(1) https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/04/green-brownshirts-strike-at-michael-moore.php
(2) https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/04/michael-moore-heresy-watch-cont.php
(1) https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/04/green-brownshirts-strike-at-michael-moore.php
(2) https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/04/michael-moore-heresy-watch-cont.php
“New research compares what has been observed to what is forecast and finds that warming in this century will be modest—near the lowest extreme of the prospective range given by the United Nations. The previous administration justified its policy choices by calculating the Social Cost of Carbon [dioxide]. We interfaced their model with climate forecasts consistent with the observed history and enhanced the “fertilization” effect of increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2. We find that making the warming and the vegetation response more consistent with real-world observations yields a negative cost under almost all modeled circumstances.”
“This constellation of unreliable models, poor scientific practice, and exaggerated estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon argue consistently and cogently for the EPA to reopen and then vacate its endangerment finding from carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.”
The Scientific Case for Vacating the EPA’s Carbon Dioxide Endangerment Finding. The Hazard of Unreliable Models Guiding Policy. By Patrick J. Michaels and Kevin D. Dayaratna.
Quote above from page 1 of the pdf available at this link.

The UN, Bill Gates, John Holdren, English royals, NGOs, academics, documentary producer Michael Moore, The Club of Rome, etc claim the earth is overpopulated. They are lying and they know it. They are pushing a eugenics ideology, but they don’t use that word because it is associated with Hitler, Nazis, Margaret Sanger, sterilizations, abortions, etc.
The ideology has been around for millennia but was popularized broadly by Robert Thomas Malthus in the late 1700s and the “population bomb” in the 1960s. They theorized exponential population growth and arithmetic food supply growth, neither of which is true, and population growing fast but finite resources to support them, which is also another false dilemma.
Eugenics adds a hubristic claim, a moral imperative, derived from Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, not coincidentally also in the late 1700s. Kant’s impeccable didactic, dialectic logic drives eugenicists like Margaret Sanger, Hitler, Woodrow Wilson, and many others to a conclusion, an imperative noblesse oblige, to perfect (or fix) humanity by any means necessary. It is an ideology to increase power and wealth for the global oligarchy.
“The global population growth rate peaked long ago. The chart shows that global population growth reached a peak in 1962 and 1963 with an annual growth rate of 2.2%; but since then, world population growth has halved.”
“For the last half-century we have lived in a world in which the population growth rate has been declining. The UN projects that this decline will continue in the coming decades.”
“A common question we’re asked is: is the global population growing exponentially? The answer is no. For population growth to be exponential, the growth rate would have be the same over time (e.g. 2% growth every year). In absolute terms, this would result in an exponential increase in the number of people. That’s because we’d be multiplying an ever-larger number of people by the same 2%. 2% of the population this year would be larger than 2% last year, and so on; this means the population would grow exponentially.”
“But, as we see in this chart, since the 1960s the growth rate has been falling.” …
https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#how-has-world-population-growth-changed-over-time
The evidence says: NO. Firmly NO.
Gasoline and jetfuel use have dropped off vertically during this China corona virus lockdown, and so have their prices, leading crashes in stock markets. But the generally accepted standard lab at Mauna Loa, which for many decades has been measuring net global CO2 atmospheric concentration, shows CO2 concentration is still increasing.
The UN IPCC and other organizations claim that human CO2 emissions, primarily from burning fossil fuels, are the largest contributor to the ongoing and increasing trend in global atmospheric CO2 concentration. But fossil fuel use is down 50% or more and CO2 is still increasing? How can this be?
This is very strong evidence that CO2 emissions from humans are insignificant, with trivial effect on atmospheric CO2 concentration and therefore insignificant to global warming and climate change. This is not the only instance. Professors Murry Salby and Jamal Munshi and others have previously demonstrated that the human contribution to the global net atmospheric concentration is too small to measure, and therefore human-produced CO2 cannot be significantly affecting global warming or climate. Those papers and references can be found on this blog.
Human-caused (anthropogenic) global warming by carbon emissions from use of fossil fuels is a gigantic fraud, far larger than the Enron fraud that sent Bernie Madoff to jail. Eventually, the climate fraudsters will also see justice.



Reference for graphs: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/?fbclid=IwAR2DJlIKsQppKyQOErX0v9m_0ROgshG6CBzHfHBbi1TJP-luTjpyRV3Jrq4
This gallery contains 9 photos.
Originally posted on Thongchai Thailand:
? ? FIGURE 1: CUMULATIVE UFO SIGHTINGS AND CUMULATIVE GLOBAL WARMING ? FIGURE 2: TCRU: TRANSIENT CLIMATE RESPONSE TO CUMULATIVE UFO SIGHTINGS ? FIGURE 3: TCRU VALUES BY CALENDAR MONTH ? ? FIGURE 4: TCRU…
This gallery contains 14 photos.
Originally posted on Thongchai Thailand:
? RELATED POST [STATISTICS ISSUES IN CLIMATE SCIENCE] [HOME PAGE OF THIS SITE] ? ? FIGURE 1A: RCP8.5 WITH TIME SCALE = 10 YEARS ? FIGURE 1B: HADCRUT4 WITH TIME SCALE = 10 YEARS ?…
This gallery contains 2 photos.
Originally posted on Thongchai Thailand:
? FIGURE 1: PROPORTIONALITY OF CUMULATIVE WARMING TO CUMULATIVE EMISSIONS ? FIGURE 2: CUMULATIVE VALUES OF SIGN CONSTRAINED RANDOM NUMBERS The end of education as we know it. ? FIGURE 3: UNCONSTRAINED CUMULATIVE VALUES OF…
The growth rate of deaths from coronavirus in the U.S. is flattening. I have been posting weekly US death rates. We can now officially put to rest comparisons of death rates due to COVID-19 versus influenza versus heart disease, etc. Coronavirus is killing more Americans than the flu, heart disease or any other disease and the corona death rate is still growing. But, the rate of growth is slowing.

On an average week in April, 12,626 people die of heart disease in America, which has been the leading cause of death in America. As of today, 15,031 people died of coronavirus in America in the last 7 days. Coronavirus is increasing the overall death rate from all causes and the rate is still increasing, but the rate of growth of the rate (the 2nd derivative) is slowing. On April 3, the 7 day weekly growth rate versus the previous week was 620%, compared to the 40% growth rate this week versus last week.
Here are 2 pieces of evidence that lockdowns work or save lives. It was/is overly draconian and unconstitutional in implementation and indeed could have been done otherwise and better by trusting citizens, but it does work.
(1) This disease, unlike the recent epidemics, has a high percentage of human-to-human airborne transmission from patients with no symptoms. That is especially dangerous. It could be thought of as the silent killer. Some older people with no other causes have died in one day. New York City is a perfect example of the disaster that results from that. About half (21,291/52,185) of the corona virus deaths in the U.S. have been in New York, almost all in New York City. Reasonable people should ask, the state and the city that should have reacted first and firmly, were very slow. Why? New Jersey is in second place with 5,617 deaths, only one fourth as many as New York.
(2) Vietnam is an example of lockdown isolation and quarantine working very well. There have been no deaths and only a few hundred coronavirus cases in a country of 97 million with a porous border with China. Vietnam’s severe lockdown and quaratine was probably more severe than could be accomplished in western countries, but nevertheless, the evidence is instructive. Vietnam has been very severe in isolating infected individuals and families and tracking backwards to determine the origin of the case.
A preliminary scientific publication reports that the coronavirus has already mutated at least 30 times. A high rate of mutation complicates the use of any potential vaccine. Typically flu mutates 8 to 10 times faster than corona, which means in many cases flu vaccines are ineffective before they are available, and it comes back every year; essentially the vaccine was developed for a virus that has been out-competed by a new set of mutations. Keep a close watch on the rate of mutation of this corona virus.
You must be logged in to post a comment.