budbromley

Dominion Voting worker states she saw batches of same ballots being re-processed repeatedly, a stack of 50 ballots became 800 or 900, and she never saw a single Trump vote though she was working at polling place for 24 hours on Nov 3 to Nov 4. Her job was to assist with failures of scanning batches of ballots. She saw this re-processing happening the entire time she was there. She was one of 4 Dominion employees on site.

She reported the issue to her Dominion manager as a “huge issue.” Her manager “Nick” said he “doesn’t want to hear it.”

https://79days.news/watch?id=5fbc5f49227d214bb5c34fd6

Please note that James E. “Trey” Trainor III, Chief Electoral Officer, head of the U.S. Federal Election Commission, a U.S. government agency, says the 2020 election is “invalid” in his “expert opinion.”  https://www.publishedreporter.com/2020/11/22/nations-top-election-official-says-in-his-expert-view-the-2020-election-is-invalid-mainstream-media-having-meltdown/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ThePublishedReporter+%28The+Published+Reporter%C2%AE%29

Appellate attorney Sidney Powell will be splashed all over mainstream news about splitting off from Trump’s legal team to try discredit her and Trump’s legal efforts.  Trump’s legal efforts are his duty as President even if he were not up for election.  No doubt, media will spin the announcement about Sidney Powell as a big negative.  But it is not.  It is expedient legal strategy.  Where time is of the essence as it is here and now, a court could criticize and reprimand Trump and his legal teams for pursuing a less expedient legal process.

The recent announcement about Sidney Powell’s legal efforts probably has to do with standing, appearance of conflicts of interest, and whom the various legal teams represent. 

Powell will be representing Americans, that is individual voters who have been damaged by having been de-frauded of their constitutional right to equal treatment under the law. Massive numbers of votes were changed or voted illegally.  This case #(1) will be a SCOTUS case given how Powell has described the voter fraud by the software companies acting across multiple states and outside the U.S.  This puts her in front of SCOTUS almost immediately.  This case is much, much bigger than this 2020 election.  Sidney is impressive.

The standing of the other lawyers on the other hand, Guiliani et al, will be based on representing #(2) Donald Trump personally and the GOP.  This also could become a SCOTUS case, but with different legal points from Powell’s case. There is a clear case for U.S. citizen, candidate for president, Donald Trump, who also has the right to seek damages and remedies from the court. Probably these cases would first need to be heard in each state, and appealed individually in each state, where damages occurred, witnesses live, and different types of fraud occurred.  This is similar to the Bush v Gore election case in Florida.    

Case #(3) would be represented by a federal government solicitor in SCOTUS hearings, representing the office of the president itself, not Trump personally.  Likely this will be presented when and if Pelosi refuses to swear in and seat the new members of the House of Representatives.  This case could also demand that Congress repair election law. In this case, SCOTUS could declare the election invalid and also declare a winner, as it did in the Bush v Gore decision due to clear election fraud in Florida.

To avoid conflicts of interests, the plaintiff/client and funding for (1) will be individual citizens.

Client and plaintiff for (2) will be Donald Trump with GOP or PAC funding.  These cases could be merged by the court with those of candidates from the states.

Client for (3) will be the office of the president as described by the Constitution. The remedy would be decided by SCOTUS. 

It then becomes a decision by SCOTUS whether or not to merge one or more of these 3 cases and hear them as one case.  I think that is unlikely because of the time it would require and the delay that would cause in calling a final outcome of the election.

It is true that President Trump knew the voter fraud was coming, as did about 70 million Americans, and he and others said so many times before the election.  However, it is not true that Trump did nothing about it.  He took action and is taking actions which are legal and in fact his duty since he knows the election is corrupt.  However, his possible actions are constrained by law.  Please see the Executive Order issued September 12, 2018, as well as examples of other actions listed here.  https://budbromley.blog/2020/11/19/executive-order-on-imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election/

Any action by Congress before the election with regard to vote fraud and integrity was hobbled and prevented by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives.  It is also true that Republicans in Congress did almost nothing to prevent this fraud.  The Senate for its part did confirm 3 SCOTUS justices.  Congress was distracted from the known issue of vote integrity by the continuous Democrat-led Russia investigation, the fake indictment and trial of General Michael Flynn (Trump’s national security adviser), the $40 million Mueller investigation of Trump, and the fraud impeachment by Pelosi and her sycophant Dems.  This is playing out like a Tom Clancy novel, except it is real, and the villains are inside the gate. 

IMHO, SCOTUS will punt it back to the House.  The Constitution contains clear rules for elections where the Electoral College is tied or their vote is contested.  The vote is contested in several states as well as the Federal Election Commission.  The fraud has become far worse than it was when SCOTUS reviewed the Florida election and then decided the U.S. presidential election in favor of George W. Bush instead of Al Gore.

No doubt Nancy Pelosi has a plan to stop that constitution-specified one vote per state election in the House. That election would go to Trump. She will probably refuse to swear-in and seat the newly elected members of the House in time (because the election is contested), therefore the new House would not be able to vote for President as required by the Constitution.  After that the nation is in very dangerous unconstitutional territory.  The House would be unable to pass or vote on a new law to remedy the situation since it members are not yet sworn in and seated.  So the issue may go back again to the SCOTUS.  Pelosi and Schumer probably have some other scumbag parliamentary tricks up their sleeve as well.  If Pelosi refuses to swear in and let the House vote, then the Senate could elect the vice president, as specified in the Constitution.  The VP could then run the country as interim President until the legal cases are resolved.  All of this is very messy.

My suggested solution has been to re-vote the election which has been declared invalid.  SCOTUS could decide for that solution based on the laws and precedents requiring “equal protection.”  That should be:   Polls open.  No mail-in ballots allowed. Full observation by poll watchers.  All ballots signed and identified as registered voters and citizens.  Hand counted.  If vote-counting machines are to be used, the ballot including signature must be scanned.  Total transparency required.  Voter-ID required.  That should have been U.S. law long ago.  SCOTUS could now make it law.  A secure vote is certainly implied in the Constitution and legal precedent of “one man or woman = one vote.”

First, many people do not recognize that it is very difficult, too difficult IMHO, to fire a federal employee.  Presidents can fire political appointees, but 99% of the federal government are not political appointees.  However, either the House or the Senate could have investigated, prosecuted and impeached any federal employee.  They did not do that. 

Congress could have and should still impeach Joe Biden for his $1 billion extortion of Ukraine, and for accepting money from Chinese agencies.  That would mean that Joe Biden could never again hold a federal office.  Congress could have investigated Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary, Obama and Biden as well as many Obama DOJ and FBI employees for the faked Russia coup and attempted impeachment; Congress is negligent and derelict of duty in its failure to follow through on this coup and punish the perpetrators.  IMHO, the American people will not regain confidence in their government until these crimes against the American people are prosecuted and the perpetrators receive serious punishment.  If there is no punishment, then crimes such as this will become more prevalent and eventually there will be violent revolution, and that is exactly what the leftists want.    

Second, elections are run by the states according to the Constitution, not by the federal government.  The Constitution is a contract between the states and the federal government.  Unfortunately, that legal concept was lost during the Civil War.  There should be an amendment to the Constitution ratified by the states wherein standards are established for federal elections for important issues such as transparency, fraud, penalties, voter ID, etc.

America has a long way to go.  We are not in Kansas anymore. We are in Venezuela, or Cuba, or Iran, or China. 

Aloha,

Bud

It all starts out the same…

Socialists promise utopia and deliver hell.

They pit us against one another, and tell the people with less that the only way they’ll ever have more is if they rely on the government to take it for them.

They say they’ll “fight for equality.”

They say they’ll stick up for the little guy, and stand up to corporations and billionaires.

But that’s never how it goes.

Just ask Venezuela, Cuba or Eastern Europe. Matter of fact, just ask California or New York — where Americans are fleeing by the thousands.

The truth is there’s nothing a socialist won’t steal.

They’ll steal from mom and pop shops and call it “protesting.”

They’ll steal over half your paycheck without batting an eye, and claim you still aren’t paying your “fair share.”

And if we let them, they’ll steal this entire election.

They don’t have the same moral compasses that you and I have.

They don’t care who they have to lie to or what they have to destroy as long as they get what they want in the end.

And Georgia is all that’s standing between you and a radical Left Wing government that wants to dictate every aspect of your life.

They want our guns. They want our money. But most importantly, they want our silence.

They want us to sit down, shut up and accept their agenda.

But we can’t and we won’t.

There’s too much on the line.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Newt Gingrich. (abridged by Bud.)

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/dominion-backs-out-pa-hearing-hours-after-trump-attorney-accuses-them

Note: You may recall that a Special Forces Unit raided a software company in Frankfurt, Germany this past weekend and confiscated the servers.

Consider the bold statements and election fraud charges being made by lawyers Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani about the Dominion software company. If this is not true, Powell and Giuliani have libeled and slandered this company and its officers.

Also, after the November 3, 2020 election…

1. U.S. Sec of Defense, fired.
2. U.S. Head of Homeland Security’s Election Fraud Division, fired.
3. Military chain of command revised today.  Special Operations now reports to an Spec Ops commander in White House, no longer to the Pentagon chain of command.
4. Over 20,000 National Guard troops on active duty in 12 states, now.
5. Biden’s campaign manager for Texas has been arrested by FBI.
6. The top DOJ official responsible for vote fraud investigations resigned.  This is the same DOJ official who worked with Lois Lerner of the IRS to target conservative groups like Tea Parties during the Obama administration.  When this DOJ guy was subpoenaed by the House oversight committee for his actions with regard to the politically weaponized IRS, he pled 5^th Amendment dozens of times. 

In view of all of this meta and circumstantial evidence, at the moment it appears that the Trump legal team must have sufficient evidence to win.

If that happens, I fully expect more Dem/Soros instigated violence all around the country.  Be prepared.    

EO Issued on: September 12, 2018

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):

(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and

(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.

The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.

(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.

(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.

(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.

(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and open debate.

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.

Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and

(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:

(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;

(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;

(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a person;

(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;

(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;

(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;

(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;

(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or

(ix) any other measures authorized by law.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;

(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;

(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;

(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;

(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;

(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and

(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

September 12, 2018.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/

by Jay Valentine, November 13, 2020:

“Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.”

“He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.”

“Welcome to big data analysis.”

“Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis… Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible…”

“When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.”

“Is such analysis proof?”

“Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.”

“…you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden.”

“The pattern [of vote-flipping] is one that can only be done by machines, like a computer. There are too many transactions, with too straight a line, across too many precincts, to be the guys with the ballot boxes arriving in the middle of the night. They are extra fraud.”

by Con Coughlin  •  November 16, 2020

“I expect an end to the misconceived tolerance, and for all the nations of Europe to finally realise how dangerous the ideology of political Islam is for our freedom and the European way of life.” — Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, Die Welt, November 3, 2020.

“We see very clearly that terrorist actions can actually be led by some people who use migratory flows to threaten our territory.” — French President Emmanuel Macron, Politico, November 5, 2020.

For once, the sudden upsurge in terror attacks appears to have prompted European leaders to acknowledge the glaring deficiencies in their ability to protect Europe against Islamist-inspired acts of terrorism.

The belated realisation by Europe’s leaders about the inadequacies of their ability to defend the continent from further acts of Islamist-inspired terrorism is as welcome as it is long overdue.

The latest wave of Islamist-inspired terror attacks to strike Europe has yet again exposed lamentable flaws in the ability of European security agencies to provide adequate protection for their citizens.

In all three instances — the attacks in Paris, Nice and Vienna — it has emerged that those held responsible for carrying out the attacks had links to global jihadi networks that went undetected by European security officials.

Moreover, the ease with which some of those involved in the attacks were able to travel freely across the continent has once more raised concerns about Europe’s lax border controls as defined by the European Union’s Schengen Agreement, and the ability of radicalised jihadis to exploit them.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16733/europe-security-islamist-terror

https://collateralglobal.org/