budbromley

You may have heard or read this phrase.

It has been around.

The meaning is you will not be told the rights and freedoms you are losing.

They will do everything in their power – everything – to prevent your knowledge of the planned loss of your freedom.

You will bend the knee and kiss their ring. Or, you will die.

Victim. That is YOU, unless you resist.

I am not an “anti-vaxer” and I don’t believe Kennedy is, nor are the people in this conference. We object to vaccines which have not been properly tested AND / OR the full scientific results of those tests are not available to the public AND / OR any denial of the ability of individuals and especially parents to decide whether or not to be vaccinated or have their children vaccinated.

I have had a long and mutually beneficial, professional and scientific relationship with thousands of executives and scientists in the worldwide pharmaceutical business. Unlike Kennedy, I am not cynical about the people I know in the pharmaceutical business. They are making corporate business decisions, not political calculations for world domination as Kennedy implies.

There are complex, contentious and unresolved issues regarding vaccine research and development which Kennedy neglects to mention. For example, there is a huge, contentious conflict between the safety issue in the administration of a tested and approved vaccine to patients versus the safety issue in testing human patients in clinical trials during the normal R&D phases of the vaccine; sufficient sample size is needed for statistical power to enable prediction of safety and efficacy. On the other hand, government wants expediency and control, and therefore made a deal with vaccine developers which exempts them from liability, in the process creating a taxpayer-funded multi-million dollar account to pay people who are harmed by vaccines. Kennedy knows how government works much better than he knows the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical and diagnostic people I know and have known for many decades are conscientiously working to improve health and they understand the fundamental economics requiring profitability if R&D is to be funded.

Similar to Kennedy’s positions, Michael Moore’s flip-flopped position, and for example Michael Shellenberger’s recent about-faced position on the global warming / climate change fraud, they only present half of the real story which ultimately leads to blaming and demagogue against the wrong parties. One clue for all three of these guys is the current leadership at the UN and WHO want a 10% tax on global GDP (about $8.7 Trillion) to fight the pandemic, but they say funds will only be distributed to supporters of the green climate change agenda.

Nevertheless, there is value in Kennedy’s effort here. Ultimately, recognition of a half-truth is better than no truth at all.

Here is the MP4 video file in case the YouTube is censored.

U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi tipped her hand when she asked Joe Biden to not concede the election to Trump.  The election is still two months ahead. The article in Foreign Policy magazine confirms the new Democrat strategy to steal the 2020 election.  If GOP does not win control of the U.S. House and the U.S. Presidency by commanding margins, then the American republic will be over and the world will go down in flames. 

Foreign Policy magazine is the mouth piece for the heart of the globalist cabal, which is the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) and its subunit the Trilateral Commission.  These were the nefarious creations of David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski.  You may not know that the CFR is made up of less than 50% Americans , yet it has significantly influenced most U.S. presidential elections, most cabinet level and senior positions in the Executive Branch, and many U.S. House and Senate elections, not to mention non-U.S. positions. 

In the 2016 presidential debates, Hillary made a similar Freudian slip when she asked candidate Trump (and main stream media parroted) whether he would accept the results of the 2016 election.  As we now know for fact, in Hillary’s twisted, criminal mind, she knew her campaign, Dems and deep state were already acting on an “insurance policy” as early as May, 2016 which was intended to remove President Trump if he won the 2016 election.  Their criminal “insurance policy” (the Russian collusion story and impeachment) failed badly, as we all know, but mainstream media has predictably failed to cover the story.  

Now, the Dem back up plan “B” to remove Trump is also failing badly.  Even The New York Times published an article recognizing that the covid-19 panic is a scam.  Support for BLM’s violent insurrection is dropping like a rock.  Dems have moved to plan “C” for Congress.

They are going to delay the count on as many local elections as possible beyond January 20, 2021 so that the official (and usually perfunctory) tally of the votes for Congress and the presidency is done by the sitting House of Representatives (that is, Pelosi’s House), before new members are seated, and thereby Pelosi’s House selects the next President of the United States.   

President Trump must win the Electoral College and Republicans must take control of the House by commanding leads in these 2020 elections, if not, then our republic will be like the several violent, burned out and destroyed cities which are run by Democrats today, regressed to a third world tyranny like Venezuela.  They want us all to be victims begging for government to save them, and willing to hand over freedom in return.

The Foreign Policy article is here: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/25/the-obscure-constitutional-loophole-that-2020-is-blowing-wide-open/

“Exclusive: Dem group warns of apparent Trump Election Day landslide.” https://www.axios.com/bloomberg-group-trump-election-night-scenarios-a554e8f5-9702-437e-ae75-d2be478d42bb.html

Indur Goklany has a paper being published in Conservation Biology, the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, titled: “Reduction in global habitat loss from fossil‐fuel‐dependent increases in cropland productivity.” It focuses on habitat lost to agricultural uses, which is generally considered to be the major cause for global biodiversity loss. Currently, about 35 to 40% of global land area is in agricultural uses.

The paper demonstrates that: [from Goklany]

• Over 60% of “global food production is due to increased agricultural productivity from fossil-fuel-dependent technologies.

• Absent fossil fuels, at least another 20% of global land area would have to be converted to cropland to maintain global food production, further threatening global biodiversity.

• This exceeds the total amount of land currently set aside globally for conservation in one form or another (15%), which some have called the world’s greatest conservation success story (or words to that effect).

• Global food supplies would also drop, at least temporarily, to levels about a quarter below those experienced by the Chinese people during their last Great Famine of 1959-61. Food prices would skyrocket to balance supply and demand.”

Those who are anxious to ban the use of fossil fuels probably never considered its positive effects on agriculture. Further, calculating the “social cost of carbon” is foolish without estimating the positive impacts of CO2 on agriculture productivity and the use of fossil fuels in reducing acreages needed for planting.

________________________________________

The text above is an extract quoted from this past Sunday’s edition of TWTW, a weekly e-newsletter written by Ken Haapala, President of Science and Environment Policy Project (SEPP.org)

Indur Goklany’s paper is here: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cobi.13611

TWTW is here: http://www.sepp.org/twtwfiles/2020/TWTW%208-29-20.pdf

Indur M. Goklany, PhD short biography is here: http://goklany.org/

“In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be falsifiable: and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak about reality.” – Karl Popper

Hat tip to Ken Haapala, President at SEPP.org

Summary and conclusions from 3 science papers. If you are able to turn off the climate change gaslight, you will learn.

Posted by: chaamjamal on: September 1, 2020

“We observed …that patients treated with hydroxychloroquine had a 30% lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to those not receiving this treatment. Our data were subjected to extremely rigorous statistical analysis, taking into account all the variables and possible confounding factors that could come into play. The drug efficacy was evaluated in various subgroups of patients. The positive results of hydroxychloroquine treatment remained unchanged, especially in those patients showing a more evident inflammatory state at the moment of admission to hospital.”

Published in European Journal of Internal Medicine.

3,451 patients in 33 hospitals.

https://scitechdaily.com/risk-of-death-is-30-lower-for-covid-19-patients-treated-with-hydroxychloroquine/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

#medicine #healthcare #coranavirus #covid19data #sarscov2 #covid

“What can we do to stop this voluntary suicide of western civilization?”