David Stockman re-blog

By David Stockman, Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Reagan:  … After all, is it not evident after two decades now of jihadist style terrorism—–whether quasi-organized, remotely-inspired or lone wolf executed—–that it is fostered by blowback from Washington’s imperial mayhem? And most especially the terrible 21st century military violence it has inflicted on the Moslem populations of the middle east?
The fact is, terrorism did not suddenly sprout up from the teachings of a 1300 year old religion, nor from a belated discovery in struggling middle eastern nations that they hate America’s freedom, prosperity and materialistic culture.
No, jihadist style terrorism came to America only after Washington trained and armed the Mujahedeen in the 1980s, waged unprovoked war in Arabia and Mesopotamia in the 1990s and fostered the anarchy of failed middle eastern states thereafter.
Indeed, once the neocons fully took power in the 2000 elections, Washington has mowed them down—–Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen——- with the alacrity of a jihadist gunman. Now all these failed states are breeding grounds of terrorism, but none of them trafficked in it until the beltway regime changers had their way with the assorted tyrannts and authoritarians who previously ruled these misfortunate lands.
There probably is no better symbol of that than the fact that in recent months Khadafy’s hometown of Sirte has become ISIS’ second capital; or that the so-called “government” Washington installed in Baghdad can’t even manage to hold Saddam’s hometown of Tikrit.
Nor is the Islamic State anything new under the sun or inherently more threatening to the US homeland than was al-Qaeda in its heyday. The only reason it can even posture as a “state” is owing to the endless gifts of Washington and its allies.
That is, the Islamic State managed to occupy a narrow, desolate strip of dusty, impoverished villages on the upper Euphrates in Syria, the desert expanse of Western Iraq, the war-shattered towns of Anbar province and Mosul by dint of seizing massive troves of the best weapons the Pentagon could leave behind after Washington “liberated” Iraq; and by augmenting them with even more lethal firepower seconded to ISIS by killed, captured, defecting and fleeing so-called “moderates” in Syria, who were supplied the latest and greatest US weapons by the CIA, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and various and sundry arms merchants and smugglers of the region.
Furthermore, the Islamic State’s brutal tyranny even in its backwater redoubts would not last more than a few months without the oil revenues that are smuggled in plain sight through NATO ally Turkey, and by all accounts with the intermediation of Erdogan’s own family trading company.
The notion that this crypto-state could actually sustain itself by taking ransoms, selling women into sex-slavery and levying internal tariffs on the virtually non-existent economic activity within its putative borders is pure Washington fiction. Seal the Turkish border, and ISIS’ days are numbered.
Moreover, Turkey does not possess the largest military organization in NATO with 500,000 men under arms, 1,000 aircraft and 3,000 tanks because it is incapable of sealing its border. Its border outside the Kurdish controlled northeast is an open air souk for the transit of oil, arms and recruits only because Washington and the West have greenlighted its campaign to overthrow the government of its Syrian neighbor.
If our well-intentioned but feckless President really wants to “eliminate” the Islamic State he only needs to make peace with Damascus; and then to tell Erdogan to scamper back north of his border and seal it off or face expulsion from NATO.
That would do more do extinguish ISIS than all the bombing sorties that have come back 75% loaded with their bombs undelivered to date; or that will be launched in the foreseeable future.
Washington could do three more things to further reduce the already marginal risk of lone wolf terrorism in the homeland. First, stop the bombing and get the US military presence out of Iraq and Syria entirely. No one wants us there—–not even our so-called allies.
For crying out loud, last week our clueless career warmonger who heads the DOD, Ashton Carter, said he was going to put a few more special forces on the ground in Iraq. Yet lickety-split, the Iraq militias said they would hunt them down, and the puppet prime minister Washington recently installed in Baghdad publicly and pointedly said “no thanks”.
And then over the weekend, that very same Baghdad government threatened to bring in Russian forces to help it expel uninvited Turkish-NATO troops from its territory outside of Mosul. To clarify, that would be the same Turkish government that is allied with the Kurdish regional authority in Erbil, but which is making war on the Kurdish militias of northern Syria that Washington claims to be the only effective force against ISIS on the ground.
Secondly, Washington could acknowledge that there is no coalition of the willing, anyway; its a gang of the unglued. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are in Syria not to defeat ISIS, but to score a sectarian and political victory against Assad and his Iranian-Shiite Crescent allies; and to secure gas pipeline rights that Assad and his Russian backers oppose.
Here’s the thing. There has never been a single Shiite attack—–organized or inspired—-on American soil. Jihadist terrorism is essentially a poison arising from the Wahhabi-Sunni world—–that is to say, Saudi Arabia.
The way to combat that particular curse is to get the Fifth Fleet out of the Persian Gulf. Indeed, it just so happens that the oil provinces along the Persian Gulf are inhabited by as many Shiite as Sunni.
So were the despicably corrupt, tyrannical and insatiably greedy rulers of the House of Saud to be forced to hightail it to Geneva in their 747s, their loathsome Wahhabi clerics would be sentenced to an Hobbesian life in the Arabian interior; they certainly would not be in a position to wax any longer on the drippings of Riyadh’s oil rents.
Finally, if Obama really wanted to make San Bernardino safer, he would get some gumption in his final 400 days, and tell the Washington War Party that its campaign against Assad and the so-called Shiite Crescent is over and done.
With the Turkish border sealed in the North, the alliance of Iran, Shiite Iraq, the Alawite government in Damascus, Hezbollah and their Russian ally would make short work of the medieval Sunni barbarians crouched along the Euphrates valley.
At the end of the day, the so-called Islamic State’s main recruiting arm is not its bloody perversion of Islam, but the bombing campaigns of the US Air Force; and the fighters it fields are retained not by religious zealotry, but by the payroll financed by oil receipts. Stop the bombing and the recruits would dry-up; cut off the oil revenue and its fighters would steadily vanish just as have all unpaid soldiers from time immemorial.
Obama’s Sunday night speech was mostly an attempt to placate the War Party and the rabid politicians who feast off from its lies and depredations. But he at least made an effort near the end to say what we can’t do.
He said Washington can’t put boots on the ground and the nation can not throw away its liberties in a fit of Islamophobia and hysteria about terrorism. Perhaps his Homeland Security Chief didn’t hear the speech or get the memo. Said Jeh Johnson,
“We have moved to an entirely new phase in the global terrorist threat and in our homeland security efforts.” Terrorists have “in effect outsourced attempts to attack our homeland……This requires a whole new approach, in my view.”
Why, yes it does. They way to lessen even the tiny threat of terrorism that now confronts the nation is to stop Washington’s imperial interventions and the blowback it so self-evidently fosters.
There is also one other thing that can be done. We might as well recognize that America is an armed camp; that this unfortunate condition does contribute to the fear of wanton terror and violence that pervades the land; and that the Second Amendment fetishism of the Right has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
At last count there were 300 million guns in private hands in the US—-114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, 86 million shotguns and some several millions of military-style assault weapons. This means that about 40% of all the known non-military guns in the world are in the hands of our 4% of the population.
No, this insanely huge arsenal is not about hunting—-there are probably not even that many ducks, pheasants, rabbits and deer in America. Nor does the mere fact of this arsenal give rise to the demented psychopaths, racists and whackos who are responsible for the non-jihadist terrorism and mass killings that recur in the nation. Sick people do that.
But there have been 400,000 gun deaths in America since 9/11. We have a culture of guns so endemic and an arsenal so immense that no conceivable further gun control laws could make any difference. Its a hopeless cause—-even if a 1787 notion of the right to bear arms is a relic of agrarian society.
At the same time, the anti-terrorism hysteria of right-wing politicians is truly misbegotten and dangerous. The threat that it poses to our constitutional liberties dwarfs into insignificance the Left’s ineffectual arm-waving at the Second Amendment.  [end quote]
Difference Between Us
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tolerating the intolerable

In my experience at least, most Democrats and most Europeans have been brainwashed to the point that they completely believe (i.e. they have no doubt) that: (1) multiculturalism is good, (2) moral relativism is good, (3) unlimited tolerance and political correctness are good, (4) more government is a good thing, (5) less religion is good, and (5) judgment by individuals is bad but judgment by the media and the courts is good.

I am not alone in my opinion. Even liberal philosophers like the late Allan Bloom agree. The minds of Americans (following the path of European socialism) have been closed by dis-education and dis-information. Literally, they are unable to accept concepts different from what they have been taught for so long. Higher education as an institution has failed them, though they would reject that idea. It is hardly possible for so-called liberal Democrats (and even less so with European socialists) to imagine profiling a group of people who openly state their intention to harm Americans and this country. Europe is probably beyond the point of return.

I would love to hear a counter argument.

Reference:  The Closing of The American Mind  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Closing_of_the_American_Mind

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ignore this at your peril

photosynthesis_equation1354260592094

The Obama administration and the UN want to control this, which means they want to control life itself. The meeting to negotiate and sign an agreement to this effect is happening right now in Paris, France.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The geostrategic question

Then there is the geostrategic question.
The world of 2015 is nothing like Truman’s world of 1952 or Reagan’s world of 1982. The adversary we confronted then, the Soviet Empire and Soviet Union, has not existed for a quarter century.
Why then does NATO, created to defend Western Europe against that adversary, still exist?
Why are we still committed to fight Russia not only to defend Germany, but Estonia and Erdogan’s Turkey, and if the neocons get their way, to be committed in perpetuity to fight Russia for Georgia, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Moldova, Ukraine, Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk?
If the history of the 20th century teaches anything, it is that war guarantees all too often lead to war.
But in this war against “radical Islamic terrorism,” who is the real ally: Erdogan, who has been aiding and abetting Islamic jihadists in Syria, or Putin, who has been bombing them?
~ Pat Buchanan
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Illegal aliens are changing elections

Illegal aliens are already changing U.S. elections and they are doing it without going to the polls.  Here is how it works.  This is important to understand and important to change. Pass it around.

http://sfppr.org/2015/11/how-illegal-immigrants-give-democrats-the-edge-in-close-elections/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Progressives?

“Conformity will be the only virtue and any man who refuses to conform will have to pay the penalty.” ~ U.S. President Woodrow Wilson,  Democrat, arch-Progressive, led America into the disastrous WWI, was against the right of women to vote until he was about to lose his re-election and then he was for it, reversed GOP-led gains for black people, and he signed into law and supported the creation of the Federal Reserve, which he later called his worst mistake. He intervened militarily in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Nicaragua, and supported the White Russians in the Russian Revolution, setting the stage for dictators of Batista, Trujillo, the Duvaliers, the Somozas, and the Soviet Union.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How Western Civilization Can Be Destroyed by Herbert London

“Civilizations die as a result of suicide, rather than murder.” ~ Arnold Toynbee

This is an excellent opinion piece by Herbert London.

http://www.aim.org/guest-column/how-western-civilization-can-be-destroyed/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email111915&utm_medium=email

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This migration crisis

“We” were not alone in causing this crisis. Politicians of all stripes and colors in all countries create crisis by profession. That is what they do. This particular crisis is not new either, having been underway since at least 1948. The western NATO countries and Muslim countries caused this particular crisis as much as did the U.S. That subject by itself is a whole book. But Middle Eastern leaders, Russian and Chinese political leaders were the teachers, the instructors. They have been forcing mass migrations of their people since history began, and most of those were very deadly to the migrants.

Here are a few examples of the beginning of the current crisis:

1). Emil Guri, secretary of the Supreme Arab Council (interview with the London “Daily Telegraph” in Beirut on September 6, 1948): “I do not want to blame anyone, I just want to help the refugees. The situation in which they found themselves – the direct result of the actions of the Arab countries who opposed the division and the creation of the Jewish state. The Arab states unanimously agreed to this policy, and they are required to participate in solving the problem. ”

2). Newspaper “Nasser” May 7, 1948: “Victory is assured, but to achieve it can be much easier and with fewer losses if the local Arab population frees the way. It will be back after the victorious Arab armies not only to their homes and property, but still get home and property of the conquered and murdered Jews. ”

3). Arab radio station in the Middle East, which broadcasts from Cyprus (April 3, 1949): “We must remember that the Arab Higher Council supports the withdrawal of the Arabs living in Jaffa, Haifa and Jerusalem.”

4). The newspaper “Akhbar Ol-Pum” (Cairo, 1963): “There comes a May 15 … The Mufti of Jerusalem called on the Arabs of Palestine to leave their country because the Arab armies were ready to invade and expand in the country large-scale hostilities.”

5). Newspaper “Falastyn” Jordan (October 19, 1949.): “The Arab states supported the Arabs in their decision to temporarily leave home, so as not to interfere with the invasion of Arab armies.”

am

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What did Abraham do?

Want to stop terrorism? Ron Paul had it right: get out of Muslim countries. Stop bombing. Stop installing dictators. Stop stealing. Stop intervening. Stop killing.

There is nothing there that we need. There is much to do here.

I would add to Ron’s list: stop selling or giving weapons to them, stop giving military training to them, and stop funding and implementing proxy and regime change wars.

All of the above is just common sense, selection and judgment and does not imply isolationism, the slur by neocons on the right and left.

What problem has been fixed by bombing the Middle East? What national interest has been served? Do you feel safer now after 15 years of bombing and killing in your name? We have more enemies now and they are better trained, armed and funded than in September 2001. Turkey, Egypt, Saudi, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, etc already have sufficient military power to eliminate ISIS. Our problem is they don’t really want to.

Remember that a U.S. Navy ship shot down an Iranian airliner full of innocent people. Get a grip on your reactions.

Americans need to retaliate by finally securing our borders, executing existing laws, bringing home and strengthening our military for our own defense, and profiling people who are already here. The latter task should not be limited to the government.

We fully expect to be attacked. They have been training for generations. When that happens, we will respond.

We must protect peaceful Muslim citizens in America. It is their burden to prove they are peaceful by turning in the radicals in their community. The radicals kill their fellow Muslims, the peaceful moderates among them, more than they kill us, to maintain fear, discipline and control within their community. We cannot reform their social system, culture and religion for them. If we don’t protect the truly peaceful ones and give them a safe place to reform, then there will be no reform and these 1400 year old problems will remain. We cannot protect peaceful Muslims unless we profile their community to find and remove the radicals among them. When this effort starts, know that the radicals will attack the safe places hard and prepare for that. The moderates must have confidence in us if they are to help us.

Some of the radicals are in high places in our government. Be prepared.

Perhaps the majority of Democrats and left wing libertarians will resist the need for profiling…until it is too late. Help them understand if they listen.

We learned from incarcerating Japanese-Americans in WWII. It is a very slippery slope. Wisdom is needed, not aggression. Parts of Muslim holy books call for jihad and violence. So do ours in places.

You cannot defeat an enemy who is morally certain unless you are morally certain. The U.S. is far from that today. How about you?

If you ask God for something, and especially if He grants it, then whatever you prayed for had better be good. He has a long history of wrath against evil doers, sometimes taking all of their blood line. You are really praying for a revelation of your forgotten mission here. Such good things are not new, but their time has come.

Abraham casts out Hagar and Ishamel

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Re-post: France’s answer to terrorism: The Law of Suspects

On April 5, 1793, decorated French military commander Charles Dumouriez caused a sensational panic in Paris when he fled the country and defected to Austria.

It had been nearly four years since French peasants stormed the Bastille, the event that historians generally regard as the start of the French Revolution.

And hardly a week had gone by since without some major crisis, emergency, or tragedy in France.

There were regular violent riots across the country– in Paris, other major cities, and even the rural countryside. Widespread massacres were commonplace.

And given that one of the key goals of France’s new revolutionary government was to eliminate Christianity from the nation, civil war between religious factions broke out as well.

To cap things off, France was under constant threat of foreign invasion.

Austria and Prussia were not only waging conventional war against France, but both nations had sent highly trained agents to infiltrate French borders to pursue violence and chaos from within.

It was exhausting. French people were living in perpetual fear, and the wanton death of innocents had become an unfortunately normal part of life.

So when it was found that Dumouriez (a French citizen) had defected to the enemy, people hit their breaking points. Enough was enough. And they cried out to the government to save them.

The government listened.

The very next day, on April 6, 1793, the new French government established the Committee of Public Safety (though it was originally known as the Danton Committee).

The Committee was given broad, emergency powers since it was a time of such crisis.

And under the leadership Maximilien Robespierre, the French people got their protection.

Robespierre passed the ‘Law of Suspects’, allowing the government to essentially imprison anyone they wanted for any reason.

It was impossible to tell friend from foe back then; you never knew if someone was a loyalist, or a Christian, or an Austrian spy, or any number of counter-revolutionaries.

So people were required to carry special certificates indicating that they were good and dutiful citizens. Those without would be imprisoned, and potentially executed.

The University of Chicago estimates that nearly 30,000 either died in prison or were executed as a result of this law.

Then there was the Law of the Maximum, which attempted to stabilize an ongoing financial crisis by fixing the prices of goods and services in the country. The law also imposed the death penalty on those who did not follow the rules.

They also passed the Law of 22 Prairial, which awarded the Committee even more power to arrest, try, and execute anyone deemed to be suspicious or disloyal.

The law also prevented anyone accused of a crime from being able to call witnesses or have defense counsel.

Plus it required that ALL citizens report potentially suspicious or disloyal neighbors to the Committee. If you see something, say something.

As you are likely well aware, this period in French history became known as the Reign of Terror, or often simply ‘the Terror’.

Coincidentally, this is where the first modern use of the word ‘terrorist’ is found.

Except that it wasn’t used to describe the counter-revolutionaries. Or the rebels. Or the foreign agents.

It turns out that “terrorist” was originally a term used to describe the government officials who created and executed these oppressive tactics under the guise of keeping people safe from their enemies.

Governments have a dangerous tendency to never let a serious crisis go to waste.

The US government spent trillions of taxpayer dollars to fight a War on Terror that made the world less safe and Americans less free, all to protect them from a threat that has a statistical likelihood of 0.0%.

(You’re far more likely to be shot by a police officer than to ever even see a terrorist.)

Yes, the desire for revenge runs deep. And that’s understandable.

But the greatest thing to fear is not men in caves. It is the consequent loss of freedom and the never-ending cycle of costly, destructive war.

Until tomorrow,

Simon Black, in Chile
Founder, Sovereign Man

www.sovereignman.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment