PM ET

https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/14/william-burns-cia-carnegie-cusef-marco-rubio/

List of 20+ names at link at bottom of article

Tags : ccp central intelligence agency china sen marco rubio william burns

More: https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/17/lenczycki-newsnation-ceip-cia-ccp/

Speaking with Fox News’ Will Cain last week following the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, conservative historian Victor Davis Hanson said, “The FBI is beyond redemption.”

Swag & music: https://www.brysoncreates2.com/