10 Responses to Death by covid vaccination

1. Sunface says:

   April 23, 2024 at 8:45 pm

   Dr. Peter McCullough has suddenly changed his tune. He was very pro-vax and was a firm believer in the elusive SARS COV2 virus.

   As a matter of fact he claimed he has seen it.

   This bloke was heavily funded by the BIG Pharma industry. Here is the entry for PETER A MCCULLOUGH (335114), and below you can see a partial (just partial) summary of the funding he’s received since 2014:
   https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/335114

   I do welcome the fact that he is now admitting vaccines are dangerous. I wonder if he still has his annual flu vax?

   LikeLike

   Reply
   • budbromley says:

     April 24, 2024 at 9:40 am

     Sunface, I am sorry but you are misinformed about Dr. McCullough, a very senior and heavily published cardiologist, and also about the SARS COV2. Dr. McCullough immediately began reporting cardiac complications and deaths from his patients from the so-called covid vax. Here is an early interview (May 7, 2021) https://budbromley.blog/2021/05/07/interview-with-dr-mccullough-md-mph/

     And another interview in July 2021, wherein McCullough says among many other things, “This [vaccine] program should have been shut down in February based on safety.” https://budbromley.blog/2021/07/31/dr-peter-a-mccullough-this-vaccine-program-should-have-been-shut-down-in-february-based-on-safety/

     Dr. McCullough has been a frequent speaker at science meetings and in Congressional hearings, always speaking against the so-called vaccine and its dangers. There is nothing new or recent about Dr. McCullough’s objections.

     You have mischaracterized Dr. McCullough, who was removed from his senior position at Baylor no doubt due to his strong objections.

     Also, there is nothing elusive about SARS COV2. You and I have discussed this before. The virus has been sequenced by multiple techniques and it has been observed by electron microscopes as well as confocal laser fluorescent microscopes. In the latter case, resolution is sufficient for the S or spike protein to be observed as well as the virus inside living cells. The human modified virus is patented, the vaccine is patented, the PCR test is patented, the lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery is patented, and monkey virus DNA fragments used to produce the “vax” has been found and sequenced in the nucleus of cells. The evolution of the corona-19 virus demographics over time and geography have been tracked backwards to reveal where it was released into humans and where and when it traveled around the world.

     LikeLike

     Reply
     • Sunface says:

       April 25, 2024 at 3:46 am

       Evidence shows otherwise. He is a scoundrel on the take. That is my opinion of course.

       He made claims and was questioned on these claims. He avoided responding with snarky comments.

       If one has confidence in making claims especially a credentialed individual like Dr McCullough, then it should be easy for him to provide the proof would you not agree.?

       Dr Sam Baily did some work on this as did Christine Massey.

       I start with Dr Sam Bailey. https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/dr-peter-mccullough-says-he-has-seen viruses.  Dr Baily cites two instances in the post – see the References. https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/electron-cryotomography-of-sars-cov https://www.twc.health/blogs/news/dr-peter-mccullough-understand-spike-shedding-before-it-s-too-late

       Now for Christine Massey. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/weve-got-your-back-dr-mccullough/ and this https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/peter-mccullough/

       PCR is a load of croc. Proven and shown. No Ok

       This may help- https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/pcr-finds-godzilla-spawning

       LikeLike

       Reply
       • budbromley says:

         April 26, 2024 at 11:45 am

         Sunface, you and I have communicated about this previously in comments and I posted on this here on my blog. For example: https://budbromley.blog/2020/08/05/is-cov-2-confirmed-as-the-cause-of-this-pandemic/
         You and your references are incorrect and passing misinformation. SARS CoV-2 has indeed been isolated.
         https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 However, completing the full Rivers’ Postulates will take time since there is no working animal model to use demonstrating the final post-isolation steps in Rivers, as there was for SARS Co-V1 circa 2003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693394/pdf/15306393.pdf
         There is an ethics-approved study recruiting human volunteers in the UK which intends to infect the volunteers with SARS CO-V2. Until this is completed or a living animal model is developed, then they can only re-infect living cells, which means an incomplete Rivers Postulate.
         As I already explained, viruses and even living CoV-2 have been observed in multiple states of their life by electron microscopes, atomic force microscopes and confocal fluorescent fluorescence microscopes. You can read about the latter case here, which includes 3D fluorescence images of SARS-CoV-2-infected ferret nasal turbinates, published already in 2021: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8234815/ Probably, it is work like this that Dr. McCullough observed. You can probably find videos online from confocal and fluorescent microscope of living cells being infected by virus and even spike proteins injected by virus inside living cells, and immune cells attacking and killing virus. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18681-z

         By the way, some of the “reference” links you provided clearly do not understand the molecular biology. For example, mRNA is not “integrated” into a cell’s DNA as one reference mentions.

         It is good to be skeptical and ask questions.

         LikeLike
       • Sunface says:

         April 26, 2024 at 8:23 pm

         It was never been an isolated Corona Virus and to date there has never been an isolated virus. I would recommend you get out of your trance with total respect.

         Start here if you will.

         https://thefreedomarticles.com/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-reveals-virus-misconception/

         Then you may not be aware that June Almeida made an unsubstantiated claim.

         https://viroliegy.com/2021/12/07/june-almeida-and-the-first-coronavirus-em-images-1967/

         People tend to refuse to consider evidence— if what they might discover contradicts what they believe.

         LikeLike
       • budbromley says:

         April 27, 2024 at 9:21 pm

         Sunface, you obviously did not not read my prior reply or the references linked in my reply. Quoting Sunface, “People tend to refuse to consider evidence— if what they might discover contradicts what they believe.” Your comment applies to you, not to me.

         I have made no reference to June Almeida or her work. Electron microscopes would kill cells, but that is no longer necessary with modern staining techniques and newer microscopes.

         With regard to the clearly erroneous claims by Stefan Lanka at the link you provided, for example: “All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations … All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way.” The links in the papers in my comment contain images of LIVING CELLS and viruses, not dead or dying tissues or cells.

         Perhaps Lanka is misunderstanding two normal cellular processes by which non-living fragments of RNA and DNA (oligonucleotides ~180 base pairs or less) are routinely removed from living cells to protect the cell’s internal processes and by packaging these fragments and excreting them from the body; these DNA or RNA fragments from these two normal cellular excretion processes can be detected by PCR and produce about 50% false positive PCR results. This makes PCR tests virtually useless for viral diagnosis. But, as I already wrote, whole virus particles are observed inside living cells by fluorescence and scanning laser confocal fluorescent microscopes which do not kill cells or virus and do not use PCR.

         LikeLike
       • Sunface says:

         April 27, 2024 at 11:41 pm

         Why don’t you ask Dr Stefan Lanka yourself? After all he is highly qualified. An ex-virologist and a microbiologist?

         If you can please reference to the first study – or any study – showing the proper isolation of a virus and of course following scientific method.

         Then provide proof that man can resurrect the dead. After all viruses are claimed by virologists to be non-living, not capable of reproduction and have no nucleus.

         LikeLike
       • Sunface says:

         May 4, 2024 at 11:38 pm

         I won’t waste my time responding to your idiocy. The construct of virology is clear. It relies on biblical claims like resurrection and beliefs like reincarnation as support. I can also tell you that the little scientists that are handsomely paid are still not able to create a single living organism or demonstrate its existence other than on computer generated sequences and computer generated graphics. Gods creation and metamorphosis makes these titled credentialed fools a laughing stock in reality. I suggest you argue with yourself in the mirror. But before that peruse your claims-at https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/a-response-to-robin-monottis-notice

         LikeLike
       • budbromley says:

         May 6, 2024 at 3:56 pm

         Sunface, respectfully, I think you need to review the scientific method, compare it to the methods used by virologists, brush up on your logic, and find better scientific sources of information. Yes, the covid plandemic and infection were democidal eugenics, still killing and still underway. Yes, likely more are coming our way. The evil people and beings promoting these deadly plaques are still perverting minds and killing. A Nuremburg Trail 2.0 is in humanity’s future on this.

         But none of that scam means that viruses do not exist, and does not mean that viruses (about 200 in humans) have not been isolated and confirmed by multiple means. Please read.

         Respiratory Track Viral Infections: Abstract:
         EURICO ARRUDA, … FREDERICK G. HAYDEN, in Tropical Infectious Diseases (Second Edition), 2006
         The HCoV that fulfills Koch’s postulates as the causative agent of SARS127 shares structural features and genome organization of the family Coronaviridae (Fig. 59-1). The prompt recognition of the peculiar morphology of a coronavirus in the electron microscopic studies of Vero E6 cells inoculated with oropharyngeal material from a patient was the initial finding that resulted in the identification of SARS-CoV.128 The viral genome is 29,727 nucleotides in length, with more than 11 open reading frames coding for 23 putative proteins, some of which have unknown functions. SARS-CoV is phylogenetically different and equidistant from all previously known coronaviruses, but isolates from different origins are relatively homogeneous genetically. Genome analysis reveals that SARS-CoV is neither a host-range mutant nor a recombinant of previously known coronaviruses but rather an independently emerged virus. SARS-CoV seems to have evolved from an animal SARS-like virus, acquiring greater fitness in humans during the course of the outbreaks, probably through the appearance of nucleotide deletions in open reading frame 8.129 It is also noteworthy that genetic signatures present in the genomes allow for differentiation of isolates obtained from different clusters.129 The replicative cycle of SARS-CoV is thought to follow the same main steps as other coronaviruses. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780443066689500648/pdfft

         * SARS CoV-1 was confirmed following Koch’s postulates in 2003 by Dutch scientists. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095368/
         * Also, you might read T.M. Rivers paper on Viruses and Koch’s postulates. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545348/pdf/jbacter00773-0005.pdf
         * Basic viral analysis: Cultivation and Assay of Viruses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173454/
         * Single-Virus Tracking: From Imaging Methodologies to Virological Applications: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075663/
         * Virology, Immunology and Pathology of Human Rabies [virus] During Treatment: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809748/
         * History of Virology: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128012383000787

         LikeLike
       • Sunface says:

         May 8, 2024 at 9:36 am

         You are even more arrogant than I thought giving me ridiculous advice.

         I’ll start with the postulates. Neither Rivers or Koch’s postulates have proven anything ever. https://mikestone.substack.com/p/a-senseless-strand

         Viruses are claimed to be dead by virologists? Dead cells contain zero ATP and therefore fluorescence cannot be used . Fluorescence as you are well aware requires the enzyme from luciferase.

         Secondly Electron microscopes are detecting nothing other than artefacts. Suggest you read this – Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 15 Number 3 Fall 2010- Etienne de Harven, M. D. and https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32079-1 Of course Cell Biology is Currently in Dire Straits- by Harold Hillman. This too may be uncomfortable for you. https://dpl003.substack.com/p/why-you-should-know-about-harold

         I won’t go further or bother to read the papers you sent. A claim that is made without any controls is worthless. Every cultivation that has been done done has never had any controls and not was any isolation done. That too was shown by Lanka and the Institute of Bulgarian Pathology Association. Discussed both isolation in the true sense not virologists soup definition and how deluded PCR is in any event, hope this helps you. https://odysee.com/@DrAndrewKaufman:f/Virus_Isolation_Is_It_Real_Andrew_Kaufman_Responds_To_Jeremy-Hammond:9?r=7eYbQtUCRK41yZ8uPuZ1XLpRv91yGTJG

         Talking about brushing up. Just maybe you should take your your own advice?

         LikeLike

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.