“Even if I was fully vaccinated, I would admire the unvaccinated for resisting the greatest pressure I have ever seen, including pressure from spouse, parents, children, friends, colleagues and doctors. People who have been able to characterize such personality, courage and such critical abilities certainly embody the best characteristics of humanity. They are everywhere, of all ages, education levels, countries and views. They are a special kind; these are the warriors that any army of Light would like to have in their ranks. These are the parents that every child wishes to have and the children that every parent dreams of having. You are made of the greatest people to ever live, those heroes born among ordinary people and glow in the dark. They are beings beyond the average of their societies; They are the essence of nations that created all cultures and conquered horizons. They did what others couldn’t, they were the tree that withstood the storm of abuse, discrimination and social separation. They did it because they thought they were lonely and believed they were the only ones. They were banned from sitting at their family tables at Christmas, but they had never seen anything so cruel. They lost their jobs, lost their careers, they were out of money… but they didn’t care. They have experienced unmeasurable discrimination, condemnation, betrayal and humiliation… but they did not stop. There has never been such a selection in Humanity – now we know who is the best on Planet Earth. Women, men, old, young, rich, poor, people of various races and religions, the unvaccinated, the chosen ones of the invisible ark, the only ones who managed to stand when it all fell apart. It is YOU, You passed an unimaginable test that many of the toughest Marines, commanders, green berets, astronauts and geniuses could not. You are made of heroes who ever lived, heroes born among ordinary people and shine in the dark.”
Despite years of pressure campaigns, discriminatory policies, social separation, loss of income, threats and death accusations, French General Christian Blanchon thanked the “unvaccinated” for their strength, courage and leadership.
Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines as controls. He was ‘shocked’ to find that they were allegedly contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA.
McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.
Knowing that the contamination had not been disclosed by the manufacturers during the regulatory process, McKernan raised the alarm, posting his findings to Twitter (now X) and Substack with a call-out to other scientists to see if they could replicate his findings.
Other scientists soon confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.
In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present.
‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.
Dr Buckhaults alleges that the presence of high levels of contaminant DNA in the mRNA vaccines ‘may be causing some of the rare but serious side effects, like death from cardiac arrest’. He added, ‘I think this is a real serious regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level.’
Dr Buckhaults’ concerns are shared by McKernan, who presented his findings to the FDA in June. At the time of writing, McKernan had not received any response from the FDA on the matter. Dr Buckhaults said in the Senate hearing that he had emailed his findings to the FDA, but he had not received a response either.
In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) maintains that Covid vaccines cannot alter a person’s DNA. A spokesperson for the TGA stated, ‘The mRNA in the vaccines does not enter the nucleus of cells and is not integrated into the human genome. Thus, the mRNA does not cause genetic damage or affect the offspring of vaccinated individuals.’
They also said, ‘All batches of Covid vaccines distributed to Australians have been tested for the presence of contaminants including residual DNA template levels.’
However, a legal case filed in the Australian Federal Court in July of this year alleges that the TGA is not the appropriate regulator of COVID mRNA vaccines because, under the Gene Technology Act (2000) definition, DNA contamination is a genetically modified organism (GMO).
The plaintiff, Victorian doctor and pharmacist Dr Julian Fidge, is seeking an injunction to stop Pfizer and Moderna from distributing their mRNA Covid vaccines because they never obtained a license from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), which is the agency that oversees all GMO related products.
The TGA did not require tests for genotoxicity or carcinogenicity before providing provisional approval and, eventually, full registration of both the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines. OGTR guidance strongly suggests such tests should be undertaken where there exists a risk of harm to human health.
McKernan, who provided expert advice on the case, agrees that the DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines fits the Australian legal definition of a GMO. But there is also a second component of the mRNA vaccines that fits the definition.
That’s the mRNA itself, which is actually modified RNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The case argues that this ‘LNP-mod-RNA complex’ falls under the legal definition of a GMO and that, like the DNA contamination, it has the capacity to enter the cell nucleus and integrate into the human genome.
There is already at least one peer-reviewed scientific paper demonstrating that the Pfizer Covid vaccine mRNA can enter the human liver cell line and reverse transcribe into DNA in vitro (meaning in a lab dish).
Other studies cited in the case materials show the presence of spike protein mRNA in the nucleus of human cells, and evidence that acquired immune traits pass down to the offspring of mice pre-exposed to the Covid vaccine mRNA-LNP platform. This is suggestive that, once in the nucleus, the vaccine mRNA can be transferred and integrated with chromosomal DNA.
Taking both the LNP-mod-RNA complexes and the recently discovered DNA contamination present in the mRNA Covid vaccines, acting solicitor Katie Ashby Koppens says, ‘Every single person who has been injected with these products has received a GMO that has not been through the expert regulatory process in this country.’ She adds, ‘The human genome could be changed permanently, and no one was informed.’
Now, McKernan, Dr Buckhaults and other scientists are calling for urgent research to test whether the DNA contamination is lingering in the cells of mRNA vaccinated people, and whether the human genome has in fact been altered by mRNA Covid vaccines.
The same judge putting nonviolent J6 defendants in gulags while hissing her displeasure that Donald Trump “remains free to this day,” decided Monday that she can shut him up while on the 2024 campaign trail. Gag orders are sometimes placed on cases, but this has never happened to a presidential candidate in the annals of the criminal justice.
Trump reacted on his Truth Social account by putting up economic tables comparing his presidency to Joe Biden’s policies.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/111245799427436844/embed The hearing in Judge Tanya S. Chutkan’s D.C. U.S. District Courtroom over whether to at least partially gag Donald Trump was at times contentious and at other times surreal and Kafkaesque. Chutkan ruled that Trump could not post or repost “attacks against Special Counsel, staff, court staff or personnel” as well as prohibited statements about witnesses or expert witnesses.
The hearing was part of one of two cases Special Counsel Jack Smith brought against Trump for calling the 2020 election “stolen” and for somehow instigating the January 6 incursion into the Capitol Building, despite evidence to the contrary notwithstanding. And now Judge Chutkan, an Obama appointee who has dripping antipathy for Donald Trump, will decide if the former president and current presidential candidate can speak at will about the gang-up on him by the intelligence community, the Department of Justice, the Biden Administration, and the Biden campaign to knock him out of contention for the White House.
Trump lawyer Liz Harrington wondered, “Let’s see what happens on Monday in Judge Chutkan’s courtroom. Will America survive, or not?”
Ruling? Not.
The Trump spokeswoman amplified a Truth Social post of Trump’s characterizing Special Counsel Jack Smith as “crooked and deranged.” Trump again called for the judge to recuse herself because she’s so demonstrably biased against the former president.
“Let’s see what happens on Monday in Judge Chutkan’s courtroom. Will America survive, or not?” pic.twitter.com/izOrznixSi
“Today’s decision is an absolute abomination and another partisan knife stuck in the heart of our Democracy by Crooked Joe Biden, who was granted the right to muzzle his political opponent, the leading candidate for the Presidency in 2024… pic.twitter.com/vAYBT3Eqcw
The gang-up on Trump appears to be a continuation of the Democrats’ ongoing lawfare against the Republican, which has reached Kafkaesque proportions, to the point that the Chutkan took specific Trump quotes about Jack Smith and other political figures, including William Barr, the former president’s attorney general, asking a hypothetical question, if Trump should be able to post, “Bill Barr is a slimy lawyer.”
Lauro injected a little legal humor into the colloquy, saying he’s “‘not going to say truth is a defense’ but adds he is [a] public fig[ure] and won’t be intimidated.”
Judge Chutkan now grilling Trump lawyer John Lauro on hypothetical statements she’s drawn up. Q4 was if “Bill Barr is a slimy liar” — should Trump be permitted to post that? Lauro says “not going to say truth is a defense” but adds he is public fig and won’t be intimidated
Lauro asked the judge to obviate the problem and hold off on the trial until after the election. Reporter Hugo Lowell of The Guardian summed it up, “Trump lawyer John Lauro tells Judge Chutkan that public officials like AG Barr should be allowed [to] be criticized, but ‘let’s have this trial after the election to avoid this problem.’”
Judge Chutkan asked “Lauro why Trump has to call [the] prosecutor a ‘thug’ to advance [the] point that this [is] politically motivated? Lauro says what are you supposed to do in [the] face of oppression? Chutkan: ‘let’s tone this down.’” Lauro bristled, “If your honor wants to censor my speech…”
Judge Chutkan asks Trump lawyer John Lauro why Trump has to call prosecutor a “thug” to advance point that this politically motivated? Lauro says what are you supposed to do in face of oppression? Chutkan: “let’s tone this down” Lauro: “If your honor wants to censor my speech”
Indeed, she wants to silence Trump’s and his lawyers’ speech because she, like her fellow Democrats, thinks he’s the human version of an atom bomb to their progressive policies.
Chutkan asked Trump’s lawyer Lauro if she thought it was appropriate that the presidential candidate called D.C. “filthy” and “crime-ridden.” He defended Trump by saying that it was a political statement against his opponent, Joe Biden.
She’s upbraided Lauro before for saying “political” things in her courtroom, but, of course, this case is an entirely political exercise, brought to take Trump out of the 2020 presidential campaign, whether overtly or in the court of public opinion.
At one point, Chutkan told Lauro that his client doesn’t have unfettered First Amendment rights after he kept deriding Smith’s efforts to gag Trump as “censorship.” The judge shot back, “There is no question that a court is entitled to draw restrictions on a def[endant]’s behavior and a def[endant]’s speech pending trial.” The judge continued, ” You [Lauro] keep talking about censorship like the def[endant] has unfettered First Amendment rights. He doesn’t,” she lectured.
Lauro keeps calling this “censorship,” and Chutkan stops him: There is no question that a court is entitled to draw restrictions on a def’s behavior and a def’s speech pending trial. You keep taking about censorship like the def has unfettered First Amendment rights. He doesn’t.
Trump also wants to have jurors fill out a questionnaire in an attempt to discover their biases — which shouldn’t be hard since 97% of D.C. voters cast votes for Biden.
Special Counsel Smith previously put up a fight over the possibility of the questionnaire, suggesting that D.C. is so small that potential jurors could be discovered without their names being revealed. Of course, Trump wants the questionnaire to show an appeals judge at a later time how incredibly biased the jury pool is in the nation’s capital. The special prosecutor argued, according to reporter Lowell, “Special Counsel prosecutor Molly Gaston tells Judge Chutkan: Trump isn’t campaigning, he’s using his campaign to intimidate witnesses and pollute the jury pool.”
And this is where the surreal aspect comes in. The Special Counsel chose the D.C. jurisdiction in which to bring this case because that’s where the Capitol Building breach was, but he didn’t have to. He’s hoping the decidedly anti-Trump jury pool will do anything he wants. But he doesn’t want Trump to question the jurors to find out just how biased they are. Indeed, they claim that Trump speaking would taint the jury pool in an area that is already decidedly against Trump.
NEW: Jack Smith desperate to prevent the public from learning about the deep bias of DC jury pool. He already asked Judge Chutkan for restrictions on defense jury survey to gauge prejudice of jury pool now wants more rules related to picking, vetting jurors: pic.twitter.com/thiGOdzvxG
Trump wasn’t part of the breach; he was arguing around the entire country that the 2020 election was stolen. Smith charged Trump with defrauding the United States because he said it out loud, with obstructing an official proceeding, even though he wasn’t there and didn’t call for people to break into the Capitol Building, and with conspiring against the voters because his opinion might not match voters who didn’t cast their ballots for him.
Trump wrote Sunday that “Nothing like this has ever happened in our Country before.” And that’s right. Democrats are using every tool in their unlimited warfare bag to do to the 2024 campaign what they did to the 2020 campaign.
On Monday, the judge decided that she could shut down Donald Trump from telling the American people what he believes is the truth about his case.
Victoria Taft is an award-winning journalist, writer and terrestrial radio talk host, heard in Seattle and on the rest of the Left Coast. Listen to her twice weekly “Adult in the Room Podcast.” Find her at VictoriaTaft.com Parler, MeWe, Minds,Locals, Twitter & Facebook. Her book mocking antifa will be out this year. For media inquiries write: Victoria@VictoriaTaft.com
Bud’s question: What can citizens do when unelected judges and unelected prosecutors are corrupt and politically biased?
In the meta analysis described in the two graphics above, the studies showed positive results with Ivermectin, reported here in detail: https://c19ivm.org/
About halfway down the FDA page at the link above: “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.”
Contrary to the FDA’s statement above, on this FDA list below of ivermectin clinical trials, most of the 36 completed studies found ivermectin was effective against corona virus.
For example, in this randomized, controlled study below looking through and comparing the tabular results, the patients in the trial did better (for example, high lymphocyte counts, higher oxygenation) with fewer side effects and adverse events than the control patients who received no ivermectin. This report does not include its own conclusions.
Published in June, 2020 in the journal Anti-viral Research, the laboratory (i.e., non-clinical, invitro) study at the link showed a 5000 fold reduction in viral mRNA only 48 hours after a single dose of ivermectin.
“We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32251768/
In Australia…ivermectin prescriptions are no longer limited.
“From 1 June 2023, prescribing of oral ivermectin for ‘off-label’ uses will no longer be limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious diseases specialists.”
In its final decision published today, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has removed the restriction through its scheduling in the Poisons Standard because there is sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low when prescribed by a general practitioner in the current health climate.”
Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St George’s Hospital Medical School, London:
Excerpt of full article linked below: “At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week. Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel. So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence. No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.” ~ Angus Dalgleish
Dear friends and family, and representatives in government;
At the link below is a 4 month old video of about 40 minutes length. It is an interview of two experts by a medical doctor. One expert is a medical doctor/professor specialized in virology and immunology and the other expert is a scientist specialized in DNA and RNA testing of viruses.
It is vital for you and your family to understand this critical information. Governments are again approving and promoting mRNA “vaccines” and testing for new corona virus variants even when there is presently no epidemic nor pandemic and there has been no human clinical trials to test these new mRNA “vaccines” for the new variants. Also, governments are now approving and pushing mRNA “vaccines” for flu as well as approving corona virus “vaccines” for expectant mothers and newborn babies and also use of mRNA “vaccines” for veterinary use in the animal products we eat and drink.
Please watch at the link below the video to the end.
If you have taken these injections or allowed your family to take these injections, you are modifying your DNA with synthetic DNA or by mRNA and that is ongoing. You are modifying your genes. You were told that the injections did not contain DNA and the mRNA was limited to the site of injection; this is not true and it has been proven. The mRNA “vaccines” are manufactured in DNA cultures and that DNA cannot be removed from the injections, and it is not your DNA, and there are two types of synthetic DNA (linear and plasmid) in the injections and both can be transcribed into your DNA. Also, it has been shown that mRNA once in your cells can be reverse transcribed by normal cellular processes into your DNA. Your cells are transfected with synthetic DNA and will continue to manufacture the synthetic spike protein, permanently as far as is known. The spike protein is produced by the synthetic DNA and mRNA. This has been tested by multiple techniques, as explained in the video.
This man-created crisis is not over by any stretch of the imagination, it is growing. Some reports have 20-25 serious adverse events including 7 deaths per 100 injections.
Cleveland Clinic data (paper attached below as pdf.). Each injection results in progressively higher cumulative infection rate, and a higher rate than no injection.
These mRNA injections result in autoimmunity in your body and that autoimmunity will continue to increase as cells divide and replicate. The more injections you take and the longer you wait, the lower will be your immunity to diseases, not only corona virus or flu virus but your general immunity to diseases. The immune system has been genetically modified. There are post-vaccine therapies published by reputable front line critical care doctors, for example, and, which are available to treat “long vax” even if you do not yet have symptoms. Print and share the treatment protocols with your personal doctor. Do not wait to develop symptoms. So far as is understood today, the genetic damage is permanent. If you have taken one of more mRNA injections, you have undergone gene therapy and have modified your genome. So far, no one knows how to remove that synthetic DNA from your genome and it spreads in your body as your cells divide and multiply. Eggs, sperm and milk contain synthetic DNA. Life expectancy at birth is declining for the first time in many decades.
I wish I had better news. Please watch and listen to these experts. Do not take my word for it, I am not a doctor. Then share. I am sharing this again to all emails I have on file for friends and family.
I beg you again, DO NOT take these mRNA injections and do not let your family and friends take these injections and especially do not let your children and grandchildren be injected. Talk to your doctor and get treatment ASAP.
Carefully read the labels on all meats, milk, cheese, eggs, etc. If possible, buy from local ranchers and farmers known to you. Write your political representatives and demand that veterinary mRNA injections be prohibited in food animals.
Video above:Why the COVID “mRNA” vaccines are actually DNA gene therapies that must be removed from the market.
Below is more technical information about how injected synthetic DNA is incorporated into your DNA code with references on the increase in cancer rates.
How Google Shifted 6 MILLION Votes To Joe Biden! w/ Dr. Robert Epstein
Dear All,
I stumbled upon this YouTube video and watched it from start to finish. Dr. Epstein appears to be a serious man and one with an amazing story to tell about what Google and others in Big Tech are capable of. The age of “surveillance capitalism” and the “surveillance state” is upon us and has been with us I believe ever since 9/11 and the passage of the PATRIOT ACT. I do not know anything about Mr. Dore, but he is just the medium of the message in this case.
I continue to be amazed as to why politicians and crony capitalists can’t leave well enough alone. Organic change in any society is certainly best as it evolves over time and with the shared judgment and discussion of all citizens. The lessons of history have always demonstrated that. Yet the “ruling elites” never seem to get that message. The history of the laws passed in our country since the early 20th Century are ample proof and are Orwellian in result.
The change that the do-gooders and utopians of the world envision for everyone (but themselves of course) is beyond old-fashioned good and evil. The monsters of collectivism and totalitarianism are still among us, only with better masks. I will not live to see it but the deaths caused by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Chavez, and others like them will pale besides what I see coming in the remainder of this century. A lot of us grew up with Ayn Rand in the 1950s and early 1960s. She foresaw what we are seeing today in America, even to some of the memes and narratives that we see around us, for example, the death of meritocracy and the denigration of genius, capitalists, and producers. The only statement that Mr. Biden ever spoke that I agree with is that we are, indeed, fighting for the soul of America. However, he does not have the slightest clue as to what the true soul of America is all about and he never did, even from as early as 1972 when he was elected as one of the youngest senators ever.
Without a moral compass in our country throughout the various functions and institutions of our society, we will end up like the “proles” in “Nineteen Eighty Four,” without fail. Too many people in America do not understand that you cannot unflush a toilet and you can unsell your soul.
By the way, everyone, if you think that this is just a simple political battle between Democrats and Republicans, I have a lake here in Reno to sell you.
If you think this email and this embedded attachment is of any value, then perhaps you should pass it along to your extended network.
All the best,
Andrew
Next, is an interview by Kim Iverson of Dr. Robert Epstein on the same subject
GOP Rep. Victoria Spartz of Indiana accused Attorney General Merrick Garland during a congressional hearing Wednesday of allowing his department to scare Americans like the KGB did in the former Soviet Union.
Spartz began her questioning of Garland, who was testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, by noting how moving she found his opening statement.
In it, the attorney general recounted how his grandparents came to the United States from Belarus early in the 20th century to escape religious persecution.
Garland shared with emotion how two of his grandmother’s siblings did not make it to America and died in the Holocaust.
However with his grandmother, “Under the protection of our laws, she was able to live without fear of persecution.”
“That protection is what distinguishes this country from so many others,” Garland said. “The protection of law — the rule of law — is the foundation of our system of government.”
Spartz told Garland that she immigrated from Ukraine, which, like Belarus, was also part of the former Soviet Union.
“When I came here as a young person I believed in the value as an American not to be afraid of my government,” Spartz said.
According to her congressional bio, the lawmaker moved to the U.S. in 2000, when she was in her early 20s, having been born in Ukraine in 1978.
MUST WATCH:@RepSpartz EPIC Questioning of AG Garland
SPARTZ: “Are you aware that a lot of Americans are now afraid of being prosecuted by your department? Are you aware of that?”
“Are you aware that a lot of Americans are now afraid of being prosecuted by your department?” Spartz questioned Garland.
“Are you aware of that? … Are you aware or not?” she asked again, when he did not initially respond.
Garland then answered: “I think that constant attacks on the Department and saying –“
Spartz interjected, “It’s not attacks. Let me give you an example,” pointing to the January 6, 2021 protesters that came to the U.S. Capitol to voice their concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election.
“There probably were some people that came on January 6 here that had bad intent,” the congresswoman acknowledged. “But a lot of good Americans from my district came here because they are sick and tired of this government not serving them.”
She said the situation at the Capitol became chaotic because the proper security was not in place.
In response to the incursion, the FBI launched the largest federal investigation in U.S. history to round up protesters who had been on the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, The Washington Post reported in March.
Do you share Rep. Spartz’s concerns about the DOJ?
Yes: 100% (159 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)
Spartz pointed out that there were FBI notices posted throughout her district northeast of Indianapolis, and the agency conducted raids into people’s homes.
“People are truly afraid,” she said. “And this is a big problem, when people are afraid of their own government.”
Spartz then raised the issue of U.S. Attorney John Durham’s report released in May that found the FBI and DOJ had no justifiable predicate to launch an investigation of then-Republican candidate Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 for alleged ties to Russia.
It was based primarily on the Steele dossier provided to the FBI by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.
Rather than having equal treatment under the law, which Garland said the U.S. stands for, investigations into Clinton and Hunter Biden have been slow-walked, running out the statute of limitations on various crimes, Spartz contended.
“We move very quick on Donald Trump, but very slow-walked on others,” she said, referring to the DOJ.
“I couldn’t believe it happened in the United States of America. This is my frustration,” Spartz told Garland.
The lawmaker argued the overall effect of it is to give Russia and China fodder for propaganda aimed at destabilizing the U.S.
“That is danger to our republic,” she said. “It is significant danger.”
Bud’s comments:
Garland is truly the most deplorable and contemptible U.S. Attorney General in history.
Eric Holder, Obama’s thoroughly contemptible Attorney General, who was held in contempt by Congress in 2012 by a vote of 255 to 67, (which included 17 Democrats voting for the contempt charge) has been outdone in evil by Biden’s Attorney General Merrick Garland. Recall that Holder was charged by Congress with contempt and resigned related to the botched gun sting called “Operation Fast and Furious” during the Obama administration, wherein agencies of the Obama administration sold over 2,000 weapons to drug cartels and some of those weapons were identified in subsequent crimes including the death of at least one U.S. Border Patrol Officer. (You may recall that President Obama claimed his administration was scandal-free.)
Holder was the first member of a U.S president’s cabinet in history to be held in contempt by Congress. According to the law, Holder’s contempt charge would normally result in jail time. But Holder’s case was held up in federal courts for 7 years after Holder resigned. That is just too convenient and smells of swamp. U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia dismissed a contempt order which was issued by Congress. The Court had already ruled that Holder had broken the law since there was no legal basis to withhold the documents which had been duly subpoenaed by Congress. And then Judge Berman gave Holder even more time to produce the documents, which neither Holder nor D.O.J. ever provided. The swamp is protecting its own, and taxpayers are paying for it.
Congress should hold Judge Berman in contempt. The D.O.J. and D.C. Courts are violently in contempt of the rule of law, the Constitution, the Republic and the American people. The three branches of government finally dropped the case against Holder. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/09/fast-and-furious-documents-holder-1313120
Not to be outdone, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, proven to be thoroughly contemptible by impeaching President Trump under pretenses now proven to be false, also charged Trump’s Attorney General Barr with Contempt.
But Garland is outdone in evil by the Joe Biden crime family. No doubt Congress would be impeaching A.G. Garland, but first Congress is moving finally to impeach President Biden, hopefully before President Biden’s son and about 9 members of the Biden crime family can be pardoned by President Biden.
It is the proverbial race to the bottom, and it is occurring almost worldwide.
Definition: contempt
The feeling or attitude of regarding someone or something as inferior, base, or worthless; scorn.
The state of being despised or dishonored.
Open disrespect or willful disobedience of the authority of a court of law or legislative body.
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.