To President Trump from Profs Richard Lindzen (MIT) and William Happer (Princeton) re: “net zero”

Posted on May 8, 2025 by budbromley
Greenhouse Gases and Fossil Fuels Climate ScienceDownload

47 page pdf file can be downloaded at the link above

Unknown's avatar

About budbromley

Bud is a retired life sciences executive. Bud's entrepreneurial leadership exceeded three decades. He was the senior business development, marketing and sales executive at four public corporations, each company a supplier of analytical and life sciences instrumentation, software, consumables and service. Prior to those positions, his 19 year career in Hewlett-Packard Company's Analytical Products Group included worldwide sales and marketing responsibility for Bioscience Products, Global Accounts and the International Olympic Committee, as well as international management assignments based in Japan and Latin America. Bud has visited and worked in more than 65 countries and lived and worked in 3 countries.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to To President Trump from Profs Richard Lindzen (MIT) and William Happer (Princeton) re: “net zero”

  1. Sunface's avatar Sunface says:
    May 9, 2025 at 11:21 pm

    Bud How would one cite this paper?

    I was also surprised that Edwin X Berry’s proof of the IPCC error was not cited? https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/Berry-2023-Natural-CO2-Dominates-Atmospheric-Increase.pdf

    It seems to me there is a little spat here between MIT and Ed Berry. He disputed Andrews who represented those believing IPCC and shows Andrews’ fundamental errors. The paper is https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/21

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • budbromley's avatar budbromley says:
      May 21, 2025 at 5:56 pm

      Thanks for your comments Sunface and thanks for your long time reading.

      Regarding Dr. Berry, the cited references were used in the present work, either by me in asking the questions or training Grok, or else were used in this work and referenced by Grok. In addition to Berry, the conclusions and works of others such a Dr. Murry Salby presumably agree with these results.

      Grok and I are iterating this thought experiment to show the effects when ocean pH is changed, when ocean salinity is changed, when sea surface temperature weight ocean surface area is changed, when the water is stirred instead of still, and perhaps more.

      Thanks for posting those reference links; always helpful!

      Like

      Reply
    • budbromley's avatar budbromley says:
      May 21, 2025 at 7:34 pm

      Sunface, regarding citation are you asking about the Lindzen and Happer paper or my blog post here with Grok?

      Like

      Reply
      • Sunface's avatar Sunface says:
        May 22, 2025 at 6:04 pm

        With respect Bud.

        I have to laugh at people that want to site Artificial Intelligence opinion as fact or as substance.

        It is a constructed opinion of a non-existent thing that exists an a computer only because it was created by some complete nutter (mentally unsound and eccentric) geek with an opinion and an ability to write a program in code. That is an unqualified opinion and is irrelevant in a living world inhabited by humans with a real brain. In fact its absurd.

        Like

        Reply
        • budbromley's avatar budbromley says:
          May 22, 2025 at 6:21 pm

          Sunface, with all due respect, AI users need to know how to use the tool. Otherwise, it is garbage in and garbage out. In the case of my present use of Grok 3 beta, the fourth AI tool I have used in the last 2 years, I specified the units to be used, I gave it the references to be used, and I commanded it to have full access to the internet (rather than use narrative that someone else fed it), and I checked all the calculations. Furthermore, other scientists have read it and so far none have presented any errors.

          In the unlikely chance you find an error, then please let me know.

          If you wish to be taken seriously, post with your name and contact information. Post somewhere else if you wish to write ad hominem like this: “complete nutter (mentally unsound and eccentric) geek with an opinion and an ability to write a program in code. That is an unqualified opinion and is irrelevant in a living world inhabited by humans with a real brain. In fact its absurd.”

          Like

      • Sunface's avatar Sunface says:
        May 22, 2025 at 6:08 pm

        The Lindzen and Happer paper, Bud

        Like

        Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.