Replacing objective morality with subjective morality

Read the original is here on her substack: https://substack.com/@jessicar/p-148031470

A trick of the cabalists

Jessica Rose

Aug 23, 2024

Right to the chase: I have been thinking about this a lot and where once I might have claimed that there was no such thing as subjective morality, I think now a better way to look at it is like this: subjective morality exists, but it is something that should be invoked under specific (perhaps even rare) circumstances.

What is subjective morality, objective morality and morality in general (definitions based on my thoughts and observations)

Morality to me is actually knowing that there is a difference between right and wrong. To act in a moral way, is to act in the “right way”, which embodies a decision to “do the right thing”. In my opinion, every single human being knows the difference between right and wrong. It’s a heart thing. Logic is more a brain thing. We can argue about what is right, and what is wrong, but I don’t want to now.

Subjective morality is thinking that what is right for you may not be right for others or vice versa. Subjective reality might be applicable according to age and circumstances. An example of this could be a child being raped, getting pregnant and wanting not to have the baby. Terminating the pregnancy might be considered to be subjectively good for this little girl, even though objectively, it might not be considered to be so. This particular morbid example of something we must all think about (because this is happening all the time) is a good example of when subjective morality can over-ride objective morality for the benefit of the community of all. Just so that you know, I think child rapists should be castrated. This would be objectively good because they wouldn’t be able to rape children anymore.

Objective morality is the big gun morality of us humans. It refers to the good and bad that certainly applies universally – the governing dynamics of humans. We all know (or perhaps feel is a better word) that some things are good, and that some things are bad. For example, hurting animals with the intention to inflict pain and suffering is bad. Objectively, it hurts the whole and breeds unnecessary conflict, chaos and pain. Making another person laugh is good. Objectively, the ripple effect of a laughing human would be beneficial for the mood of all, at least locally. But what about our little girl who was force-impregnated who does not want to be a mother yet? What is good for her? What is bad for her?

To illustrate the deployment and the nature of the balance of these moralities in decision-making, we can use the morbid example from above. Again, a person may believe that terminating pregnancies (objective morality) is bad, but this same person might also believe that in the case of this little girl, the objective morality thing doesn’t cut it, and that perhaps there must be a subjective morality invoked and deployed in her case. In other words, what is generally the right thing to do is not the right thing to do in this specific case and under these specific circumstances (age, force). This is the invocation of subjective morality; not really in lieu of objective morality, but a balancing of both.

After quite a bit of thinking about this, I have decided that both must co-exist, but that subjective morality must only be invoked in specific circumstances wherein violations of objective morality dwell and ultimately, the integrity of objective morality is maintained.

This is where it gets interesting on the subject matter of the cabalists. I call them this – rather than globalists (in this article) – because I believe that the globalists are just an off-shoot of a much older, darker, sect of human cults.1 Everyone should watch the following, by the way. Thank you to Matthew Ehret and Del Bigtree for one of the most interesting conversations I have listened to in years.

It seems to me from my own considerably shallow investigations into the history of these ‘underground’ culty people that they share a characteristic that is seated in hubris, narcissism and most importantly, ego. From what I understand, there is a separation of God as an ‘outside’ entity, and God as some kind of manifestation of man. Sort of like the idea that God made us versus we made/are God. I might be wrong about that. But it makes sense to me. If ideologies from a long time ago were passed on through the ages in the men and women who took ‘an interest’ in these cults, then who’s to say this isn’t exactly what we’re being put through now? Who else here thinks this is the ‘culmination’ of another cycle of “God purging” going on right now?

The reason I brought up the difference between – and balance of – subjective and objective moralities is because I believe that in order to be the type of person who thinks that there is no objective God (like many cultists), they must also believe that subjective morality far outweighs any notion of objective morality. A ruler, for example, rife with hedonistic, war-mongering ideals, would likely be characterized as being very egotistical, self-important and truly believe in the idea that they are subjectively right about everything, including what’s right for you according to them. How else would they believe they had the right to command others?

Side note: I would argue that a true leader would be far less egotistical and be found on the objective morality side of the scale in a far more pronounced way. In other words, in order to be the type of person who might succeed at leading others in a productive and sustainable way, one should suspend the ego. One should be able to acknowledge the existence of both subjective and objective moralities, but place far more importance on the latter, and again, invoke the former upon careful and specific examination.

What I think the cabalists do, and have been doing for a very long time, is abuse and abscond the balance between these moralities with the intention of confusing people when in a weakened state to adopt the belief that only subjective morality – not only matters – but exists.

Think: ENTITLEMENT/woke/DEI

THM: Do not succumb to the tricks of the cabalists. They will try to convince you – once in a weakened state of their making – that you are entitled to your own version of right, AT ALL TIMES.

Think about the entirely outlandish and in some cases, revolting, bullshit that we are subjected to every day, whether we want to tolerate it or not. Remember how they abused the notion of “do the right thing for everyone” by brainwashing us into believing that letting our loved ones die alone and in horrific mental and physical pain was best for them and us? This is literally the invocation – on a global scale – of what I believe is a plan to confuse people to the point of not living by an objective morality. This might be why a whole lot of Christians are having big ass problems with all the garbage being tossed at us by the truck load every day by the cabalists. It’s on the TV, it’s in the media, it’s on the Olympic stage, it’s everywhere. And why are so many churches, including Notre Dame in Paris, being burned?

Think about it. If the goal of the old-age cultists was to destroy objective morality because they themselves didn’t believe in it, how would that manifest today?

Hold tight to your sovereign, unique and creative self by living by an objective morality balanced by a subjective one, and don’t fall for the cabalist tricks to divide and confuse. Stay grounded in a solid and binding unspoken ‘code’ that serves us all.

All in all, good stuff is better than bad stuff. Knowing is easy. Look to your heart. And use your brain.

I asked Venice.ai to generate an image using the keywords “destruction of objective morality cultists”. I think it’s good that this AI sees cults this way.

1

A cabal is a group of people who are united in some close design, usually to promote their private views or interests in an ideology, a state, or another community, often by intrigue and usually without the knowledge of those who are outside their group.

Top Kamala Surrogate Denigrates Bill of Rights, Calls Transformational Document ‘A Little Piece of Paper’

by Margaret Flavin Aug. 27, 2024 12:40 pm at Gateway Pundit 695 Comments

Read original here

Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), spoke at a kickoff event for the Democratic National Convention last week and denigrated the Bill of Rights, calling it ” a little piece of paper.”

The Human Rights Campaign is America’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer civil rights organization.

Robinson said during the DNC LGBTQ+ Kickoff event that the U.S. needs to rethink “freedom” in a more “revolutionary” way than when the Founding Fathers created a “little piece of paper.”

Robinson even suggested that “we can’t just worry about protecting democracy at this moment” but should  “reimagine it with people that look and love like us at the center.”

“And I think for us right now, it’s about reimagining freedom and this American story in a way that is more revolutionary than what our founders actually put down on that little piece of paper, but instead is the type of democracy that’s by and for all of the people of this country,” she said.

That “little piece of paper” affirms that all men are created equal and our rights are inalienable.  What exactly is Robinson suggesting needs to be ‘reimagined’ here?

Watch:

Human rights campaign @HRC president says quiet part out loud:

“We can’t just worry about protecting democracy… we have to reimagine it”

“More revolutionary than what our founders put down on that little piece of paper”

Little piece of paper??

You mean the Constitution? pic.twitter.com/kV8ooIqMza

— Outspoken (@GetOutspokenUSA) August 26, 2024

HRC, which has endorsed Kamala Harris, has lost some of its sway in recent weeks as several major corporations have publicly distanced themselves from its woke efforts to strong-arm companies into “mandated activism.”

Listen to @ConceptualJames explain how @HRC enforces the Corporate Equality Index (CEI), or as he describes it, mandated activism.

I used to go to Tractor Supply all the time for horse feed, farm supplies, etc. Not anymore. Co-op it is https://t.co/WtWdJcdtfo pic.twitter.com/c21JH6RhQS

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) June 21, 2024

HRC was exposed in 2023 as the forefront of the leftist LGBTQ mafia in utilizing a social credit score to force companies to advance their poisonous agenda.

HRC publicly threatens organizations every year by sending a list of demands over what they want to be displayed in public, or corporations will face a price.

Corporate Equality Index (CEI) is a corporate social credit score that rewards or punishes companies based on the number of woke issues they are forcing on their workforce and customers.

Their CEI scores are tied to their financial futures as the global financial network that includes Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, and others use the CEI index as a means to determine investment.

Robby Starbuck reports that Lowe’s recently announced they are ending their participation in the HRC’s woke Corporate Equality Index social credit system.

Big news: I messaged @Lowes executives last week to let them know that I planned to expose their woke policies. This morning I woke up to an email where they preemptively made big changes.

Here are the changes:

• Ending participation in the @HRC’s woke Corporate Equality Index… pic.twitter.com/qOUr2JLGV7

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) August 26, 2024

Starbuck also reports that corporate policies at Tractor Supply, John Deere, Harley Davidson, Polaris, and Indian Motorcycle have also ended their participation.

Her show Ep. 89 is one for the history books. Get to know her on Rumble at Jewels Jones Live

Alternative site:

https://jewelsjoneslive.com/portfolio-item/dnc-sewage-show-a-political-rendezvous-ep-89/

Tammy Bruce

@HeyTammyBruce

An open letter to Kerry Kennedy: You people are awful. Despite your family’s checkered past and horrible behavior of so many of the men, Americans have stood with you out of loyalty, sentimentality, and too often, grief. Despite the questionable establishment of your family’s wealth, the treatment of Marilyn Monroe, the general womanizing, the abandonment of Mary Jo Kopechne to her death, allegations of rape, one could go on and on, but the point is your family has stayed loyal and protective of family members who have done the most appalling of things. But the moment one of your own acts on his conscience for this country you attempt to throw him to the wolves and publicly condemn him. Never a word for the trail of abused or abandoned women left behind by a Kennedy, but because one of your men supports Trump in an effort to make the lives of Americans better, that alone is beyond the pale. In your ugly treatment of your brother you reveal the rot that has broken the hearts of the American people so many times over the years. Beyond that, the economic destruction of American families is something your family would never truly understand. You are not touched by the worry about having enough gas to get to work, or whether or not you can afford eggs this week, if you’ll be safe walking your own neighborhood, or if your child will be safe in their urban public school or even if they will know how to read and write while collecting their diploma. You keep doing civil rights work and public service virtue signaling. But in the meantime, make a pledge to not keep doing damage as Americans are simply looking for a way to reclaim their own futures, the safety of their families, and knowing that maybe, just maybe, they can leave their children a little better off w a future they can rely on. The condition of this country should shock everyone, even if their name is Kennedy. We know it at least shocks one of you who, like us, has had enough of the fear and hopelessness assigned to us for generations. Americans are happy to see Bobby on our side as we refuse to comply and will not go gentle into the catastrophes to which we are expected to succumb. Instead, with Trump and all who join us, we will fight, fight, fight!

Quote

Kerry Kennedy

@KerryKennedyRFK

Aug 23

I am sharing a personal statement that my family and I have made in response to my brother’s announcement.

6:41 AM · Aug 24, 2024

2.2M Views

“I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.” ~ Frank Herbert, Author of the Dune novels

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself” ~ U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, his first inaugural address after election by a nation in panic.

Dr Reiner Fuellmich, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Joseph Molitorisz, and Meredith Miller in conference.  

In this episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich analyzes the modus operandi of all responsible governments worldwide and in strange synchronicity of the beginning of the so-called Corona Pandemic with Meredith Miller, holistic coach, author and Dr. Mike Yeadon, scientist and former vice president of Pfizer and Joseph Molitorisz, philosopher.

They shed light on the psychological and inhumane methods used to panic, confuse and, with the help of the media, prevent the entire world population from using common sense to make a reality check. The viciousness of those in charge is evident not only in their own behavior during the pandemic, as they obviously had no qualms or fears about shamelessly breaking all the established rules of social distancing for their population themselves, but also in how they pretended to provide medical care for people supposedly infected with covid, leading to death for very many.

How to protect yourself from such psychological tricks and methods? Meredith Miller is terrific on this!

Because the fear and panic-inducing narratives are not breaking even currently. Why, even after three years, people cannot let go of their fear of a virus, although there is so much information on the table that it is a matter of lies and deceptions? How will this greatest crime against humanity be dealt with and how and by whom can those responsible be held legally accountable? The most important thing in such situations is to remain calm and level-headed. Fear is the greatest enemy mankind has.

The covid plandemic was an orchestrated, global campaign of fear. And in 2024 the evil people are back at it again. 

“Fear is the mind killer,” as the Bene Gesserit sisterhood teach throughout 20 novels in the Dune series of novels by Frank Herbert, Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson. This notion suggests that fear has a profound and destructive influence on one’s mental state. When faced with fear, the mind is consumed by it, leading to:

• Total obliteration: Fear can overwhelm and annihilate one’s mental clarity, rendering it impossible to think clearly or make rational decisions.
• Little-death: Fear’s presence is likened to a small death, implying that it can bring about a sense of emotional and psychological demise.
• Permitting fear to pass: Instead of resisting or suppressing fear, Herbert’s concept encourages acknowledging and permitting it to pass through, allowing one to:
  • Face fear: Confront and accept fear, rather than avoiding or denying it.
  • Turn the inner eye: Reflect on the path of fear, gaining insight into its nature and impact.
  • Where fear has gone, there will be nothing: Ultimately, fear’s presence will dissipate, leaving behind a cleared mental space.

This concept emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and facing fear, rather than allowing it to dominate and destroy one’s mental faculties. By permitting fear to pass and reflecting on its path, individuals can potentially break free from its debilitating effects.

The Dune series is considered by many to be the best selling science fiction novel in history. The first book in the series was rejected by at least 20 mainstream publishers before its eventual publication by Chilton, an auto-manual company, in 1965.

What is “stakeholder capitalism”?

In 2020, G20 governments, in collusion with the World Economic Forum’s Stakeholders, discretely and undemocratically enacted a global ten-year transition to an authoritarian political system, called Stakeholder Capitalism.

After propagating a Marxist idea that black and trans people are oppressed and indoctrinating us to fear climate change, the Stakeholders are mandating their pre-planned political system, which Klaus Schwab alleges is better for ‘people and planet’.

Will we push back before A.I. takes our jobs, our wealth shifts to the Stakeholders and we become vulnerable to tyranny? Join tech entrepreneur, Richard Jeffs, as he investigates The Great Reset transition to Stakeholder Capitalism. His 53 minute video is viewable online here: https://yellow.forum/t/the-new-normal-film-2020-dir-richard-jeffs/43

Our governments have enacted a new political system, and most of us are blissfully unaware. It’s called Stakeholder Capitalism, and I’ve just spent sixteen months producing an independent series of feature films that investigative it. Stakeholder Capitalism is the birthchild of the World Economic Forum’s executive chairman, Klaus Schwab. Founded in 1971, Schwab launched the World Economic Forum (WEF) to globally enact “the Stakeholder concept”.

CO2 in air measures approximately 420 molecules per million molecules of air (ppm) or 0.0420% of air, making CO2 a trace gas in air. That CO2 gas is existentially necessary for life on earth. All green plants grow and survive by absorbing CO2 for photosynthesis from the air or water. The human contribution to that total net CO2 amount due to fossil fuels and all other human sources is estimated to be about 5% or less of the total net CO2 but unmeasurably small against the large variability in ~420 ppm background. CO2 gas does not accumulate in air. Increases in CO2 in air cause an offsetting equal increase in solubility of CO2 in water everywhere until the equilibrium is restored for the local surface temperature. Similarly, any reductions in CO2 by sequestration etc result in less CO2 solubility in water everywhere, resulting in CO2 emission from water to air exceeding CO2 absorptions into water until the equilibrium is restored for the local surface temperature. There is a short time lag (i.e., difference) between the rate of emission and the rate of absorption due to the large difference in densities of air and water.

Given the following statement from UN IPCC, it is illogical, unreasonable, malfeasant and/or misfeasant for governments, representatives, bureaucrats, UN IPCC, corporations, NGO’s, academia, etc to pursue reduction of gas CO2 in air such as the extremely expensive “net zero” plans. They rely on an assumed consensus without doing diligence required by their positions. Advocacy without due diligence is either malfeasant, misfeasant or both. In some cases, probably there is fraud. As far as I am aware, in such cases there is no statute of limitations.

The IPCC in its third report (2001) conceded: “In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible. UN IPCC (Chapter 14, Section 14.2.2.2. )]”

Since “long term prediction of future climate states is not possible,” then how is not misfeasant or malfeasant to be spending billions of dollars per year to reduce CO2? And asking citizens to spend trillions of dollars per year out to 2050 in the future? “Net Zero” appears to be financially wrong and existentially dangerous to all life.

Massive class action cases are ahead. If there is justice, damages to the eventual plaintiff groups are already in the billions of dollars. Fraud is probable, which usually means payments for damages are tripled. But all of that money means nothing if geoengineering clouds and climate for net zero kills plant life.

Definition:

A ‘malfeasant’ is an individual who commits malfeasance. Malfeasance refers to the commission of an unlawful act or the performance of a lawful act in an unlawful manner, often by a public official. It’s a term used to describe the misuse of a public position for personal gain or other nefarious purposes.

‘Misfeasance’ is a legal term referring to the improper performance of a lawful action. It’s the act of doing something that is legally permissible but doing it in a wrong or improper manner, which may result in harm or damage. Unlike malfeasance, misfeasance doesn’t involve doing something unlawful; it’s more about the incorrect way in which a lawful action is carried out.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4351026/user-clip-clinton-1995-immigration-sotu

Bill Clinton

Transcript by C-SPAN

“All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That’s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.” – U.S. President Bill Clinton, 1995 State of the Union address to U.S. Congress

Video license bought from CSPAN.

This is a 1.5 hour documentary

Your feedback, comments, and questions on my site are most welcome on my site.

If this YouTube link is removed, please let me know. I have the video.