Dear Senators: Do not confirm the President’s nominee for Secretary DOE

United States Senate

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Dear Senators,

Nominee Ernest Moniz’s stated positions on energy are in direct conflict with the mission of the Energy Department, which is to “ensure America’s security and prosperity.” He is an ideological appointee by President Obama and not aligned with current science or the needs of the nation.  He is not an appropriate nominee.

Last year President Obama’s nominee for Secretary of DOE, Ernest Moniz, told the Switch Energy Project that he supports a carbon price that would substantially increase (double or triple) energy costs due to the added cost for sequestration of carbon dioxide. However, scientific evidence for the need for sequestration of carbon dioxide is very weak and weakens more every day.  That evidence is based primarily on computer models which are failing to confirm that carbon dioxide is a trigger for significant warming.  On the contrary, real world evidence is confirming that carbon dioxide is not a controlling trigger for catastrophic warming.

“If we start really squeezing down on carbon dioxide over the next few decades, well, that could double; it could eventually triple…. I think inevitably if we squeeze down on carbon, we squeeze up on the cost, it brings along with it a push toward efficiency; it brings along with it a push towards clean technologies in a conventional pollution sense; it brings along with it a push towards security. Because after all, the security issues revolve around carbon-bearing fuels.” ~ Energy Secretary nominee Ernest Moniz, MIT professor.  (Video here: http://www.switchenergyproject.com/experts/Ernie-Moniz#/moniz-energy-expert-on-carbon-price )

Carbon dioxide concentration is continuing its long term increasing trend, but the global temperature trend has not increased as the alarmists predicted.  Mr. Moniz’s view is technically in conflict with MIT’s atmospheric physicist and Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology Professor Richard Lindzen, who has testified before multiple Congressional committees over many years that clouds and water vapor are the dominant greenhouse gas, not carbon dioxide.

Moniz is not an appropriate nominee to head DOE. Do not confirm this nominee.  The nation needs a Secretary who will direct resources to achieve lower cost energy and energy independence, as forecast by the National Intelligence Council (link below).  Carbon sequestration is a very expensive and unnecessary solution in search of a carbon dioxide problem that has not been shown to actually exist, though the federal government has spent billions of dollars on grants and programs attempting to show that carbon dioxide is a problem.  Moniz’s views align with those of outgoing Secretary Chu and President Obama’s, as well as the President’s nominee to head EPA, which have led to waste of billions of taxpayer dollars on bankrupt green energy technologies and companies.  Mr. Moniz’s views would support plunder of the public and treasury in support of regulations, taxes and schemes for trading carbon credits and derivatives which would enrich traders.      

The forecast “Global Trends 2030” by the US National Intelligence Council, predicts energy independence and surplus for the U.S.

“US Energy Independence:  With shale gas, the US will have sufficient natural gas to meet domestic needs and generate potential global exports for decades to come. Increased oil production from difficult-to-access oil deposits would result in a substantial reduction in the US net trade balance and faster economic expansion. Global spare capacity may exceed over 8 million barrels, at which point OPEC would lose price control and crude oil prices would collapse, causing a major negative impact on oil-export economies.” http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/GlobalTrends_2030.pdf

Instead of policies to enable the low energy costs we need to recover from our ongoing economic weakness, and energy independence we need for national security, Mr. Moniz’s policies would continue to suppress the hydrocarbon energy sector of our economy based on an unproven theory which requires new, expensive and unreliable green technologies which have not been able to show that they reduce global warming.  His policies would increase energy costs for Americans despite abundant U.S. hydrocarbon energy supplies and technologies which can be expected to reduce energy costs.     

Sincerely,

Clare Livingston Bromley, III

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Educator Allan Bloom argues against moral and cultural relativism

“It is important to emphasize that the lesson the students are drawing from their studies [in the last 3 decades] is simply untrue. History and the study of cultures do not teach or prove that values or cultures are relative. All to the contrary, that is a philosophical premise that we now bring to our study of them. This premise is unproven and dogmatically asserted for what are largely political reasons. History and culture are interpreted in the light of it, and then are said to prove the premise. Yet the fact that there have been different opinions about good and bad in different times and places in no way proves that none is true or superior to others. To say that it does so prove is as absurd as to say that the diversity of points of view expressed in a college bull session proves there is no truth. On the face of it, the difference of opinion would seem to raise the question as to which is true or right rather than to banish it. The natural reaction is to try to resolve the difference, to examine the claims and reasons for each opinion…Herodotus was at least as aware as we are of the rich diversity of cultures. But he took that observation to be an invitation to investigate all of them to see what was good and bad about each and find out what he could learn about good and bad from them. Modern relativists take that same observation as proof that such investigation is impossible and that we must be respectful of them all…History and anthropology cannot provide the answers, but they can provide the material on which judgment can work…Historicism and cultural relativism actually are a means to avoid testing our own prejudices and asking, for example, whether men are really equal or whether that opinion is merely a democratic prejudice…One has to have the experience of really believing before one can have the thrill of liberation…Error is indeed our enemy, but it alone points to the truth and therefore deserves our respectful treatment. The mind that has no prejudices at the outset is empty…Only Socrates knew, after a lifetime of unceasing labor, that he was ignorant. Now every high-school student knows that. How did it become so easy? …Openness used to be the virtue that permitted us to seek the good by using reason. It now means accepting everything and denying reason’s power…Cultural relativism destroys both one’s own [relativism] and the good… Nature should be the standard by which we judge our own lives and the lives of peoples. That is why philosophy, not history or anthropology, is the most important human science…History and anthropology were understood by the Greeks to be useful only in discovering what the past and other peoples had to contribute to the discovery of nature.” ~ Allan Bloom, Closing of the American Mind.http://www.amazon.com/Closing-American-Mind-ebook/dp/B003719GL8/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1365383024&sr=1-1&keywords=Closing+of+the+American+Mind

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The plan to save the banks with your money

If you have money in a bank, then you are an unsecured creditor…you have loaned your money to the bank.

“Under the strategies currently being developed by the U.S. and the U.K., the resolution authority could intervene at the top of the group. Culpable senior management of the parent and operating businesses would be removed, and losses would be apportioned to shareholders and unsecured creditors. In all likelihood, shareholders would lose all value and unsecured creditors should thus expect that their claims would be written down to reflect any losses that shareholders did not cover. Under both the U.S. and U.K. approaches, legal safeguards ensure that creditors recover no less than they would under insolvency.”

Click to access gsifi.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The US Government is coming for your assets and savings

An analysis prepared for the Federal Reserve of the U.S. federal debt problem and possible solutions DOES NOT INCLUDE REDUCTION IN THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT.  The solutions include “confiscation of all physical assets,” “Slash Social Security and Medicare by over half”  (benefits for which most citizens and their employers have paid for in advance during their entire careers), and “68% immediate and forever increase in income taxes” and “Increase the combined employer-employee payroll tax from 15.3% to over 32%.” In other words, the government will do anything except shrink the government, their jobs, their budgets and their power.

“Confiscating the customer deposits in Cyprus banks, it seems, was not a one-off, desperate idea of a few eurozone “troika” officials scrambling to salvage their balance sheets. A joint paper by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Bank of England dated Dec. 10, 2012, shows that these plans have been long in the making…” Full Story: http://seekingalpha.com/article/1306931?source=iphoneappmail

Cost per federal regulator

Social Security and Medicare: Scaling the Problem and Proposed Solutions.
The Philadelphia Federal Reserve, December 2, 2005. Kent Smetters, The Wharton School & NBER.

Two Main Problems with the Traditional Federal Budget
(1) Substantially underestimates unfunded liabilities by ignoring long-term liabilities
(2) Is biased against reforms that would reduce these unfunded liabilities

Re: (1) Underestimates Liabilities
*Budget does not track many unfunded obligations
They’re “off balance sheet”
*Examples
Social Security and Medicare
Medicaid
Federal Employee / Military pensions
* Instead, the budget focuses on a particular unfunded obligation: public debt
* Debt Held by Public Misses almost $60 Trillion in Liabilities
* Public debt is only one component of government’s true Fiscal Imbalance (FI)
* FI = debt held by public + PV of all future outlays – PV of all future revenue = $63 trillion
* On 19 March 2013, debt held by the public was approximately $11.888 trillion or about 75% of GDP. Intra-governmental holdings stood at $4.861 trillion, giving a combined total public debt of $16.749 trillion. As of July 2012, $5.3 trillion or approximately 48% of the debt held by the public was owned by foreign investors, the largest of which were the People’s Republic of China and Japan at just over $1.1 trillion each.

*But are these obligations “real”?
*Yes: the only difference between these obligations and regular debt is the policy options available for dealing with them.
*Options for reducing explicit debt:
Monetize it (except TIPS)
Increase taxes
Declare bankruptcy
*Options for reducing implicit debt:
Hard to monetize (since inflation protected)
Control outlays, increase taxes

Easy Fix / Hard Fix
* Social Security: The “Easy Fix”
Smaller problem
Nature of problem is also easier since it is cash payment (e.g., “just” price index)
* Medicare: The “Hard Fix”
7 times large (new Rx plan imbalance alone is larger than Social Security’s imbalance)
Nature of problem is also harder since in-kind payment and driven by tech change

Why Haven’t Fixed Income Markets Reacted with higher interest rates?

Options for Paying for $63 Trillion
* Confiscate all physical capital assets in the U.S. (actually does not go far enough!)
* Increase federal income taxes by 68% immediately and forever, assuming no reduction in labor supply or savings
* Increase the combined employer-employee payroll tax from 15.3% to over 32% and remove the payroll tax ceiling (but don’t credit benefits)
* Slash Social Security and Medicare by over half

Reference: Social Security and Medicare: Scaling the Problem and Proposed Solutions.
The Philadelphia Federal Reserve, December 2, 2005. Kent Smetters, The Wharton School & NBER.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), the federal government’s auditor, argues that the United States is on a fiscally “unsustainable” path and that politicians and the electorate have been unwilling to change this path. Further, the subprime mortgage crisis has significantly increased the financial burden on the U.S. government, with over $10 trillion in commitments or guarantees and $2.6 trillion in investments or expenditures as of May 2009, only some of which are included in the public debt computation. However, these concerns are not universally shared.[93 link below]

Converting fractional reserve to full reserve banking

The International Monetary Fund published a working paper entitled The Chicago Plan Revisited suggesting that the debt could be eliminated by raising bank reserve requirements, converting from fractional reserve banking to full reserve banking.[50][51] Economists at the Paris School of Economics have commented on the plan, stating that it is already the status quo for coinage currency,[52] and a Norges Bank economist has examined the proposal in the context of considering the finance industry as part of the real economy.[53] A Centre for Economic Policy Research paper agrees with the conclusion that, “no real liability is created by new fiat money creation, and therefore public debt does not rise as a result.”[54] [Links below]

an inconvenient budget

Median Household Income

federal budget pie 2012Federal spending

US_Federal_Debt_by_Senate_Majority_Party_(1940_to_2009) U.S._Total_Deficits_vs._National_Debt_Increases_2001-2010 Regulator Hiring Boom-081911 red tape rising redtape Pre and Post Obamacare

Govt gowing 4X faster thna economy Obama Budget Govt spending slows growth GDP Gains from cutting budget Private sector job gains by cutting federal budget
Pre and Post Obamacare
Receiving Welfare Persons not in labor force. Food-Stamps-Monthly March 2013 Your taxes at work you were warned about obama
feedTheAligator

http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_of_the_United_States

http://www.pgpf.org/Special-Topics/Download-the-Citizens-Guide.aspx

[50] Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (October 21, 2012) “IMF’s epic plan to conjure away debt and dethrone bankers” The Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/9623863/IMFs-epic-plan-to-conjure-away-debt-and-dethrone-bankers.html
[51] Jaromir Benes and Michael Kumhof (August 2012) “The Chicago Plan Revisited” International Monetary Fund working paper WP/12/202 http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12202.pdf
[52] “Debt-Deflation versus the Liquidity Trap: the Dilemma of Nonconventional Monetary Policy” CNRS, CES, Paris School of Economics, ESCP-Europe, October 23, 2012 http://hal.cirad.fr/docs/00/74/79/04/PDF/12064.pdf
[53 “Credit and debt in Economic Theory: Which Way forward?” “Economics of Credit and Debt workshop, November 2012 http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=thorvaldgrung_moe
[54] “The economic crisis: How to stimulate economies without increasing public debt”, Centre for Economic Policy Research, August 2012 http://www.cepr.org/pubs/PolicyInsights/PolicyInsight62.pdf
[93] Lynch, David J. (Mar 21, 2013). “Economists See No Crisis With U.S. Debt as Economy Gains”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 25 March 2013. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-22/economists-see-no-crisis-with-u-s-debt-as-economy-gains.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In Defense of Marriage

The US is a nation of laws, a republic to be specific.  We should not be a nation of men acting out our emotions and populist whims. The various states of our republic and the communities within those states are well within their rights to make such laws which they believe will sustain and preserve their communities.  Our republic protects some minorities but is not required to condone, agree or support them, and in fact, our republic and our various states can and do reject many behaviors which some people wish to be rights.  

States and communities frequently decide that they prefer certain behaviors and they prohibit certain behaviors.  For example, in the US the states have decided that they do not want a man or woman to have several spouses (polygamy) and the states have decided that sexual activity with minor children is prohibited. On the other hand, in Muslim countries both of these example behaviors are commonly allowed and no doubt some Muslim Americans wish these behaviors were allowed in the US.  Similarly, in the US the states and communities within the states are well within their rights to prefer families with the traditional structure of one man and one woman, a structure that has been preferred by civilizations for hundreds of thousands of years.  

The DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) was passed by a majority of US Congress and signed into law by the President.  Similar laws exist in most but not all US states. President Obama and his Attorney General (who set a new precedent, is already charged with contempt of Congress) are derelict in their sworn duties to enforce US law.  The people of California passed an Amendment to California’s Constitution which defined marriage in California as between one man and one woman.  California also provides equal legal rights to civil unions of same sex couples.  Jerry Brown, previously as California’s elected Attorney General and now as California’s Governor, is clearly derelict of duty by refusing to enforce  California law and refusing to defend California’s law before the California and US Supreme Courts.  Jerry Brown and Barack Obama are refusing to do their duty as elected public servants.  These are impeachable offenses. Their actions and inactions favor the desires of a minority against laws which have been duly passed by the representatives of the majority, and also in California’s case against a direct referendum (Prop 8) of the people of California which was necessary to change the state’s Constitution after a judge ruled against the defense of marriage law duly passed by California’s legislature.  The President and the Governor of California, acting out their anti-social behavior, stand in contempt of the very people and the Constitutions they are sworn to serve and protect.  

Homosexuality, polygamy, pedophilia and other such behaviors existed when the founders and framers designed our republic of laws, and the US Constitution is silent about these behaviors, which means according to the US Constitution, these matters are left to the various states to decide.  Do not forget that the states came together and created the Constitution and the federal government.  Today, the minority gay community is attempting to force acceptance of its statistically non-normal and non-self-sustaining sexual behavior onto the community at large.  They are openly criticizing the traditional family values practiced by the majority of Americans and practiced for hundreds of thousands of years as well as challenging and creating laws and propaganda designed to persuade the majority that their sexual behaviors should be accepted by the majority as normal.  Already in California teachers and individuals may be taken to court for hate crimes for merely directing a child to the sexually appropriate bathroom.

IMHO, the DOMA is unconstitutional under the US Constitution and California’s Prop 8 should be upheld as an Amendment to the California Constitution.  If the gay community wishes to be tolerated in this republic, then it should respect the will of the communities within which they reside instead of attempting to demonize their communities.       

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

End the drone wars.

Sending in the drones is kicking a nest of hornets. Let them bite themselves. Do not forget that WE have killed many of their innocents…shooting down their airliner, feeding WMD to Saddam, etc. That does not excuse the 200+ millions THEY have killed in the name of Allah, or the obvious fact that the preeminent goal of THEIR culture/government/religion is world domination. Let them fight among themselves. Time to circle the wagons and steel the defense, and that must include getting our own so-called intellectuals and media on our side…otherwise the ideas of freedom die.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Please Watch This

If you imagine that you are informed, please watch this 1.3 hour video report by National Geographic.  Please.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

John Kerry, as Secretary of State, calls for more theft of your future

Secretary of State John Kerry in his first major foreign policy speech at the University of Virginia discussed tackling climate change by collective action and more investment which he says are needed to stop it.

Kerry is attempting to support Obama’s recent proposal for taxes on carbon. The Obama administration has already wasted $80 billion on climate change initiatives since 2009, billions going to “green” companies which donated to Democrats and which have already gone bankrupt and billions to grants and projects which have tried unsuccessfully to connect human activity to climate change. These investments will have no perceivable effect on climate. Indeed, collective action is necessary: only WE together can stop this theft of America’s future.

“We as a nation must have the foresight and courage to make the investments necessary to safeguard the most sacred trust we keep for our children and grandchildren: an environment not ravaged by rising seas, deadly superstorms, devastating droughts, and the other hallmarks of a dramatically changing climate,” said Kerry.

“And let’s face it – we are all in this one together. No nation can stand alone. We share nothing so completely as our planet. When we work with others – large and small – to develop and deploy the clean technologies that will power a new world, we’re also helping create new markets and new opportunities for America’s second-to-none innovators and entrepreneurs to succeed in the next great revolution.”

Kerry called for collective action to deal with this problem. “So let’s commit ourselves to doing the smart thing and the right thing and truly commit to tackling this challenge,” he said. “Because if we don’t rise to meet it, rising temperatures and rising sea levels will surely lead to rising costs down the road. If we waste this opportunity, it may be the only thing our generations are remembered for. We need to find the courage to leave a far different legacy.”

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/fp_uploaded_documents/130220_SECRETARY%20KERRY.pdf

Obama’s carbon tax is blasted in Investors Business Daily:

“A nonexistent crisis is a terrible thing to waste, and in justifying his proposal for a cap-and-tax scheme, President Obama claimed in his State Of The Union that “the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15.” He was lying.”

“The fact is, according to new data released quietly last October by Britain’s Met Office, the world’s natural post-Ice Age warming trend stopped about 16 years ago. From the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.”

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021313-644355-obama-unveils-job-killing-cap-and-tax-plan.htm?p=full

Scientists in Belgium have shown that more CO2 is better for the planet.

From the abstract, “Overall, crops benefit from elevated [CO2] by improving water productivity (+23% for biomass production and +27% for yield production), which is achieved through production increases in biomass (+15% for aboveground biomass) and yield (+16%), in combination with a decrease in seasonal evapotranspiration (–5%).”

http://www.int-res.com/articles/cr_oa/c054p035.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

re-blog: Death from the Skies—Targeted International Assassinations via U.S. Drones

Death from the Skies—Targeted International Assassinations via U.S. Drones

by ANN SPECKHARD, PH.D. February 20, 2013

With John Breenan-considered by many to be the mastermind behind U.S. drone policy-nominated to be the next head of the CIA, we are hearing a lot about drones. And unlike those upon who drones reign down terror-it’s not the high pitch of an overhead motor that we are hearing. Instead the discussion is all about kill rates, kill versus capture, terrorizing innocents and an absence of transparency about policy-particularly when Americans and minors are considered eligible targets.

Surgically precise and effective-drone strikes are argued by many to be useful in decapitating known terrorist leadership. However the truth is that noncombatants are also being effected and the human toll of that fact may be causing as much threat to our national security as live terrorist leaders also pose.

Much of the damage caused by U.S. drone strikes is clouded in secrecy and the U.S. government rarely acknowledges the full extent of civilian casualties.  And how civilians are categorized is also arguable-for instance all adult males in the strike vicinity are often named as militants.  Data reported by the New American Foundation, informs that in Pakistan alone drones have killed between 1,953 to 3,279 persons since 2004-with between eighteen and twenty-three percent of these being civilians.  (In 2012, the hit rate on militants got better and the civilian kill rate went down to ten percent.)  The New American Foundation also estimates that of the 646 to 928 people killed in Yemen (in a combination of air and drone strikes) four to eight percent were civilians.

In addition to the civilian kills, researchers are finding that armed drones hovering over Pakistani communities day and night and suddenly striking homes, vehicles and public spaces without warning also causes considerable anxiety and psychological trauma in the daily lives of ordinary civilians-most notably children.  When families fear gathering for funerals; tribal leaders shun gathering in groups-even for tribal dispute resolution; children are kept indoors and community members dread public assemblies, a breakdown in society occurs and anti-American sentiment is greatly fostered.  Likewise when the U.S. becomes known for striking an area multiple times killing those who gather around the first strike-a behavior that unfortunately mirrors al Qaeda type strikes-and rescue and even humanitarian workers fear aiding injured victims-both societies-theirs and ours is gravely injured  in multiple ways (see the Stanford/NYU Living Under Drones Report http://livingunderdrones.org for more on this).

Indeed as the arguments of today are made in behalf of drone strikes we forget that it was not long ago-only twelve years back, in July, 2001-just before 9-11, that Martin Indyk our then American Ambassador to Israel, denounced Israel’s use of targeted killing against Palestinian terrorists stating, “The United States government is very clearly on record as against targeted assassinations. . . . They are extrajudicial killings, and we do not support that.”  Likewise, George Tenet, the then CIA’s agency director argued the week before 9-11 that it would be “a terrible mistake” for “the Director of Central Intelligence to fire a weapon like this.”

Times appear to have changed.

That we are winning the so-called “war on terror” by heavy reliance on drone strikes is not necessarily true.  For one thing killing militants versus capturing them means that valuable Intel that might have been collected from prisoners is never gathered.  And as YouTube videos of burnt drone victims-including pictures of child victims-circulate over the Internet and ideologues cry out for more recruits to protect the innocent Muslim ummah against “death from the skies” we may be unwittingly contributing more to global militant jihadi terrorism recruitment than we are gaining by terrorist decapitation. Researchers have long known that when a feeling of personal threat from an outside force increases, so to does social support and endorsement for terrorism among the civilian population thereby increasing the pool of potential recruits.

Moreover when there is a lack of public transparency over U.S. drone strike policies, failure to follow international laws regarding who can and cannot be targeted by lethal force-especially force administered by CIA operatives versus our uniformed military-and repeat strikes kill rescue workers aiding the victims of the first strike-we may be playing with real fire.  Soon other nations will also have drones and all will likely deem whatever practices we follow justifiable.  If all of these concerns are not addressed thoughtfully in the coming months they may conspire to create circumstance in which our government’s moral stance is considered so questionable that in relying on drone strikes we may be doing more-rather than less-to increase the dangers from terrorism.

Anne Speckhard, Ph.D. is author of Talking to Terrorists: Understanding the Psycho-Social Motivations of Militant Jihadi Terrorists, Mass Hostage Takers, Suicide Bombers & “Martyrs.”

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/death-from-the-skiestargeted-international-assassinations-via-us-drones#ixzz2LTZvp6PO
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

With all due respect Dr. Krauthammer, you are wrong about America’s drone wars.

I rarely if ever find difference with or object to the opinions of  Dr. Charles Krauthammer.  However, his justification of America’s ongoing, undeclared drone wars and the killing of innocent civilians is immoral, ethically wrong and bad military strategy.  Here’s why.

The foundation of my position on drones, secrecy and transparency is best exemplified by Thomas Jefferson’s statement: ““Democracy demands an intelligent and informed electorate.”  How can citizens in a democracy be intelligent and informed, and responsible as they are for control and election of the government, if the government is protecting itself and hiding its actions with secrets and executive privilege?

Dr. Krauthammer justifies Obama’s drone wars, including civilian deaths in this article:  http://www.humanevents.com/2013/02/15/krauthammer-in-defense-of-obamas-drone-war/

Dr. Krauthammer uses Anwar al-Awlaki as an example of a terrorist killed by Obama.  Al Awlaki was killed by an Obama=approved drone attack in Yemen, and so I will use the same example.

Undeclared drone wars are categorically, black and white, wrong for America because they kill innocent civilians and there is a practical way to prevent terrorist attacks in America without these drone attacks.  Militarily, America’s ongoing drone wars are a wrong-headed, counter-productive strategy which is exponentially increasing the number of terrorists even while it kills the supposed terrorists leaders.  As a result of the civilian deaths and the obvious terror of drones flying overhead, anger against America is growing exponentially among the civilian population.  But this civilian population is the only real hope of ever eradicating terrorism as a strategy of radical Islamic jihad.  As a practical matter, America cannot police the world with drones and blow up terrorists wherever they may hide.

Anwar al-Awlaki was a U.S.-born, a U.S. citizen, and earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Colorado State University and an M.A. in Education Leadership from San Diego State University.  He was an al Qaeda terrorist and self-acknowledged enemy of America.  He was on Obama’s approved hit list for 17 months.  He was killed by an Obama-authorized drone strike, the second attempt, on September 30, 2011.  His 16 year old son was killed two weeks later in another drone strike.  On October 14, 2011, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki [the son] was killed by a U.S. airstrike in Yemen along with a group of his teenage friends while eating dinner under the moonlight.

Before you read further, listen and watch Anwar al-Awlaki in this troubling PBS video:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2Ofg2BacIM

Anwar al-Awlaki openly espoused violent jihad against America and recruited others to that role.

FBI suspects al-Awlaki, “could have bought air tickets for three of the 9/11 hijackers before the attacks.”

“Two weeks after the 9/11 attacks, the FBI knew that al-Awlaki had used his Visa credit card to buy flights for Mohammed Atta, their ringleader, and two other hijackers, one internal document states.”

“Yet in February 2002, just four months later, al-Awlaki was invited to a dinner held at the Pentagon as part of the military’s “outreach to the Muslim community” in the aftermath of the attacks.”  This is convincing evidence of government incompetence.

In 2001, al-Awlaki presided at the funeral of the father of Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who later e-mailed him extensively in 2008–2009 before the Hasan killed 13 people and wounded 29 others in November 2009 in the worst shooting ever to take place on an American military base.

“Another document details how al-Awlaqi was detained and questioned at New York’s John F. Kennedy airport in October 2002, under an arrest warrant for passport fraud – a crime carrying a potential 10-year sentence.  However, the FBI ordered his release, allowing him to fly to Washington, DC, before eventually returning to Yemen.”

“Previously released documents showed that al-Awlaki was detained by US authorities a further two times in 2006 and 2007, both times again being released for undisclosed reasons.”  Another indictment of U.S. government incompetence.

“Al-Awlaki is also said to have directed Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the British-educated “pants bomber” who attempted to bring down a packed commercial jet bound for Detroit on Christmas Day 2009.”

Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, the pressure group that secured the release of the documents [by filing suit under the Freedom of Information Act], said they “further confirm disturbing dereliction by our national security establishment”.

“These and other documents leave little doubt that al-Awlaki had something to do with 9/11 and violated the law,” said Mr Fitton.”

“Yet this terrorist was feted at the Pentagon and given the proverbial ‘get out of jail free card’ by law enforcement – with deadly consequences.”

“In 2000, [Esam] Omeish personally hired … Anwar al-Awlaki to be the imam of Falls Church, VA, Dar al-Hijrah mosque [translates to ‘land of migration’].  According to IPT [Investigative Project on Terrorism] analysis, more terrorists have been linked to Dar al-Hijrah since 9/11 than to any other mosque in America.” The Saudi-backed North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) purchased the mosque’s grounds on June 19, 1983.  The current building, on a 3.4 acre plot was finished for $5 million in 1991 ($8,531,639 today) with financial help from the Saudi Embassy’s Islamic Affairs Department.”

…“Esam Omeish, former head of the Muslim Brotherhood-created Muslim American Society, visited the White House three times.”

“Omeish has continued visiting the White House even after the kill order on Al-Awlaki and even after Al-Awlaki’s death, as recently as March of this year [2012.]  Omeish heads the Libyan Emergency Taskforce and it would be interesting to know that impact this notorious terrorist supporter had on Obama’s Libyan policy.”

“Then there’s Hussam Ayloush, executive director of CAIR’s Los Angeles office, who, “publicly defended Palestinian terror attacks in comments before Muslim students at the University of California – Los Angeles, saying that terrorists were exercising their “legitimate right” to defend themselves against Israeli occupation.””

“And Muzammil Siddiqi, a former head of Islamic Society of North America, who “supported laws in countries where homosexuality is punishable by death.””

And…

“Hatem Abudayyeh – executive director of the Chicago-based Arab American Action Network, founded by Rashid Khalidi, a friend of President Obama. Abudayyeh has been under criminal investigation at least since September 2010, when FBI agents raided his home and office in connection with a terror-support probe. “

Documents received by a Freedom of Information request revealed that al-Awlaki “had ties to 26 terrorism cases and was described by the United States as head of the terror network’s most effective and lethal franchise.  The documents uncovered indicated he had been held for at least eight months between late 2006 and mid 2007.”

“About six months before … Anwar Al-Awlaki was killed in a drone strike in Yemen… U.S. State Department officials appear to have instructed the U.S. Embassy in Yemen to invite” him “to come to the embassy to receive “an important letter regarding [his] U.S. passport.”

“Post is to hold and retain the revocation letter and send a separate letter to Mr. Aulaqi informing him that there is an importatnt [sic] letter for him at post regarding his U.S. passport,” the march 24, 2011 cable said.  “The department’s action is based upon the determination by the secretary that Mr. Aulaqi’s activities abroad are causing and/or are likely to cause serious damage to the national security or the foreign policy of the United States.”

“It’s unclear from the documents whether the embassy ever actually sought to contact Anwar Al-Awlaki or succeeded in doing so. It’s possible that the attempt to reach out to Al-Awlaki was part of an internal effort by the Obama Administration to provide a form of due process to U.S. citizens targeted for the use of deadly force. Some of the documents refer to classified discussions about the passport revocation. Such a notice, if delivered, would put Al-Awlaki on official notice that the U.S. Government wanted to talk to him.”

“However, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the effort bizarre.”

“The idea of inviting al-Aulaqi – a known terrorist – to our embassy in Yemen in order to revoke his passport is beyond belief,” Fitton said in a statement.”

The above is clear and sufficient evidence of the need for transparent profiling, and action based on those public profiles.  The multiple examples of incompetency by government shows that the pervasive use of secrecy by the government endangers lives, reduces the ability of citizens to protect themselves, and prevents citizens from intelligently controlling and electing their government.

President Obama said, “The death of al-Awlaki marks another significant milestone in the broader effort to defeat al Qaeda and its affiliates. Furthermore, this success is a tribute to our intelligence community, and to the efforts of Yemen and its security forces, who have worked closely with the United States over the course of several years.”

Obama continued, “Awlaki and his organization have been directly responsible for the deaths of many Yemeni citizens. His hateful ideology — and targeting of innocent civilians — has been rejected by the vast majority of Muslims, and people of all faiths. And he has met his demise because the government and the people of Yemen have joined the international community in a common effort against Al Qaeda.”

I submit to you that this chain of events, actions and inactions, culminating in the assassination of al-Awaki by drone along with the assassination of his teenage son and the deaths of the son’s friends and innocent civilians is more than sufficient evidence of the incompetence, command negligence and dereliction of duty by President Obama, and the U.S. intelligence community, and dereliction of duty by the FBI and federal law enforcement under both the Obama and Bush administrations.  The terrorist al-Awlaki was profiled and was arrested and should have been faced trial in the United States.  Al-Awlaki’s profile was not made public and the terrorist was released.  The public was endangered by the government’s negligence.  Many innocent people died.

Also, arguably, the 13 people who died at Ft.Hood probably would not have died had al-Awlaki been arrested, tried and convicted for his connection to the events of 9-11-2001.  The deaths at Ft.Hood certainly would have been prevented if Army psychologist Hasan had been profiled and arrested or removed from the military.

I submit to you that profiling and arrest and trial of terrorists in the United States is the best way, the moral way, to eradicate terrorism.  Doing so will help immensely to recoup the moral standing of America in the world.  American terror in the skies and the resulting deaths of innocent people from America’s undeclared drone wars should be stopped.  The drone war is unnecessary.  The public will have to get over its politically correct, guilt-ridden concerns about profiling and judging the behavior of others.  The occasional overly aggressive search of an individual fitting the profile of a terrorist is a very small price indeed compared to the deaths of innocent civilians perpetrated in our name by our President and the counter-productive terror and anger among the grieving families.

Dr. Krauthammer’s attempt to justify drone killing of innocents is wrong.  He claims innocent deaths by drones is comparable to killing of civilians in Germany by bombings in WWII and North Vietnam.  These three wars are all different.  WWII was a war legally declared by Congress, and it was a symmetric war between virtually the entire United States including its civilians and industries as well as the government (and other allied countries’ civilians, industries and governments) against Germany and Japan including the civilians, industries and governments of Germany and Japan.  All of America and its allies, Germany and Japan and their allies knew these countries were in all out war and most citizens participated in the war one way or another.  The drone war is killing truly innocent people, and the terrorists are intentionally hiding among innocent people.

Opposite to WWII, America’s drone war is part of a legally undeclared, asymmetric war secretly waged by our government against a relatively small group of radical Islamists who are spread over many countries.  Parts of the war have been waged openly by America and its allies in two countries (Afghanistan and Iraq), but today the secret drone war is ongoing in several other countries, for example, Pakistan, Libya, and Yemen.  Most of the civilians, almost all industries and almost all of the governments in these countries do not support the radical Islamists.  But, these innocent people in these countries are living in terror of death by American drones.

The small group of radical Islamists has been secretly supported in their terrorism and violence by several governments, mostly Middle Eastern Islamic tyrannies, but sometimes also secretly supported by the America and its allies.  These secrets are killing innocent Americans and citizens of other counties.

America probably created Al Qaeda, perhaps accidentally, by its secret supply of weapons (e.g. ground to air missiles), intelligence and training to the Mujahedeen during the Soviet Union’s war in Afghanistan.  The name Al Qaeda did not appear until after the Soviet Union had left Afghanistan.  After the Soviets left, the radical militant group (now called Al Qaeda) turned against the Americans, wanting America out of Afghanistan and the Middle East.  History records that actions of the American government and its allies and industries helped build the early pre-war fascist state in Germany and Imperial Japan, but this was not done in secret and WWII was not a proxy war.

In eye-opening parallel to the American proxy war with the Soviet Union through the Mujahideen, followed by the Al Qaeda anti-American reaction in post-Soviet Afghanistan, America once again secretly armed Al Qaeda-affiliated militants in Benghazi Libya, and then after Gaddafi’s government was overthrown in Libya, the Al Qaeda militants turned on the Americans.   After Gaddafi died, America wanted to move the automatic weapons, heavy anti-aircraft, etc. which were supplied to Islamic militants, onward to Syria via Turkey to support the overthrow of the government in Syria.  After Gaddafi died, covert U.S. military (managed by Brennan, approved by Obama) attacked the Al Qaeda-connected militants in Libya, and then these well armed militants counter attacked the U.S. Consulate and CIA compound in Benghazi, resulting in the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans.  As in post-Soviet Afghanistan, America aided the radical Islamists in accomplishing their goal and then the radical Islamists turned on the America.

The Obama administration was secretly working to change the regime in Libya, conducting a secret, undeclared war through proxies.  The radical, rebel proxies probably never were actually under Deputy Brennan’s and Obama’s control.  Even the CIA and normal military chain of command were not aware of Obama’s secret war being carried out by Deputy National Security Adviser Brennan.  The Congress and the people were blinded to U.S. involvement in this regime change in Libya.  Government secrecy and Command Negligence killed Americans.

Osama bin Laden himself may have been a CIA “Asset” i.e. a paid collaborator, possibly trained by American intelligence, although there is dispute about this collaboration.

In a 2004 BBC article entitled “Al-Qaeda’s origins and links”, the BBC wrote:

“During the anti-Soviet jihad Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding. Some analysts believe Bin Laden himself had security training from the CIA.”

“Robin Cook, Foreign Secretary in the UK from 1997–2001, and Leader of the House of Commons and Lord President of the Council from 2001–2003, believed the CIA had provided arms to the Arab Mujahideen, including Osama bin Laden, writing, “Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan.””

“In conversation with former British Defense Secretary Michael Portillo, two-time Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto said Osama bin Laden was initially pro-American.”

“Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia, has also stated that bin Laden once expressed appreciation for the United States’ help in Afghanistan. On CNN’s Larry King program he said: “This is ironic. In the mid-’80s, if you remember, we and the United – Saudi Arabia and the United States were supporting the Mujahideen to liberate Afghanistan from the Soviets. He [Osama bin Laden] came to thank me for my efforts to bring the Americans, our friends, to help us against the atheists, he said the communists. Isn’t it ironic?””

Contrary to the opinion of Dr. Krauthammer, the Vietnam War was categorically different from WWII in many ways.  The Vietnam War was not legally declared by Congress.  The Vietnam War was begun and progressed in secret on the American side for about 10 years.  Secret American activity in Vietnam began in 1954 and expanded under President Kennedy and was secretly conducted by intelligence and U.S. Special Forces.  The American people knew nothing about this war until it was already well advanced and after the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in August, 1964, an incident which President Johnson used to expand the war.

The North Vietnamese people, industries and government were entirely behind the war, attempting to unite North and South Vietnam into one communist country, the Vietnam which exists today.  The American people did not know they were at war with North Vietnam for about 10 years, but the America government was secretly conducting psychological warfare, spying and bombing the North Vietnamese people, industries and government.  The America government had involved itself in a civil war in Vietnam – part of a global, political, cold war between capitalism and communism – without the legally required declaration of war against North Vietnam and without the knowledge of the American people and most of American industry.  Within 1 to 3 years (1965 to 1968) of Americans becoming aware of this secret war, the majority of Americans had turned against both the war and the American government, both Democrat and Republican, eventually resulting in exit of American forces from Vietnam in 1975…a 31 year war.

Dear Dr. Krauthammer, the secret drone wars of the American government today are similar to the Vietnam War, but not how you imagine.   Both were immoral and strategically wrong.  Today, once Americans understand the deaths and destruction being done by their government in their name, Americans will demand the secret, counter-productive drone wars be stopped.

Germans and Americans were entirely committed to WWII.  North Vietnamese were entirely committed to their war against Americans and the South Vietnamese.  For about 10 years Americans in general were unaware of the war against North Vietnamese and the deadly decisions of the American government.  It is now more than 10 years after September 11, 2001, but Americans in general still do not have transparency about their government’s decisions and actions prior to and after that date.  It is abundantly clear that Americans do not know what happened in Bengazi or what our government really is doing in Yemen, Algeria, Syria, Egypt, Jordan and many other countries and especially in the United States.  U.S. Government contracts reveal that Americans are being spied upon by their government.  Instead of doing their duty to protect our liberty, our government is invading it and planning to further reduce it.

Secrecy is the focus of the problem.  Transparency in government is the solution.  There is no doubt that a database of international terrorists already exists inside American and other governments.  Are you in that database?  How much would you have to spend to find out?  The information in that database would be dramatically improved if peaceful, reform-minded Muslims, especially, and all citizens in general believed that their government would arrest and convict violent terrorists within their community.  But that database must be public and government, politicians, intelligence agents, military personnel who slander must be held civilly and criminally liable for damages.

Quite obviously Muslims not only do not believe that Americans will take effective action against violent jihadists, they are afraid that violent jihadists in their community will harm them, so they must sit in mosques and listen to imams such as Anwar al-Awaki.  In contrast, if the terrorist database and hit list were public information and the terrorists were being arrested and convicted, then peaceful Muslims and all citizens could confidently assist in the profiling and resistance to terrorist activities.  Terrorists of any persuasion would not be able to move around freely or conduct their violence – if there were transparency and their photos were on the internet and every post office.  They would be prevented from boarding airplanes, they would be prevented from entering the country,  learning to fly planes and rent cars.  Their solicitations of violence would become evidence against them as citizens would report them to police, they would be more easily apprehended.  The accused would also have the opportunity to defend themselves in courts of law.  Secret information about individuals and hit lists should be outlawed, and punished as a felony when discovered, whether that information is in the Oval Office, the CIA, or any other government agency.  Incompetent or nefarious government agents would be prosecuted.  Secrecy is the heart of George Orwell’s prophetic book 1984 and the cause of a long list of real life tragedies.  Secrecy is antithetical, destructive to liberty.

How are Americans to measure, judge and correct the actions of their government if the government’s actions, up to and including deadly force against its citizens, are kept secret?  Do you know who is on Obama’s hit list?  The case of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American, and his American son and friends who were all killed in secret without the due course of justice has revealed the incompetence of the U.S. government at many levels.

So long as the American government conducts secret wars in other countries and keeps secrets from American citizens about its actions in those countries and inside America, then America will continue to have unending wars, the deaths of innocent civilians will increase, and an army of angry enemies of America will grow exponentially.

More young people like Anwar al-Awlaki will be turned into terrorists against America by the American government itself.  So long as the politically correct memes of tolerance and moral equivalence prevent mis-educated Americans from judging between distinct and conflicting moral behaviors, then Americans and all peaceful people will be in deadly danger from both their own government and those who oppose that government.

There is no difference between Dr. Krauthammer’s justification for the deaths by drone of innocent civilians and the justification of violent jihadists for their actions against any American.

Our governments should be profiling and publishing information about all individuals, groups, companies and governments who incite or commit violence against its citizens or their property so that those citizens may better protect themselves and their property, that is a fundamental role of government.  If an accused terrorist is innocent, then by the application of prompt due process, the balance of justice will enable the accused to be released and recover any damages, but not if the government can claim the privilege of secrecy.

The U.S. government should never have been allowed the right of indefinitely and secretly holding a person in America without due process.  Anyone could be held in secret for association with terrorism.  Consider the instances of government incompetence presented above; those are sufficient reasons to distrust the promises by the President or anyone else that these draconian laws will not be misused.  And the President should never have been allowed to kill a citizen without due process of law.   But, very unfortunately, today these things are not only possible but they are already being done under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and the Patriot Act, both laws supported by both Democrats and Republicans.  It is in the national interest, in your personal interest, to repeal these laws.

The government defines the words “terrorist” and the very ambiguous word “association” and the facts will be withheld as secrets, unless disclosure can be forced using great expense and time.  For example; at least one American, Susan Lindauer, an anti-war activist and CIA “Asset”, was held for two years in an Air Force jail in Texas without due process.  The government attempted to shut her up and to use mind-altering drugs on her.  The CIA and NSA agents who had abundant, admissible evidence to free her were forbidden to testify by the President.  Don’t think it can’t happen here.  It is happening here.

The American government must stop terrorizing and killing innocent civilians with its drones.  Enemy or hijacked drones will soon be in American skies too.   There is a better and moral way.  Transparency in government without delay, and due process is the way.  Secrets in government must end.

References:

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/anwar-al-awlakis-boss-is-regular-white-house-visitor/

http://www.businessinsider.com/anwar-al-awlaki-may-have-bought-hijackers-pre-911-tickets-2013-1

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/al-qaeda/9781370/Radical-al-Qaeda-cleric-Anwar-al-Awlaki-purchased-plane-tickets-for-911-hijackers.html

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/afghanistan/121129/al-qaeda-cleric-anwar-al-awlaki-killed-drone-h

You can read more details about Anwar al-Awlaki here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Aulaqi  and here:  http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.4729/pub_detail.asp

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2012/11/us-revoked-anwar-alawlakis-passport-six-months-before-150521.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_Al-Hijrah

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/30/remarks-president-change-office-chairman-joint-chiefs-staff-ceremony

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1670089.stm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

I rarely agree with Code Pink, but here is one time:  They are writing Senator Feinstein to protest against the drone wars and secrecy:  http://codepink.salsalabs.com/o/424/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=7129

Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of The Patriot act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq.  by Susan Lindauer.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments