The article at the link below is for those Bernie-bros who were fooled or fooled themselves into believing that socialism/communism is progressive instead of regressive.

https://nypost.com/2025/12/28/us-news/bernie-sanders-demands-moratorium-on-new-ai-data-centers/

The federal government is responsible for regulating interstate commerce within the U.S. as well as U.S. commerce with foreign nations. Clearly, artificial intelligence (AI) is interstate and international commerce. The federal government was authorized to regulate U.S. interstate and international commerce by the U.S. Constitution through its Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, which states that Congress shall have power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”

Congress exercised this authority through comprehensive legislation in the Interstate Commerce Act, passed on February 4, 1887. The scope of the Commerce Clause expanded significantly through Supreme Court interpretations. Landmark cases like Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) established the broad reach of federal authority over interstate commerce. The power became effectively unlimited starting in 1937.

Socialists /communists are flat earthers trying to walk us into a trap laid by globalists to take civilization back to feudalism and tyranny, eliminating nation-states, national sovereignty, individual sovereignty, rights and liberties such as free speech, freedom of movement and assembly, freedom of religion, right to carry, etc. These rights are directly from God, as the founders and framers of America as well as the philosophers and economists of the enlightenment reminded us about 250 years ago. But many of these rights already have been stolen except for rhetorical lip service in many countries, states and most international organizations, entities who commonly and nefariously claim to be “protecting our democracy.”

These supposed comrades have discovered they cannot take us back to feudalism and return themselves to power, where we the people bend the knee and kiss their rings, until individual rights and national sovereignty are eliminated in the United States of America; they believe they must destroy America and western civilization by any means before they can “build back better” their utopia. There utopia has never been successful when tried and each time millions of their comrades have died, and this does NOT include those who died in wars.

I just saw the following three comments below, which fit the subject above:

on X by biofeedback369 @IsaInsane1 · Dec 15 , as follows:

[UN] Agenda 2030 is presented as a blueprint for a better world – but behind the curtain, it’s a masterplan for global control disguised as sustainability.

The 17 goals are not just about ending poverty or protecting the planet. They’re about centralizing power, monitoring every human, and digitizing every aspect of life – from your health and finances to your food, movement, and even thoughts.

No Poverty & Zero Hunger = Total dependency on state-issued digital currencies and lab-grown food.

Quality Education & Gender Equality = Ideological reprogramming of the next generation.

Good Health = Biometric surveillance, forced medication, and control of your biological data.

Clean Energy & Climate Action = Elimination of personal property, carbon tracking, and restricted movement.

Sustainable Cities = Smart prisons, 24/7 surveillance, and algorithmic governance under the label of “efficiency.”

How the above is being accomplished before our eyes is well described in the following commentary “Lived Reality” By: Linda Goudsmit | pundicity

“Lived Reality” is a term derived from the subjective, personal experience of an individual. Similar terms like “direct experience” and “firsthand experience” help define the specific meaning of “lived reality.” What is most descriptive, however, is its antonyms. The Power Thesaurus lists ten opposites of lived reality as: acted, playacted, feigned, faked, played, pretended, simulated, bluffed, fooled, and play-acted. Words matter, and the ten opposites listed infer that anything that is not experienced firsthand is not authentic. The actual antonym for lived reality is objective reality. In the woke realm of subjective reality, where “lived reality” is the metric, only feelings matter. In the impersonal, verifiable realm of objective reality, facts are the metric. In objective reality, gravity exists–it is a fact. In subjective reality, little Johnny feels he can fly, but if he jumps off the roof, he will fall to his death because gravity is a fact. Objective reality always prevails.

Daniel Greenfield’s December 27, 2025, article “Tucker Carlson: ‘I don’t Know Anyone Who’s Been Killed by Radical Islam’” dramatizes the consequences of adults living in subjective reality. Tucker Carlson is quoted as saying, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” The statement is patently absurd on two levels. First, it infers that if Tucker Carlson did not personally know anyone in the United States killed by radical Islam, then it did not happen. That is as preposterous and infantile as saying that if you close your eyes, no one can see you. The statement denies any reality outside your own perceptions. Second, Carlson’s statement separates doctrinal Islamic religious obligations from the Islamists who act out those religious obligations. The gift of Tucker Carlson’s surrender to the madness of subjective reality is that his statement highlights the calamitous social consequences of living in the subjective, woke world of leftist relativism, where facts in objective reality are conveniently denied, and only personal feelings matter. In subjective reality, if Tucker Carlson’s “living reality” is that he doesn’t personally know anyone in the United States who’s been killed by radical Islam, then society is expected to believe that no one has been killed. If that is true, then Martin Richard, the eight-year-old boy killed by Muslim terrorists in the Boston Marathon bombings, is still alive. But Martin is dead. And the Muslims who killed him were acting out the doctrinal religious obligation to kill infidels (any non-believer, especially Jews and Christians) as stated in their holy book, the Koran.

The ideological moorings of ordered liberty require consensus on what is real. This is no small matter. Language is based on such a consensus. Laws are based on such consensus. Without agreement on what is real, there is no societal order; there can be only chaos. It is for this reason that globalists support the leftist Culture War on America and its attack strategy to replace factual, objective reality with subjective multiple realities based on feelings. If the Left can shatter the reality-based foundation of language and laws, then it has succeeded in shattering our ordered liberty and the Judeo-Christian morality that supports it. The Judeo-Christian tradition is not only the infrastructure of our Constitution, but also the foundation of Western civilization.

We are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not: Globalism vs. nation-states. The globalist war on the world’s nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from a constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of the objective world of facts into the madness of the subjective world of feelings. Psychological warfare subdues the enemy without destroying the physical infrastructure of society. It replaces brute force with mind control, shattering consensus on what is real by denying the existence of objective reality.

The globalist social engineers exploit the “lived reality” of woke leftists and the doctrinal religious obligations of Islamists as tactical weapons in globalism’s strategic war on nation-states. Woke leftism is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in communism. Communism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is convinced its manifest destiny is to rule the world. Islam is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology with a religious wing that is convinced its destiny is to rule the world in a global caliphate. Globalism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is funding and fomenting Marxist/Muslim (red/green) hatred to do their dirty work of destabilizing and collapsing Western democracies from within, in preparation for their own planetary dystopian Unistate administered under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated agencies and organizations.

The intentional escalation of antisemitism and anti-Christianity are tactical weapons in globalism’s overarching war on Western nation-states. Using the familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalists are targeting the Judeo-Christian foundation of Western civilization. It is my opinion that antisemitism is, always has been, and always will be political. In biblical times, there was no separation between church and state–religious power was political power. So, when Jesus (the most famous Jew) left Judaism and Christianity was born, so was antisemitism. But it was the shared Judeo-Christian tradition that birthed Western civilization, and it is my opinion that the globalist elite are determined to divide, conquer, and collapse our Judeo-Christian infrastructure and replace our political infrastructure with their dystopian, totalitarian Unistate. First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. The globalists are escalating antisemitism and using the progressive left (Marxists) and the Muslims in every Western country to create the required chaos to make society ungovernable. Israel, like the United States and every other Western nation, will cease to exist as free and sovereign nations if the progressives and their Muslim partners continue to tear those nations apart from within–the red/green alliance funded and fomented by the globalist elite will end in Kissinger’s predictive statement:

Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991

Notice Kissinger said U.N. troops–internationalized world troops–to bring order in a world government. Personally, I think the United States should withdraw from the United Nations and let it collapse because it is the instrument of one-world government and infrastructure of the Unistate. For me, antisemitism, anti-Zionism, Jew-hatred, is all being fomented to divide and collapse our Judeo-Christian tradition–it is political, not religious. I believe that we are in a critical moment in history when it is essential that Jews and Christians unite to protect and preserve Western civilization because united we stand, divided we fall.

Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, finally said the unsayable in her December 16, 2025, post on X that referenced the horrific Bondi Beach Islamist terror attack on Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Australia:

The tragic Islamist terror attack against those at a Hanukkah celebration in Australia sadly should not come as a surprise to anyone. This is the direct result of the massive influx of Islamists to Australia. Their goal is not only the Islamization of Australia but the entire world—including the United States. Islamists and Islamism is the greatest threat to the freedom, security, and prosperity of the United States and the entire world. It is probably too late for Europe—and maybe Australia. It is not too late for the United States of America. But it soon will be. Thankfully, President Trump has prioritized securing our borders and deporting known and suspected terrorists, and stopping mass, unvetted migration that puts Americans at risk.

My question is how President Trump is going to resolve the staggering hypocrisy of protecting Qatar, a major funder of Islamic terrorism worldwide, including the Islamic terrorism inside the United States, which Tucker Carlson does not acknowledge in his lived reality.By: Linda Goudsmit | pundicity

“Lived Reality” is a term derived from the subjective, personal experience of an individual. Similar terms like “direct experience” and “firsthand experience” help define the specific meaning of “lived reality.” What is most descriptive, however, is its antonyms. The Power Thesaurus lists ten opposites of lived reality as: acted, playacted, feigned, faked, played, pretended, simulated, bluffed, fooled, and play-acted. Words matter, and the ten opposites listed infer that anything that is not experienced firsthand is not authentic. The actual antonym for lived reality is objective reality. In the woke realm of subjective reality, where “lived reality” is the metric, only feelings matter. In the impersonal, verifiable realm of objective reality, facts are the metric. In objective reality, gravity exists–it is a fact. In subjective reality, little Johnny feels he can fly, but if he jumps off the roof, he will fall to his death because gravity is a fact. Objective reality always prevails.

Daniel Greenfield’s December 27, 2025, article “Tucker Carlson: ‘I don’t Know Anyone Who’s Been Killed by Radical Islam’” dramatizes the consequences of adults living in subjective reality. Tucker Carlson is quoted as saying, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” The statement is patently absurd on two levels. First, it infers that if Tucker Carlson did not personally know anyone in the United States killed by radical Islam, then it did not happen. That is as preposterous and infantile as saying that if you close your eyes, no one can see you. The statement denies any reality outside your own perceptions. Second, Carlson’s statement separates doctrinal Islamic religious obligations from the Islamists who act out those religious obligations. The gift of Tucker Carlson’s surrender to the madness of subjective reality is that his statement highlights the calamitous social consequences of living in the subjective, woke world of leftist relativism, where facts in objective reality are conveniently denied, and only personal feelings matter. In subjective reality, if Tucker Carlson’s “living reality” is that he doesn’t personally know anyone in the United States who’s been killed by radical Islam, then society is expected to believe that no one has been killed. If that is true, then Martin Richard, the eight-year-old boy killed by Muslim terrorists in the Boston Marathon bombings, is still alive. But Martin is dead. And the Muslims who killed him were acting out the doctrinal religious obligation to kill infidels (any non-believer, especially Jews and Christians) as stated in their holy book, the Koran.

The ideological moorings of ordered liberty require consensus on what is real. This is no small matter. Language is based on such a consensus. Laws are based on such consensus. Without agreement on what is real, there is no societal order; there can be only chaos. It is for this reason that globalists support the leftist Culture War on America and its attack strategy to replace factual, objective reality with subjective multiple realities based on feelings. If the Left can shatter the reality-based foundation of language and laws, then it has succeeded in shattering our ordered liberty and the Judeo-Christian morality that supports it. The Judeo-Christian tradition is not only the infrastructure of our Constitution, but also the foundation of Western civilization.

We are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not: Globalism vs. nation-states. The globalist war on the world’s nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from a constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of the objective world of facts into the madness of the subjective world of feelings. Psychological warfare subdues the enemy without destroying the physical infrastructure of society. It replaces brute force with mind control, shattering consensus on what is real by denying the existence of objective reality.

The globalist social engineers exploit the “lived reality” of woke leftists and the doctrinal religious obligations of Islamists as tactical weapons in globalism’s strategic war on nation-states. Woke leftism is rooted in Marxism, which is rooted in communism. Communism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is convinced its manifest destiny is to rule the world. Islam is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology with a religious wing that is convinced its destiny is to rule the world in a global caliphate. Globalism is a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian, political replacement ideology that is funding and fomenting Marxist/Muslim (red/green) hatred to do their dirty work of destabilizing and collapsing Western democracies from within, in preparation for their own planetary dystopian Unistate administered under the auspices of the lethally corrupt United Nations and its associated agencies and organizations.

The intentional escalation of antisemitism and anti-Christianity are tactical weapons in globalism’s overarching war on Western nation-states. Using the familiar divide-and-conquer strategy, the globalists are targeting the Judeo-Christian foundation of Western civilization. It is my opinion that antisemitism is, always has been, and always will be political. In biblical times, there was no separation between church and state–religious power was political power. So, when Jesus (the most famous Jew) left Judaism and Christianity was born, so was antisemitism. But it was the shared Judeo-Christian tradition that birthed Western civilization, and it is my opinion that the globalist elite are determined to divide, conquer, and collapse our Judeo-Christian infrastructure and replace our political infrastructure with their dystopian, totalitarian Unistate. First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday. The globalists are escalating antisemitism and using the progressive left (Marxists) and the Muslims in every Western country to create the required chaos to make society ungovernable. Israel, like the United States and every other Western nation, will cease to exist as free and sovereign nations if the progressives and their Muslim partners continue to tear those nations apart from within–the red/green alliance funded and fomented by the globalist elite will end in Kissinger’s predictive statement:

Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991

Notice Kissinger said U.N. troops–internationalized world troops–to bring order in a world government. Personally, I think the United States should withdraw from the United Nations and let it collapse because it is the instrument of one-world government and infrastructure of the Unistate. For me, antisemitism, anti-Zionism, Jew-hatred, is all being fomented to divide and collapse our Judeo-Christian tradition–it is political, not religious. I believe that we are in a critical moment in history when it is essential that Jews and Christians unite to protect and preserve Western civilization because united we stand, divided we fall.

Tulsi Gabbard, the United States Director of National Intelligence, finally said the unsayable in her December 16, 2025, post on X that referenced the horrific Bondi Beach Islamist terror attack on Jews celebrating Hanukkah in Australia:

The tragic Islamist terror attack against those at a Hanukkah celebration in Australia sadly should not come as a surprise to anyone. This is the direct result of the massive influx of Islamists to Australia. Their goal is not only the Islamization of Australia but the entire world—including the United States. Islamists and Islamism is the greatest threat to the freedom, security, and prosperity of the United States and the entire world. It is probably too late for Europe—and maybe Australia. It is not too late for the United States of America. But it soon will be. Thankfully, President Trump has prioritized securing our borders and deporting known and suspected terrorists, and stopping mass, unvetted migration that puts Americans at risk.

My question is how President Trump is going to resolve the staggering hypocrisy of protecting Qatar, a major funder of Islamic terrorism worldwide, including the Islamic terrorism inside the United States, which Tucker Carlson does not acknowledge in his lived reality.

Hat tip on Linda’s article above to Terresa Monroe-Hamilton on December 28, 2025 and https://www.trevorloudon.com/2025/12/lived-reality/

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

P.S. There are many more posts on my blog covering this subject.

P.S.S. POWERFUL WARNING from former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss.

Here is Ms. Truss, short video on X: https://x.com/i/status/2004903913468690748

Provided by Grok, below is the transcript of Liz Truss’s statement from the short video clip (based on the visible subtitles, clear audio in the ~60-second clip, and the context from the post’s description where she speaks about the changed nature of political opposition):

You just can’t negotiate with these people.
You can’t compromise with them.
You can’t do bipartisanship.
You can’t do media charm offensives.
All of those things worked in the 1990s, in the 2000s.
They don’t work now.
Because the other side has fundamentally changed.
They want to tear down Western civilisation.
And that’s what Donald Trump gets, better than almost anybody else in the Western world.

(The clip appears to be from a recent conservatism/Vanity Fair-related event or interview panel, where she’s discussing modern political strategy, the “deep state,” and comparing approaches by leaders like Trump, Orbán, and Bukele. The phrase “You just can’t” starts her key point, matching the on-screen subtitle in the preview you shared.) This is the core spoken part in the short excerpt that’s circulating — powerful and direct, as described in the post!

Short bio on Liz Truss by Grok: Liz Truss’s political views have undergone a significant evolution over her career, shifting from youthful radical liberalism to a hardline, populist brand of Thatcherite/neoliberal conservatism with increasingly Trump-aligned cultural and anti-establishment rhetoric by late 2025.

Early Ideological Roots and Transformation

Truss began her political life as a Liberal Democrat at Oxford University in the mid-1990s, where she served as president of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats. During this period, she advocated for:

• Abolishing the monarchy (calling it undemocratic at a 1994 party conference),
• Decriminalizing cannabis,
• Opposing aspects of Thatcher-era policies (she even marched against Margaret Thatcher as a teenager).

Her parents’ left-leaning background (to the left of Labour, with her mother in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) influenced this phase. However, she switched to the Conservative Party in 1996 and gradually moved rightward, adopting free-market, small-state principles. This transformation is often described as opportunistic or chameleon-like by critics, driven by ambition rather than fixed ideology.Core Economic Views — “Trussonomics”Truss remains most associated with neoliberal/supply-side economics (often called “trickle-down” by detractors):

• Strong support for tax cuts (especially for high earners and corporations) to stimulate growth,
• Deregulation and free trade,
• Reducing the size of the state and rejecting “economic orthodoxy” (e.g., criticizing institutions like the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England).

Her 2022 premiership’s infamous mini-budget exemplified this: unfunded tax cuts led to market chaos, a plummeting pound, and her rapid downfall. In 2025, she continues defending these ideas, blaming failure on sabotage by the “deep state” (including central banks, bureaucrats, and the establishment). She has praised Trump’s attacks on the Federal Reserve and predicted a “reckoning” for independent central banks globally.

Foreign Policy and Geopolitics: Truss is a foreign policy hawk:

• Strongly anti-China (calling Uyghur treatment “genocide,” reducing economic dependency, supporting Taiwan),
• Tough on Russia (pushing sanctions post-2022 Ukraine invasion),
• Pro-Brexit (despite initially supporting Remain),
• Supportive of alliances like AUKUS and CPTPP.

She frames global threats in civilizational terms: warning that China, radical Islam, and Western internal “left-wing ideology” could lead to the West’s collapse within a decade without strong conservative leadership.

Social and Cultural Positions: On social issues, Truss leans libertarian-conservative:

• Supports same-sex marriage but opposes expansive transgender rights (e.g., rejecting self-identification, emphasizing biological sex),
• Critical of “woke” ideology, identity politics, cancel culture, net zero extremism, DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion), and what she calls “Islamism.”

Post-2022 Shift to Populism and “Culture War” ConservatismAfter her 49-day premiership and losing her seat in the 2024 election, Truss has embraced a more populist, anti-establishment stance:

• Frequent criticism of the “deep state” (unelected bureaucrats, judiciary, media, central banks, and even parts of her own party) as sabotaging elected leaders,
• Calls for a UK version of MAGA (“Make America Great Again”) and a “Trump-style counter-revolution,”
• Praise for leaders like Trump, Orbán, Bukele, and Meloni who confront entrenched power.

In late 2025 statements (including her new YouTube show The Liz Truss Show, launched December 2025), she has escalated this rhetoric dramatically:

• Claiming modern left/Democrats/left-wing forces are no longer moderate social democrats but aim to “destroy Western civilisation” through ideology, excessive government, net zero policies, mass migration, and cultural battles,
• Arguing traditional compromise, bipartisanship, and media charm offensives no longer work — the “other side has fundamentally changed,”
• Positioning Trump as uniquely understanding this existential threat and the need for direct confrontation.

This places her firmly in the global populist right ecosystem, appearing at events like CPAC, associating with figures like Steve Bannon, and framing politics as a battle to save Western values from internal subversion and external enemies (China, radical Islam).

In summary, Truss’s current worldview (as of late 2025) combines classic Thatcherite economics with culture-war populism, deep suspicion of institutions, and apocalyptic warnings about the decline of the West unless conservatives adopt aggressive, Trump-like tactics. Critics see this as conspiratorial or self-serving (blaming others for her failures); supporters view it as a bold wake-up call. Her trajectory reflects a broader realignment on the international right.