If you know a way to filter the good from the bad, then please do tell.
Related posts on my blog:
Links from each company supporting BLM and/or Antifa were here when this was posted. Links may have been removed. I am not tracking these links.Shame on these countries, companies, CEOs, boards and the cities, counties, and states and their politicians who allowed and enabled this desecrationof sovereignty and human rights. YOU have been fooled and taken as a fool. This desecration happened worldwide!
Boards should immediately fire these executives for losing their focus on their business, the responsibility for which they are paid. Board member, citizen, if you do not fire them, then they will be emboldened and then YOU are part of the problem.
One would think that the United States intelligence services would know this kind of stuff, along with the elites supporting the same criminals involved and actually bring justice against those funding these thugs. Actually, maybe they do have it and they are just looking the other way to implement the agenda of their masters. In either case, it’s important that the people know exactly which companies are supporting these criminals that are not protesting, but engaged in insurrection and crimes against the people in the US.
With that said, Ashley Rae Goldenberg produced a comprehensive list of companies she says are supporting ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter.
Currently, Ashley is an investigative journalist who is out of work so, if you would like to donate to thank her for the list, please do so via PayPal or Patreon.
Companies allegedly defending the rioters. There is not enough SHAME for these companies and their CEOs. Where are the boards of directors and investors?
“There was an expensive PCR and magnetic bead process used to make the modified mRNA vaccines for the clinical trials. Then, for the commercial products, they switched to a less expensive plasmid e-coli system. Basically, a completely different process was used for manufacturing. Dr. Jessica Rose called it a “bait and switch.” So the vaccines that were approved were not the same as the ones that were injected into the population. It was chilling when Dr. Rose shared that every vial that has been independently checked has had DNA in it. “Every single one,” she emphasized. “100%. And that scares me!”
Fast paced, over an hour long, technically intense, but important interview with microbiologist Kevin McKernan. Stick with it for the key points even if you do not follow the biochemistry. Interspersed throughout are plain English answers supported by technical details. Kevin is founder and CSO of Medicinal Genomics Corp, previously co-founder president & CSO of Agencourt Personal Genomics, VP and Direct of R&D of Life Technologies, and under Eric Lander he managed R&D for the Human Genome Project at the Whitehead Institute at MIT, which is where I met them both. The Whitehead was a major customer for our Molecular Dynamics high throughput DNA sequencers and gene expression tools during the Human Genome Project.
Parts of this interview are also available on the Twitter pages of @JanJekielek and @Kevin_McKernan.
Kevin is interviewed by Jan Jekielek, Senior Editor at Epoch Times at the link below. Responding to Jan’s questions, Kevin discusses the corona virus vaccines, quality control, lipid nano particles, DNA contamination, implications for long covid and long vax diseases, how the COVID vaccines may be contributing to a rise in cancers, possible implications for reproduction, the monkey virus SV40 promoter, what’s actually in the vaccines, how they have been tested and reported, along with references. SV40 enhancer sequence is used in the vaccines because it’s a component of the plasmid used for amplification (exponential replication) of the vaccine mRNA. SV40 virus DNA was removed from polio vaccines in the 1950s and 1960s due to risks around cancer. But cancer is not the only risk.
“In the first 24h after application, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 caused neither functional disturbances nor morphological abnormalities. After 48h, expression of the encoded spike protein was detected in ventricular cardiomyocytes for both mRNAs. At this point in time, mRNA-1273 induced arrhythmic as well as completely irregular contractions associated with irregular as well as localized calcium transients, which provide indications of significant dysfunction of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2).”
“In contrast, BNT162b2 increased cardiomyocyte contraction via significantly increased protein kinase A (PKA) activity at the cellular level. Conclusions and Implications Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events.” https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bph.16262
This past week, a statistician with over 20 years working in pharmaceutical contract research organizations (CRO) has said that Pfizer/BioNTech had two batches of mRNA vaccines. One batch was used in the clinical trials with about 250 patients and data submitted to FDA for EUA approval of the mRNA vaccines. A second batch was used to vaccinate billions of patients. There has been no informed consent about this.
Pfizer/BioNTech supported by FDA was sued to release full information on these vaccines, Pfizer refused, asking for 75 years before releasing the information. Court refused the Pfizer/FDA request and gave them a timeline to release the data. The data is coming https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/97544
Other scientists confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.
In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present.
‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.
Dr Buckhaults alleges that the presence of high levels of contaminant DNA in the mRNA vaccines ‘may be causing some of the rare but serious side effects, like death from cardiac arrest’. He added, ‘I think this is a real serious regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level.’
Dr Buckhaults’ concerns are shared by McKernan, who presented his findings to the FDA in June. At the time of writing, McKernan had not received any response from the FDA on the matter. Dr Buckhaults said in the Senate hearing that he had emailed his findings to the FDA, but he had not received a response either.
There is at least one peer-reviewed scientific paper demonstrating that the Pfizer Covid vaccine mRNA can enter the human liver cell line and reverse transcribe into DNA in vitro (meaning in a lab dish).
Other studies cited in the case materials show the presence of spike protein mRNA in the nucleus of human cells, and evidence that acquired immune traits pass down to the offspring of mice pre-exposed to the Covid vaccine mRNA-LNP platform. This is suggestive that, once in the nucleus, the vaccine mRNA can be transferred and integrated with chromosomal DNA.
Taking both the LNP-mod-RNA complexes and the recently discovered DNA contamination present in the mRNA Covid vaccines, acting solicitor Katie Ashby Koppens says, ‘Every single person who has been injected with these products has received a GMO that has not been through the expert regulatory process in this country.’ She adds, ‘The human genome could be changed permanently, and no one was informed.’
Now, McKernan, Dr Buckhaults and other scientists are calling for urgent research to test whether the DNA contamination is lingering in the cells of mRNA vaccinated people, and whether the human genome has in fact been altered by mRNA Covid vaccines.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) responded to concerns about billions of plasmid DNA fragments in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine—as a university researcher recently testified in front of a South Carolina Senate hearing.
“The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines authorized or approved for use in the United States are not defined as a gene therapy,” the FDA told Maryanne Demasi, a former Australia Broadcasting Corporation journalist who now operates a Substack page. She noted that the FDA spokesperson didn’t answer specific questions about the DNA fragments.
Continuing, the spokesperson said that the “FDA is confident in the quality, safety, and effectiveness of these vaccines” and added that the “agency’s benefit-risk assessment and ongoing safety surveillance demonstrates that the benefits of their use outweigh their risks.”
McKernan said he found that the amount of DNA in vaccines could be 18 to 70 times higher than the limits required by a top health agency. Earlier this year, McKernan published a paper finding that the quantities of DNA contamination in the vaccines exceeded the European Medicines Agency’s 330 ng/mg of DNA to RNA requirement by between 18 and 70 times. It’s also higher than the FDA’s 0 ng/dose requirements, and it had a reading of 12 ng/dose. At the time, he warned that the DNA plasmids could infiltrate the human genome, contradicting public statements made by the FDA and other regulators that COVID-19 vaccines do not alter human DNA.
“The evidence for fraud in the inducement is that at every single stage of the process, Pfizer knew they were had information they materially withheld from the American people, the American taxpayer, or the American government,” says attorney for Jackson, Robert Barnes (@barnes_law). “This is not an effective product whatsoever … and Pfizer knew it. They had the clinical trial data,” co-counsel Warner Mendenhall (@MendenhallFirm) stated. “If you look at the 30,000 foot view of their overall data, it’s just not there.”
Viral Vaccine paper: Batch-dependent (~1000 X difference in batch) safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine – Dr. John Campbell – July 5, 2023. The journal paper discussed in this video is attached below.
Professor of Oncology at St George’s Hospital Medical School, London: “At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week. Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel. So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence. No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.” Dr. Angus Dalgleish
Pfizer’s records include a report, which was approved in February 2021, on the animal trials on the distribution of the Pfizer COVID vaccine in rat subjects, in a section titled “Safety Pharmacology,” the report notes, “No safety pharmacology studies were conducted [emphasis by me] with BNT162b2 [the BioNTech vaccine] as they are not considered necessary for the development of vaccines according to the WHO guideline (WHO, 2005).” Similarly, under “Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions,” is “Nonclinical studies evaluating pharmacodynamic drug interactions with BNT162b2 were not conducted as they are generally not considered necessary to support development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).” As you probably know, pharmacodynamic drug interactions are today a major cause of death and hospitalizations. The recently approved new mRNA “vaccines” for the new variants have had no human trials, but are only tested in mice.
This Pfizer report notes that when lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) “with a comparable composition,” to that used in the Pfizer COVID vaccine were injected into rats, “Total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP outside the injection site was greatest in the liver and was much less in the spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries.” … “in summary” … “the LNP distributes to the liver.” In the detailed analysis, the report states, “Over 48 hours, the LNP distributed mainly to liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries, with maximum concentrations observed at 8-48 hours post-dose. Total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP, for combined male and female animals, outside of the injection site was greatest in the liver (up to 18%) …” This same Pfizer/BioNTech study notes “No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2 [the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine] as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA and are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005).” Similarly, “Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of the vaccine construct are lipids and RNA and are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential.” Keep in mind that these LNPs contain synthetic mRNA as well as synthetic DNA for which humans have had no time to evolve defenses.
A June 2020 “Pharmacokinetics Written Summary” for the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines notes that: Ad26COVS1 (also known as VAC31518 or JNJ-78436735) is a monovalent, recombinant replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vectored vaccine encoding a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike protein…. No specific pharmacokinetic studies have been performed with Ad26COVS1. However, to assess distribution, persistence, and clearance of the Ad26 vector (platform), biodistribution studies were conducted in rabbits using two other Ad26-based vaccines encoding [redacted] and [redacted] antigens…. [T]he available biodistribution results are considered sufficient to inform on the biodistribution profile of Ad26COVS1, for which the same Ad26 vector backbone is used.
Further regarding biodistribution in the human body of the mRNA and DNA from the injection site in its LNP delivery package: “We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin,” Bridle said. Bridle, a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant for research on COVID vaccine development, said that he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to what’s called the “confidential Pfizer biodistribution study.”
“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” said Bridle. “Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting.”
Vaccine researchers had assumed that novel mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle. Instead, the Japanese data showed that the infamous spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.
Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said “ACE2 receptors are common in the heart and brain,” she added. “And this is how the spike protein causes cardiovascular and cognitive problems.”
Before the first covid “vaccine” was EUA approved, On Dec. 8, 2020, the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) received a very informative public submission from John Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D., currently practicing at UCLA. The submission was in response to the FDA’s request for comments regarding vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in advance of the Dec. 10 meeting when the committee would review the Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for emergency use authorization (EUA). I watched and listened to that very long FDA conference call and if I recall forwarded the link to your group.
It is now clear from their emails that Fauci, Walensky and others in the U.S. government knew that covid jabs were causing myocarditis and blood clots in early 2021, but hid this vital information behind lies. It is also clear that they knew that ivermectin and HCQ were anti-viral especially in prophylactic and early treatment, but instead they asserted “There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” They promoted and allowed the government and media to fear monger these safe and proven medicines as quackery and horse medicine. Instead they illegally approved under EUA for these mRNA drugs and they are still doing so today. As you probably know, EUA are illegal if there are approved, safe and effective alternatives, and both ivermectin and HCQ meet these standards, and has been shown in thousands or millions of covid patients. Governments and media suppressed ivermectin and HCQ so mRNA vaccines could be approved under EUAs and they are still doing that today. On August 29, 2023, the U.S. government was forced to release 472 pages of emails dated February 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021. During this timeframe, the federal government carried out their liability-free contracts with Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, and disseminated their first round of experimental mRNA spike protein, which they claimed was a “safe and effective vaccine.” mRNA vaccines are (1) not safe and serious adverse events including deaths are higher than all previous vaccines combined, (2) are not effective in neutralizing the virus (3) nor stopping transmission, (4) unnecessary for children and young people and (4) more deadly and damaging than the virus itself.
Bombshell emails were released under FOIA request, submitted by attorney Edward Berkovich. The emails reveal Anthony Fauci (NIAID), Francis Collins (NIH) Rochelle Walensky (CDC), Vivek Murthy (U.S. Surgeon General) and other top level government employees knew that the covid jabs would cause myocarditis and blood clotting disorders. These risks were brought to their attention several times and discussed throughout the email chain. In fact, science papers were published over 10 years ago showing spike proteins caused deadly clotting problems in mice.
There is evidence of substantial adverse effects including heart problems and death from these mRNA drugs, occurring even 2 years after injection. No end point is known. The data on post-covid and post-vax patients gets worse daily and I expect it will continue to worsen for years to come because it is now known by competent science as discussed in the video interview by Kevin McKernan that synthetic DNA and well as synthetic mRNA are in the injections. It may not be in all injections because there are reports of bad batch-to-batch quality control, batch-to-batch differences in formulation and contaminates, and placebo batches. But worse, IMHO and experience, proper clinical trials were not done and reported to the public and are not being done and reported to the public and there is no proper informed consent of the huge unnecessary risks and adverse effects from these injections.
These so-called vaccines are shown in a study by Cleveland Clinic (graph below and study attached) to increase the rate of corona virus infection with each incremental dose and more than unvaccinated. They are shown to increase the rate of heart problems, and the rate of many other kinds of medical problems including death. Read and watch this very credible interview about the study by Dr. Drew of Ed Dowd regarding cardiovascular problems in the UK. https://vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-drops-devastating-report-on-cardiovascular-deaths-in-the-uk
Graph above from Cleveland Clinic study (attached).
“However, if it used to be geopolitical confrontation, in which there would be no final victory [like the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Russia’s War in Afghanistan, US War in Afghanistan, etc which is how Brzezinski saw them], then in the 21st century – it is all about “the last battle”, which will be fought not for life, but for death and it will end history for one of the giants – either the West or Russia. The interests of America in the near future: to preserve it’s [sic] key world supremacy and in the distant future – to transform it into a more legal, global partnership. Using the more severe terminology of the old empires, the responsibility of a great empire is to prevent collusion between vassals, keeping them dependent on the public security, keeping the subservient loyal and too, keeping them secure and not letting the barbarians unite.”
Brzezinski advised the John F. Kennedy campaign and Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey campaigns. Brzezinski was National Security Advisor to President Carter. He served on Reagan’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and co-chaired G.H.W. Bush’s National Security Advisory Task Force. He endorsed G.H.W. Bush for president, and later Obama for president. Brzezinski co-founded The Trilateral Commission with banker David Rockefeller and served as its director. He also was a member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Bilderberg Group. Since it was formed, The Trilateral Commission has influenced every American presidential election and then had input on their cabinets, even though many or most members were hand-picked by Rockefeller or Brzezinski and were not American citizens. Brzezinski, and presumably Rockefeller and the CFR, viewed “The War on Terror” and the several color revolutions including Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Ukraine, etc. as modern imperialism on a global chessboard, similar to the British Empire where the sun never sets, proxy wars and destabilization to maintain U.S. hegemony…our never ending military engagements and international bases. Bodies, bombs and bases. In the mid-1850s the British Empire had a series of ongoing operations around the world, including the Crimean War of 1853, which was the UK, France and Turkey against Russia, and the Opium Wars in China. Sound familiar? For Brzezinski the prize was Eurasia, and the extension of the arc of crisis into Central Asia. Piotr Pietrzak suggested“Although Zbigniew Brzezinski is dead, his work is very much alive; the Biden administration follows Brzezinski’s geostrategic blueprint, which supports Ukraine militarily, logistically, diplomatically, and politically.”
“This is a repeat of the Great Game,” said Brzezinski. He was the foremost advocate for expansion of NATO to surround Russia, the NATO intervention in Libya (which was a disaster), and other hawkish interferences. Unfortunately, the Machiavellian Brzezinski influenced every U.S. president in our lifetimes as well as their foreign policy and intelligence agencies, that is, every president except Donald Trump. Brzezinski was a harsh critique of President Trump. Trump kept the U.S. out of new wars, arguably prevented wars, and greatly reduced bodies, bombings and wants to reduce bases and bring the boys, girls and weapons home.
IMHO, Brzezinski’s grand strategy got us into these never ending wars and entanglements and we are still there today. We and the world need a hard break from this Machiavellian madness.
“It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world, “so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronising infidelity to existing engagements.”GEORGE WASHINGTON, FAREWELL ADDRESS TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES | MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1796
“Even if I was fully vaccinated, I would admire the unvaccinated for resisting the greatest pressure I have ever seen, including pressure from spouse, parents, children, friends, colleagues and doctors. People who have been able to characterize such personality, courage and such critical abilities certainly embody the best characteristics of humanity. They are everywhere, of all ages, education levels, countries and views. They are a special kind; these are the warriors that any army of Light would like to have in their ranks. These are the parents that every child wishes to have and the children that every parent dreams of having. You are made of the greatest people to ever live, those heroes born among ordinary people and glow in the dark. They are beings beyond the average of their societies; They are the essence of nations that created all cultures and conquered horizons. They did what others couldn’t, they were the tree that withstood the storm of abuse, discrimination and social separation. They did it because they thought they were lonely and believed they were the only ones. They were banned from sitting at their family tables at Christmas, but they had never seen anything so cruel. They lost their jobs, lost their careers, they were out of money… but they didn’t care. They have experienced unmeasurable discrimination, condemnation, betrayal and humiliation… but they did not stop. There has never been such a selection in Humanity – now we know who is the best on Planet Earth. Women, men, old, young, rich, poor, people of various races and religions, the unvaccinated, the chosen ones of the invisible ark, the only ones who managed to stand when it all fell apart. It is YOU, You passed an unimaginable test that many of the toughest Marines, commanders, green berets, astronauts and geniuses could not. You are made of heroes who ever lived, heroes born among ordinary people and shine in the dark.”
Despite years of pressure campaigns, discriminatory policies, social separation, loss of income, threats and death accusations, French General Christian Blanchon thanked the “unvaccinated” for their strength, courage and leadership.
Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines as controls. He was ‘shocked’ to find that they were allegedly contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA.
McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.
Knowing that the contamination had not been disclosed by the manufacturers during the regulatory process, McKernan raised the alarm, posting his findings to Twitter (now X) and Substack with a call-out to other scientists to see if they could replicate his findings.
Other scientists soon confirmed McKernan’s findings, though the amount of DNA contamination was variable, suggesting inconsistency of vial contents depending on batch lots. One of these scientists was cancer genomics expert Dr Phillip Buckhaults, who is a proponent of the mRNA platform and has received the Pfizer Covid vaccine himself.
In September of this year, Dr Buckhaults shared his findings in South Carolina Senate hearing. ‘I’m kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine – it’s different from RNA, because it can be permanent,’ he told those present.
‘There is a very real hazard,’ he said, that the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers in some people who have had the vaccinations. He also noted that these genome changes can ‘last for generations’.
Dr Buckhaults alleges that the presence of high levels of contaminant DNA in the mRNA vaccines ‘may be causing some of the rare but serious side effects, like death from cardiac arrest’. He added, ‘I think this is a real serious regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level.’
Dr Buckhaults’ concerns are shared by McKernan, who presented his findings to the FDA in June. At the time of writing, McKernan had not received any response from the FDA on the matter. Dr Buckhaults said in the Senate hearing that he had emailed his findings to the FDA, but he had not received a response either.
In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) maintains that Covid vaccines cannot alter a person’s DNA. A spokesperson for the TGA stated, ‘The mRNA in the vaccines does not enter the nucleus of cells and is not integrated into the human genome. Thus, the mRNA does not cause genetic damage or affect the offspring of vaccinated individuals.’
They also said, ‘All batches of Covid vaccines distributed to Australians have been tested for the presence of contaminants including residual DNA template levels.’
However, a legal case filed in the Australian Federal Court in July of this year alleges that the TGA is not the appropriate regulator of COVID mRNA vaccines because, under the Gene Technology Act (2000) definition, DNA contamination is a genetically modified organism (GMO).
The plaintiff, Victorian doctor and pharmacist Dr Julian Fidge, is seeking an injunction to stop Pfizer and Moderna from distributing their mRNA Covid vaccines because they never obtained a license from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), which is the agency that oversees all GMO related products.
The TGA did not require tests for genotoxicity or carcinogenicity before providing provisional approval and, eventually, full registration of both the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines. OGTR guidance strongly suggests such tests should be undertaken where there exists a risk of harm to human health.
McKernan, who provided expert advice on the case, agrees that the DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines fits the Australian legal definition of a GMO. But there is also a second component of the mRNA vaccines that fits the definition.
That’s the mRNA itself, which is actually modified RNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The case argues that this ‘LNP-mod-RNA complex’ falls under the legal definition of a GMO and that, like the DNA contamination, it has the capacity to enter the cell nucleus and integrate into the human genome.
There is already at least one peer-reviewed scientific paper demonstrating that the Pfizer Covid vaccine mRNA can enter the human liver cell line and reverse transcribe into DNA in vitro (meaning in a lab dish).
Other studies cited in the case materials show the presence of spike protein mRNA in the nucleus of human cells, and evidence that acquired immune traits pass down to the offspring of mice pre-exposed to the Covid vaccine mRNA-LNP platform. This is suggestive that, once in the nucleus, the vaccine mRNA can be transferred and integrated with chromosomal DNA.
Taking both the LNP-mod-RNA complexes and the recently discovered DNA contamination present in the mRNA Covid vaccines, acting solicitor Katie Ashby Koppens says, ‘Every single person who has been injected with these products has received a GMO that has not been through the expert regulatory process in this country.’ She adds, ‘The human genome could be changed permanently, and no one was informed.’
Now, McKernan, Dr Buckhaults and other scientists are calling for urgent research to test whether the DNA contamination is lingering in the cells of mRNA vaccinated people, and whether the human genome has in fact been altered by mRNA Covid vaccines.
The same judge putting nonviolent J6 defendants in gulags while hissing her displeasure that Donald Trump “remains free to this day,” decided Monday that she can shut him up while on the 2024 campaign trail. Gag orders are sometimes placed on cases, but this has never happened to a presidential candidate in the annals of the criminal justice.
Trump reacted on his Truth Social account by putting up economic tables comparing his presidency to Joe Biden’s policies.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/111245799427436844/embed The hearing in Judge Tanya S. Chutkan’s D.C. U.S. District Courtroom over whether to at least partially gag Donald Trump was at times contentious and at other times surreal and Kafkaesque. Chutkan ruled that Trump could not post or repost “attacks against Special Counsel, staff, court staff or personnel” as well as prohibited statements about witnesses or expert witnesses.
The hearing was part of one of two cases Special Counsel Jack Smith brought against Trump for calling the 2020 election “stolen” and for somehow instigating the January 6 incursion into the Capitol Building, despite evidence to the contrary notwithstanding. And now Judge Chutkan, an Obama appointee who has dripping antipathy for Donald Trump, will decide if the former president and current presidential candidate can speak at will about the gang-up on him by the intelligence community, the Department of Justice, the Biden Administration, and the Biden campaign to knock him out of contention for the White House.
Trump lawyer Liz Harrington wondered, “Let’s see what happens on Monday in Judge Chutkan’s courtroom. Will America survive, or not?”
Ruling? Not.
The Trump spokeswoman amplified a Truth Social post of Trump’s characterizing Special Counsel Jack Smith as “crooked and deranged.” Trump again called for the judge to recuse herself because she’s so demonstrably biased against the former president.
“Let’s see what happens on Monday in Judge Chutkan’s courtroom. Will America survive, or not?” pic.twitter.com/izOrznixSi
“Today’s decision is an absolute abomination and another partisan knife stuck in the heart of our Democracy by Crooked Joe Biden, who was granted the right to muzzle his political opponent, the leading candidate for the Presidency in 2024… pic.twitter.com/vAYBT3Eqcw
The gang-up on Trump appears to be a continuation of the Democrats’ ongoing lawfare against the Republican, which has reached Kafkaesque proportions, to the point that the Chutkan took specific Trump quotes about Jack Smith and other political figures, including William Barr, the former president’s attorney general, asking a hypothetical question, if Trump should be able to post, “Bill Barr is a slimy lawyer.”
Lauro injected a little legal humor into the colloquy, saying he’s “‘not going to say truth is a defense’ but adds he is [a] public fig[ure] and won’t be intimidated.”
Judge Chutkan now grilling Trump lawyer John Lauro on hypothetical statements she’s drawn up. Q4 was if “Bill Barr is a slimy liar” — should Trump be permitted to post that? Lauro says “not going to say truth is a defense” but adds he is public fig and won’t be intimidated
Lauro asked the judge to obviate the problem and hold off on the trial until after the election. Reporter Hugo Lowell of The Guardian summed it up, “Trump lawyer John Lauro tells Judge Chutkan that public officials like AG Barr should be allowed [to] be criticized, but ‘let’s have this trial after the election to avoid this problem.’”
Judge Chutkan asked “Lauro why Trump has to call [the] prosecutor a ‘thug’ to advance [the] point that this [is] politically motivated? Lauro says what are you supposed to do in [the] face of oppression? Chutkan: ‘let’s tone this down.’” Lauro bristled, “If your honor wants to censor my speech…”
Judge Chutkan asks Trump lawyer John Lauro why Trump has to call prosecutor a “thug” to advance point that this politically motivated? Lauro says what are you supposed to do in face of oppression? Chutkan: “let’s tone this down” Lauro: “If your honor wants to censor my speech”
Indeed, she wants to silence Trump’s and his lawyers’ speech because she, like her fellow Democrats, thinks he’s the human version of an atom bomb to their progressive policies.
Chutkan asked Trump’s lawyer Lauro if she thought it was appropriate that the presidential candidate called D.C. “filthy” and “crime-ridden.” He defended Trump by saying that it was a political statement against his opponent, Joe Biden.
She’s upbraided Lauro before for saying “political” things in her courtroom, but, of course, this case is an entirely political exercise, brought to take Trump out of the 2020 presidential campaign, whether overtly or in the court of public opinion.
At one point, Chutkan told Lauro that his client doesn’t have unfettered First Amendment rights after he kept deriding Smith’s efforts to gag Trump as “censorship.” The judge shot back, “There is no question that a court is entitled to draw restrictions on a def[endant]’s behavior and a def[endant]’s speech pending trial.” The judge continued, ” You [Lauro] keep talking about censorship like the def[endant] has unfettered First Amendment rights. He doesn’t,” she lectured.
Lauro keeps calling this “censorship,” and Chutkan stops him: There is no question that a court is entitled to draw restrictions on a def’s behavior and a def’s speech pending trial. You keep taking about censorship like the def has unfettered First Amendment rights. He doesn’t.
Trump also wants to have jurors fill out a questionnaire in an attempt to discover their biases — which shouldn’t be hard since 97% of D.C. voters cast votes for Biden.
Special Counsel Smith previously put up a fight over the possibility of the questionnaire, suggesting that D.C. is so small that potential jurors could be discovered without their names being revealed. Of course, Trump wants the questionnaire to show an appeals judge at a later time how incredibly biased the jury pool is in the nation’s capital. The special prosecutor argued, according to reporter Lowell, “Special Counsel prosecutor Molly Gaston tells Judge Chutkan: Trump isn’t campaigning, he’s using his campaign to intimidate witnesses and pollute the jury pool.”
And this is where the surreal aspect comes in. The Special Counsel chose the D.C. jurisdiction in which to bring this case because that’s where the Capitol Building breach was, but he didn’t have to. He’s hoping the decidedly anti-Trump jury pool will do anything he wants. But he doesn’t want Trump to question the jurors to find out just how biased they are. Indeed, they claim that Trump speaking would taint the jury pool in an area that is already decidedly against Trump.
NEW: Jack Smith desperate to prevent the public from learning about the deep bias of DC jury pool. He already asked Judge Chutkan for restrictions on defense jury survey to gauge prejudice of jury pool now wants more rules related to picking, vetting jurors: pic.twitter.com/thiGOdzvxG
Trump wasn’t part of the breach; he was arguing around the entire country that the 2020 election was stolen. Smith charged Trump with defrauding the United States because he said it out loud, with obstructing an official proceeding, even though he wasn’t there and didn’t call for people to break into the Capitol Building, and with conspiring against the voters because his opinion might not match voters who didn’t cast their ballots for him.
Trump wrote Sunday that “Nothing like this has ever happened in our Country before.” And that’s right. Democrats are using every tool in their unlimited warfare bag to do to the 2024 campaign what they did to the 2020 campaign.
On Monday, the judge decided that she could shut down Donald Trump from telling the American people what he believes is the truth about his case.
Victoria Taft is an award-winning journalist, writer and terrestrial radio talk host, heard in Seattle and on the rest of the Left Coast. Listen to her twice weekly “Adult in the Room Podcast.” Find her at VictoriaTaft.com Parler, MeWe, Minds,Locals, Twitter & Facebook. Her book mocking antifa will be out this year. For media inquiries write: Victoria@VictoriaTaft.com
Bud’s question: What can citizens do when unelected judges and unelected prosecutors are corrupt and politically biased?
budbromley 
You must be logged in to post a comment.