by Bill Melugin @BillMelugin. Bud’s comments down below.

September 11, 2025

BREAKING: Per multiple federal sources to @FoxNews , the suspect arrested in the grisly machete beheading of a motel manager in Dallas, TX yesterday is a Cuban illegal alien who was released into the US by the Biden admin in January despite having an active deportation order.

I’m told YORDANIS COBOS-MARTINEZ was released from ICE custody by the Biden admin on 1/13/2025, one week before Trump took office, due to “no significant likelihood of removal in the forseeable future”. The Biden admin didn’t believe they could enforce his deportation order and remove him because Cuba doesn’t cooperate, and they did not conduct third party country deportations the way the Trump administration does. (sending aliens to countries they aren’t nationals of).

Cobos-Martinez has a prior criminal history of:

False imprisonment in CA (unknown disposition)

Indecency with a child in Texas (dismissed)

Grand theft of vehicle in Florida (dismissed)

Carjacking & false imprisonment in CA (acquitted on carjacking, convicted of false imprisonment).

Disturbing surveillance video shows Cobos-Martinez allegedly kicking and picking up the victim’s severed head in the motel parking lot as it drips blood, before he places it into a dumpster. It reportedly all started with an argument with the motel manager, and the beheading took place in front of the victim’s wife and son.

Bud’s comment: Democrats (i.e. communists) as well as judges and prosecutors funded, promoted, and celebrated by Soros, Obama, Schumer, etc. are causing this problem. It cannot be dismissed as simple neglect. This is strategic disruption of the nation to foment revolution. Of course they all have rhetorical denials.

These radicals arranged a dangerous combination of radical Islamists, far left wing Democrats (communists), illegal aliens and gang members unhinged from their culture but also not loyal to America or even interested in assimilation with U.S. society, but rather they denounce it, and support massive release or non-prosecution of unstable persons and violent criminals, and active promotion of anti-social, emotionally and psychologically dis-functioning people such as several members of the Biden administration and child sex traffickers. And they arranged that criminals were seldom prosecuted and removed from society but instead their political opponents were prosecuted non-stop; meanwhile mainstream media, law firms and organizations such as Southern Poverty Law Center focused on the latter.

For example, George Soros has invested significantly in judicial reform initiatives in the United States, primarily through funding progressive prosecutors. Since 2016, he has donated sums exceeding $1 million to local district attorney campaigns via the Safety and Justice PAC, supporting criminal justice reform proponents. Over the past decade, Soros has spent at least $50 million to elect what critics describe as “social justice” prosecutors across the country, funding, directly and indirectly, to as many as 75 district attorneys who advocate for criminal justice “reform,” who collectively represent more than 70 million people. This funding, often channeled through political action committees like the Safety and Justice PAC and the Mississippi Justice and Public Safety PAC, has been instrumental in electing prosecutors who prioritize bail reform, decriminalization of low-level offenses, and alternatives to incarceration.

One prominent example includes approximately $1.7 million in funding for Larry Krasner’s successful campaign for district attorney in Philadelphia. Soros-backed prosecutors have implemented policies such as eliminating cash bail for certain offenses and reducing prosecution of misdemeanors and non-violent crimes. For example, John Chisholm in Milwaukee County released Darrell Brooks on $1,000 bail five days before Brooks drove through a Christmas parade, killing six people. Similarly, Kim Foxx in Chicago faced criticism for declining to prosecute various offenses, which some analysts link to a rise in homicides from an average of 501 annually before her tenure to 666 during her time in office.

Critics argue that these reforms have contributed to rising crime rates in cities where Soros-backed prosecutors hold office. Reports cite increases in violent crime, including a 26% rise in homicides in Orlando during Aramis Ayala’s tenure and a 40% increase in aggravated assaults in Arlington County after Parisa Dehghani-Tafti took office. In Baltimore, murders rose nearly 50% between 2015 and 2019 under Marilyn Mosby, another Soros-supported prosecutor. Other jurisdictions, including San Francisco under Chesa Boudin, saw significant increases in property crime, with some attributing the rise to policies that decriminalized shoplifting and reduced prosecution rates.

Supporters of these reforms, including Soros himself, argue that traditional criminal justice disproportionately harms marginalized communities and that reinvesting in mental health response, youth programs, and rehabilitation is more effective for long-term public safety. Soros contends that factors such as the pandemic’s mental health impact, reduced policing, and gun trafficking are more significant contributors to recent crime increases than prosecutorial policies.

However, a backlash has emerged, with several high-profile Soros-backed prosecutors being recalled, resigning, or choosing not to seek re-election amid public criticism and legal challenges. Examples include Chesa Boudin’s 2022 recall in San Francisco, Kim Gardner’s resignation in St. Louis, and Monique Worrell’s suspension by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. This shift suggests growing voter concern over the perceived consequences of progressive prosecutorial policies on public safety.

Similar examples can be produced for arguably treasonous activities by Barack Obama and his sycophants, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, John Brennan, etc. How many times did Soros and members of his organizations visit the Whitehouse during the Obama and Biden administrations? Did Soros or U.S. agencies fund or instigate riots such as those following George Floyd’s death, but also January 6th? There is an active effort to tear down society by violence, crime and chaos by Antifa, BLM and myriad other groups along with massive depletion of public resources. Radicals hope for exhaustion of patience and eventual resort to violence by conservatives, centrists, etc. This is an old plot used by White Russians, the Red Russians, then the Bolsheviks in the Russian Revolutions, resulting in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians and other ethnic groups in Russia not during war time. Theoretically in the minds of these radicals, this would lead to revolution, destruction of capitalism, and elimination of national and personal sovereignty except as lip service, and finally domination by an elite who believe they know better, based on their various psychopathologies.

It appears to be a human characteristic that some cannot handle freedom, which is revealed by perpetually playing the victim.

A key part of this radical revolutionary strategy is often associated with two Columbia University professors, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, is known as the Cloward-Piven strategy. It was proposed in a May 1966 article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” published in left wing The Nation magazine. The strategy aimed to create a crisis in the U.S. welfare system by encouraging large numbers of eligible but unenrolled individuals to apply for welfare benefits simultaneously. In the Biden administration, this strategy was rapidly accelerated by opening U.S. borders to more than 15 million illegal aliens and providing illegal living benefits at taxpayer expense. And lawyers and judges block attempts to stop of reverse the invasion and misuse of resources. The resulting strain on government resources, according to the theory, would overwhelm the system and force the adoption of more radical, leftist social policies such as a guaranteed annual income.

Cloward and Piven, both sociology professors at Columbia University’s School of Social Work and married to each other, believed that systemic change could be achieved not through violent revolution but by leveraging the political power of the poor to create structural crisis and reform, essentially the reforms (or more precisely said the de-evolution of the U.S. Constitution) along the lines of Soros’s Open Society Foundation. They argued that mass mobilization of the poor could disrupt existing political and economic systems, leading to transformative policy shifts being demanded by the people in return for safety.

This strategy was linked to real-world organizing efforts, including the formation of the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) in the late 1960s, which sought to increase welfare enrollment and advocate for the rights of welfare recipients. During the Biden administration this was expanded to include USAID, United Nations, Red Cross, Catholic Church and myriad NGOs funded directly and indirectly by U.S. taxpayers and of course more federal debt. While the Cloward-Piven strategy was ostensibly intended as a means to achieve social justice and end poverty, it has since been used as a deliberate plan to destabilize government institutions.

“The plan was first put into practice in New York City in the late 1960s, where Cloward and Piven organized the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) to increase the number of people on welfare. The NWRO was successful in getting thousands of new people to apply for welfare benefits, which led to a budget crisis in New York City and forced the government to adopt more progressive policies.”

“Today, many conservatives believe that what is happening in America is a clear execution of the Cloward-Piven plan. They point to the Biden administration’s push for massive spending on welfare programs, such as the $1.9 trillion COVID relief bill, which includes a $300 weekly unemployment benefit on top of existing state benefits. They argue that this is just the first step in a larger plan to create a crisis in the welfare system and force the government to adopt even more radical policies.” ~https://politicrossing.com/the-two-little-known-columbia-professors-who-planned-the-collapse-of-america-in-1966/ or politicrossing.com